Best Writer

5-7 pages

Research proposal
Research proposal
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality
The research topic and research questions of the proposal should be the student’s original perspective. The arguments about the perspective are effectively supported by other research work. The work builds on and speaks to existing work in the area, showing enough evidence that it is a novel contribution.
16 pts
Excellent
This submission establishes an entirely new paradigm or theoretical framework.
14 pts
Good
This submission introduces some interesting new ideas.
12 pts
Ok
This submission is a timely contribution but doesn’t break new ground.
10 pts
Meh
This submission takes a well-worn approach to a well-understood problem.
8 pts
What?
This submission is a reprise of previously reported work.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance
The student should effectively explain why the problem or question that the paper addresses is important and why the research is needed. It’s a justification of the importance of your work and the impact it has on your research field, its contribution to new knowledge, and how others will benefit from it.
16 pts
Excellent
The submission will significantly influence the field by altering other people’s choices of research topics or basic approaches.
14 pts
Good
Some of the ideas or results will substantially contribute to ongoing research in an area.
12 pts
Ok
The submission is interesting but not too influential. The work will be cited, but mainly for comparison or as a source of minor contributions.
10 pts
Meh
Marginally interesting. It may or may not be cited.
8 pts
What?
It will have no impact on the field.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality
The submission should show soundness in terms of quality. Is the research represented in this submission convincing? Are the research questions well-defined? Is the approach, method, or theory appropriate for the authors’ aims, or stated research questions?
16 pts
Excellent
High-quality research proposal. Questions are clearly stated, the approach is suitable, and the evaluation plan is valid.
14 pts
Good
Solid work with a few shortcomings or flaws. All of the elements are in place for good research, but I have a few suggestions about how to strengthen the approach, analysis, or evaluation plan.
12 pts
Ok
Fair work. The authors need to make some important changes to make this work fully convincing (e.g., the research design is somewhat flawed or inappropriate or the conclusions are not completely supported).
10 pts
Meh
Below-standard work. The research questions are not articulated, not addressed, or the authors’ claims are unsupported.
8 pts
What?
The approach is fundamentally flawed.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature review
The student should effectively place prior work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied. By revealing any gaps that exist in the literature, the student points the way to fulfilling a need for additional research and locate their research within the context of existing literature.
16 pts
Excellent
The literature review in the submission covers all aspects of prior research and supports the research question of the student seamlessly.
14 pts
Good
The literature review in the submission has the primary perspective intact, but there are a few under-developed arguments.
12 pts
Ok
The literature review in the submission needs some improvements. The authors should make significant changes in the literature review to fully support their arguments in their rationale and justification of the research question.
10 pts
Meh
The literature review is there but mainly listing and summarizing the related research rather than putting them in the context of the primary research question.
8 pts
What?
The literature review is not relevant or there is no literature review.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValidity
The student should design the research to argue that the expected outcome of the study and the research contribution can reasonably result from the artifacts implemented in the research, not from the external factors. The study should be reliable and free from bias; the threats to validity should have been addressed.
16 pts
Excellent
The submission provides a full aspect of validity addressed in the research design.
14 pts
Good
The submission has a few shortcomings or flaws. The research design makes sense, but I may be able to provide a few suggestions about how to address the issues of validity.
12 pts
Ok
The submission has a major flaw in the research design that needs to improve in terms of the issues of validity.
10 pts
Meh
The validity of the research design in the submission is seriously challenged. The research design does not make sense and would not produce the proposed outcome.
8 pts
What?
There is no research design to review.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance
How closely related is the topic of the submission to research topics and themes of Information Technology? Is this a project that will stimulate interesting/meaningful conversation in the IT community?
10 pts
Excellent
The topic is bang on target of the IT research, and the submission will generate a lot of excitement.
9 pts
Good
The topic is very relevant to the IT research, and the submission will create quite a bit of buzz.
8 pts
Ok
People from a wide variety of areas will be interested to hear about this submission.
7 pts
Meh
This submission may be of interest to a handful of specialists.
5 pts
What?
The topic is not relevant to the IT research, and it is unlikely any people in IT will be interested in this submission.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation, grammar, and clarity
The student should submit a paper that users can read easily and understand the meaning with no difficulty. Is this submission well-written and well-structured? Does the English need editing? Would the explanation benefit from more examples or illustrations? Are the results appropriately interpreted, explained, and put into context? Is there sufficient detail for an expert to validate the work?
10 pts
Excellent
Very well written, a pleasure to read, easy to follow, few grammatical or typographical errors.
9 pts
Good
The essential content will be understood by most readers, but the writing or figures could be improved.
8 pts
Ok
The major points are clear, but the details are either obscured by poor writing or are missing.
7 pts
Meh
Important questions were hard to resolve even with effort; the submission may need substantial grammatical editing.
5 pts
What?
The submission is so poorly written that it is difficult to accurately judge the work.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

Choose one play.
Write an analysis essay of at least two pages. What are the three most important details about the play? Create a three-part thesis statement –at the end of the first paragraph– and support it with details and quotes from the play you choose.
For example, if I were to write about Walter Mosley, (and you will not write about Mosley for this assignment), I could argue this:
A few major elements of Walter Mosley’s mysteries include violent imagery, relatable narratives, and fascinating characterization.
You may also use three literary techniques or figures of speech.

Proofread carefully for correct spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure. Italicize or underline the title of a play. Refer to writers with their entire names first; after that, use only the last name.

write an 3 poems on whatever topic you like
every poem is not less than 15 lines
use stanzas , line breaks , long or short lines in the poems

QUESTION TO BE ANSWERED.
What is being disputed over Taiwan? What are the major positions held by China, Taiwan, and the US?

READ BELOW CAREFULLY> ALL answers must come from READING AND TEXTBOOK. The pages are listed below. Make sure spelling is correct an there are no run-on sentences. Make sure to nouse the words, if, they, this, or that. Use transition words. Use professional words to write this page, and have ALL parts of the QUESTION ANSWERED correctly. expand on concrete details for quotes if used from the reading. make sure there is a topic sentence and a good conclusion. should be one page

Readings:

CFR, “Why China-Taiwan relations are so tense?” May 2021.

Mastro, Oriana Skylar, “The Taiwan Temptation: Why Beijing Might Resort to Force.” Foreign Affairs, Jul/Aug2021, 100: 4. PDF on the bb.

Responses to Mastro’s article: “Strait of Emergency? Debating Beijing’s threats to Taiwan.” Foreign Affairs, Aug. 8, 2021. PDF on the bb.

statement describing a challenging time in your life and how you overcame it. Including details on how overcoming such adversity has impacted your life today.

NO SOURCES NEEDED

Pick one of the following Persuasive
essay topics:
Social media has an effect
on suicide amongst teenagers and young adults
Excessive
use of social media by teens leads to depression
The
Covid-19 pandemic affected school-aged children’s mental health
The purpose of the Persuasive Essay assignment is to
choose a topic that has some debatable issue. You will then take a position on
that issue and write a 2 full-page Persuasive Essay trying to influence
you to accept or agree with your position on this issue.

Here are the details:

1.
Choose a topic. Your topic will be on
some issue of debate where you are able to take a side on that issue.

2.
There is no required outline or pattern
that you have to use for organizing this essay. However, you will want to plan
your organization so your ideas connect and make sense to the reader.

3.
Since this essay is more persuasive
instead of argumentative, you do not have to do any formal research, but you
should have explanations and support for any positions you offer.

4.
The essay will be at least two
full pages long but no more than four pages (unless you have your
instructor’s permission to go over 4 pages). You will use the MLA
formatting guidelines that you used in the previous essays.

Please use the attached articles and link to answer Q1&Q2 and
as your References

Question-1(minimum of 4 paragraph answer on the first page)
Is there bias in drug development and clinical
research of new drugs? Comment on some factors that can minimize bias in drug
testing. Who should be responsible for regulating drug testing?

Question-2 (minimum of
4 paragraph answer on the second page)
How is the “off-label” use of
medications beneficial to patients and what are the risks of this practice?
What are some of the ethical considerations and regulations related to the
off-label use of drugs? How did the COVID-19 outbreak transform the use of
“off-label” drugs? Start with the links below.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7207985/
https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/label-prescribing-era-covid-19

Self Care Project
Do a comprehensive lit review on the need for self care for caregivers. Develop some interventions that are easy ie breath work, art, music, etc.
Create a class, infographic, or poster demonstrating options for self-care. Be creative.
Turn in: a copy of what you presented, feedback from the recipients in short paragraph. (pretend it was presented to the elderly residents, and what was the feedback)
Reminiscence Session
Do a comprehensive literature review on the significance of reminiscence for the elderly population. Develop a reminiscence session for an individual or a group.
Write up in one paragraph how it went.
Include all references (APA Not needed)
Medication Evaluation (2 hours outside of clinical per patient)
Poly pharmacy is a problem in the senior population. Select patient with multiple medications with high blood pressure, low iron, and diabetes.
Evaluate these medications using Beers Criteria
Make recommendations as appropriate.
Write up what you found and what you learned in your weekly report.

Each community has its own characteristics. These characteristics, along with demographic data, provide valuable information in understanding the population that lives within the community and the health status, strengths and limitations, risks, and vulnerabilities unique to the “population of interest.” Once you have defined a “community of interest” to assess, a windshield survey is the equivalent of a community head-to-toe assessment. The best way to conduct a windshield survey is to have a designated driver and at least one other passenger to scan the outline and take notes. Having one pair of eyes on the road, you can benefit from having several other individuals noticing the unique characteristics of the community and a shared experience provides additional insight. As you analyze your findings, it may be necessary to make a second tour to fill in any blanks. Many of us take these characteristics for granted, but they provide a rich context for understanding communities and populations and have significant impact on the health status of the community in general. You will report your findings in practicum conference and use relevant findings in your Community Problem Analysis paper, so collect your findings and analysis in a useful format.
Elements Description
Boundaries What defines the boundary? Roads, water, railroads? Does the area have a name? A nickname?
Housing and zoning What is the age of the houses? What kind of materials in the construction? Describe the housing, including space between houses, general appearance and condition, and presence of central heating, air conditioning, and modern plumbing.
Open space Describe the amount, condition, use of open space. Is the space used? Safe? Attractive?
Commons Where do people in the neighborhood congregate? Who congregates there and at what hours during the day?
Transportation How do people get from one place to another? Is public transportation available? If so, what kind and how effective? How timely? Personal autos? Bikes, etc.?
Social service centers Do you see evidence of recreation centers, parks, social services, offices of doctors and dentists, pharmacies?
Stores Where do residents shop? How do they get to the shops? Do they have groceries or sources of fresh produce? Is this a “food desert”?
Street people and animals Who do you see on the streets during the day? Besides the people, do you see animals? Are they loose or contained?
Condition of the area Is the area well kept or is there evidence of trash or abandoned cars or houses? What kind of information is provided on the signs in the area?
Race and ethnicity What is the race of the people you see? What do you see about indices of ethnicity? Places of worship, food stores, restaurants? Are signs in English or other languages? (If the latter, which ones?)
Religion What indications do you see about the types of religion residents practice?
Health indicators Do you see evidence of clinics, hospitals, mental illness, substance abuse?
Politics What indicators do you see about politics? Posters, headquarters?
Media Do you see indicators of what people read? If they watch television? Listen to the radio?
Business and industry What type of business climate exists? Manufacturers? Light or heavy industry? Large employers? Small business owners? Retail? Hospitality industry? Military installation? Do people have to seek employment elsewhere?

Methadone has a more than 30-year history of use in the treatment of opioid addiction. By blocking cravings and withdrawal symptoms without making people high, it reduces illicit drug use. Many individuals on methadone maintenance are able to live successful and productive lives. However, some oppose methadone treatment, arguing that it just substitutes one drug for another. What do you think? Is methadone administration a good thing? Why or why not?
In response to your peers, engage openly and respectfully comment on their perspective.