Best Writer

The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital-associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the “Hospital Associated Infections Data” Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment.
Scenario
You have been tasked with displaying Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital quality measures data for a 5-year period on four quality measures at your site. After examining the data, identify trends and determine the best way to present the actionable information to stakeholders.
Assignment
Create a 12-15-slide PowerPoint (not including title and reference slides) presenting the data to the stakeholders. Address the following in your PowerPoint:
What conclusions can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period?
What trends do you see for each quality measure over the 5-year period?
When comparing each quality measure, is the quality measure better than, worse than, or no different from the national benchmark over time?
Based on your examination of the data, which of the quality measures should you prioritize and why?
Develop a quality improvement metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience relating to the identified area of opportunity.
Explain how you would monitor the metric and use collected data for improvement.
Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.

how social media affects teenagers social skills. Discuss

Topic
https://theconversation.com/the-wiring-in-your-plane-could-soon-be-made-from-recycled-plastic-new-research-174431
this is the topic
Checklist.pdf
Sample Formal Report.pdf
these are requirements and a sample
the sample has 15 pages but it includes pictures

Be sure to use Headings for each of the sections for this paper. Consider each Heading a separate essay within the whole paper. The following outline provides a breakdown of what should be in the paper:
The Situation (Use this Heading in your paper)
First paragraph
1. Hook the reader with the first sentence.
2. State the controversy or problem. Why is this a problem?
3. What is your dominant reaction to the problem?
Second paragraph
1. Clearly define terms (e.g., hair discrimination, stand your ground laws, vaccine hesitancy, etc.) for the reader.
2. Focus your definitions on how the term will be used in your paper. You may start with a general definition, but you should lead the reader into a very specific definition relating to your overall topic.
3. Use research to help you define the term.
Third paragraph
1. Provide history or background on the topic.
2. Focus on providing the reader with a clear explanation of the historical significance of the topic. Situate the topic in terms of how you will address the issue in the paper.
3. Use research to assist with the background information.
Fourth paragraph
1. Focus on the CAUSES.
2. What is the cause of hair discrimination, standing your ground, vaccine hesitancy, etc.?
3. Use research to assist with the Causes.
4. Write a concluding sentence for the paragraph.
Fifth paragraph
1. Focus on the EFFECTS.
2. What were the consequences or what happened as a result of hair discrimination, standing your ground, vaccine hesitancy, etc.?
3. Use research to assist with the Effects.
4. Write a concluding sentence for the paragraph.

THE PROBLEM (Use this Heading in your paper)
[What are the problems associated with the topic? Base this on your research.]
First paragraph
1. Hook the reader with the first sentence.
2. State the controversy you will address in your reaction.
3. State your position (What do you think is the main aspect of this problem?)
Second paragraph
1. Topic Sentence: Use a transition. What is the main point you will discuss?
2. Support: Use clear logic and thinking to support the topic sentence. Use examples from the videos, articles, and your research to the topic sentence. Use MLA to document borrowed information.
3. Write a concluding sentence for the paragraph.
Third paragraph
1. Summarize your reaction.
2. Restate your position.
3. Transition to solution section

The purpose of this speech is to convince and/or motivate an educated audience about your point of view
toward political correctness versus freedom of speech relating to ethics in communication. Your goal is to change or reinforce the audience’s beliefs or actions.
Rather than simply arguing for your position, you must recognize the legimiticy of your listener’s views
throughout your speech because they will not all likely agree with you.
You will need 4 – 6 sources for this speech. Sources may include academic journals, textbooks, trade publications, case studies, popular press, promotional materials, etc., as appropriate to your topic and the
presentation assignment. Make sure to include a mixture of sources that adequately cover all sides of the
issue you are addressing in your speech.

Lesson 4
It is important to take the subject matter as your own to be able to participate in the construction of your own knowledge. While critical thinking is the element that defines whether the choice you’re making is sound, decision making is the process that leads to actionable conclusions. With that in mind, begin thinking about some of your personal experiences as it relates to making decisions.

View the video on Critical Thinking and Decision-Making.
Play Video
Reflecting on your past experiences, have you implemented these activities when making decisions? How so?
Explore the following scenario:
You are outside taking your daily walk and just happen to witness a bank robbery. You make the decision to follow the perpetrator, who ends up going down an alleyway. Upon a closer look, you notice that he stops at an orphanage and gives them all the money.
Would you: A) Report the man to police since he committed a crime …OR… B) Leave him alone because you saw him do a good deed.
Thinking critically, how would you go about making a decision on this? What elements would you consider? Which elements, if any, are not as important? What impediments do you think might show up during your decision-making process? Then reflecting on your decision-making processes in the past, was your process to decision-making similar? Why or why not? Be sure to include specific examples to support your thoughts.

Use poem as a source and 2 more credible
ones.

Professors indications: Here are some
possible topics to think about

-Metaphors, Imagery or Personification in
The Road Not Taken
-Literary Techniques in the Road Not Taken
-Conflict in the Road Not Taken
-Symbolism and Imagery in The Road Not
Taken
-Explain the theme in The Road Not Taken
-Theme of Individual Choice or The
Permanence of
-Decisions in The Road Not Taken
-Overcoming Fear of the Unknown in The
Road Not Taken
-Or you can choose another topic to
discuss in your paper.

Research and Analysis of a Short Story
For your second essay, you have several options. For each, you will research a specific topic and
apply what you’ve learned to the analysis of
one
short story. In addition to the stories we’ve read
and discussed in class, you may also choose from the list at the bottom of this assignment sheet.
Option One:
Both Chris Adrian’s story, “Stab,” and Bradford Morrow’s story, “The Hoarder,”
feature characters who engage in unusual and violent behavior. Does their behavior mark
them as insane? By what criteria should we make such a determination? What point
does
either
author make about the source of madness

Identify disparities in health among populations for a Healthy People 2030 health issue. For this assignment:
Describe the chosen Healthy People 2030 topic area and specific health issue.
Contrast causes of disparities related to this health issue within populations.
Propose a public health communication strategy to reduce disparity and promote health.
Outline a plan for the communication.
Describe an evaluation plan for the communication.
Create targeted communication for each population.
Reflect on learning through this project.
Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

The assignment is intended to evaluate the student’s ability to critically read, interpret, and analyze scientific physiological published material. In addition, the student is expected to correctly interpret the published literature using appropriate scientific terminology and transmit such information in a clear, logical, and concise manner. Moreover, source materials must be included and properly cited. Relevant sources may include textbooks, scientific publications, and peer-reviewed articles. Miscellaneous internet sources such as Webpages will not be accepted.

A paper that is plagiarized 33% or higher will receive a grade of zero and the student may be reported to the appropriate academic unit.
This assignment prepares the student:
To demonstrate analytical thinking and scientific literacy by including a description of a normal physiological system, including detail at least as what is described in the textbook.
5 (Very appropriate) – description of system is detailed at the molecular, cellular, organ and system levels.
4 (Appropriate) – description of system is detailed at 3 of the four levels listed above.
3 (Satisfactory/Adequate) – description of system is detailed at 2 of the four levels listed above.
2 (Somewhat appropriate) – description of system is detailed at 1 of the four levels listed above.
1 (Not appropriate) – there is no description or the description is of a system unrelated to the pathology described.
To demonstrate analytical thinking and scientific literacy by including a description of a specific aspect of a pathology related to physiology in the detail at least as what is described in the textbook.
5 (Very appropriate) – pathological condition is described at the molecular, cellular, organ, and system levels.
4 (Appropriate) – pathological condition is described at 3 of the four levels described above.
3 (Satisfactory/Adequate) – pathological condition is described at 2 of the four levels described above.
2 (Somewhat appropriate) – pathological condition is described at 1 of the four levels described above.
1 (Not appropriate) – no description of pathological condition.
To demonstrate analytical thinking and understanding by including a description of the relationship between the normal physiology and the disease by relating the mechanisms of pathology to normal physiology. Is there a connection between the normal physiology described and the pathological condition?
5 (Very appropriate) – appropriate systems are described, there is a correlation in the description of the normal and pathological condition at every level described.
3 (Satisfactory/Adequate) – Either the appropriate system is described or there is a correlation between the normal condition and pathological condition at some level.
1 (Not appropriate) – Neither the appropriate system is described, nor is there a correlation between normal and pathological condition made.
To demonstrate scientific observation, scientific methods and scientific literacy by including a diagnostic tool or criteria is included with a short description in sufficient detail at least as what is described in the textbook, with a normal range and correct units. Is the diagnostic tool appropriate for the condition? Is it described in sufficient detail?
5 (Very appropriate) – list one tool/criteria, description of appropriate clinically accepted tool or criteria to diagnose pathological condition in the US, normal and abnormal clinical ranges, all abbreviations are spelled-out.
4 (Appropriate) – includes 3 of the items listed above.
3 (Satisfactory/Adequate) – includes 2 of the items listed above.
2 (Somewhat appropriate) – includes 1 of the items listed above.
1 (Not appropriate) – does not include a diagnostic tool or criteria.
To demonstrate scientific literacy, the length should be 1 page, single spaced, well-written (grammar), spelled-checked, include in-text references and a bibliography.
5 (Very appropriate) – format as sample, includes reference(s) in-text, reference list, correct spelling and proper use of terminology.
4 (Appropriate) – includes 2 of the items listed above and a reference list.
3 (Satisfactory/Adequate) – includes 1 of the items listed above and a reference list.
2 (Somewhat appropriate) – includes at least a reference list.
1 (Not appropriate) – does not include references regardless of how many other items are correct.
Score (out of 25): ______________
X4
Grade (out of 100): ____________
List of Pathologies Acceptable for Course Embedded Assignment
Instructions: Each student must choose one condition. Pathologies listed below are examples of acceptable conditions for this assignment and are covered to some degree in the assigned lecture text. Other conditions have to be approved by professor prior to submission. All conditions must be described from a physiological (functional) point of view. For example, fracture of a bone is an anatomical condition but repair from a fractured bone is a physiological approach to this condition.