Best Writer

Assessment 3 Instructions: Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission
PRINT
At the completion of your intervention, produce a 5-8 minute video discussion of your care coordination intervention for a peer-reviewed media platform.
Introduction
As an advanced practice health care provider, it’s likely that you will be asked to give a presentation at some point in your career. Now that you have completed this project, it’s time to disseminate the outcomes in the form of a recorded professional presentation. A professional presentation style requires the confidence and ability to convey the right image that you want your audience to see. Unfortunately, it’s easy to miss some of the opportunities available to help you present yourself in the best possible light and, as a result, enjoy the success you deserve. Remember to be forthright about what happened during the project and about how data were collected and analyzed, and present the findings so stakeholders and external parties clearly understand the steps in the process. By completing this final activity, you can help others recreate this type of project and enhance outcomes in other patient care settings.
Preparation
In Assessment 3, you will build on the work you completed in Assessments 1 and 2.
Read the following:
American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing. (2016). Scope and standards of practice for registered nurses in care coordination and transition management.
Standard 15: Resource Utilization.
Standard 16: Environment.
Assessment Summary
This assessment requires you to prepare a 5–8 minute video discussion of your care coordination intervention. Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations. If you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty member as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.
You have completed the intervention and achieved enhanced outcomes. Now you need to disseminate your findings and provide recommendations to sustain the results of your intervention. You have been asked by nursing leadership to produce a scholarly video for a peer-reviewed media platform. The video will include 5–8 minutes of scholarly discussion covering the topics listed below.
Grading Criteria
The numbered instructions outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. You may also want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Analyze care coordination efforts related to clinical priorities based on a PICOT question.
Provide the PICOT question and a brief introduction of the issues.
Describe the change in practice related to services and resources that will be available for the interprofessional care coordination team.
Describe the key care coordination efforts.
Explain efforts to build stakeholder engagement within the interprofessional team.
How did you lead the change in practice?
Summarize how you encouraged and built stakeholder engagement.
Recommend next steps that that support thoughtful resource utilization and a safe environment in care coordination.
Propose how you will sustain the current outcomes with the coordinated care interprofessional team.
Make recommendations on moving forward that support thoughtful resource utilization and a safe environment.
Produce a video that provides insight, understanding, and reflective thought about care coordination.
Communicate audibly and professionally, using proper grammar and including a reference list formatted in current APA style.
Important Note: You do not need to submit the transcript of your video, but do address each scoring guide criterion in the video, including a discussion of authors in the literature who support the ideas presented. Please submit a separate APA-formatted reference list for the resources discussed in your reflection.

As a consequence of the pandemic and increasing sophistication of online purchasing platforms, how can brick and mortar stores continue to compete to stay afloat?

Find an example of a brand that has effectively utilized influencer Livestream marketing. Why has it been a success, and which other brands could benefit from following suit? Finally, which industry might find the most success engaging in this form of advertising?

In Livestream marketing events, viewers can actively see how many products are being purchased in real-time. How do you believe that impacts buying motivation? How does it motivate interactive behavior on the Livestream itself?

In this concluding exercise for our course, your assignment is to compose an essay that’s around 1,000 words long addressing the following. (For a briefer model of the kind of essay you’re being asked to write here, review the section “Analyzing an Argument” in our Module 9 Overview.)
Read again the two essays from Module 5 on the US.’s dropping of atomic bombs on Japan – one by Historian A and one by Historian B. Choose one of those two arguments — either the one advanced by Historian A or the one advanced by Historian B — and compose an essay in which you discuss the argument, scrutinizing, analyzing and critiquing both its content and its form.
Note: You’re not being asked to make an argument of your own here. Your assignment is to analyze the argument put forth by one of these two authors.
Recall that each essay has numbered paragraphs. (Also, bear in mind that the paragraph numbers, which appear at the beginning of each paragraph, are distinct from the superscript numbers that appear within paragraphs. Those superscript numbers refer to Endnotes, a list of which follows the text of each Historian’s essay.)
After a brief introduction explaining what you’re writing about, go numbered paragraph by numbered paragraph and ask yourself, regarding each paragraph, what its primary purpose is, which is to say, what does the paragraph contribute to the overall argument? Try to put yourself in the position of the writer — the Historian whose argument you’re analyzing – when you do this. Consider the paragraph’s function in the larger context of the particular Historian’s purpose, which is to persuade her/his audience that the US was or was not justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan.
Consider purpose
About each paragraph, ask the following questions about purpose and make note of your answers. (What you judge to be the most significant of these notes will inform the essay you compose):
–Is this paragraph’s primary purpose to assert a claim and/or to refute another claim?
— Is this paragraph’s primary purpose to provide background information?
— Is this paragraph’s primary purpose to provide support for the claim (or the refutation of another claim)?
Consider the form of support provided
–If the paragraph’s primary purpose is to provide support for the claim (or the refutation of another claim), then what is the nature of that support? That is, does the support take the form of any of the following?
An appeal to ethics (If so, try to name the kind of ethics the Historian has in mind.)
Deductive reasoning (If so, then explain or diagram the deduction in question.)
Inductive reasoning (If so, then explain the probabilistic thinking involved.)
Analogy (If so, then explain what two things are proposed as being alike.)
A logical fallacy or propaganda device? (If so, then give the name of the fallacy and briefly explain how it manifests in the Historian’s text.)
A rhetorical appeal such as ethos (the writer’s credibility), logos (logic and reasoning), or pathos (emotion)?
[Note: It’s possible a given paragraph does none of the above.]
Consider the quality of support
–Now, once you’ve identified the kind of support (if any) a given paragraph provides, then evaluate the quality of that support. Consider questions like:
If deduction is involved, is the deduction valid? Is the argument sound?
If probabilistic thinking is involved, do the probabilities, statistics or samples meet
the criteria for such reasoning?
If an analogy is involved, is it a good analogy, or a poor or even false analogy?
If a fallacy or propaganda device is involved, how does that impact the claim?
If a rhetorical appeal is involved, is it persuasive? And if so, how or why?
If one or more ethical issues is involved, does it impact the claim strongly or
weakly?
–Additionally, check all the endnotes against the parts of the argument they’re linked to in order to confirm whether or not they effectively and/or reasonably flesh out what’s said in the body of the argument.
Write up what you think is most significant regarding the matters described above in essay form. This portion of your essay should be around 3.5 – 4 pages in length (which is about 825-1,000 words).
Then consider our recent study of Erikson’s essay, “Of Accidental Judgments and Casual Slaughters.” Does anything in Erikson agree or disagree with what your Historian of choice argues? Or does Erikson offer a different perspective from either Historian A or B? And if, so what is that third perspective? Write up this additional piece in about 100 words.
Finally, close with an overall evaluation of your Historian’s argument. What is the argument’s strongest point? What is the argument’s weakest point? Do the argument’s strengths outweigh its weaknesses or vice versa? This final section should be around 75-100 words in length.
All that makes for an essay that’s about 1,000 to 1,200 words long, or about 4-5 typed double-spaced pages in length.
And indeed, this paper should be typed, double-spaced. You should refrain from using outside sources for this paper. However, you should feel free to draw on any sources we have read for class. If you feel a pressing need to use an outside source, then you must first check it with your instructor.
Wherever you quote, paraphrase or summarize a source, you must cite the source, using MLA style. MLA citation style is outlined here: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html

In a novel by William Styron, a father tells his son that life “is a search for justice.” Consider how this statement applies to your novel or play. Choose a character from The Andromeda Strain by Michael Crichton who responds in some significant way to justice or injustice. Then write a well-developed essay in which you analyze the character’s understanding of justice, the degree to which the character’s search for justice is successful, and the significance of this search for the work as a whole. Incorporate a minimum of three (3) direct quotes from different parts of the work to highlight your knowledge of the entire text; cite all quotes using page numbers.

In this unit, you will complete your Puerto Rico research paper. You will add a minimum of two additional pages to the first half of the paper that was submitted in Unit V. The final research paper draft you complete in this unit should contain the following:
Step 1: Make any needed revisions to the Unit V submission and use this as the first half of your Unit VII paper.
Step 2: Add at least two additional pages of content about solutions to address the problems you presented in the first two pages of the paper in Unit V. You must include at least two different solutions. Make sure to include both source material and your own analysis regarding the solutions. Additionally, discuss the following topics in your paper:
Analyze sustainability as an approach to addressing social problems in Puerto Rico. Do you think this would help alleviate social problems?
Discuss if you support or do not support statehood for Puerto Rico. Discuss how that would or would not be a positive step in helping to fix the urban problem(s) you presented.
In this final draft, include the sources from your first draft and at least one additional source from the CSU Online Library. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying APA citations.
The CSU Online Library contains a good resource database for this assignment. It is called the World Scholar: Latin America & the Caribbean database.
Another good resource is the CIA-World Factbook. It can be found at https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/

You will use what you have learned from Chapter 8, 9, 13, and 14 in Big Java: Late Objects to complete the following program. Use what you have learned about Searching & Sorting, the Comparable Interface, Superclasses, Subclasses, Inheritance, Objects, Instance variables, Instance methods, Constructors, and Recursion to complete the project.
For examples constructing classes using a binary search, an array sort, and using the Comparable interface, please see:
Videos in iCollege for examples on these topics and how to comment your program correctly.
Code examples in iCollege (in the Java Code examples folder – these can be downloaded to your computer for reference)
**Class Notes in iCollege for Chapter 14 – **PLEASE read my Ch. 14 Comparable Interface notes for several examples!
**Please see the Comparable Interface Supplement.pdf for an example on using the Comparable interface.
Big Java Textbook – Section 14.6.2 (p. 669-670) and Section 14.8 (p. 678-681)
Please do not use any advanced material that is not in Chapter 8, 9, 13, or 14.
We will be completing our Programming Projects using Code Check. Nothing is required by you to use this program. For each project, I will provide a URL that will take you to the project to complete. Once you have completed the coding project(s) (you have unlimited attempts), you will download the Report from the Code Check website and upload this zipped file(s) to this Assignment folder. Inside this zipped file will be your completed code and your *calculated score based on testing. You may use your IDE (jGrasp/Eclipse) to write the code and then copy and paste over to Code Check, if desired.
*The calculated score will be located at the bottom of your submission in the form of (for example) “5/5 = 100%”, “4/5 = 80%”, “3/5 = 60%”, etc. IF YOU DO NOT obtain 100%, I encourage you to reach out for help on the Problem & Solutions Blog with your error messages so others can help. You can also view the “Common Code Check Errors” document located in iCollege. Please make sure you have viewed the “How to Use Code Check” video before starting.

We will be writing two classes, PhoneBookEntry.java and PhoneBookCatalog.java. In the PhoneBookEntry class, we will implement the Comparable interface of type PhoneBookEntry and override its compareTo method to sort our phone book entries.
UML Diagram
PART 1 – Writing the Phone Book Entry class:
PhoneBookEntry.java
This class represents a phone book entry (contact) that has a first name, a last name, and a phone number.
Instructions for Part 1:
Please go to the Code Check URL: Chapter 14 Project
Using your IDE (jGrasp, Eclipse, other), create a new project folder called PhoneBook
Inside this project folder, create a class file named PhoneBookEntry.java
**Note: Because we want to implement the Comparable interface, we will need to implement this in our class definition (see p. 679, Section 14.8.3). We will use the type PhoneBookEntry.
Write the Class comment describing the class and @author and @version tags
Declare and initialize 3 instance variables for the first name, last name, and phone number (see UML diagram).
Remember to declare them “private” instead of “public”. Also, please make sure to use the “this” keyword anytime you use your instance variables after declaring them.
Create a Constructor that takes the two names and phone number as parameters (see UML diagram)
**NEW: Inside the constructor, we need to handle unchecked exceptions. We must check that the parameters first name, last name, or phone number are not null. If they are, we must through an IllegalArgumentException with a message. (See 7.4 p. 352 Syntax 7.1).
Inside the constructor, initialize the instance variables with the parameters of the constructor
Write the 3 mutator (“setter”) methods to “set” the first name, last name, and phone number (see UML diagram). Remember to use “this” with instance variables.
**NEW: Inside each of the “setter” methods, we must handle unchecked exceptions for the parameters. Since we are dealing with Strings, we need to check if they are null and throw and IllegalArgumentException with a message. (See 7.4 p. 352 Syntax 7.1). You must do this for all 3 “setter” methods.
Write 3 accessor (“getter”) methods to “get” the first name, last name, and phone number (see UML diagram). Remember to use “this” with instance variables.
Write the toString() method (override), that takes no parameters and returns the formatted phone book entry as:
Name: Amy Jones
Phone number: 753-854-7895
Note: You can do this in one line using concatenation and n to join the names and phone number
Write the compareTo method (override) of the Comparable interface to determine how the entries should be sorted when calling Collections.sort (later in this project). The phone book entries should be sorted alphabetically by last name – if the last names are the same, then we will need to sort by the first name – if the first and last names are the same, we will need to sort by the phone number. I recommend using an if/else if/else statement to compare these instance variables to the “other” (See Ch. 9, section 9.6.3, p. 474). This uses separate if statements, but you should use the if/else if/else statement since we are comparing three different items.
Make sure you have commented your Class, Constructor, and all methods and inserted the correct @tags, as needed.
PART 2 – Implementing the PhoneBookCatalog class
PhoneBookCatalog.java
Instructions for Part 2:
This class will model a phone book catalog that contains individual PhoneBookEntry objects. You can think of this as an “old-fashioned” phone book or like the Contacts on your mobile device. Once we construct individual PhoneBook Entry objects in Part 1, we will add them to our phone book catalog.
In the same PhoneBook project folder from Part I, create a new class file named PhoneBookCatalog.java
Write the Class comment and @author and @version tags
Declare and initialize 1 instance variable of type ArrayList (see UML diagram)
Write a Constructor that no parameters and initializes the instance variable as a “new” ArrayList of type PhoneBookEntry (see UML diagram)
Write the addEntry method that takes a PhoneBookEntry object as a parameter and adds it to the ArrayList instance variable (see UML diagram).
**NEW: We need to handle the unchecked exception that the entry is not null. If it is, we must throw an IllegalArgumentException with a message. (See 7.4 p. 352 Syntax 7.1).
Write the getEntry method that takes an integer as a parameter and returns the entry located at that index in the ArrayList (see UML diagram).
**NEW: We need to handle the unchecked exception that the index is outside the range of out phone book catalog list. We can do this by checking if the index is < 0 or > the size of the list. If it is, we must throw an IllegalArgumentException with a message.
Write the removeEntry method that takes an integer as a parameter and removes the entry located at that index in the ArrayList (see UML diagram).
**NEW: We need to handle the unchecked exception that the index is outside the range of out phone book catalog list. We can do this by checking if the index is < 0 or > the size of the list. If it is, we must throw an IllegalArgumentException with a message.
Write the sort() method that uses the Collections sort method to sort the catalog. You do not need a return value.
Write the toString() method (override) that uses an enhanced for loop to traverse the ArrayList and create a String that is formatted as:

You will return this string from the method
**Make sure you have commented the class, constructor, and methods and included @param or @return tags as needed
Testing
Once you have written all classes, please download and save PhoneBookTester2.java in your project folder. Run PhoneBookTester2.java and correct any errors in your Object classes. **Make sure you understand the tester file. You should be able to understand the creation of objects and how we are testing their methods.

Qualitative research project on leader-follower communication. Locate three followers who report to different organizational leaders (three different leaders). Using qualitative in-depth interview methods and procedures, determine how followers want their supervisor/manager to communicate with them — style, quantity, type, etc. Write a research paper that presents the research question that answers what followers want from their leaders in regards to communication, the methods and procedures used, the data collected, the analysis of the data, and your general findings. Your interviews MUST be conducted face-to-face or via phone or SKYPE. Your personal research MUST be supported by further academic research. You can easily expect to have 6 or more external academic references. Ypur paper must include tables, charts, graphs or diagrams representing your findings. Your paper must include the interview questions among the items in the Appendices. Your paper should include; cover letter, abstract, introduction, review of literature, methodology, structure, summary, implication, recommendation and conclusion.

Select a sports event to attend. This may be an event of any type – a pickup game, a practice,
a formal event with paid admission at any level, etc. Try to arrive early, before others (or, if
that is impossible, stay late, after the participants and audience have left). Your focus will be
the location and sense of place at this event, rather than the event itself.

Please read them https://abc7news.com/san-francisco-crime-union-square-neiman-marcus-robbery/10947954/

and use a minimum of 350 words and a maximum of 500 to address the following:

1, Explain how this news story is a good example of the routine activities perspective, or how the facts of the story completely contradict this theoretical perspective if you disagree the news story is an example of the theory.
2. Do you have concerns over putting more officers on the streets to decrease crime? If so, what are your concerns?

Write a review of one of the following documentary films: “Ain’t Scared of Your Jails,” “Berkeley in the Sixties,” or “Negroes With Guns: Rob Williams and Black Power.”
Your essay should include:
–A clear summary of the film’s historical subject (What is the film about?)
–The major ideas the film communicates (What is the film’s point of view? What ideas does the film most encourage us to consider?)
–Specific details about the film’s most compelling and persuasive scenes (What details did you find most significant and engaging, and why?)
–Drawing on assigned readings and class lectures, assess the film’s contributions to public knowledge about social change in the “long sixties.” (How does this film help us think about the larger context of U.S. history in this period? Are there important experiences or views that are relevant to the film’s subject that are missing or distorted?
Length: Five pages. Double-spaced (approximately 300 words per page)