LOU FERRINGO DEAF BIOGRAPHY

Purpose:
• To research and assess the historical impact of famous
Deaf individuals
around the world
Requirements of Biographical Report (Essay) and
Presentation:
ESSAY: Essay is to be five full pages of researched content
covering the content
explained below; this does not include name, date and your
works cited/resource
page
o MLA format or APA format, whichever you prefer
o Five-page essay
o Essay is to be 12-pt. font, double-spaced, with 1”
standard margins
o Works cited/resource page (sixth page)
o 75 points
Content to be Covered:
• Personal Life: Who was/is their family? What
hobbies/interests did they
have? (i.e. were they an animal lover, etc.)
• Hearing Status: How did they become Deaf? Explain how they
became
Deaf, including the cause (if known), age, and how they
discovered they
were Deaf
• Education/Training: What kind of education/training did
they receive?
Explain their educational background (primary, secondary,
and post[1]secondary if
applicable); also include their mode of communication (signed,
oral, etc.)
• Career and Impact: What was/is their career? How did their
career impact
the Deaf community and society?
Requirements of Biographical Report (Essay) and Presentation:
the Deaf community and society?

Communication for behavior change

Compare and contrast two different theories described in your textbook reading for this topic. Highlight the key elements, strengths, and limitations of each theory, and provide an example of how each theory has been applied in practice.

Prejudice

Instructions from my professor:

Writing Prompt
The writing prompt is rather simply and fairly open-ended:
In your first legitimate discussion post that you should have completed by now you stated some of your interests within the realm of Social Psychology. I want you to take one of those interests of your choosing and pursue this idea even futher as a research topic. I will not formally confine you to choosing the topic you stated in your discussion, you can pick whatever you want so long as it is an issue within the realm of Social Psychology. Having said that, they are already there, they are your preliminary interests, and you’ve already done the work so it would be easiest to just take your own previously stated idea and run with it.
Guidelines
Moving on from that, once you have chosen your topic, you are to conduct a 3-5 source targeted literature review on your topic with the end goal being a formal research hypothesis (or hypotheses) on the topic. This review should run roughly about 3-5 pages (over is fine, under is not) not including an attached reference page and title page. An abstract does not need to be completed. All should conform to current APA standards. Again, if you need guidance in this aspect please consult the Academic Writer modules and I will also include separate attachments for your reference.
Format
Once you understand literature reviews you realize they have a pretty formulaic structure. However I do not expect you to have that or any preexisting knowledge regarding them and as such am going to provide you with my general expectations for the structure of the Literature Review here:
Introduction
This is the beginning of your Literature review where you briefly state your topic of research and your reasons for conducting said research. These reasons can range, but for the sake of this course should generally fall under a few different justifications:
Theoretical inconsistencies (your research and rationale conflicts with a previously held theory; two theories disagree; theories only work under some conditions or populations)
Gaps in research (what hasn’t been studied? Different groups of people? Relationships with other social psych phenomena?)
Need for action (findings in this area will provide an in-need benefit to a population.
This Introduction should be rather brief (2-3 paragraphs or so) and should outline ultimately ‘what you are doing’ and ‘why you are doing it’ to your audience. You will want to cite any articles that help you flush out this section. It should naturally then flow into your theoretical section.
Theory
This is where you identify your theory or social construct(s) and define them. By the end of this section your audience should know what it is, how it is defined, and what are the relevant findings regarding this theory that either help define or bolster your rationale for conducting this research. If using multiple theories to any degree you should do this separately for each theory. You will want to cite articles that you reference when establishing your theories.
Rationale
You will now want to take this theory and apply it accordingly when putting forward your rationale. This section should explain how this theory lends support to your hypothesis and should lead your audience by the hand so that they may be able to reach the same reasoning as you when you state your hypothesis. You will want to back up as many claims or assumptions in your rationale with your sources! This lends strength to your argument just like the theory does. Your rationale should logically flow from theory to hypothesize and as such the last statement you make should be:
Hypothesis
One or two sentences stating your research expectation.
Practical Implications
I would like you to add an extra section at the end in which you discuss the practical implications of your research. Be sure and go into how it may be applied to the real world, who it might help, and how it might be implemented.

My personal ideas on the subject:

My paper topic is going to be on prejudice. I want to know how prejudice has become so ingrained in our psyche that it spills into the way we view others, speak, and even think.

My big question about prejudice is how has it become so ingrained in society that we automatically apply these prejudices and sterotypes to people we have never met and see once in passing by? I read once that your first thought is what you’ve been “trained” or taught to think, but your afterthought is how you truly feel. For example, if I see a bigger person wearing more revealing clothes, my first thought is “oh they shouldn’t be wearing that, they need to cover up”, but then I remind myself, “no, it’s their body, they have the confidence in themselves to dress however they want to, and I have no right to judge them for that.” I’ve just been “trained” as I was growing up that there was only one way you should do things, and as I’ve gotten older and I’m trying to get myself out of that one way viewpoint, I have to constantly correct and redirect my thought processes. But not everyone does this. Not everyone realizes that the one way view cannot be applied to everyone, because everyone is SO different. So my question is how can something like prejudice be so ingrained in us, even when we don’t realize it? Even when we try to be more open minded and less self centered, how can those thoughts still just sit in the back of our mind??

I think understanding where prejudice comes from could be a stepping stone into potentially solving it and understanding it’s roots and how they’ve grown to separate society versus being able to come together to solve issues the world faces. Prejudice is definitely something that holds people back. Personally, just because I didn’t agree with an action someone else did, doesn’t mean I hold hate or disdain for them in my mind and heart. I just choose not to associate with that person or that action. Although I know everyone is different, this is one thing I cannot wrap my head around why everyone can’t be on the same page with. How can one person hold so much hate in their heart for one thing that they feel actual anger and hatred towards certain people for it? An example would be that following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, a lot of Americans held hatred in their heart for the Japanese as a whole. Not the Japanese soldiers, or the Japanese leaders, but Japanese people in general. Americans blamed the entire race and hated them so much, they created internment camps for Japanese Americans because they thought that they would turn on America. Even though these people were living in America and even though they were just as much American as they were Japanese. Prejudice is heavy, and it’s definitely a heavy subject, but that is why I want to learn more about it and how it can effect people so much that it alters their views of entire groups of people instead of blaming the sole person or group that caused the problem in the first place.

Philosophy course study guide

This activity is considered to be an Open Educational Resource (OER) that may be placed in a repository as an example for future learners. You will also share your finished product with other learners in next week’s discussion forum to help you study as a group for the final.
Prompt:
By utilizing Microsoft PowerPoint, create a presentation that includes topics covered throughout the course. You will be able to use this presentation as a study guide for your final examination in Week Sixteen. This activity is considered to be an Open Educational Resource (OER) that may be placed in a repository for future learners. You will have the opportunity to share your presentation in next week’s discussion forum. The purpose of this activity is to help provide you with a study guide for the course final. Be creative, and have FUN!
The following steps will help you create and submit your PowerPoint presentation:
Download Microsoft PowerPoint if you do not already have it installed on your computer, or head here: https://www.office.com/launch/powerpoint?ui=en-US&rs=US&auth=2 (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
Select a theme (template).
Click on “New Slide”.
Create an introduction slide with your name, course, etc.
Continue to add slides and add text, photos/graphics, and sound as desired. Each slide must contain 2-3 concepts from each weekly lesson from the course (no fewer than 15 slides excluding your introduction slide).
Select ‘Save As’ and title your presentation appropriately; select PDF as the file type.
Submit the PDF file to the assignment dropbox in Canvas.
Have fun, and be CREATIVE!

Gamification is the use of elements and techniques from video game design in non-game contexts. Explore the use of gamification, its ability to modify behaviours, and whether or not the use of gamification is ethical

APA 7 Citation Format
12 sized font
5 pages, double-spaced
3 sources required – Academic/Scholarly articles, peer reviewed

Topic:

Gamification is the use of elements and techniques from video game design in non-game contexts. Explore the use of gamification, its ability to modify behaviours, and whether or not the use of gamification is ethical.

Mainly focus on the analysis of arguments; potential breaches of codes of conduct on the part of key players; fallacies; theories of utilitarianism and deontology; the importance of cyberethics in this initiative; add any other areas of information age/cyber/technology/IT ethics to the topic.

Please review the document attached to find resources to help build the paper.

Graphic design

For this assignment, you’ll be writing a 7 page research paper that discusses graphic design in
cultural, social, and historical context. First you’ll choose a primary source, such as a poster,
commercial object with graphic design elements, public service campaign, magazine layout, or
other example of graphic design to study. This cultural artifact must have been produced
following the Industrial Revolution, or after 1840, and before the year 2010. You’ll describe
your primary source to the reader, then, using secondary sources, put it into context. The
central question your paper will focus on is: what does this graphic design tell us about the
moment in time when it was made and seen? You’ll consider questions like: What social and
cultural factors were at play to create this graphic design? What messages does the design
convey? Who was the intended audience for the graphic design? What indicators do we see
that would tell us when the design was made and who might made it? Are there any major
design movements you can identify?
Assume that you are writing this paper as an analysis for an art history journal, where the
readers may have an understanding of art historical terms and movements generally, but not
necessarily a deep knowledge of graphic design. Be sure to define and explain key terminology
in your paper. All references must be properly quoted in APA style throughout the paper

The topic/movie I chose was “shottas” a jamaican film and the sources are attached below…can mention drug violence in Jamaica in the early 2000s etc
Source #1
https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/entertainment/two-decades-of_242868
Source #2

POLITICS: Jamaicans Angry at Tabloid Spin on Drug Smuggling


source #3
https://www.unodc.org/pdf/barbados/caribbean_drug-trends_2001-2002.pdf
source #4
https://cuny-ny.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUNY_NY/1ue9q0j/cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563489
source #5
https://cuny-ny.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUNY_NY/1ue9q0j/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0094582X0202900505

welcome to change the last 2 sources

Comparative Religion Essay

Students will write a 3 page (minimum) essay, Works Cited/References as an additional page, that compares one Eastern and one Western Religion. Support your essay with at least 3 sources.
The purpose of the paper is to simply draw comparisons and contrasts between religions, not to elevate one religion over another.
Overview
Students will focus on 3 topics to compare and contrast in their essay, which might include:
History
Rules
Rituals
Suffering
Soteriological beliefs
Afterlife beliefs
Views towards women
Rough Draft Requirements
The rough draft should include:
Thesis Statement: This section identifies one Eastern religion and one Western religion and the three topics to be compared and contrasted.
Comparative Content: The rough draft includes a completed first section that compares and contrasts the two religions (one Eastern and one Western). The section is descriptive and detailed.
Research and Citations: In the first comparative section, there are two research sources and two citations that are accurately cited.

Diversity & Inequality in the Bureaucratic Context

Diversity & Inequality in the Bureaucratic Context
Building on our third major section of the course, which theorizes the relationship between the individual and the organizational context and explores the nature of the social actor, and also highlights key social problems associated with diversity and inequality in the bureaucratic context…
You will develop a case study/term paper relevant to some of these issues focusing on an aspect of the organizational context of human interaction. In so doing, you will highlight a unique group or population of interest to you and explore issues, challenges (and potential solutions) they face in dealing with some facet of interaction with human service, criminal justice, health, educational, economic or other institutional sector.
The group you focus on could be distinguished by some combination of: age, race/ethnicity, social class, gender/sexuality, disability, religion, citizenship status, etc.
You may focus on one specific institutional context or view several in a holistic manner.
Your paper may focus more on highlighting problems and issues that require resolution, or you may highlight instances where unique organizations (or offices/functions within larger organizations) have emerged to serve the needs of the unique population.
Your paper may draw upon a mix of sources/references (ranging from journalistic to academic) which best enable you to provide background information and presentation of your case. You may also draw upon personal knowledge/experience and/or some interviews with key informants about your case. Please include a minimum of three outside references, listing each at the end of your paper in any acceptable format you chose (i.e. APA).
You paper should include the following elements (aim for roughly 1250 words in length).
Introduction to the case along with some background context
Exploration of some of the issues raised in section three of the course in terms of their relevance/application to your case
development and elaboration of your particular case beyond the issues raised in the course
conclusions regarding persistent problems that need addressing and/or discussion of how organizational solutions identified may be expanded

OSHA VIOLATIONS AND FINES

COURSE OSH 3525_LEGAL ASPECTS OF SAFETY & HEALTH

Unit III Essay:

Violations and Penalties
OSHA publishes the results of inspections, including the type of violation and proposed penalties. Visit the Occupational Safety and Health Administration website, and type citations and penalties in the Search field. Click on Citations and Notification of Penalty. A list of inspections will appear.

Select a company of interest to you.( I WORK IN THE MARINE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FOR DREDGING COMPANIES. PLEASE USE A DREDGING COMPANY FOR EXAMPLE, WEEKS MARINE, GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK, CALLAN MARINE, OR CROSBY. THOSE AREA FEW COMPANIES YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM) Review the types of citations and proposed penalties that were issued to the company you selected.

Write an essay that addresses the following items listed below:
-an overview of penalties that were issued based on severity,
-the steps the employer should take once it receives the citations and proposed penalties,
– the documentation required to respond to citations and penalties,
-an employee’s rights and responsibilities following an OSHA inspection, and
-an employer’s abilities to reduce the level of citations and/or penalties.

Your essay must be a minimum of three pages in length. Be sure to include an introduction and at least one scholarly reference.
Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

Race and Conflict

This week the discussion question covers both week 7 and 8. Race becomes a more central focus in these weeks as the US enter into conflicts across the globe. How did race affect how Canadians and Americans saw their role in the world in the 1990s?
Consider now, the role of economics. Can this explain why Canada and the US were involved in some conflicts across the world and not in others?
Lastly, how can we view both race and class as connected when looking at these military ventures in the Balkans, the middle east and the global south?