Best Writer

Narrow one of these themes into a more specific thesis, question, or contestable claim. Use one of the following mediums to explore your topic:
Researched essay of 1000+ words (or at least 4 full pages in 12 pt. font) exploring the topic pulling from primary sources of all/any types. No Secondary Sources.
Task:
My Topic
Voting Rights 1960
Thesis- The Voting Rights Act of 1965 should be viewed as a monumental achievement
because it not only symbolizes the triumph of social justice, but it also opened the door for African Americans and other minorities to seek greater political influence in order to build a “great society.”
● How democratic is our democracy?
We recently have had voting rights concerns in this country, which are not new. What is the purpose of strong organizations in keeping their votes from others who are less powerful for a long time? Voting rights were first granted to white male landowners in the late 1700s when America began its great democratic experiment. Many states in the South continued to impose voting restrictions on African-American males even after the original ones were removed, such as poll taxes and literacy tests Individuals from various walks of life pushed for legislation and constitutional changes that expanded voting rights based on race, ethnicity, gender, disability, age, and other factors (Berkowitz Pg 9). With the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the federal government made a crucial step in preventing widespread voter suppression.

Think about the the claim or argument you want to make or the question you want to answer, and how best you can present your research to achieve that goal. Make that question or argument clear in the title of your project, and remember that you will need to provide analysis for your sources, and not merely summarize facts or events.
Finally, after you’ve completed your project, write a 1 page (2-3 paragraph) reflection on how this process went for you – what came easy, what was frustrating, how you feel about your results. This will likely be a project that will push you out of your comfort zone, precisely because you have so much freedom.
Did this freedom feel liberating, or was it overwhelming?
What did you learn about your topic?
What did you learn about yourself and your process? What questions did you want to explore but didn’t?
How do you feel it represents your learning in the course overall?
Criteria on which you will be graded:
Clarity/logic of your argument/claim or question
How well your project supports that argument/claim or answers that question through analysis of your sources
Medium fulfills the above time/page requirements
Primary sources are used and correctly cited in Chicago Style
Your correctly formatted bibliography summarizes, evaluates and communicates how each of your sources will be used
Inclusion of a written reflection on your work

Select your career pathway. ( Coach)
Research a career pathway specific cultural/social issue/problem within your career.
Select a course-based theory covered within psychology.
According to your chosen theory explain the cause/contributing factors of the career pathway specific cultural/social issue/problem. For psychological theories, the focus is on the individual (micro level), so explain the human behaviors (according to the theory) that contributed to the career pathway specific cultural/social issue/problem.
Write a three-to-five-page essay in which you will apply, analyze, and synthesize psychological concepts to speculations/thoughts concerning your future career. In the essay, you will need to clearly identify your future career pathway and why you have chosen it, and then explain how what you have learned in psychology will enhance your future career pathway.

Define the term “allegory” as a literary genre. Identify at least five allegorical images in Cantos I & II. Explain how the use of allegory extends the meaning of the poem to today’s world. Do you think that Dante’s message is

Please answer both questions below. Each response to each question must be two pages double spaced. Please do not add the question to your essay just start typing. Failure to provide two full pages will result in a loss of points. If you need to write over two pages, that is fine if it does not exceed three pages.
1. Write an essay explaining how this class has assisted you in understanding American Government and the fundamental ways in which race plays historically and contemporary.
2. Using your political imagination, write an essay describing what you believe will be the political reality for black communities in the year 2050. Will there be more black people in elected office? Will black people still feel like second-class citizens? What would you tell your children about this current political time?

Write an exploratory essay about the meaning of “friends”.

Write an essay for a human rights class, meaning it will need to have information pertinent to human rights. Including but not limited to actual human rights documents (i.e.: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Canadian Charter of Rights, and/or the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples).

I have attached all necessary documents and insturtcion below. Please read the assignment instructions thoroughly (I’ve blocked out information specific only to my program/class) and be sure to follow the guidelines. I’ve attached pdf files of our class slides so that you have a chance to understand the viewpoints on which to touch in this paper. I have also included some short questions I have done for this class for an example of how to approach these topics. Linked below are also two readings I’ve done for this class. If you use these as sources, they do not count as the five reuqired sources -for those, please use peer-reviewed sources.

Please address all 9 topics of: individual liberty, liberal democracy, Foucault and Deleuze, orientalism, race and racialization, marxist power perspective, discourse and power, queer theory, and feminism. And be sure to relate it all back to the essay prompt: Critically assess the potential and the limits of the idea of human rights in providing protection against relations of power.

If you feel as if you can complete this assignment to expectation and within the deadline, I would be glad to work with/hire you!

Section 1: Economic Factor Models and Statistical Arbitrage:

For this section, we are going to focus on the following six
stocks: Walmart (WMT), JP Morgan (JPM), Coca-Cola (KO), Microsoft (MSFT),
Alaska Air (ALK), Lululemon. (LULU).
We are going to estimate the alphas and factor loadings of
these stocks using the four factor model as the benchmark.
The general idea of this section is to estimate the alphas
and risks of these stocks using January 2012 – December 2016 as an in-sample
estimation period,
create a portfolio with no systematic risk based on these
estimates, and then measure the ex-post out-of-sample risk of this portfolio
during the period January 2017 – December 2021.

1.1. Retrieve monthly factor returns for the four
factor model. The data is available at:
http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
Click on U.S. Research Returns” on the left side of
the webpage. Y
You will need to download the Fama-French factors (MKT-RF
HML, SMB) in one file, and then separately download the momentum factor.
Make sure you properly align the monthly return observations
on your six stocks with the returns on all four factors. (4 points)

1.2. Retrieve total return data from the Charting Tab
in FactSet for the six stocks.
Compute monthly
excess returns for each of the six stocks.
Note that the Fama-French data conveniently includes a
column for the deannualized risk-free rate expressed as a percentage. (4
points)

1.3. Using data for January 31, 2012 through December
31, 2016, estimate the alphas and factor loadings for each of the stocks.
Do any of your stocks have statistically significant
estimates for alpha, and if so, are these stocks candidates for overweight or
underweight positions? (8 points)

1.4. Using the Excel Solver and the estimates from
(1.4), compute the set of weights required to form a portfolio from the six
stocks that has zero factor risk, an expected alpha of 1% per month, and
satisfies the full investment constraint (weights sum to one). This portfolio
is an arbitrage portfolio as it is expected to generate alpha without any risk
exposure. Include a screen shot of the Solver Dialog box you used to solve for
the portfolio weights (4 points).

1.5. Using the set of weights from (1.4), compute the
monthly excess return on your portfolio during the period January 2017 –
December 2021. To maintain risk neutrality, the portfolio must be rebalanced
back to these weights each month, so the monthly portfolio return is simply rpt
= Σi wirit, where wi are the weights from (1.4). Calculate the total risk (variance)
of this supposed arbitrage portfolio. (5 points)

1.6. The portfolio defined in (1.4) is an arbitrage
portfolio that offers (in-sample) a positive alpha with no systematic risk
exposure. It is created based on information available at the end of December
2016, and we assume that you create and hold this portfolio from January 2017
through December 2021. Calculate the alpha and the factor loadings of your
portfolio using returns for January 2017 through December 2021 to measure its
out-of-sample risk. Do the alpha and factor loadings of the out of sample
arbitrage portfolio match your expectations? Are these results (alpha and
factor loadings) significant and statistically reliable? (5 points)

1.7. Calculate the alpha and the factor loadings of the
6 stocks using returns for January 2017 through December 2021. Compare the
results with your in-sample results from 1.4. How did each stock behave
differently between the two periods i.e. can you explain why your 1.6 results
are different from what out expected in 1.4? (8 points)

1.8. For each month in the out-of-sample period, use
the returns on the four factors and your estimated loadings to calculate the
systematic risk (as explained by the factor loadings i.e. factor loading from
1.6 times factor returns for each month) and idiosyncratic risk (unexplained by
the 4 factor model) on your portfolio. What percentage of the total risk
(calculated in 1.5) of your portfolio was idiosyncratic risk and what portion
was due to factor risk? Hint #1: Use variances. (5 points)

1.9. Compare the percentage of systematic risk to the
portfolio regression R-square from 1.6.

1.10.
Are they the same? Should they be? (2 points)

Section 2: Estimating a Fundamental Factor Model:

We are now going to build and backtest a fundamental factor
model based on the four variables that you choose. The first task is to
estimate the factor premia on your fundamental factors. We are going to estimate
the premia at three different points in time by using three different backtest
dates (06/30/2020, 12/31/2019 and 06/30/2019) with data accessed through
FactSet Screening. Be certain that the formulas you use are lagged properly to
avoid a look-ahead bias. One way to avoid the look-ahead bias is by using
quantitative factors specifically built by FactSet for backtesting. To estimate
the premia, you need to obtain the monthly return FOLLOWING your backtest date.
For example, use the July 2019 return for the 06/30/2019 backtest date. Use the
S&P1500 Composite as your universe.

2.1. Select 4 factors to use in your model. What are
your factors? Why did you choose these factors? What signs (exposure) do you
expect for each of the factor premia i.e. is a low value desirable or not? Each
factor must be from a different factor category (e.g. do not pick 2 valuation
factors like P/E and B/P). (8 points)

2.2. Include the Excel export of the summary page from
Universal Screener showing your factor formulas as well as your total return
formula. (2 points)

2.3. For each of the three backtest dates, estimate
the standardized fundamental factor model to obtain factor premia. Use next
month raw returns as the dependent variable. Each of the following sub-step must
be clearly identified and not combined i.e. I should be able to see the raw
data, the data (2.3.1.), with the outliers issue addressed (2.3.3) and the
standardized data (2.3.4).

2.3.1 What percentage of the universe is left after
filtering out missing data for each factor? How did you handle these missing
data points? Why did you use this approach? Hint: If you are missing more than
10% of the universe, this is probably not a good factor. (3 points)

2.3.2 Using the raw exposures to each factor extracted from
FactSet, compute the following statistics: min, max, mean, median, standard
deviation. How different are these statistics for each of the three backtest
dates? (4 points)

2.3.3 Describe how you handled it and solved the outliers
issue. If you decide to winsorize the data, use the PERCENTILE function to
obtain the 1% and 99% thresholds. (5 points)

2.3.4 Compute each stock standardized exposure (i.e.
z-scores) to each factor and provide the following summary statistics for the
distribution of standardized exposures: min, max, mean, median, standard
deviation. Hint: The monthly returns should not be standardized (9 points)

2.3.5 For each of the three backtest date, calculate the
equal weighted benchmark return and each factor premia using a cross-sectional
regression using your standardized exposures from 2.3.4 against the 1 month
holding return for the universe. What are each of the factor premia, and are
the estimates consistent with your expectations from 2.1? (9 points).

2.4. You now have three estimates for each of your
factor premia (one from estimating the standardized model for each backtest
date from 2.3.5). Average the three estimates for each factor and consider
these to be your expected factor premia. Explain what these numbers represent i.e.
how to interpret them. Be precise and specific. Hint: factor premia are not
betas. (5 points)

Section 3: Backtesting Your Fundamental Factor Model (Alpha
Testing)

Now it is time to backtest your fundamental model using
Alpha Testing (@AT) in FactSet. Import your screen and set both the universe
and the benchmark to be the same as your screening universe. Include inactive
securities, but exclude secondary listings and non-equity securities. Set the
backtest period to 12/31/2011 through 12/31/2021 and use monthly frequency for
rebalancing. Import your raw exposures as factors and then setup a multifactor
rank (MFR) based on z-scores as your signal for expected returns. The weights
assigned to each component of the multifactor ranking should be the expected
factor premia from Section 2[1]. Make sure you handle outliers for each factor
when setting up each factor and the MFR. Set the risk-free rate to be the
91-day T-Bill yield

3.1. Run your model and export the following reports
from Alpha Testing to Excel: a) Workspace, b) Summary: Single Factor, c)
Summary: All Factors, d) Periods, and e) the portion of the Constituents report
containing data for December 2016 (do not submit the entire Constituents
report). (8 points)

3.2. Using the Summary and Period output, evaluate
3.2.1.
Does you model work overall? (2 points)
3.2.2.
How much monthly return does your alpha signal generate? (2 points)
3.2.3.
How much alpha does your best quintile (F1) generate? Can this number be
trusted? (2 points)
3.2.4.
Which factor contributed the most (had the highest impact) to your MFR model?
(2 points)
3.2.5.
Is the contribution of the factor identified in 3.2.4 due to the return or the
weight of the factor? (2 points)
3.2.6.
What was the best monthly return for your best quintile (F1) and what was the
date? (1 point)
3.2.7.
What was the worst monthly return for your worst quintile (F5) and what was the
date? (1 point)

3.3. For your theorical best quintile (F1), 1)
calculate the geometric return average, 2) geometric average active return
(excess return over the benchmark/universe), 3) the total risk and 4) the
tracking error. The data needed for this step is in the Periods Report. Hint:
One risk measure is based on total return and one on active return (4 points)

3.4. Using the data you computed in Step 3.3:
3.4.1. calculate the Annual Sharpe Ratio and
Information Ratio of your F1 (theorical best) quintile. The data from Step
3.3.is expressed on a monthly so will need to convert them to be able the
calculate the data on an annualized Annualize the average monthly return
geometrically (i.e. (1+r)12−1) and annualize monthly risk measures by
multiplying by
. Hint: If you calculate a SR and IR for each month, you are
doing it wrong. (4 points)
3.4.2.
How does your Information Ratio compare to the information on the Summary Report
(single factor)? (1 point)

3.5. Using a linear regression, estimate the alpha and
beta of your F1 (theorical best) quintile relative to your benchmark/universe
(data in the Periods Report). Does this agree with your conclusion on 3.2.3? (4
points)

3.6. Using a linear regression, estimate the alpha and
beta of your F5 (theorical worst) quintile relative to your benchmark/universe
(data in the Periods Report). (3 points)

3.7. Using the data from Steps 3.5 and 3.6, calculate
the weights needed in each quintile to create a long-short market neutral
strategy that has zero exposure to the benchmark i.e. beta = 0 and a total
weight of 1. Calculate the geometric
average return and alpha on your market neutral strategy. Hint #1: geometric
average return and beta are simple weighted average. Hint #2: Don’t turn this
into a difficult problem, it is not meant to be one. If you are not doing basic
algebra computation, you are overthinking it. DO NOT USE SOLVER. (4 points)

3.8. Using the constituents report for the period
December 2016, compute the Spearman rank correlation between your MFR (alpha
signal) and realized returns (universe returns). Does your estimate for the IC
match the FactSet computed IC for the period (available for the period return)?
(6 points)

3.9. Consider the six stocks from Section 1. Compare
the alphas estimated for these stocks during the period January 2017 through
December 2021 in 1.7 to their MFR values available in the December 2016
Constituents report. Did your fundamental model correctly identify stocks with
positive or negative risk-adjusted returns? Discuss the efficacy of your model
as a predictor for future alpha. (4 points)

Section 4: Clarity and Data Presentation

4.1 Present your data and conclusions for each section
in a clear and easy way to understand. I should be able to easily identify what
question you are answering and follow your logic with ease. Data should not be
copied from one sheet to another but referenced. Conclusions should clear and
properly supported. (10 points)

[1] If the weights you computed in (2.4) are not reasonable,
you can override those estimates and use your own set of weights. Just be sure
to explain in your report why you have made this choice.

Write a practice paper differentiate the differences in the regulation of practice standards of the licensed practical and registered nurse specified by Alabama Board of Nursing (ABN).
Administrative Code Chapter 610-X-6

This business analysis is based on the last proposal I have completed to write, many of the required parts I have mentioned in the proposal, now I need to add the industry analysis required in this final submission of the project. I have uploaded the project requirements and attached my proposal for the project.
Analytical Report
Write a document that compares and/or contrasts two alternatives of substance (products, actions, techniques, theoretical approaches, applications, etc.) that will act to solve a problem for a theoretical client by providing a recommendation based on a comparative, causal, or feasibility analysis.
Although you are compiling analysis for a theoretical report and client, the alternatives you will be choosing between must be real, or have a substantial basis in reality. Spend some time investigating your options and creating a client, rhetorical situation, and realistic choices to fit the “situational parameters” of this assignment. It is also imperative to replicate a plausible situation, imitating what you can expect in your professional future as closely as you can.
To familiarize yourself better with the requirements for this major assignment, carefully review the following sections:
Guidelines for Selecting Report Topics
General Report Requirements
Content Requirements: The Elements of the Formal Report
Guidelines for Selecting Report Topics
Your analytical report will help the report’s readers make an informed decision about a realistic choice they must make, a problem that needs solving, or a situation that needs resolving with one of two options.
The type of report you produce for this assignment will be determined by the rhetorical situation, or “case,” you fabricate, and by the focus of the investigation that situation will require. Consider using one of the following types of investigations for your report project.
An investigative focus deciding between competing products to perform a needed task, service, or to solve a problem:
The report might compare and contrast two competing products, investigate how the features or components of each will perform within the situational parameters, and recommend one product over the other.
An investigative focus determining which of two competing solutions is more feasible:
The report might investigate whether Y or Z is a more feasible solution to a client’s problem and, based on the results of the investigation, make a recommendation to implement Y, Z, or neither.
An investigative focus convincing a client to implement a particular action, technique, theoretical approach, application, etc., to solve a problem, or fulfill a need or task:
The report might propose that the client authorize (provide the funding or permission for) the writer to implement X, and not Y.
The report might propose that the client consider an alternate method, procedure, or product for meeting an existing need (would compare existing versus alternative).
General Report Requirements
The general report requirements are as follows:
Length: The body of the report should be approximately 5-8 pages, single-spaced, not including the front and back matter (title page, executive summary, table of contents, list of illustrations, appendices, exhibits of data, bibliography/works cited pages, etc.). Note: I am not overly concerned with length, and will not deduct points concerning length; rather, I am concerned with adequate development. Use page suggestions as a general guideline.
Sources: Use a minimum of six sources, cited both in a works cited or references page and in in-text citations.
Visuals: Use a minimum of three visuals, unless you have arranged otherwise with your instructor. (Note: Your visuals will not count toward the six source minimum unless you engage with them in the text—e.g., a chart that you refer to in the report).
Format: Format your report as a professional document. Use single-spaced paragraphs with double spaces between paragraphs. Use at least two levels of headings in addition to the title (main sections and subsections), with appropriate formats for each level.
Pagination: Paginate your front matter using lowercase Roman numerals (ii, iii, iv, etc.) and the rest using Arabic numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.).
Content Requirements: The Elements of the Formal Report
The content requirements are as follows:
Front Matter
Title Page
Table of Contents
Body
Introduction
Executive Summary
Case Overview
Alternatives
Criteria
Comparison
Recommendation
End Matter
Works Cited, or References
List of Illustrations

For this assignment, spend time discussing and planning with your mentor teacher on the Mentoring Plan to Improve Teaching Practice to create a mentoring plan for the mentee teacher you observed in the Topic 3 clinical field experience. As you create the plan, collaborate with your mentor teacher to ensure you are communicating in a way that builds trust and rapport.
The plan should include the following:
Goal for the mentee to improve their instructional practice.
Skills, knowledge, or behaviors of the mentee that will benefit from further development.
Action steps for the mentee to reach the goal, including milestone deadlines.
List of support resources recommended for the mentee.
Identify possible obstacles the mentee may encounter.
Establish criteria for success; how the mentee knows they have successfully reached their goal.
A tool to provide feedback on the mentoring process to ensure the mentee has the necessary skills and knowledge to grow.
Support the plan with 3-5 scholarly resources.
At the end of your mentoring plan, reflect, in 250-500 words, on how you will practically and effectively encourage the mentee to change or improve their practice. Additionally, provide strategies you will use to motivate the mentee and promote self-efficacy.