Best Writer

Final Paper Description
Your final paper will be related to the female STEM pioneer chosen in Assignment 4 and on whom you will present. Using your outline from Assignment 4 and any feedback received, you will develop a 5-page paper related to the scientist’s life, their accomplishments, and an analysis of the hardships endured by the scientist. The paper should showcase topics we discussed in the course, how the scientist dealt with those issues, and whether or not those issues were a positive or negative influence on the scientist’s career.
Your assignment should include:
1. 5 pages
2. Double spaced (so I can make comments in between)
3. Arial or Times New Roman font, 12 point
4. At least 3 references, although more would be better
Topics below;
whether those topics were a positive or negative influence on their career 6. (5 points) Conclusionary remarks
to be included and graded; at least 1 paragraph needs to be devoted to each of the criteria
however, you may need more than 1 paragraph for some of the following items.
1. (15 points) Introductory Paragraph(s): at least one needs to be included
2. (15 points) Scientist’s Life/Upbringing
3. (25 points) Scientist’s Hardships and Journey to their final or current position
4. (15 points) Scientist’s Accomplishments
5. (25 points) Analysis of the Scientist’s Life, showcasing topics we discussed in class and

What is meant by the cycle of disorder as it relates to the country’s drug abuse problem? Explain.

How and why do criminal organizations “launder” money? Explain your response.

Thesis: Economic Inequalties
Submit 2-3 full annotations. Review Prompt.
Use Sample Format to create each annotation.
Each annotation should be 300 words: 3 parts; 100 words per part minimum.
Ask myself and your classmates clear and specific questions:
How can I help you continue your research?
Is there something you are stuck with?
How are your identifications of logical fallacies?
Are you able to identify 1 specific logic fallacy + 1 weak usage of rhetorical device per source?
Once you identify 1 specific logic fallacy per source, can you attempt to fix, untangle, resolve the error or reasoning; error of logic?
Context
The goal of this assignment is for you to gain a 360 view on your topic.
Essay 1 and 2 supports your thesis; whereas, Essay 3 focuses on differing point of views that disagree with your claim.
Each new source must counter, oppose, and reject your thesis for your final project’s individual topic.
Use “Sample Extended Annotated Bibliography Essay 3″ Repeat pattern 5 times for 5 new sources (counterarguments).
Do not re-use research sources from Essay 1 or 2.
You may use Pico Iyer or Alain de Botton as your counterargument.
ESSAY 3 OUTLINE (rubric, grading criteria, skills required)
The bibliographic information: Generally, though, the bibliographic information of the source (the title, author, publisher, date, etc.) is written in MLA format.
For each of your Annotated Bibliography write a minimum of 300 words.
Breakdown of each annotation: Use this exact format for each new source:
Summary of Counterargument (100 words);
Assess the Counterargument: provide a Refutation (100 words);
Reflect: provide a solution with a Concession if needed (100 words).
In other words, write 300 words (per source)
Definitions of each part of annotation:
Summary of Counterargument: Define and present the source’s objective thesis. Provide a neutral reporting of the source’s argument against yours own. What rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos, intertextuality) does the source use effectively to gain followers? A counterargument differs from a refutation. When a writer presents a counterargument, it acknowledges the opposing perspective’s viewpoints or evidence for taking a given position. Do not point out the counterargument’s weaknesses, blindspots, and shortcomings. A summary of counterargument must use unbiased language.
In other words,”Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is” (Purdue Online Writing Lab).
Assess = Refutation: A refutation, on the other hand, disproves the opposing arguments. In other words, a refutation points out the author’s weak (ineffective) use of rhetorical appeals (telos; ethos; pathos; logos; kairos; intertextuality) and logical fallacies that an opposing argument commits, or highlights what an opposing arguments fails to address. Prove why the source is wrong: identify the source’s specific logical fallacies. How can you fix the source’s blindspots and/or oversights? What are the consequences for the demographic(s) that the counterargument fails to serve, address, and/or consider? In other words, build a refutation of its argument, exposing its incorrect assumptions, errors in logic or fact, or reasons that its argument may be biased, carefully supporting your own position with research sources with which you agree. This refutation should be relevant to the argument you are constructing so that you can use it in your final essay, but could focus on whether or not this issue is actually a problem, what the causes of the problem are, or on a different solution to the problem. Your refutation should be directed against a counterargument source.
In other words,”After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?” (Purdue Online Writing Lab).
Reflect = Concession: Reach a (hypothetical and/or metaphorical) compromise with this counterargument. Remember, a concession is a conceding argument, yielding, or compromising in some way; albeit, grudgingly or unwillingly.
In other words,”Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?” (Purdue Online Writing Lab).

How the Cold War changed U.S. foreign policy. Discuss

Why is it important for organized crime businesses to become involved in legitimate business? Explain your response.

**The topic I chose for my bibliography is post-traumatic stress disorder or PSTD amongst veteran women. I chose this topic because I never hear or heard much about women having PTSD after discharging from the military and what challenges they possibly endure. I have only seen and heard from a male’s point of view; women should be acknowledged as well, just as often.**

There should be eight articles or chapters in bibliography. Each annotation of an article of an article or chapter consists of four parts: 1) The reference to the article or chapter using APA style; 2) A summary of the article or chapter; 3) An evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses, including method and presentation, of the article or chapter; and 4) A brief description of how the article or chapter fits with the other articles and chapters you have included in your bibliography. A good example of annotation is the one labeled Sample APA Annotation (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/ annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html). Do not use websites (although there are some exceptions), newspaper or magazine articles, or televised news accounts.

Identify one quality improvement strategy to improve health. How could you apply it to your current nursing practice? How does the assimilation of quality improvement strategies enhance leadership?

Fonts:
Font size for paragraphs of written content is 10 – 12 point in a standard, business type font.
Font size for headlines for charts, graphs and digital media should not exceed 14 point business type font.

Margin information:
Margins of documents are 1.00 – 1.25 inches on left/right and 1.00 – 1.5 inches on top/bottom of written content in either document format.
Margins of digital media projects are determined by the software used and design parameters.

Writing style:
Your writing must be professional, business style and concise to appeal to a boss, CEO, board of directors, investor, client, etc. It should convey all important information indicated by the template without the appearance of being flowery or overdone.

Materials used:
The plan should draw upon the material from each of your DMMS courses and include elements from each course including concepts and in some cases assignment content.
[DMMS cources are “Mastery” summaries of classes] found –
https://express.adobe.com/page/n6VE1LTqapo9k/

Additional sections:
You may add sections you feel are relevant as needed.

Topics covered:
You MAY NOT delete any section of the Template Outline Word Doc that you choose.
You MUST provide a summary statement of why any specific section outlined in the template is not being utilized along with a description of what you would implement should the boss, CEO, client etc. insist on including this strategy.

Graph and images in content:
You are encouraged to create and include cohesive charts, graphic content, images or digital media, to support content outlined in the Template Outline Word Doc.

Do not make commentary that is not supportable by evidence from credible sources. Points will be deducted for conclusions drawn without credible outside support.

References are to be in APA format at the end of the document or digital presentation.

(As for Course referances the book “Mastery” (by robert greene) is used, and can be given acess to if needed. Cource specific information can be given for references through sharing of cources, or short explanations through Adobe Spark link.)

Select a state or federal law or regulation related to patient safety that has been implemented within the last five years requiring hospitals or any other health care organizations to change the way they manage the delivery of care. Discuss the changes that have occurred because of this law or regulation.

Additionally, discuss the technology associated with either your selected law/regulation or a similar one. Are there ethical dilemmas that have resulted from technology changes when delivering care to patients or patient safety? Explain the dilemmas and how they might be resolved.