Best Writer

Answer all 3 questions in one document. 1000 word limit.
What excites you most about your intended field of study? (MBA)
What do you see yourself doing professionally upon graduation and how will a degree from Santa Clara help you achieve these aspirations?
Discuss any attributes, experiences, or interests that would enable you to make a distinctive contribution to the school.

– paper describes chronic dehdration from a cultural and ethical perspective
– Answer the following level 1 question in the paper-
How do money, power, and control matters relate to the issue and its treatment?
Which cultures or societies are most affected by the issue? Why?
-Compose a Research Question for each kind of inquiry that provides detail, specificity, and focus to your inquiry,
research, and writing.

– State your research questions in the paper’s introduction.
– Form the body of your paper by answering each research question and support your assertions with evidence (research).
– In the conclusion of the paper, briefly review the issues, research questions, answers, and insights.

or this week’s writing exercise, you will write a paragraph of at least 300 words that is a topic proposal for your final paper. This paper and your final will be an argument. We can all think of something right now that we feel strongly about and can argue our opinion on. You should pick a topic that you feel passionately about and that you know enough about to form a sound opinion. You should NOT do research for these final assignments. You should pick a topic that you have some general background knowledge on which to base your opinion. For example, I do not know everything about the current Covid 19 vaccines, but I’ve read enough and heard enough to form a general opinion about whether I should take one or not. There is a good general list of topics on page 318 that you might choose from if you are struggling for ideas.
For this week’s assignment, the topic proposal, you should introduce your topic and tell why it is important and any background needed to explain why it is a controversial topic. You should NOT state your personal opinion in this paper, but explain both sides of the controversy and explain why it is a controversial issue. You will argue your own opinion later, but this paper should just explain your topic.

Persuasive Speech following Monroe’s Motivated
Sequence

Topic: Some juveniles need to be prosecuted as adults.

(More and more
teenagers are committing heinous crimes. They know they will get off easy, that
they will not face serious consequences. According to the level of savagery
committed, juveniles should at times be prosecuted as adults.)

Must follow this outline
Monroe’s
Motivated Sequence
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence is an
organizational pattern that attempts to convince the audience to respond to a
need that is delineated in the speech.[1] Five separate steps characterize the
Motivated Sequence organization style:

1. The attention step should get the audience’s attention
as well as describe your goals and preview the speech.

2. The need step should provide a description of the
problem as well as the consequences that may result if the problem goes
unresolved. In this step, the speaker should also alert audience members to their
role in mitigating the issue.

3. The satisfaction step is used to outline your
solutions to the problems you have previously outlined as well as deal with any
objections that may arise.

4. In the visualization step, audience members are asked to
visualize what will happen if your solutions are implemented and what will
happen if they do not come to fruition. Visualizations should be rich with
detail.

5. The action appeal step should be used to make a direct
appeal for action. In this step, you should describe precisely how the audience
should react to your speech and how they should carry out these actions. As the
final step, you should also offer a concluding comment.

Prepare: Review Chapters 9, 10, and 11 in the course text and any assigned additional learning material. In addition, carefully read Global environmental change and the nation state (Links to an external site.).
Reflect: The peer-review process is invaluable for scientific research. Political science and security scholarship, like any other scholarship, must be evaluated against the norms of research within the field of study. In particular, peer reviews can help researchers determine if their conclusions are valid and reliable, if the research design is sound and appropriate, if the analysis is complete, and if the conclusions are logically and theoretically linked. Peer review is the gatekeeping process that ensures that any political science or security research released to the public has the stamp of approval from experts in the field and that it contributes new knowledge to our profession.
In this exercise, you are asked to review a published paper, and this process should be beneficial from both an application and educational standpoint. You will utilize the peer-review process while you are learning more about how professional political science or security papers are structured and presented. For this discussion, you will review Global Environmental Change and the Nation State.
Write: In your initial post of at least 250 words, using the assigned article (Links to an external site.), complete the following:
Discuss whether the research design is appropriate for the research question and hypotheses.
Determine if the links between the theory and the hypothesis are valid and reliable.
Assess if all the necessary evidence is provided to support the research argument.
Evaluate if the conclusions are accurate or overstated and why.

– You will have to use the NCBL website to build an evolutionary tree, under the result section for the PowerPoint. Needs to be in PowerPoint, can use a small font, and it’s only 1 page. I sent 3 files, with 1 just being the criteria for this powerpoint, and the other 2 to help you complete this PowerPoint. 1 file you will see its one page with questions in the boxes, which you answer the questions in the boxes and erase the question and put the answer in there instead. The second file just tells you how to do the PowerPoint and how to create the evolutionary tree and from which website you need to create it from and then, you post the tree in the PowerPoint, and that file is your instructions it helps you figure out what you’re writing on.
Any questions: (239)-273-6892

In chapter I.6 of Leviathan Hobbes claims that “these words Good, Evill, and Contemptible, are ever used with relation to the person that useth them.” Locke on the other hand is confident that while there are certain individuals in the state of nature who are indeed evil, the rest of us are in agreement on good and evil. What is the basis for this disagreement over our sense of good and evil? And what are the implications of this disagreement for their respective views of political authority—of who should rule? Which of the two theorists would you argue has given the more coherent solution to the problem of finding agreement in politics and society and why? he essay is to be 6-7 pages double spaced. You may answer the question you have chosen any number of ways, but make sure your essay is coherent and well-written. Be sure as well to provide citations and quotes from the text to support your points. Synoptic summaries of the argument without textual evidence or citations will receive a low grade. Also, do not, I repeat do not, rely on synopses of the theories taken from the internet. I am interested in how you think and write. Synopsis from the internet will be regarded as plagiarism. If you need help understanding the texts, I will be happy to discuss them with you.
1. Make sure that your first paragraph states clearly and succinctly the problem you will be addressing and the argument you will be making. You do not need an introduction of the throat-clearing kind such as, “ever since human beings have been on this earth, they have had to deal with the problem of authority,” or “Hobbes is one of the most important thinkers in political thought,” or “the problem of consent has been the basis of all political orders.” Instead use your opening paragraph to frame the rest of your argument.
2. Make sure your paragraphs follow from one other. Don’t just finish a topic and then without a transition go to the next one. Work on providing transitions between paragraphs.
3. In laying out an argument it is good form to use words like Hobbes/Locke “claims,” “argues,” “maintains,” “insists,” “suggests,” rather than “states” or “says.” For example, “Hobbes claims that fear will drive us to leave the state of war and submit to a sovereign” is better than Hobbes states that…. or Hobbes says that. Do not start a paragraph with a quote. Quotes need to be integrated into an argument.
4. Try to have a strong conclusion. Your conclusion may indicate that your opening thesis needs modification, or that there is even more evidence for it than we thought at the outset, or that we need to think very differently about the problem informing your essay than at first seemed the case.

Instructions!
The critical lense I choose ishistorical

Summarize the story according to your critical perspective. (If you were to tell what the story is about through your critical lens, what would you say?)
Make your Claim: Make it specific and arguable.
Look for evidence in the story. Back up what you say with what the story says by closely reading a short section. (Don’t try to take on the whole work, it is WAY TOO COMPLEX!!)
Look for sources that will back up what you have to say. Look for definitions, evidence, and other things you can cite as you make your point.
Answer your detractors. What would someone say against your claim? How will you answer them?
Synthesize what you have found out: Bring together all you have found out and tell the reader why it is significant to understanding the story.
These list if points below should be visible in your essay

HISTORICAL
Critics who use a historical approach believe the historical context of the work has a great deal to do with understanding the work as a whole.
How does the work reflect the period in which it is written?
How does the work reflect the period it represents?
What literary or historical influences helped to shape the form and content of the work? What evidence can you present that would back up what you say?
How important is the historical context (both the work’s and your own) to interpreting the work?

your critical perspective,
how you will see Elethia through that perspective,
why it is important, and
introduce your claim
The essay should be formatted correctly, organized, . The claim should be bold and specific.
515994
8 minutes ago

This is the main instruction
Write a 3-5 page paper about “Elethia” by Alice Walker. In your paper, give a specific literary interpretation of a section of the work, or an issue in the work.
515994
5 minutes ago
link to the novel
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dpDIt9iG5thErcBnYqsK918Lb1L9gvkx76PsPT1JUog/edit?usp=sharing

~200 words. Choose ONE of the following topics:
1) Discuss specific aspects of THE KILLING that clearly align it with film noir. How does Kubrick’s approach to noir fit in with (or defy) your expecations?
OR
2) Discuss some specific ways, in terms of style and/or narrative, in which THE KILLING is a more accomplished film than KILLER’S KISS.
With either topic, as always, you should make meaningful reference to the readings.

How do Paul’s concepts of leadership in writing to the Corinthians strengthen, challenge or extend the contemporary model of servant leadership? Give specific examples. What are the implications for these connections between Scripture and Servant Leadership for the current development of the Servant Leadership model and its application to contemporary organizations and the church?