Best Writer

R‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ead the case carefully and consider the list of main considerations those working in the preventative health space could think about when developing programs, policies, or interventions to change behaviors listed on page five.‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ Please address the following questions on the provided rubric. There is a link on the rubric to the case study. This journal assignment should be 2 to 4 paragraphs in length. No title page, page numbers, or headers are needed‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ssignment: Change and Growth – Write a 2000–2500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Support your ideas with at least three (3) scholarly citations in your essay. • Using concepts and ideas that you have learned in this course describe how you will approach future change. • Discuss growth you perceive has happened in your professional practice. • Describe any differences in how you will approach change in the future. • Finally, describe how you intend to measure future success in change for both yourself and others. Assignment Expectations- I’VE INCLUDED AN ATTACHED DOCUMENT WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Length: 2000-2500 words; answers must thoroughly address each of the points in a clear, concise manner. Structure: Include a title page and reference page (if needed) in APA style. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least five (5) scholarly sources to support your claims. MUST BE FIVE YEARS OLD OR LESS Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document and a Word document (.pptx) and (.doc or .docx) or Open Office Impress. IMPORTANT: Must be less than 15% on Turnitin (Plagiarism site) READING/BOOKS • Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Edition) – 9781433832154 • Health Care Systems Transformation for Nursing and Health Care Leaders – 978-0826196439 GRADING RUBRIC/CRITERIA Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score MY GOAL IS HIGHLIGHTED IN PURPLE BUT NOTHING LOWER THAN 86% Content Weight: 30% 0 points Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. 21 points Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. 24 points Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. 30 points In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. Score of Content Weight: 30%,/ 30 Organization Weight: 25% 0 points Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. points Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. 20 points Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. 25 points Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. Score of Organization Weight: 25%,/ 25 Logic/Argument Weight: 15% 0 points Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. points Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. 12 points Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. 15 points Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. Score of Logic/Argument Weight: 15%,/ 15 Support Weight: 20% 0 points Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. 14 points Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. 16 points Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. 20 points Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. Score of Support Weight: 20%,/ 20 Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10% 0 points Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. 7 points Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distrac‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌t the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 8 points Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 10 points Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Score of Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%,/ 10 Writing Style for an APA Paper Description Guidelines and Examples ORGANIZATION and STRUCTURE Read the assignment; highlight the elements that must be in the paper – be sure that each of these elements in addressed in the purpose. IF you are unsure about what you are to do, for example –critique, look up the term to be sure that you are ‘doing’ what is expected. Failure to complete the full assignment will result in loss of grade points. Organization is the internal structure of a piece of writing, the thread of central meaning that ties the piece together from beginning to ending. Begin with perhaps one to two sentences about the general topic. Followed by one to three sentences that describe in detail the purpose of the paper. A piece of solid academic writing: • begins with an introduction regarding the piece’s primary purpose or theme, which prepares the reader for what is to come, (., thesis statement). Students are asked to paraphrase the stated purpose of the assignment including all components in the introduction • ends with a conclusion that summarizes the key points of the piece, draws conclusions, and generally provides closure for the reader. The conclusion is a mirror image of the introduction; there is never new material added to the conclusion. The body of a piece of academic writing can be organized around a variety of structures. Students are not considered experts; therefore, any statements made that have not been previously developed and supported by references is considered unsubstantiated; fails to meet academic writing standards. SO, use references; not many quotes, but be sure that your definitive statements are supported. Examples of organizing structures: • Main Idea/Thesis with Supporting Details/Evidence; internal consistency within the paper—if in the introduction there is (a), (b), & (c), then in the paper each point is to be presented in order in the body of the paper. • Comparison-Contrast; know the difference (APA uses Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; this can be accessed online) • Critique versus Analyze; know the difference (APA uses Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; this can be accessed online) • Deductive Logic • Point-by-Point Analysis • Development of Central Theme • Chronology or History (., of an event, process, era) • Strategies versus Action Plan Solid academic writing uses transitional words and phrases to provide logical connections and sequencing. Graduate students are expected to have a greater word use than undergraduates. Practice using new words that ‘mean’ what you might usually say. However, be careful with use of word strings that have little meaning and diminish clarity; APA calls this ‘wordiness’ Examples of transitional words: • Addition: also, again, as well as, besides • Consequence: accordingly, as a result, consequently, for this reason • Generalizing: as a rule, as usual, generally • Illustration: for example, for instance, for one thing • Emphasis: above all, chiefly, with attention to, especially, particularly • Similarity: comparatively, coupled with, correspondingly • Exception: aside from, barring, besides, except, excluding • Restatement: in essence, in other words, namely • Comparison: in contrast, by the same token, conversely, instead, likewise • Summarizing: after all, all in all, briefly, in any case, in any event, in conclusion, in short, in summary, finally MECHANICS Download: Free version of Grammarly Description Guidelines and Examples Solid academic writing is characterized by the proper use of conventions and mechanics and sentence structure, including: spelling, grammar, paragraphing, capitalization, and punctuation. Examples of Conventions and Mechanics in Academic Writing: • Proper Use of Capitalization, Punctuation, Quotation Marks • Subject/Verb Agreement • Proper Use of Pronouns; if you have a question, check your APA guide; if it’s not there, reword the sentence or use the noun. • Technical Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Units of Measurement • Paragraphs that are indented; consisting of three or more sentences • Use of Title Page, Headers: APA 7th edition is expected • Avoiding the Use of: Contractions, Incomplete and Run-on Sentences WORD CHOICE and USAGE In solid academic writing, the use of language is precise, with correct word usage and appropriate word choice. In good descriptive writing, strong word choice clarifies and expands ideas. In persuasive writing, careful word choice moves the reader to a new vision of possibilities; your writing should have the reader say “wow that was terrible”; the writer doesn’t write ‘that was terrible’. Effective word choice depends less on an exceptional vocabulary and more on the skill to use everyday words well. Use a thesaurus for new words with more specific meaning: For example, “pronounce” for “say”, “embarkation” for “start.” In academic writing, “it” is not acceptable. Make ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌sure the reader knows what the subject of each sentence is; clarity is key to effective APA format and Graduate level writing skill

Students will submit a 4-5-page double-spaced paper (in APA format) that describes how this course has impacted their professional development as a clinician and supervisor. What is your developing conceptualization and approach to supervision? Incorporate the course readings and other peer-reviewed articles regarding your understanding of the models of supervision and conceptualization and approach to supervision. Describe the challenges you anticipate you might experience in the role of a supervisor and how you might address them. Discuss what steps you might take to ensure you receive and integrate feedback as a supervisor. Discuss any specific issues (e.g., ethical/legal; gender differences; generational gap; cultural diversity) that may play a significant role in your supervision experience. Please include references. The course syllabus and an outline have been attached attached to the file option. The outline discusses where in the text book you can find the answers to instruction prompts.

Here are the textbooks please reference them Campbell, J. M. (2005). Essentials of clinical supervision. John Wiley & Sons.
Falender, C.A. & Shafranske, E.P. (2017). Supervision essentials for the practice of competency-
based supervision. American Psychological Association.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌fter viewing Chapter 6 The Corrections Client, answer ONLY 3 out of the 5 questions. EACH answer should be AT LEAST one paragraph in length. CITE REFERENCES 1. Identify the characteristics of the career offender. What makes this offender unique? 2. Discuss the care and management of the elderly offender in prison. Be able to discuss ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌hospice programs in United States prisons. 3. Prisons have become the psychiatric hospitals of the United States. Discuss managing offenders with mental health issues. 4. From Chapter 6, discuss Michael’s story from page 154. What are your impressions of his case and sentence? 5.From Chapter 6 discuss the case of Henry Earl page 144‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

Eco-Feminism Assignment
Define Eco-Feminism using Borderlands by Gloria Anzaldúa and the “Matter” chapter of Woman and Nature by Susan Griffin as your anchor texts. Explore the texts to find core passages that speak to you. In your definition, make sure to incorporate citations from the other texts in the course materials folder for March 23rd (you do not have to read all the way through, but please skim to get the gist). In your definition, consider the following:
How do these authors explore the relationship between feminism, gender, the body, and land/environment–as well as religion, colonization and environmental justice?
How do the texts speak to each other?
Provide examples from observation(s) or personal experience.

Is the United Nations worth it? Discuss the argument that the UN serves only the interests of great powers and does not achieve its mission.

H‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌i Writer Hope you are ok. This order contains 2 activities, please see below and uploaded unit F and H books. I have uploaded unit books for E and G for information only, incase needed. 1. M7: Activity F – Company safety policy – As a safety manager you have been asked to draw up a plan that can be used to assess how effectively a company safety policy has been integrated into the overall risk management structure and how it is being communicated to employees. Identify and summarise the main areas that you would consider and the methods you might use. Answers should be between 500-750 words and appropriately referenced. 2. M7: Activity H – Reporting mistakes and errors – When have you felt comfortable or that it was worthwhile to‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ report a mistake or error made by others (or yourself)? Conversely, when have you felt uncomfortable or that it was not worthwhile and what was the difference? Think of an example (personal or work) when you have felt uncomfortable or where it seemed not worthwhile to let anyone know. How did you justify this to yourself? Now think of a situation where you felt comfortable or thought it worthwhile to let someone know that a mistake or error had been made by someone else (or yourself)? What was the difference? How did you feel when you realised the mistake/error for each situation? What translated this feeling into the action of letting someone know? Answers should be no more than 500 words and appropriately referenced. Thank you‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

R‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌esearch Study Design The aim of this assignments (in conjunction with previous Literature review on Unemployment among middle-aged African American women in the US) is to help you conceptualize how to build a research study. The Research Study Design asks you to develop a study design proposal. This paper should reflect your learning in the course. Make sure to incorporate changes/feedback from the literature review related to the rationale for the study and the research question. Instructions: Write a five-page paper presenting a study design that you believe will help you to obtain relevant evidence to generate new or additional knowledge that will inform the research problem identified in the Literature Review assignment. In your proposal, address the following: 1. Provide a very brief statement on the rationale for the study including the problem, scope of the problem, and research gap your proposal would address. 2. State the research question, in the form of a question. 3. Briefly state your study approach and design a. Identify your general study approach (., qualitative, quantitative) and specific research design. b. Identify the population, sampling framework (if applicable), and sampling strategy. c. Describe the recruitment procedures for your sample. d. Describe your data collection procedures (., interviews, survey), including when you will introduce the IRB consent, who will collect data and how, how data will be stored and secured, and any other relevant information. e. Identify your key measures and concepts (., what will the main quantitative independent and dependent variable measures be? Or, what areas will the focus group or interviews inquire about?). Operationalize your variables if doing a quantitative study. If doing a qualitative study, include your interview guide. f. Identify any known limitations to your study design. g. Describe how your study results would translate to practice and how you would disseminate or report your findings. 4. Provide a few statements on what new knowledge you believe your study will create and add to the literature. State how your findings will help fill the knowledge gap you identified in your literature review. 5. Provide a brief discussion of the ways in which your proposed study reflects the values within the Code of Ethics. Select at least two core values to provide specific examples of areas where your proposed study reflects those values and areas. In this section, you must do more than identify the value—you must clearly explicate the aspects of your study that reflect the value. Describe where yo‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ur study does not fully reflect the values of the profession and why this is the case (., limitations in sampling, measurement, recruitment, or other issues). Specifications: The paper will be double-spaced, in APA format 7th Edition, with citations and references. Use the questions (and sub items) as headings within the paper. Include citations as needed to support your statements and decisions. Include a cover page. Rubrics Criteria/ Expectation 1. Explanation of study’s significance and purpose 2. Clearly and explicitly states a sufficient research question 3. Identify your study approach (., qualitative, quantitative) and specific study design. 4. Identify the population, sampling framework, and sampling strategy. 5. Describe the recruitment procedures. 6. Describe the data collection methods. 7. Data Collection Ethics: including when you will introduce the IRB consent, who will collect data and how, how data will be stored and secured, and any other relevant information. 8. Measurement: Identify your key measures and concepts (., what will the main quantitative independent and dependent variable measures be? Or, what areas will the focus group or interviews inquire about?). Operationalize quantitative variables. Include interview guide for qualitative studies. 9. Identify limitations to your proposed study. 10. Translation to practice and dissemination plan: Provide a few statements on what new knowledge you believe your study will create and add to the literature. State how your findings will help fill the knowledge gap you identified in your literature review. 11. Ethics section: Provide a brief discussion of the ways in which your proposed study reflects the values within the Code of Ethics. Select specific examples of areas where your proposed study reflects those values and areas. In this section, you must do more than identify the value—you must clearly explicate the aspects of your study that reflect the value. Describe where your study does not fully reflect the values of the profession and why this is the case (., limitations in sampling, measurement, recruitment, or other issues). 12. Clarity: Relay the points clearly and concisely. 13. Presentation: Presentation is free of APA and typographic mistakes. Please, includes all appropriate references in the correct format. Note: This Research study design paper is a continuation of the previous order of the Literature Review on ” Unemployment Among middle-aged African American women”. It is very important to strictly follow through the instruction and the r‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ubrics.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ssume the role of an administrator for a new school that is being formed. Write a paper (1,500-1,750 words) in which you discuss the philosophical underpinnings of a strategic plan that will be established for the first five years of the school’s life. Include the the three following components in your paper: 1) A research-supported discussion of the necessary elements of governance and structure. 2) A research-supported method for cultivating relationships with internal and external stakeholders. 3) A research-supported discussion of how to integrate continuous school improvement and sustainable change. How w‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ill you design a plan that is flexible enough to deal with unforeseen changes? (Benchmarks C7.5: Analyze the development of a comprehensive learning plan for K-12 education that supports continuous school improvement and sustainable change.) All sources must be peer-reviewed journal articles and no books or random website. The references and citations and in-text citations must all be APA 7th edition. This requires a minimum of 5 references that are peer reviewed journal articles. Read the attached rubric to make sure you are meeting the requirements and getting the maximum points – which is 5 for each section‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

Company to write paper on is CPP Investments (https://www.cppinvestments.com/)
Board Governance: Prepare a paper exploring trends in developing committees that meet the needs of the contemporary business. Issues to consider include, but are not limited to: executive compensation, increased focus on codes and regulations, independence, equality and diversity, value creation and CSR, risk governance, intellectual property protection, board member accountability, responsibility, and educational development.
This paper should focus on:
1. Introduce CPP Investment company
2. Discuss initiatives that have been successful
2. The current gaps or limitations
3. Recommendations.