Best Writer

Outline, Argument Paper (Rationales for freedom of speech), another article you can reference (Free speech and hostile environment)

Term Paper: The paper is to be a critical examination of an argument presented in one of the required readings. The paper must be typed, double spaced, in 10 or 12 point type with normal margins. The paper should be at least 8 pages and no more than 15 pages long. State the position that you are defending clearly, preferably early in the paper and be sure to consider probable objections to the arguments you give. Each paper should contain Parts I–IV.

Part I. Choose one of the required readings and clearly present (explicate) the author’s position and arguments (if the author gives a number of arguments then pick one or two that you consider to be the most central). Be sure to explain what conclusion(s) they argue for and what evidence or support they give for their conclusion(s). Note: this is the most important part of the paper because it lays the groundwork for the rest of the assignment.

Part II. Give, in your view, the most damaging criticism of the argument or position explicated in Part I. Be sure to develop your criticism in some detail. Where exactly does the author go wrong? What empirical claims (matter of fact claims) do they make that are false, if any? Do not use the shotgun method — don’t briefly mention five or six problems, develop one or two in detail.

Part III. How would the author defend their argument(s) against your critique in Part II? Put yourself in their shoes and try to think how they would argue to save their position. You should push the debate beyond class lectures and readings — i.e. in this part don’t merely explain material that we have already covered.

Part IV. Present and defend your views on the subject that you have chosen to write about. Do you agree with the author? If so, why? If not, why not? Whatever your views be sure that you give reasons or arguments in support of them — remember opinions are only a starting point.

This assignment is intended to be primarily an independent piece of scholarship; some additional readings will probably be necessary, but comprehensive knowledge of the literature is neither expected nor desired. The point is to struggle through the issue you choose in a philosophically sophisticated way, making sense of the issues involved and the arguments that surround them, and defending a position which you find tenable on the basis of those arguments.

Please see syllabus for due date.

Plagiarism: If you consult sources and borrow direct quotes, paraphrased arguments, or ideas you must footnote or endnote your sources with complete bibliographic information.

Assignment Rubric: Term Paper

Part I: Presents, analyzes, and defends an argument given in an assigned reading. This must be done correctly or Parts II-III cannot be completed.

10.0 pts

Full Marks

10.0 pts

Part II: Attacks a premise given and supported as part of an argument discussed in Part I.

2.5 pts

Full Marks

2.5 pts

Part III: Defends the premise(s) and argument given in Part I against the critique offered in Part II. Does the student demonstrate the ability to take the different “roles” of critique and reply.

2.5 pts

Full Marks

2.5 pts

Part IV: The part that separates the high honor grade papers from the B-level papers. The student gives, analyzes, defends, critique, and responds to the critique . . . their own argument related to the topic or issue being discussed? This requires the student to go beyond what was covered in class material and to do some independent thinking and scholarship. Might consider issues of DEI etc.

15.0 pts

Full Marks

15.0 pts

Total

30.0 pts

Guidelines for Grading Written Work:

A The high honor grade goes to papers which,

— demonstrate a clear and insightful attack or presentation of the problem;

— develop a logical, coherent argument and a sequence of related paragraphs

which lead to clear conclusions; provides reasons for claims;

— show a firm grasp of classroom sessions and assigned readings and an ability to

use the right information in the right place in substantial enough amounts;

— adds something to what has been said about the problem in the classroom;

— are correctly written in a technical sense.

Share your general impressions of “The Red Convertible” by answering the question below.
https://www.oneida-boces.org/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=1719&dataid=1933&FileName=The%20Red%20Convertible.pdf

What did you think about the work?

Choose 3 literary devices from the “Literary Devices” website.
http://literary-devices.com/

Include the devices in your comment. Under each device, write the sentences from “The Red Convertible” in which the device occurs. Choose one example from the work for each device. Explain why the sentence(s) is an example of the chosen device. Use the source integration formula to organize your answer for each literary device.
Source Integration Formula

This formula will allow you integrate quotations, paraphrases, and ideas into your work while developing your points.

1. Introduce it

2. Include it

3. Cite it

4. Explain it

1.What did you learn that is new or interesting from the readings? 2. Why does this interest you?

You will create a multimodal composition that proposes a solution to a
problem you have identified and care about. You will use convincing support to
back up your solution with both research and visual features.
All the Instructions and examples are included and uplolded on the file section

The Assignment
Please write a 5–6-page essay that argues for an interesting and meaningful comparison between a key theme of your choosing from the book “I Was Once You” by Maria Hinojosa, and your own life.
A successful essay should:
• Be 5-6 pages long
• It must persuasively explicate that a key theme found in Hinajosa’s book has resonance in your own life by drawing a meaningful comparison between the two. In what way(s) does this text speak to you about the world you live in? Contrast may be used here but only in the service to a larger comparison.
• The essay must assert a central thesis that will be focused on a single main comparison and its significance based on your analysis about the similarities between the book and your own life. This thesis must be demonstrated with a succinct claim found on the first page that is supported and developed by the rest of essay. It also must be revealed through the dominant impression you create.
• It must provide detailed information and a probing analysis about the chosen subject that is learned through thoughtful comparisons and research. This information should be explicated effectively through multiple appropriate explanatory strategies, such as definition, comparison-contrast, classification, illustrative examples, and cause-effect. It should also use quotes, summaries, and paraphrasing.
• It must introduce appropriate sources, justify their use, and integrate them smoothly in the essay. While summary of a resource is always welcome, there must be at least two uses of quoting to demonstrate your ability in using them appropriately. The resources must be cited correctly both in the parenthetical citations and works cited page. Do not fall into the trap of overpacking the essay with too many resources or allowing these resources to take the place of the writer’s own voice.
• It must employ a minimum of four different sources (with at least one being Hinajosa’s book) up to a maximum of six. Do not exceed the limit of six sources. These resources must only come from academic peer-reviewed essays found on JSTOR or Academic Search Complete, books, and/or at most two movies or TV episodes. I highly urge you to consider your readings in other courses. I will not accept interviews, surveys, websites, blogs, magazine articles, or newspaper resources to serve as any of the required sources. Anecdotes and observations can be used in the paper in addition to the required research. Do not list anecdotes and personal observations to your working bibliography nor works cited page.
• It must utilize multiple illustrative examples and offer a sustained vivid voice when conveying the analysis. Examples should be presented with vivid description, detailing, and word choice that evokes multiple senses and utilizes figures of speech to enliven the prose and create a dominant impression related to your thesis. Writers must go beyond simply telling the reader about the subject – they must show the subject and allow the reader to experience it. Be sure to sustain your descriptive voice throughout the entire essay.
• It must have a clear, logical, and narrowly focused topical organization of either chunking or sequencing. Topic sentences are crucial for this essay as signposts that help direct the reader, and effective transitions are critical in stitching the disparate arts together to achieve unity. Choose an organization that is both understandable and interesting.
• A proper MLA works cited page must be included. The works cited page does not count towards the page total.
• Adhere to MLA format style and be sure to proof your work. The essay invites verb tense problems, fragments, and fused sentence errors, so be sure to edit.

As the new nation pushed west, thousands of Native Americans still lived in areas close to “the graves of their fathers.” As President, Andrew Jackson forcibly removed thousands of indigenous peoples to “the Great American Desert.”

What was the government’s motives in relocating these peoples?
Were the motives just?
Your initial response should address the prompts in the discussion topic. It should be substantial (at least 300 words in length) and contain citations for at least two sources you utilized in your response.

https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/historyofus/web03/segment7_p.html

https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3148

Research Paper

In your research paper, you will answer your research
question and provide evidence to support your conclusion. Your goal is to write
a well-supported, clearly organized, thesis-driven argument in a form that will
effectively communicate your thought process to your target audience. You will use APA Style and Format.
Topic
Your topic will be the same issue you have been
researching for your Annotated Bibliography. You might have shifted your focus
slightly based on the research you collated in your AB, and that’s fine.
Setting Up (Structuring) Your Paper
Figuring out what kind of paper you want to write or
what kind of claim you want to make will determine how you will structure your
paper. Structure (organization) is incredibly important in a paper as it guides
readers through your thought process. You need to ensure a logical progression
of thought throughout. Essentially, you
need to think about what information needs to be presented early on, in the
middle, and towards the end, and how you are going to paragraph the information.
You can set up your argument in a variety of ways.
For example, you might set it up as a proposal argument: during your research,
you have discovered that a problem exists. In your research paper, you would
then outline the problem, explain what (if anything) has been done in the past
to solve it, and why those attempts have not been successful, and then propose
a viable solution. This is also called a claim
of proposal.
Another possibility, especially if you do not have a
viable solution, could be to focus your paper on arguing that a certain problem
exists and make a claim of fact.
You would then in your paper shed light on the different aspects of the problem
and explain who is affected and why this is a problem that should be taken
seriously. If you are not writing about a problem but, rather, are explaining
how something has happened or how something has come into existence, you would
also have a claim of fact. In this
case, you would outline the origins of the issue and explain what happened or
how things developed over a certain amount of time. You may also want to define
and explain the different factors that helped shape the issue.
Yet another possibility here is to set up your paper
as a claim of value: you could
evaluate an issue, a problem, or whatever it is you have researched. Claims of
value typically make a judgment and argue that something is good or bad. For
example, if my research topic was reality TV shows, my claim of value might be
that while some reality shows have added value to TV programming, others have
been detrimental to the viewers’ experience. As you can see, a claim of value
does not necessarily have to deal with huge issues—it simply argues that
something is beneficial or detrimental, and then explains in depth why this is
the case.
Or you could develop your research paper as a claim of definition: waiters are
professionals.
In the final draft of your Research Paper, you should:
o Get to at least 5 pages in length. This
does not include the Reference, title, and abstract pages.
o Present a clear claim (thesis) about
your issue that is an answer to your research question
o
Cite at least 5 sources. At
least 3 of these should be scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources. Non-scholarly
sources should be credible. Hang on to your sources; you will need to
turn them in with the second draft.
o A strong research paper will aim to synthesize
multiple sources in body paragraphs when possible instead of automatically
using just one source in each paragraph.
o Present your argument in a structure that
allows your target audience to follow your train of thought and that presents
the issue you are writing about in a logical way. This is not a five-paragraph
essay.
o Address any relevant counterarguments you have come across to
strengthen your position
o Edit and proofread your draft so that it is virtually free of
errors in grammar and mechanics and consistently uses a tone appropriate for
your target audience
o Follow APA documentation style.
Cite all sources used in your paper according to accepted conventions of
academic writing.

For this final large assignment, you will complete two parts: a formal, 8-10 page academic argument with about a page of entries on the works cited page. Then you will complete a short reflection that 1) lets me know what was good and what wasn’t so good about this class so that I can make revisions in future classes, and 2) what your intention was in terms of persuasion behind your formal argument.

No later than the fourth day of the academic week, please respond to this thread by writing a thorough and thoughtful 300 word essay that addresses each item in one of the following question sets:
The progress of logic and knowledge of the physical world during the Scientific Revolution was constantly at odds with the oppositional force of religion and mysticism. How were average Europeans, and the scientists themselves, affected by the dilemma created by these forces?
What were the conditions necessary to advance astronomical knowledge from Copernicus to Newton? How did they develop during the seventeenth century?
How do the following quotations illustrate the tension between science and religion in the Renaissance? How did new cosmological discoveries contribute to the establishment of the Church?
“The Bible shows the way to go to heaven, not the way the heavens go.” – Galileo Galilei
“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.” – Galileo Galilei
One of our themes this semester is that before several transformations, people looked to the past in order to make sense of their universe; people lived in a world with little change; people were not particularly optimistic. All of this changed, however, over the course of several centuries. In the readings so far this semester, where do you see people beginning to look to other sources than an authority from the past; beginning to experience and expect more and more change in their lives; and beginning to expect the future to be better than the present? This question will appear again in Week 8.
Drawing on the readings, describe a day in the life of one of the following 16th-19th century people. You may use your historical imagination to prepare your post, but make sure you use the readings to provide evidence for the details you include in your account. You may cite from credible outside sources in addition to the required readings. Remember to cite the required readings at least 3 times.
Ruler
Church Authority – Protestant or Catholic – This can include a monk or nun, for anyone in the Church was seen as an authority by many in society.
Intellectual – Scientist, Philosopher, Scholar, Writer, Musician, etc.
Merchant
Peasant / Farmer (The transition occurs in this period for most.)
Your Initial Post is expected to be a 300 word prose essay, with a thesis statement and 2-5 paragraphs supporting and explaining the thesis. Remember to base your response on information and analysis from the readings. Cite the required readings at least 3 times, and cite broadly from a broad range, not the same reading 3 times. Explain what you learned in your own words,and do your best to synthesize the authors’ analyses into your own original analysis; do not rely exclusively on quotations from the readings to make your points. Please change the title of your post to something unique. Note which question you choose to answer.
Your Initial Post should be up by the fourth day of the academic week.
So that our discussion is thoughtful and sustained, each peer response must be at least 75 words in length. Your Peer Responses should be posted by the last day of the academic week.

Assignment – Workforce Plan – The Overview
For this assignment, choose a public sector or nonprofit organization, (It can be your current workplace, or where you want to work upon receiving your MPA.) and develop a workforce plan following the format below. This is a plan you develop, not one already created by the organization. If you are unable to respond to certain criteria, explain why. See attached resources for assistance. APA Style: Webpage on a Website References (Links to an external site.)
Answer the following Workforce Planning questions:
I. Overview
Describe the mission, strategic goals, objectives, and business functions of the agency. Indicates what changes, if any, may take place over the next few years that might affect the agency’s mission, objectives, and strategies.
Basic information to include in the workforce plan:
agency mission
agency strategic goals and objectives
core business functions
anticipated changes to the mission, strategies, and goals over the next five years.
Submission Your final workforce plan should be about 2-3 pages. It does not need to be in essay form. It can be in outline form; it can be bulleted; it can be a mindmap. However, your work should be something you would be proud to submit to your boss as a draft.