Best Writer

Keep in mind that this paper should contribute in some way to intercultural communication theory.
The paper will include your introduction, literature review, analysis, and conclusion sections. Each section should be labelled clearly
using subheads to separate them from others.
• Your introduction section will introduce your thesis or argument (problem + solution) as well as provide a blueprint for the
rest of the paper. Your argument is a claim that you make, which is backed by evidence (For example: I argue that despite
including a diverse cast in terms of race and ethnicity as well as gender, The Walking Dead ultimately maintains the centrality
of whiteness by rendering characters of color as secondary to the white protagonist).
• In your literature review section, you can use as many as class readings as you want, but you can also do independent
research. This section will review work in this area that scholars have done so far and identify how your work contributes to
this conversation.
• The third part is the heart of any essay, which is the analysis section. Your analysis should provide enough “proof” that
demonstrates your argument. This could be the analysis of a show or providing some other kind of “proof” that
demonstrates your argument. I am interested in seeing how you APPLY the theories and concepts you learned in this class to
your text.
The last section, conclusion, ends the essay by reiterating some overarching points. It could also list some limitations of your
work as well as indicate areas for future research.

7-9 pages, the prompt is: Iago has often been described as one of the first depictions (in fiction / drama) of what is referred to today as a “psychopath”. What does this terminology mean, and how closely do you feel it applies to Iago, in the sense the word is used today? In a broader sense, how does Shakespeare work to outline the mental states of his characters, and how does that resemble or differ from the ways we currently deal with (and speak about) psychological issues? And these are the rules we have have to use when writing the essay.

No matter which topic you choose, don’t forget to use quotes from the text! This is your main method for proving your points, whatever they happen to be! Please refer to the “Integrating Quotes” lecture for more information on how to do this.
All essays should be 7 – 9 pg. and include six to seven sources (not including the primary text itself). Half should be popular/newsmagazine sources (The New Yorker, The Atlantic, Washington Post, New York Times, etc) and half should be scholarly (library sources). And at the end there needs to be an annotated bibliography.

This is a research project where we need to present our own analysis of the data, fram a research around an identifiable hypothesis.
The following are important- identify what your hypothesis is related to the drug, and then focus your analysis on either confirming or rejecting that hypothesis, then presenting your rationale.

ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW

Addressing the needs of language and literacy development in the early childhood and primary years requires the integration of a number of different areas of knowledge, including an awareness of theories, appropriate teaching methods, the features of the learning environment, and the Australian educational context.

This assignment will allow you to demonstrate your understanding in these areas through the design of a presentation that describes approaches to the teaching of speaking and listening skills through which children’s language and literacy development are supported.

Your presentation should be supported by at least 5 references. The references will be combined into one reference list. Your work should demonstrate a relevant link made to either the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) or the Australian Curriculum (or a state equivalent), the set-text Fellowes and Oakley (2019), and other relevant scholarly and professional sources. You can refer to the learning materials for additional sources and conduct an independent search using the Swinburne library online database for relevant sources to support your work.

ASSIGNMENT DETAILS

For this assignment, you are required to produce a 5 minute video presentation using Canvas Studio that addresses the following components:

Identify a specific link to a sub-outcome under Outcome 5 from the EYLF or a content description from the Australian curriculum: English (or a state equivalent) that you think will promote children’s speaking and listening skills.Identify a specific age group within the early years that you would like to focus on for this assignment. For example, 3 year olds in a pre-kindergarten room or 6-7 year olds in Year 1. It must be within either an early childhood setting (birth to 5 years of age), or an early years primary school setting (5 to 8 years of age).Describe a learning experience or an activity that educators can use to support your chosen age group’s speaking and listening skills. Identify or use a prop in your presentation to provide further context e.g. a book, a puppet, visual aids etc.Explain how the learning experience or activity can support children’s speaking and listening skills for your chosen age group.Explain how your learning experience or activity will promote the learning of your chosen age group and support them in achieving the sub-outcome.Present a rationale to explain why it is important for educators to include the teaching of speaking and listening skills in their literacy program. In your rationale, you must make a specific reference to a relevant theory to help support your statements.Your audience

The imagined audience for your presentation will be the board or committee of an early childhood centre or a primary school. With this in mind, consider this as a formal presentation. A suggested structure for your presentation is as follows:

An introduction: Introduce yourself and present your topic.The components of your presentation: Address all of the components (1–7) of your presentation.A conclusion: Highlight the key points of your presentation and thank the imagined audience for their time.

In your descriptions and explanations, you must demonstrate an awareness of a relevant theory, an understanding of appropriate teaching approaches. In addition, you should make a relevant link to either the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) or the Australian Curriculum (or state equivalents), the set-text Fellowes and Oakley (2019), and other relevant scholarly and professional sources. You can refer to the learning materials for additional sources and conduct an independent search using the Swinburne library online database for relevant sources to support your work.

Preparing your presentation

You are strongly advised to engage with all resources provided in Weeks 1–7, and participate in the collaborative activities. These will help you build your understanding of the key concepts and theories related to this presentation, and practise and develop your presentation skills.

The length of the completed paper is to be 8-10 pages, in 12 pt. font size with double line spacing. Inclusion of maps and other images are always welcome, but each illustration or image must have a brief caption (printed in 10 pt. font size) explaining what is being shown.
Citation Style:
Chicago style citations and bibliography references are to be used.

Argument on why Should the federal government be allowed to require vaccine passports for interstate domestic airlines travel?.

Watch the WBTi UK video, any PAR video (it could be the one listed), and explore the WBTi web site. Read at least one country’s report in detail, including recommendations of the evaluation team.
WBTI UK video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_D2cw5kyLoU
Participatory Action Research (PAR) video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86aoV5uYZgs
WBTI web site and country reports http://worldbreastfeedingtrends.org/
USA 2019 report https://www.worldbreastfeedingtrends.org/uploads/country-data/country-report/WBTi-USA-2019.pdf
Write a reflection paper that comments on this form of research and how policymakers, the public, and advocates might use the findings to improve breastfeeding practices at a national level.
Use APA format. Your paper should be 200-250 words.

The written assignment for this course requires that you critically analyze the role of culture in the
development of child’s psychology using various theories. Students will write a 3-4 page paper on
development of human psychology and the impact of culture. This paper will also reference developmental
theories studied through this semester in addition to your own critical analysis of how cultural background
may impact a child’s development. Make sure to incorporate APA format and stvle.
Contact me anytime with your questions & concerns!

Theories to be compared/contrast:
Biological and Environmental Interactions vs Culture, Gender, and Personality Interactions

For this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including required cover and Reference pages, comparing and contrasting two personality theories from the course. You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date but only two theories may be used.
Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories you chose via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality. It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories. This is a fact based paper only. It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion.
Your submission should be double-spaced with 1 inch margins on all sides of each page and should be free of spelling and grammar errors. It must include source crediting of any materials used in APA format, including source citations in the body of your paper and in a Reference list attached to the end. Easy to follow guides to APA formatting can be found on the tutorial section of the APUS Online Library and on the following website. Upon submission your paper will automatically be submitted to Turnitin.

3000 words in total:
The essay is for ‘introduction to social theory’ class. I’m not sure if ‘sociology’ is the correct subject area for my order. It is about postcolonial theory and the problem of climate change in the global south. The aim of the assignment is to operationalise the inquiry of the social theory in a particular area and show its strengths and weaknesses. The essay will relate postcolonial theory with climate change and international law, and human rights. It is going to talk about post colonial theory, climate change international law, global inequalities and their consequences of climate change. How the human rights discourse might actually aid addressing these inequalities. And then explore how post colonial ideas might then dialog with this problem.
Please follow this essay plan. The essay will be divided into 4 sections:
Section 1 will be about post colonial theory (500 words). It will set out postcolonial theory that the essay is going to engage with.
Section 2 will set out the research problem which is climate change in the global south and in relation to international climate change law (UNFCCC) (500 words).
Section 3 will be about how the postcolonial theory and the research problem (being climate change and UNFCCC) relate to one another (1000 words). In this section, please write about what does postcolonial theory enable us to do with the research problem? How does it enable us to think about the research problem in relation to the concrete research issues raised in the essay, which includes international law and the scholarship around international law in this area.
Also, please write about human rights here to explore why human rights might be a useful addition to the paradigms that the essay is exploring. In particular, the use of human rights for the defense of low and middle income counties interests in a postcolonial situation that actually the discourse of human rights and its universalism actually can be termed into an instrument that holds the global north on its own terms because the human rights discourse originates in the global north and it is therefore a strategic and useful tool to press the global north to meet their practical and ethical obligations towards the global south in relation to climate change.
Also, you can use the work of Edward Said to point out the fact that climate change still has its “others”; climate change in the north is still something more abstract because it isn’t something that is experienced in the same way in the south and so it can become “othered” in a way that Said describes orientalism. Those who experience climate change in the most severe ways are somewhere south of the equator or on the equator to the global north and it remains an othering discourse. And until we breakdown the othering, it is arguable that these global inequalities in climate change will remain. And it is actually then you can come back to human rights and say “this is where human rights might actually be strategically useful because they are universal and there is a discourse that comes with the north, it demands things of the world and of the global north. And it might be a vehicle for holding the global north to account for the consequences of their use of energy, with historically and today”.

Section 4 is an evaluative section (1000 words). It asks about the consequences of the arguments made in the essay. What are the consequences of the arguments in the essay for the research, what are their strengths and their limitations? what does it mean for what the essay is able to investigate and what will the essay won’t be able to investigate. So identify the limitations and strengths effectively of the approach of using the theory when it is operationalised, when it is actually turned into a concrete research project and goes beyond being a conceptual level argument and engagement. The strength of postcolonial theory, human rights and international law is that they are better at looking at structural problems. They are addressing structural features of the worlds and of societies and the relationship between them such as structural inequalities and telling a story about historical exploitation that has contemporary consequences that includes continued exploitation and inequality. post colonial theory also is able to talk to us about how subjectivities of those who are colonized the way people see themselves is affected by the values of the colonizers and of the global north. So in effect the colonized start to evaluate themselves in relation to the values of the colonial power rather than in relation to the values that they either do or used to hold in their own societies. The limitation of these paradigms is that they explore less is what is happening in the lives of the people who are affected by these structural issues because it does not have the tools to actually investigate the concrete experiences of people how they are affected by climate change.
Please also write that there are other theories that would be more effective for the non-structural issues. For example that the non-structural issues of climate change could be investigated perhaps through more interpretive approaches like those of Goffman and some of the ideas that Weber speaks about ‘verstehen’ and seeking to understand the meaning of social action. Perhaps more qualitative ethnographic approaches that use these sort of interruptive theory could enable us to investigate the livd realties and consequences of these structural problems in relation to climate change. So in short, this section can say ‘ well the approach leans towards a structural inquiry about structured inequalities in the global legal and regulatory frameworks that govern climate change and our response to it. But it doesn’t tell us much about the lived consequences of these structural inequalities and issues. And to investigate those one would…’ and then you could set out some brief suggestions about other theories and you don’t have to do that in great detail.
So the argument that is very straight forward to make in postcolonial theory is that the global north extracted vast wealth and industrialized itself on the back of its colonies. It is part of that process the colonial countries industrialized and produced enormous amount of carbon emissions, deforestation, natural resource plundering, and in our contemporary post industrial societies build on this exploitation and are current climate change crisis is indistinguishable from this history, it is a consequences of this history and that is what postcolonial theory can do and it can then usefully be related to human rights and to law to the legal conventions and obligations that exist, and could also be imagined in the future. It can frame the investigation of the consequences of climate change, but it doesn’t tell us about the specific human situations, like for example, the situation in in Madagascar where the increase in tropical storms is having a devastating effect on the infrastructure, the agriculture, the economy and the lives of those that live in Madagascar. It can tell us something about the history of why that situation is happening now, but of we want to investigate what is going on in Madagascar right now, postcolonial theory will only give us the background. However, the limitation is that if we want to explore the lived experiences of people, then we would need a different set of conceptual theories for that. (please note that Madagascar is only used here to exemplify what I mean by lived experiences, this country is not central to the inquiry of this essay).
959766
12 hours ago
The essay is for ‘introduction to social theory’ class. It is about postcolonial theory and the problem of climate change in the global south. The aim of the assignment is to operationalise the inquiry of the social theory in a particular area and show its strengths and weaknesses. The essay will relate postcolonial theory with climate change and international law, and human rights. It is going to talk about post colonial theory, climate change international law, global inequalities and their consequences of climate change. How the human rights discourse might actually aid addressing these inequalities. And then explore how post colonial ideas might then dialog with this problem.
Please follow this essay plan. The essay will be divided into 4 sections:
Section 1 will be about post colonial theory (500 words). It will set out postcolonial theory that the essay is going to engage with.
Section 2 will set out the research problem which is climate change in the global south and in relation to international climate change law (UNFCCC) (500 words).
Section 3 will be about how the postcolonial theory and the research problem (being climate change and UNFCCC) relate to one another (1000 words). In this section, please write about what does postcolonial theory enable us to do with the research problem? How does it enable us to think about the research problem in relation to the concrete research issues raised in the essay, which includes international law and the scholarship around international law in this area.
Also, please write about human rights here to explore why human rights might be a useful addition to the paradigms that the essay is exploring. In particular, the use of human rights for the defense of low and middle income counties interests in a postcolonial situation that actually the discourse of human rights and its universalism actually can be termed into an instrument that holds the global north on its own terms because the human rights discourse originates in the global north and it is therefore a strategic and useful tool to press the global north to meet their practical and ethical obligations towards the global south in relation to climate change.
Also, you can use the work of Edward Said to point out the fact that climate change still has its “others”; climate change in the north is still something more abstract because it isn’t something that is experienced in the same way in the south and so it can become “othered” in a way that Said describes orientalism. Those who experience climate change in the most severe ways are somewhere south of the equator or on the equator to the global north and it remains an othering discourse. And until we breakdown the othering, it is arguable that these global inequalities in climate change will remain. And it is actually then you can come back to human rights and say “this is where human rights might actually be strategically useful because they are universal and there is a discourse that comes with the north, it demands things of the world and of the global north. And it might be a vehicle for holding the global north to account for the consequences of their use of energy, with historically and today”.

Section 4 is an evaluative section (1000 words). It asks about the consequences of the arguments made in the essay. What are the consequences of the arguments in the essay for the research, what are their strengths and their limitations? what does it mean for what the essay is able to investigate and what will the essay won’t be able to investigate. So identify the limitations and strengths effectively of the approach of using the theory when it is operationalised, when it is actually turned into a concrete research project and goes beyond being a conceptual level argument and engagement. The strength of postcolonial theory, human rights and international law is that they are better at looking at structural problems. They are addressing structural features of the worlds and of societies and the relationship between them such as structural inequalities and telling a story about historical exploitation that has contemporary consequences that includes continued exploitation and inequality. post colonial theory also is able to talk to us about how subjectivities of those who are colonized the way people see themselves is affected by the values of the colonizers and of the global north. So in effect the colonized start to evaluate themselves in relation to the values of the colonial power rather than in relation to the values that they either do or used to hold in their own societies. The limitation of these paradigms is that they explore less is what is happening in the lives of the people who are affected by these structural issues because it does not have the tools to actually investigate the concrete experiences of people how they are affected by climate change.
Please also write that there are other theories that would be more effective for the non-structural issues. For example that the non-structural issues of climate change could be investigated perhaps through more interpretive approaches like those of Goffman and some of the ideas that Weber speaks about ‘verstehen’ and seeking to understand the meaning of social action. Perhaps more qualitative ethnographic approaches that use these sort of interruptive theory could enable us to investigate the livd realties and consequences of these structural problems in relation to climate change. So in short, this section can say ‘ well the approach leans towards a structural inquiry about structured inequalities in the global legal and regulatory frameworks that govern climate change and our response to it. But it doesn’t tell us much about the lived consequences of these structural inequalities and issues. And to investigate those one would…’ and then you could set out some brief suggestions about other theories and you don’t have to do that in great detail.
So the argument that is very straight forward to make in postcolonial theory is that the global north extracted vast wealth and industrialized itself on the back of its colonies. It is part of that process the colonial countries industrialized and produced enormous amount of carbon emissions, deforestation, natural resource plundering, and in our contemporary post industrial societies build on this exploitation and are current climate change crisis is indistinguishable from this history, it is a consequences of this history and that is what postcolonial theory can do and it can then usefully be related to human rights and to law to the legal conventions and obligations that exist, and could also be imagined in the future. It can frame the investigation of the consequences of climate change, but it doesn’t tell us about the specific human situations, like for example, the situation in in Madagascar where the increase in tropical storms is having a devastating effect on the infrastructure, the agriculture, the economy and the lives of those that live in Madagascar. It can tell us something about the history of why that situation is happening now, but of we want to investigate what is going on in Madagascar right now, postcolonial theory will only give us the background. However, the limitation is that if we want to explore the lived experiences of people, then we would need a different set of conceptual theories for that. (please note that Madagascar is only used here to exemplify what I mean by lived experiences, this country is not central to the inquiry of this essay).