Best Writer

Connected to Argumentative Essay Project [ School Uniforms ]

Description: a research proposal consisting of three sections:
Section 1: What is the topic? (100-150 words)
Section 2: What is the controversy? Include paragraphs that detail both sides of the controversy. (300-400 words)
Section 3: Your tentative thesis statement (one to two sentences)

Assignment 1 marking guide
Criteria No Pass Pass
50–59% Credit
60–69% Distinction
70–79% High Distinction
80–100%
Research:
Displays depth of research through the use of a variety of sources.
Sources are relevant to the chosen topic.
(25%)
Did not meet criterion.
Essay demonstrates the use of a limited number and variety of researched sources.
Some of the research sources are relevant to the chosen topic.
Essay demonstrates the use of increasing number and variety of researched sources.
Most of the research sources used are relevant to the chosen topic.
Essay demonstrates the use of several varied researched sources.
The majority of the research sources used are relevant to the chosen topic.
Essay demonstrates the use of many highly varied researched source.
All of the research sources are highly relevant to the chosen topic.
Content:
The key issues and concepts of the topic have been identified.
Appropriate discussion of key issues and concepts of the topic have been provided.
Appropriate and logical construction of argument.
Logical and valid conclusion expressing a clear opinion and answers the research essay question.
(40%)
Did not meet criterion.
Identifies some of the key issues and concepts relevant to the chosen research topic broadly, but is somewhat unclear.
Essay highlights a good but limited discussion of key issues and concepts of the topic provided.
Essay is somewhat organised with a developing ability to logical construct an argument.
Conclusion expresses an opinion but is somewhat unclear in answering the research essay topic.
Identifies most of key issues and concepts relevant to chosen research topic that provides adequate direction for essay.
Essay highlights a sound discussion of key issues and concepts of the topic provided.
Essay is adequately organised. Argument constructed and arranged reasonably well, with a progression of thought throughout the essay.
Conclusion expresses an opinion and generally answers the research essay topic.
Identifies the majority of key issues and concepts relevant to the chosen research topic, which provides clear direction for the essay.
Essay highlights an excellent and informed discussion of key issues and concepts of the topic provided.
Essay is effectively organised. Argument is constructed and arranged logically with a good progression and linking of thought throughout the essay’s position.
Conclusion clearly expresses an opinion and answers the research essay topic well.
Identifies all of the key issues and concepts relevant to the chosen research topic that provides clear direction for the essay that is engaging.
Essay highlights an outstanding, in-depth and informed discussion of key issues and concepts of the topic provided.
Essay is extremely well organised. Argument is constructed and arranged logically, with a strong progression of thought throughout the essay, from paragraph to paragraph, connecting to the essay’s central position.
Conclusion expresses a concise, informed and strong opinion that clearly answers the research essay question.
Citation and referencing:
In-text citations are clear and accurate, providing evidence of research in the discussion.
References have been provided in relevant sections of the essay.
Reference list is adequate and matches all in-text citations and referencing.
(20%)
Did not meet criterion.
Some text citations are clear and accurate, providing evidence of research in the discussion.
References have been provided in relevant sections of the essay occasionally.
Reference list is adequate, however, matches in-text citations and referencing with several omissions.
Most text citations are clear and accurate, providing evidence of research in the discussion.
References have been provided in relevant sections of the essay generally.
Reference list is a good and matches in-text citations and referencing, with some omissions.
Majority of in-text citations are clear and accurate, providing evidence of research in the discussion.
References have been provided in relevant sections of the essay frequently.
Reference list is very good and matches in-text citations and referencing, with few omissions.
All in-text citations are clear and accurate, providing evidence of research in the discussion.
References have been provided in relevant sections of the essay entirely consistent and correct.
Reference list is excellent and matches all in-text citations and referencing, with little or no omissions and/or errors.
Presentation:
Spelling and grammar is of appropriate standard.
Word limit has been adhered to.
Page numbers have been included.
Appropriate use of font and font size, spacing throughout is consistent.
Essay submitted on time.
(15%)
Did not meet criterion.
Essay shows an average and/or casual writing style, using standard English. Essay is within the word limit, however, contains several noticeable errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage and/or formatting.
Essay shows an average and/or casual writing style, using standard English. Essay is within the word limit, with some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, usage and/or formatting.
Essay is written well with above average writing style and clarity, using standard English. Essay is within the word limit with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage and/or formatting.
Essay is extremely well written. Paper shows above average writing style and clarity in writing, using standard English. Essay is within the word limit and is characterised by elements of a strong writing style. Mostly free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage and/or formatting errors.

The exam is on Chapters 11-14
This exam is a timed exam which is for 1hr and 15mins. It contains eight questions.
– Four short essay questions
– Two longer essays
JadaWada
Apr 10, 9:08 AM
Chapter 11 Learning Goals:
Recognize the enumerated powers of Congress
Describe what the Elastic Clause (aka the Necessary and Proper Clause) of the Constitution does
List at least five differences between the House and the Senate
Explain how incumbency gives sitting members of Congress an advantage in getting re-elected
Tell the difference between reapportionment and redistricting
Define gerrymandering
Understand the difference between partisan gerrymandering and racial gerrymandering, including the different legal standards for when each is permissible (or not)
Distinguish between the delegate, trustee, and politico styles of representation
Describe how members of Congress engage in constituent service (“home-style” activities), and the challenges they face in doing so
Know what the Congressional Budget Office, Government Accountability Office, and Congressional Research Service do
Define divided government
Understand how the recent increase in partisan polarization has affected the norms of how members of Congress interact with each other
Describe the leadership structure of the House and Senate
Know what congressional committees do and how they’re organized
Tell the difference between standing, special/select, joint, and conference committees
Explain how the House and Senate differ in their procedures in the legislative process
Describe the formal process of how a bill becomes a law
Describe the give-and-take between Congress and the President regarding using the military (declaring war, the War Powers Act, etc.)
Explain the investigative/oversight role of congressional committees
Understand Congress’s role in developing and passing the federal budget
Describe the two special powers of the Senate: confirming presidential appointees and ratifying treaties
Chapter 12 Learning Goals:
List the constitutional qualifications for the office of president
Understand these aspects of the Electoral College:
Why it was developed
How it was originally supposed to work
How the 12th Amendment changed it
How it works today
Give reasonable arguments both for and against its reform/abolition
Define and give examples of the president’s express, delegated, and discretionary powers
Describe the president’s official roles as:
Chief executive
Commander-in-chief
Chief diplomat
Chief of state
Lawmaker
Describe the president’s unofficial roles as:
Party leader
Economic leader
Opinion leader
Understand the organization of the executive branch in immediate contact with the president:
The Cabinet
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Define the “unitary executive” theory of presidential power
Identify the privileges used by the president to keep information secret from the public and other branches of government
Describe the role the vice president plays in a presidential administration
Describe the procedures under the 25th Amendment for dealing with a dead or incapacitated president
Chapter 13 Learning Goals:
Define and give the characteristics of a bureaucracy
Distinguish between the spoils system and merit system of staffing the bureaucracy
Know the difference between political appointees and civil service employees
Understand the different components of the federal bureaucracy, and give examples of each:
Cabinet departments
Independent executive agencies
Independent regulatory agencies
Government corporations
Identify the sources of power in the federal bureaucracy
Describe the ways each branch of government (Congress, president, and the courts) can control the federal bureaucracy
Chapter 14 Learning Goals:
Explain the three-tiered structure of the federal courts
Define the concept of judicial review and understand how it works
Distinguish between civil and criminal law
Understand the difference between jurisdictional requirements and justiciability requirements
Describe how the Supreme Court deals with a case
Granting or denying a petition for writ of certiorari
Oral argument
Opinion-writing
Implementation of the Court’s ruling
Know how the other two branches of government exercise checks on the federal courts
Understand the impact of a judge’s political beliefs and judicial philosophy on his or her decisions
Distinguish between “judicial activism” and “judicial restraint”
Discuss the “textualism vs. purposive” and “originalism vs. living constitutionalism” conflicts over how courts should interpret laws
Explain the nomination and confirmation process for federal judges, including:
Factors that influence a president’s decision
Senate confirmation hearings

Use the Poetry Foundation, the Academy of American Poets, or any of the poems linked in the Weekly Modules to find two poems that address the same theme. Write an essay comparing and contrasting their treatment of that theme. ((The poems I chose: ‘ For My People’ by Margeret Walker and the poem ‘Caged Bird’ by Maya Angelou. ))

Your essay should have a clear organizational scheme with an introduction, body paragraphs focusing on one idea each, and a conclusion. Write a thesis statement making an arguable claim about the poems, and support your thesis with at least four quotations from the poems and your analysis of those quotations. Look carefully at the diction, syntax, imagery, and poetic devices to analyze how each poem communicates its message.

No matter which prompt you choose, each essay must include at least one reliable secondary (research) source and clearly indicate how it supports, provides context for, or contrasts with your analysis. You must include at least one quotation or paraphrase, with an MLA in-text citation, from your secondary source in the body of the paper. Your source must be from the library or a website ending in .edu, .gov, or .org. Poetry Foundation and the Academy of American Poets are good sources for poets’ biographies and critical articles on poetry.

Your paper must have MLA in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.

This paper should be 3-4 double-spaced pages long. Give your paper an interesting, descriptive title and use MLA formatting throughout.

Paper three will be a claim of policy, also known as a proposal. In this paper, you will argue that there is some type of problem that needs to be addressed, and you will also offer a solution to that problem while keeping in mind the elements of Rogerian argument.
1. Introduction: Introduces the problem, establishes why it is a problem, and points out how both the writer and the reader are affected (establishes common ground)
2. Present the reader’s view of the problem (hostile audience)
3. Presents the writer’s view of the problem (includes evidence to support writer’s viewpoint)
4. Shows how the reader would benefit from moving toward the writer’s solution (includes evidence to support the writer’s viewpoint)
5.Explain why your solution is feasible and worthwhile (includes evidence to support the writer’s viewpoint)
6. Address possible objections to your solution
7. Conclusion: Strong concluding statement that answers the “why does this matter?” question
REQUIREMENTS:
Minimum of 4-5 pages
Minimum of five sources
Only upload Word documents; Pages or any other word processing program is not compatible with Canvas
MLA Format
Work Cited page
Four short quotations, and one block quotation, for a minimum of five quotations
Avoid using second person in formal writing (you, your)
Avoid using contractions in formal writing (isn’t, can’t, doesn’t, I’m, you’re, wouldn’t, couldn’t, won’t, don’t, didn’t, we’ve, they’re, it’s, you get the idea…………….)

IMPORTANT- Please read through 1. IB3H50-Images-of-Creativity-Assessment-final.pdf 2. IoC-2022-Week-4-Lecture-Unpacking-your-assessment.pdf 3. PART-2-Example-Extracts-literature-review.docx 4. IoC-22-Navigating-Uncertainty-Guide-Extracts.pptx
The rest you can choose which to read and please cite at least 10 citations from the document (scroll down to the document to see the lecturer reference and cite it) that i sent to you.
It about looking at creativity from different lenses, perspective and bring your own perception, assumption, and understanding about creativity.
Please attached a graph or sketches to help communicate and inform the writing.

Please see the attached final project rubric. I have already uploaded the previous modules that were completed. Please just put those together as I charged an extra page for this work to be done. Ionly need 3 pages for the last part of this module. Plesae also tryto use the sources already provided. But it is up to you!

Submit your final theoretical analysis of two theorists, comparing their views on the nature of mankind, capitalism, justice, liberty, revolution, and the relationship between a citizen and the state.

At a point of your choosing during the semester (final deadline 12/2), you will watch and respond to a film about some aspect of displacement/migration. You will write a 700-800 word response to the film using at least two concepts from the course content and/or readings. In particular, you will want to focus on how different cultures are portrayed, as well as how the film discusses and portrays processes of migration.

OVERVIEW
After reading the assigned articles/case studies for the Module: Week, you will write critiques of
the case studies provided in Module 5: Week 5 (Read: Peace Officers Bill of Rights
Guarantees Responding to Union Demands with a Management Sanctioned Version).
INSTRUCTIONS
Each case study critique must be between 3–5 pages (not including the title, abstract, and
reference pages) in current APA format and must discuss the major facts of the case. You must
tell whether or not you believe the right decisions were made and why. Follow the guidelines
listed below:
 Identify the important facts in the case study.
 What decisions were or were not made in the case study?
 Do you believe the decisions or best practices were appropriate?
 Discuss any alternative solutions to the problem and support those solutions with
additional research (in other words, support your solution with similar cases).
 Conclusion
 Bibliography
 Make sure each section is labeled appropriately (Facts, Decision, Alternative Solution,
Conclusion).
 Citation style: current APA
 All papers must use the following format:
o Times New Roman
o 12-point font
o Double spaced
o 1” margins from left to right and top to bottom
 Do not forget to review the grading rubric.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

What is the etiologic agent of this disease and why was this discovery surprising?
What are the preventive and curative methods to treat this disease?
What precautionary measures did scientists and researchers in the United States take in order to shield the country from a SARS epidemic?