Please follow all instructions before submitting.
I paye for extra pages to allow for some editing of existing sections to complete the report properly
all requires writing areas are highlited with “XXXXXXXXXX”
I provided a sample report pdf for reference
1- provide new summery
2- fix formatting in table of contents
3- update list of figure to reflect what is on the report at the end
4- update glossery
5- provide new outline
6- provide new paragraphs to describe visuals
7- provide one more visuale (graph or chart)
8- research and provide the followong analysis: cost, durability, availability, and ease of intalation all compareding geapolymer to
portland cement
9- provide analusis summery
10- provide conclusion
11- update references and fix the formating.
This discussion is required and is worth up to (10) points. An additional two (2) points can be had through “Early Bird Submission.”
The prompt for this discussion is as follows:
Imagine that you have started up your very own travel company, and you’re creating a package tour for history-minded clients, intrigued by “the Albigensian Crusade” and the legends of the Cathars. Plan out an action-packed five day tour to “Cathar Country,” designed to give those participating an understanding of some of the most important surviving sites and monuments connected with this theme. Think carefully what you want to bring into the mix and menu (cities, villages, churches, castles, … ???), and the logistics of a five day tour, moving from site to site at a pace that will not run your flock ragged. But come up with an exciting five day itinerary, and indicate as well what you, as the tour guide, will be talking about when you are “on site” with your group.
In planning your itinerary and its content, you are free to use any good website or YouTube video to help stimulate your thinking and planning. But I most highly recommend that you work with Marcus Cowper’s guide, Cathar Castles: Fortresses of the Albigensian Crusade, included in resources for Week/Module 11 (“Albigensian Crusade”). CLICK HERE FOR DIRECT LINK.
Once again, as with all forum assignments, basic expectations are that you put up three postings. The main posting should be a reasoned response to the discussion prompt, totaling ca. 500 words. You don’t need to include references on this forum. Just come up with a good and exciting itinerary and basic plan for what you’ll lecture about, on site. And remember, any good tour guide has entertaining stories derived from “the primary sources,” so pick your favorites and add them to the mix!
Plagiarism of any sort — including reproducing other classmates’ posting ideas — will not be tolerated.
What is next? Write the first confirmation paragraphs for your researched argument paper. This is a graded checkpoint for my feedback to help correct any mistakes before they appear in your researched argument paper.
What are the confirmation paragraphs? These two paragraphs are the heart of your paper because they support your position on your controversial topic. They introduce, explain, and support your two specific points from your thesis statement. (I have corrected your thesis, so be SURE to use the corrected version. It will impact your grade.)
How do I write the confirmation paragraphs? Follow each step below–carefully, with college-level skill. Also, use the sample researched argument paper as a guide.
STEP 1: Using the perfectly formatted MLA document that contains your introduction paragraph with your thesis, add your FIRST confirmation paragraph.
STEP 2: Identify the two points in your thesis so that you can write a focused topic sentence.
EXAMPLE THESIS with the first point in bold: Although some people believe that pipelines pose too many risks to the health and safety of the environment, pipelines are the most efficient and economical ways to move resource because they boost the U.S. economy and they reduce dependence on oil from the Middle East.
STEP 2: From your first point, write a topic sentence for your paragraph. Make sure to identify your first point in the topic sentence of your paragraph.
Pipelines are an economic boost for the United States. (Now all of the sentences that follow will prove that the use of pipelines in America is vital to boosting and maintaining a strong U.S. economy.)
STEP 3: After your topic sentence, write a 150-200 word paragraph that explains why the topic sentence is true–and provide supporting evidence with your research material. You should have at least three pieces of cited and documented evidence. You can do this by summary, paraphrase, or quotes. Make sure you use in-text citations for your borrowed material. See your Harbrace textbook, Chapter 13.
STEP 4: Check your work with the questions below.
Did you refer back to the topic sentence at strategic points in the paragraph? Just repeating a key word or phrase once or twice in a paragraph can focus the reader’s attention and add force to the entire point. However, avoid any repetition that doesn’t serve a specific purpose.
Did you begin a body paragraph with a quote? Revise it–Your topic sentence is not a quote.
Did you use sound logic to fully explain and prove your point? No fallacies.
Finally, did you make sure to tie all of this information together by showing how it relates to your overall position statement? (Look at the position section of your thesis.)
2. After reading, your writing prompt today is to write about an app idea you have! Do you ever come up with app ideas with your friends? Even if it is far-fetched, please share an innovative tech idea and explain its purpose. If you’re struggling with this question you can also write about an app or two that you regularly use and why you think they are unique.
You will be expected to carry out research, using outside resources. In addition to the discussion of your topic, you will be expected to find a real-life case with enough detailed information to discuss it in relation to the forensic discipline in your paper.
The sources you use for this assignment should include at least two outside sources or articles. One of your outside sources can be any of the provided classroom readings. The source(s) of your real-life case do not count towards your two outside sources. Significant amounts of information from these outside sources should be incorporated into your paper. Wikipedia is NOT an appropriate outside source for any college level paper and should not be used as an outside source in this paper.
This paper is expected to be your explanation of this particular discipline, although you are expected to incorporate and apply the course material and material from the outside sources to your forensic discipline. To show your critical thinking and that you incorporated your outside references into your paper, the entirety of your paper must be written in your own words. You may not use quotations in your paper.
Make sure that you provide in-text citations throughout your paper, using APA format. Remember that for any information you receive from outside sources, whether you quote it, paraphrase it or summarize it, you must provide citations telling the reader where that outside information came from.
Your paper should contain the following items:
Cover/Title Page
Introduction
Body of Paper
Discipline Specifics to include:
History
Education and/or certification requirements
Types of evidence examined
Types of instrumentation utilized for evidence examination
Inclusion of a real-life case that utilized this discipline
Discuss if the discipline assisted in providing investigative leads in solving the case
Analysis must incorporate information received from 2 outside sources
Conclusion
References Page
Do you think the right to a jury trial for complex and time consuming cases should be abolished? If yes, what should be the alternative?
If no, how do we address those jurors who find it difficult to understand complex facts?
ALSO PLEASE REPLY TO TWO OTHER STUDENTS.
PART 2.
Assignment Objectives This assignment shall test your understanding of subject
matter jurisdiction
Instructions: Please read and answer the following fact pattern.
Mark, a citizen of Georgia, was crossing a street in Atlanta when he was struck by a car driven by David, a citizen of New York visiting
Atlanta. The car was owned by David’s employer, a Delaware corporation that has its principal place of business in Atlanta, Georgia.
Mark sues both David and the corporation in federal district court in Atlanta alleging damages in the amount of $500,00. Does the
court have subject matter jurisdiction? Why or why not?
BUS 1 Discussion (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Initial Response
15 to >13.5 pts
Excellent
Thorough response to discussion prompt that effectively demonstrates and integrates knowledge (not necessarily mastery) of course materials (lectures, videos, and text). May also integrate personal experience if applicable.
13.5 to >8.25 pts
Acceptable
Initial response is acceptable, but not thorough. Response may be missing a part, or some parts may demonstrate only minimal knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, text).
8.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Initial response is off-topic, missing multiple parts, and/or does not demonstrate knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, text). **Initial Posts not submitted by Friday receive 1/2 credit (i.e., .5 points)**
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Reply 1
2.5 pts
Excellent
Replies is substantive and reflects knowledge of course materials and/or personal experience. Reply moves the conversation forward by attempting to elicit responses and reflections from other learners, building upon the ideas of other learners, or answering a question asked in response to their own posting.
2 pts
Acceptable
Reply reflects knowledge of course materials, but does not attempt to move the conversation forward (engage with other members) or answer a question posed.
1 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reply lacks substance and does not reflect knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, or text). Reply does not move the conversation forward or answer a question posed.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Reply 2
2.5 pts
Excellent
Reply is substantive and reflects knowledge of course materials and/or personal experience. Reply moves the conversation forward by attempting to elicit responses and reflections from other learners, building upon the ideas of other learners, or answering a question asked in response to their own posting.
2 pts
Acceptable
Reply reflects knowledge of course materials, but does not attempt to move the conversation forward or answer a question posed.
1 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reply lacks substance and does not reflect knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, or text). Reply does not move the conversation forward or answer a question posed.
2.5 pts
Total Points: 20
What is the Problem of Freedom? Introduce the philosophical issue and then discuss all parts.
–Which of our behaviors /characteristics are (at least arguably) choices, which cannot be helped? How would fatalism, predestination, divine foreknowledge, and logical determinism rule out human freedom?
–Discuss the three positions (hard determinism; compatibilism or “soft determinism”; libertarianism) that are debated in the philosophy of action. Explain how a defender of each thesis might attempt to respond to the problem.
–Also discuss Indeterminism and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and how these contribute to the discussion of the problem of freedom.
ESSAY REQUIREMENTS
Your exam should be a minimum of three typed double spaced pages using default margins and times new roman 12 point font.
This exam is open resource, however you must compose the essay in your own words while using key terminology. Copying and pasting text constitutes cheating. No citation or works cited is necessary, as this is an exposition of basic issues.
This exam period requires your individual work and any group efforts (e.g. multiple instances of identical text in the essay) constitute cheating.
Essay exams are 5 points off per calendar day late, and less than the length requirement will be penalized depending on how short. 3 full pages is 3 FULL pages minimum. Top to bottom. Quality essays answer all parts of the question according to the guidelines, and therefore 3 pages really should be understood as a minimum.
Read and analyze the information in Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing at Voray Case and use the article Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.
1. Describe the Business Model for Voray.
2. Describe Time-Drive Activity Based Costing and how it is used to make business decisions.
3. Prepare a production time analysis and customer profitability analysis for SG1, SG2, and SG3.
4. Recommend a plan of action for Voray.
Complete your calculations and analysis in Excel and prepare a 1 to 2 page memo that addresses each of the following as if you are an consultant.
These final two documents are just additional support to assist with the case
So I just received the case. I have began to read it and intend to work on it tomorrow i just want to put in for assistance from now instead of waiting until its to late and im not sure whats going on. I rather be safe than sorry.
Read and reflect on the prompt entitled “Apologizing at Community Hospital,” which is on Sakai under the
Resources tab.
Address the following issues and questions in your paper.
Ethics Portion (2-3 pages)
a. What ethical issues does Karen face?
b. Who are the stakeholders and what makes them stakeholders (i.e., what are their interests)?
c. What choices does Karen face in response to the lawsuit?
d. If you were Karen, what would you do? Why would you take that course of action? How would you explain
your course of action to the Hospital’s Board of Directors? What should you say? How should you say it? (It
is OK to use the first-person “I” when answering these questions.)
[Banner ID]
[Class Day/Time]
2
e. What 2-3 ethical models (from Chapter 2) could you apply here? Define the models and how they could help
you decide what to do. (Note: the seeing-knowing-doing concept is NOT an ethical model that informs ethical
decision-making. Rather, it is simply a description of the process of ethical decision-making. You should use 2-
3 of the other traditional ethical models we covered in class and/or from Chapter 2.)
Legal Portion (~4-5 pages)
1. Tom Beach’s family sued the Hospital for negligence as a result of his death. What does Tom’s family need
to prove at trial in order to succeed on a claim for negligence?
2. Also, assume that upon his admission to the Emergency Room, Tom signed a contract with the Hospital that
said, “Hospital agrees to treat Tom with the required level of medical care for his needs.” Did the Hospital
breach this provision of the contract based on the facts in the story? Explain why or why not.
3. Finally, assume that after the first day of trial, Karen gets cold feet and asks her legal team if there are any
alternatives to court available to resolve the dispute with Tom’s family.
a. What alternatives to court are available? (Please only focus on the two alternative dispute
resolution mechanisms we discussed in class.)
b. What are the pros and cons of each alternative?
c. Which option would you recommend to Karen and why?
