Best Writer

This assignment must use the required article stated in the announcement described above to complete the following items:
Title Page
Introduction
Explain that this paper is a summary of the assigned article
Explain that the impact of the article contents on your own future practice will be presented
Length of Introduction must be 50-75 words
Assigned Article Summary
Clearly summarize the major content of the assigned article. This should be an improved version of your Week 4 submission.
One or two short quotations with citations (must include the assigned sentence for quotation)
Several paraphrased areas with citations (must include the assigned sentence for paraphrasing)
Length must be 175-200 words
Impact of Assigned Article Content on Future Practice
Clearly state how learning from the assigned article will impact your future practice
Must be your own ideas about the impact of the article on your future nursing practice
Use first person in this section
No citations are needed in this section
Length must be 125-150 words
Conclusion
Write a concise summary of the main points of the paper
Provide a concluding statement
Length must be 75-100 words
Reference for the assigned article should be a revised version of the Week 4 reference improved based on your instructor’s Week 4 feedback. Include the following:
Author(s)
Year
Article title
Journal name
Volume number
Issue number
Page numbers
Parentheses
Double line spacing
Hanging indent
DOI if available
Each of required items above is clearly described on the Professional Paper Template and Rubric (below on this page).
When your Week 6 Professional Paper Assignment is completed, save and close the completed template. Follow the submission instructions at the top of this page to upload your assignment.

1. Parker discusses the exciting idea of supercomplexity in the humanities. Identify one text that you believe should find a place in the “New Humanities” and justify its inclusion by relating it back to Parker’s arguments.

2. Jones et. al discuss the need for us to be critical thinkers before we begin the process of becoming interdisciplinary thinkers. They argue that we must come to better understand our own values that we bring with us. I would for you to pick out one value that you believe you bring along with you to your studies and discuss how that has influenced your educational career.

Rubric for group presentations:
Peer reviewers and I will use same forms
Your final score will be the average of my score and the average of the peer reviewer scores
All components are evaluated on a scale of 1-5 (5 is highest):
Components for the whole group (75 points possible) 1-5
Content (45 points)
Clearly introduce research question
Clearly motivate importance of question
Clearly describe data, restrictions, time period
Clearly describe research approach, methods
Clearly describe why approach is novel/contribution to the literature
Clearly interpret results in words
Clearly interpret key tables and figures
Clear and accurate summary of findings
Share key points from conclusion
Organization (5 points)
Well-organized
Use of communication aids (15 points):
Graphics reinforce thesis, maximize understanding
Visual aids colorful, large enough
Slides professional. Main points stand out
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors
Overall presentation impression

To aid the above, presentation MUST answer the following questions:

You may NOT include any direct quotes, or you will get NO credit.
Include a citation referencing the assigned paper using the proper format (economists often use Chicago style—in the text include the author’s name and publication year such as Abrams, Clarke, and Mehta (2021) and Chicago for the reference listed at the end).
As with all of your work, please write clearly and concisely.
In your prose, be sure to address the following questions:
What research questions do the authors examine in this article?
How does the incentive program work?
What two explanations do the authors give for why the additional commitment option had stronger long-run effects extending after the end of the commitment-contract period?
What is the primary data source the authors use?
During which months and years did the experiment take place?
How many subjects were part of the experiment?
What did the treatment and comparison groups get in the initial four week period? Describe the different incentives for the four groups in both the treatment and control groups.
How do the authors ensure employees didn’t cheat (i.e., log in to the gym and not exercise to earn the incentive)? And, if there was such cheating, why isn’t it such a concern to the authors?
Describe the authors’ concerns about extrapolating the results of their experiment to the population as a whole? What do they recommend if one were to extrapolate the results of the experiment to the entire population?
Why did the authors choose to incentive gym attendance and not weight los?
Describe the second-level treatment.
Describe the difference in the emails received by the incentive+commit group and the incventive-only group after the introductory four weeks.
Consult Figure 1A and the corresponding text. Describe the effect of the incentive, the commitment contract, and then the lasting effects after the end of the commitment-contract period.
What do the authors observe happens to gym attendance in the long-run? Is there a difference for those offered incentive+commit or incentive-only?
What does Table 4 tell us about who was likely to take up the commitment option? (Ignore the results by male/female. There might be a typo in the text? I read the table as men being significantly MORE likely to make commitment contracts. But the text notes women more likely?)
Describe (in words) the concerns the authors have with substitution
Describe (in words) the concerns the authors have with cross-talk
What share of the incentive payments went to new exercise and what share went to employees for exercise they would have done even without the incentive?
For students presenting this paper, BE CERTAIN to also address:
Does the prior literature suggest that health behaviors are responsive to financial incentives in the short-term?
What does the literature show happens in the longer term, once the incentive programs end?
Describe, in detail, the setting of the experiment
How were subjects recruited?
Present online Appendix Figure 1 (Timeline) Download Present online Appendix Figure 1 (Timeline)
Present online Appendix Figure 2 Download Present online Appendix Figure 2(Sample construction flow diagram)
Describe the level they chose and the reasoning for why did the authors pick the level of attendance they chose for the commitment contract?
Present Tables 1A and 1B
Interpret Figures 1A, 1B, and 1C. Were the effects bigger for those who were already gym members or nonmembers?
Equation 1
Table 2
Figure 2 or Table 3 (I like the statistically significant findings in Table 3 for the very long run but the visual in Figure 2)
Present Table 4

I need the literature review section of a research proposal. My research question is “Does owning a pet improve your mental health?”. Please see attachments for instructions.

What are your thoughts about the reflection from articles
REFLECTION
Reflect on the subject addressed and solutions journalism. topic? What did you learn? How was the subject portrayed uniquely through solutions journalism compared to other media?
RESOURCE
Solutions Journalism U
https://www.solutionsjournalism.org/educators

Explain and give examples of overt and covert racism. What impact does it have on policy and criminal justice?
Cite your response in APA 7th edition format. 300 words or more initial responses

This assessment will require you to conduct research into indeterminate and determinate sentencing practices. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with at least three (3) credible resources, which may include the class textbook as well as journal articles or periodicals from the Internet or from the KU Library.
Comprise a minimum 2-page essay, and please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. Please conduct the necessary research in an effort to effectively discuss, analyze and evaluate the following questions:
What is the main difference between determinate sentencing and indeterminate sentencing?
Discuss at least one (1) argument, which advocates will espouse in support of indeterminate sentencing.
Discuss at least one (1) argument, which advocates will espouse in support of determinate sentencing.
Explain why states continue to revise their positions with respect to determinate sentencing and indeterminate sentencing as there seems to be a “cyclical” stance concerning the same.

You work for an organization that has assigned subgroups to various projects. You are assigned to one of the phone design groups. There are also groups for assembly, testing and marketing.

There has been a friendly competition between the two phone design groups. You have brought a few designs to the team leader but have not seen it on the agenda the first 3 meetings nor heard any communications regarding progress. Your friend on the assembly team said his team leader received the design selected and they will start assembly soon.

What type of subgroup is your group? Explain whether you think the group is effective, has faultlines and how your performance has been affected. Also, explain whether you are more likely to forgive the leader of your ingroup or of an exterior (out) group. Please be sure to review the chapter before answering and reference your textbook reading within your submission.

Use APA format and cite properly. Initial answer due by Thursday and 2 responses to classmates due by Sunday.

Write a paper using
two of the six moral theories (Virtue Ethics, Natural Law, Utilitarianism,
Ethical Egoism, Deontological Ethics, and Contractarianism) to discuss the
moral issue of Animal Rights and Environmental Duty found in the text-book.
The main thing is to
pick two explicit theories and stick to them. Please cite a philosopher for
each theory and ground the discussion on a recognized philosopher—for example,
Virtue Ethics – Porphyry and Utilitarianism – Bentham or Mill. Dig into one or
the other and describe how it would address the issue of Animal rights and
Environmental Duty. Stay away from legal issues.
If you choose Virtue
Ethics, explain what virtue is. Animals have virtues, too, but focus on what
human virtues are at issue. What are they? Kindness? Loyalty to one’s pets?
etc., and if you choose Utilitarianism will need to explain how and why we can
apply utility to non-human animals. How exactly would that work? Quote and
write a page or two on recognized philosophers and analyze their arguments.
Then you can go beyond generalizations. That Do you think they are good
arguments or bad arguments? Why? Please make sure you quote him and cite him.
If you do use an
article, make sure you do not rely solely on one article for each theory and do
not only summarize those arguments. Your own analysis should be more in the
paper. Also, if you use any article, do not forget to cite it.

Discussion question responses must be 200-300 words in length and include at least 1 academic resource (other than the textbook). Websites, Wikipedia, Dictionary.com, etc., do not count as academic sources. Academic sources are peer-reviewed scholarly journals and/or business publications found in the research databases. Examples include The Harvard Business Review, the Academy of Management Journal, MIT Sloan Management Review, etc.
755584
2 minutes ago
The discussion question is: Why must a manager monitor the progress of a project? What can be done if a project is not proceeding according to plan