Summary:
What is the subject (premise) of the article, and what are the questions and/or
hypotheses being investigated by the author? What conclusions does the author
reach about the cultural beliefs/values being addressed in the article?
Data and Methods: What “data” did the author collect, and what methods did they use to get it?
Were these data and methods sufficient to provide a factual/realistic portrayal
of these people and their culture? Why or why not? You need to support your
answer with specific details from the article.
Cultural Relativism: Did the author take a culturally relativistic approach to their research? Make an
argument either in favor of the author’s unbiased and culturally relativistic
approach or against it, using specific examples to support your conclusion.
Viewpoint / Perspective: What other viewpoints/perspectives (besides that of the author) were presented
in the article? Are there any other viewpoints/perspectives that should have
been addressed and, if so, why? Do not simply provide an opinion.
Relevance: Explain why the article is important to the discipline of Anthropology. What
specific contributions does this article make to the discipline of Anthropology
and/or the study of human cultures? Do not simply restate your summary.
Best Writer
Sources of Authority
What are the sources of authority according to Max Weber.
Explain in detail Max Weber’s types of authority.
Describe the participants. What was their age range? Gender? Race/Ethnicity? Socioeconomic status?
STEP#2: Reading your article
Learn more about how to effectively read an empirical research article here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687192/
Remember, statistical analyses in the Results section are always followed by a description of what the numbers mean in plain English. Don’t skip the results!
STEP#3: Format your assignment
At the top of your paper, include your full first and last name, your group’s name, and your group’s topic (framed as a question) along the top.
Next, please include the full reference for the paper you are analyzing in proper APA format. Not sure what proper APA format for citing a journal article is? Go Here – the Purdue OWL.You can also use this automatic citation generator for free: https://www.citethisforme.com/us/citation-generator/apa. You do not need any additional citations for the assignment.
Your assignment should be written in Time New Roman or Arial 12pt. font, double-spaced. Save your work as a Word or PDF file before submitting to Turnitin in Blackboard. No other formats will be accepted. Your entire assignment #3 should not exceed 3 pages.
STEP#4: Answer the following questions
In order to complete your Summary and Analysis, answer EACH of the following questions. Your answers should be written in complete sentences and can be brief. Some questions may only require 1-2 sentences to answer. Others may need a brief paragraph. Don’t include the questions below in your writing (Turnitin falsely flags them as plagiarism). Be sure to answer all of the following questions:
Summary (10 points total):
1. Describe the purpose of this study. (2 points)
▪ What is this research article about?
▪ What theoretical idea(s) or research questions inspired the study?
▪ What is the authors’ hypothesis?
2. Who participated in this study? (2 points)
▪ How many participants were included in the study?
▪ Where are they from?
▪ Describe the participants. What was their age range? Gender? Race/Ethnicity? Socioeconomic status?
3. What research design was used? (2 points)
▪ What research design (e.g., correlational, experimental, naturalistic, qualitative) was used?
4. What methods were used to investigate the topic? (2 points)
▪ What were the main variables in the study (you don’t need to describe all of them, just the most important ones)?
▪ How were these variables operationalized (measured)?
5. What were the most notable results? (2 points)
▪ Briefly summarize the findings in your own words.
▪ You do not need to describe the statistics used, just the results.
▪ Did the results support or disprove the researchers’ hypothesis?
Analysis (16 points total):
6. Who do these findings tell us about? Who is missing? (4 points)
▪ Consider the population of adolescents these authors are interested in explaining something about. Is it all adolescents? A certain age group? All genders? Ethnicities? Family types? Etc.?
▪ Then consider the characteristics of the actual participants in this study (see your answer to question #2).
▪ Who might be missing from the authors’ sample? How might this limit the conclusions that can be drawn? Or – what might be different about the results if these other adolescents were included as participants?
7. How to the findings from this article relate to adolescent development? (4 points)
▪ Think about what changes in adolescence and what makes adolescence unique as a developmental period.
▪ Draw at least one specific connection between a concept we have learned in class and a finding in this article.
8. How do these findings relate to your group’s topic? (4 points)
▪ How does this article help you to answer your group’s research question? Be specific!
▪ What does it tell you that you didn’t know before? That other people who have or work with adolescents should know?
9. What lingering questions do you have? (4 points)
▪ Think about what you would do if you were reading this article in order to write your own research paper…you would evaluate how it helps answer your question and THEN what else you need to know before finding another article that could fill that knowledge gap.
▪ So what other information do you need in order to answer your group’s question?
▪ What does this article not answer…that can help guide you to find an article for Assignment #4?
FORMAT (2 points): Paper is no more than 3 pages long, follows all formatting guidelines outlined in the syllabus, and accurately cites the article in APA format at the beginning.
MECHANICS (2 Points): Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are RARE and do not detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is good (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid).
Both Welcome to the South and Bread and Chocolate are comedies that address social issues. How are the films different? How do you interpret the endings?
Both Welcome to the South and Bread and Chocolate are comedies that address social issues. How are the films different? How do you interpret the endings?
-Using MLA format.
Please do not summarize the plot.
Argumentative Essay about how successful Shenzhen is
-Consider this: “Is Shenzhen, China’s most successful megacity?”
-Gather your evidence for ways in which Shenzhen is or is not.
-Answer the following question, using specific evidence: Would you consider Shenzhen to be a successful
Megacity? Why or why not?
-Remember that your point of view is correct if you have evidence to back it up.
-Use rubric to help you with what you need to put in your argument.
-Read the articles and links I provided down below and use them:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/shenzhen-tencent-net-city-car-free-future/
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2018/nov/07/urban-mountains-shenzhens-green-rooftop-project-in-pictures
WHAT CHALLENGES HAS MICROSOFT’S RAPID GROWTH PRESENTED AND HOW HAS THE COMPANY RESPONDED TO THOSE CHALLENGES?
QUESTION 1- WHAT CHALLENGES HAS MICROSOFT’S RAPID GROWTH PRESENTED AND HOW HAS THE COMPANY RESPONDED TO THOSE CHALLENGES?
QUESTION 2- HOW HAS MICROSOFT’S STRATEGY AND GOALS CHANGED IN RESPONSE TO TECHNOLOGY CHANGES, ESPECIALLY THE INTERNET?
QUESTION 3- HOW WAS MICROSOFT AN $11 BILLION COMPANY ABLE TO CHANGE ITS STRATEGY SO QUICKLY?
QUESTION 4- EXPLAIN THE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE? WHY WOULD GATES ESTABLISH AN OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT?
QUESTION 5- WHAT ARE THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES FACING MICROSOFT?
HOW IS THE COMPANY RESPONDING TO THOSE ISSUES?
Write a paper on climatology report on Amado Dial lo
Write a paper on climatology report on Amado Dial lo
Write a research Essay on Reagan’s relationship with Soviet leadership on Star Wars,
Write a research Essay on Reagan’s relationship with Soviet leadership on Star Wars,For this option, you will investigate and analyze the topic of President Reagan, Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), and how it won the Cold War. Writing is not easy; it requires thinking, reading, lots of drafts, and time. To help, know that there are multiple steps to writing a strong paper; it is very difficult to write an A+ paper in two hours.
First, you will think about the main topic – President Reagan, SDI, and the end of the Cold War.
Second, you must think about how you will narrow your argument further so that you can write a strong argumentative essay. This could be a particular event, process or person. You may wish to focus on
Reagan’s relationship with Soviet leadership on Star Wars
Third, this argument will transform into your thesis statement, which is the most important sentence of your entire paper.
Hint: If your topic is too broad, the result will be a summary paper.
Note: A thesis statement is not a “road map” of the paper. Please read “Writing a Thesis and Making an Argument”. Rael’s explanation is very good and this should help you a lot, especially if this is your first history class.
Lastly, each paragraph that you write must be logical and purposeful. Organization is key – another Rael webpage.
Create your own Word document (which must be converted to a pdf file before submission), or use the attached template (below), to write a 1500-2000 word argumentative research essay on your chosen theme, event, or person.
You must use the sources provided below or materials provided. If you use “outside the course” sources, you will automatically fail this assignment. If you do not have any citations (footnotes/endnotes) in your paper, you will automatically fail this assignment.
Primary sources:
Ronald Reagan, “Star Wars Address” 1983.
Ronald Reagan, “Evil Empire,” June 8, 1982.
Various sources from this website. Scroll down to “The Second Cold War” and “The end of the Cold War”.
Ronald Reagan’s Star War Address (this is the same as #1)
Secondary sources (in no particular order):
Atomic Heritage Foundation. “Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)”
Boyer, Paul. “Selling Star Wars”. Attached below
Fischer, Beth. “The SDI: Ending the MADness”. Attached below.
Kavka, Gregory. “Space War Ethics”. Attached below.
Podvig, Pavel. “Did Star Wars Help End the Cold War?” Attached below.
Rowland and Jones. “Reagan’s Strategy for the Cold War and the Evil Empire Address” Attached below.
Crash Course, “The Reagan Revolution”
Evaluation Criteria
Your analysis will be evaluated based on the following criteria. The analysis:
is within a 10% range of 1500-2000 words,
is free of any errors in spelling and grammar,
is well organized, concise, precise and flows logically from one point to the next,
is your own work and is written in your own words,
provides properly-formatted Chicago Style citations for any quoted or paraphrased material,
makes direct, specific references to at least three primary sources,
makes direct, specific references to at least three secondary sources,
contains a clear, concise and precise introductory paragraph with an argumentative thesis statement,
makes inferences which are well-supported by clear and precise use of evidence from primary sources,
clearly identifies arguments or interpretations presented in secondary sources,
clear analytical argument on a particular theme, event or person found in the American colonial witch hunts
draws on specific, relevant details from the assigned reading.
* I CANT USE ANY OTHER SOURCES, BESIDES THE ONES PROVIDED, NO OUTSIDE INFORMATION SHOULD BE USED*
Write a proposal to present to the Senior Management staff that addresses how to begin this diversification.
Submit a paper which is about 4-pages in length, exclusive of the reference page, and double-spaced. The paper should cite sources independent of the textbooks using APA format.
You have been hired by a company to help them diversify their workforce — your choose the type of company. Write a proposal to present to the Senior Management staff that addresses how to begin this diversification. Assume the business that has hired you is committed to training and education of people who have the talent, but may need some professional development, coaching, mentoring, etc. The CEO and Vice President for Human Resources have met with you and made it clear that diversity of all types is important, including cultural, gender and sexual orientation; they believe in inclusivity in the broadest of terms.
This company is looking for a proposal that is integrated into all key functions of the organization, including, Recruitment and Selection; Training and Development; Pay and Incentives; Performance Management and Appraisal; and anything else appropriate to the type of organization you choose. You should consider the geographic region where the company is located and the demographics of the people who live nearby. Along with proposal include recommendations for policies and procedures that need to be considered as part of this effort.
The choice of business is yours, your paper should include start with a brief description of the business and where it is located.
Assessment Criteria
Description of business and geographic location is included and provides enough detail to set the stage for the rest of the proposal
Paper includes a description of the overall plan for diversification that makes sense given the business itself and where it is located
Paper includes proposal for recruitment and selection of employees
Paper includes proposal for training and professional development
Paper includes proposal for restructuring pay and incentives
Paper includes proposal for performance management and appraisal
Paper includes recommendations for policies and procedures that need to be added, updated or changed
Writing Organization
Use of Research and References
Write a story about U.S. history through the lens of the primary sources.
Write a story about U.S. history through the lens of the primary sources.