Best Writer

I need an ethical, philosophical and law analyses for two stakeholders in the debate regarding euthenasia by patients suffering from late stage dementia

Introduction
As a doctor, you do not only have to deal with patients and fellow professionals in your work. More stakeholders play a role in contemporary medicine, such as the pharmaceutical industry, the Healthcare Inspectorate (IGZ), health insurers, the government, patient associations, etc. These stakeholders all have their own expectations of the doctor. As a doctor, you also have to deal with treatments and treatments about which expectations can differ and on which the parties have a different perspective. What are the important values of the stakeholders? Which legal principles play a role in their considerations? What vision do the stakeholders actually have on illness and health? And how do you deal with that as a doctor? These questions are central to the essay in the second year of the master’s degree, with the emphasis on reflection on the role and position of the physician within the social and scientific context. Ethical, legal and scientific-philosophical aspects are also discussed.
Learning goals
The student can
• look beyond the boundaries of the discipline and can assess the relevance of the social context
charting for acting as a doctor
• map and compare the visions from different perspectives
• reflect on the role of the doctor in the context of society and science
• find and appropriately use information that supports the essay
• write a well-structured and logically structured argument
Contents
The essay should have the character of an argumentative, informative discourse. So choose a topic that has always amazed you, that has a lot of opposing opinions and ideas, that has been covered in the media or that has undergone major development in recent years. Do not forget to clearly describe and reflect on the role of the doctor. Examples include topics such as: euthanasia, termination of pregnancy, early diagnosis, vaccination, expensive drugs, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), anti-depressants, reproductive technology, cochlear implant (CI), deep brain stimulation, etc.
Structure of the essay
Overall, the essay consists of an introduction, a description of the perspectives of stakeholders opposing each other, an analysis of ethical, legal and philosophical presuppositions in the position of all stakeholders, a discussion and a conclusion.
• Introduction
Stimulate the reader with an example from literature, the media or from practice. Describe the background and rationale for the topic. Make clear what the relevance is for you as a (future) doctor. Describe a clear goal or starting question.

• Stakeholders
In this section you describe the perspective of two stakeholders1 who are prominent in the debate on your chosen topic and who defend opposing(?) positions within it. Choose clear stakeholders, e.g. ‘government’ is very vague (because who is/are they then?) and give a short introduction of the stakeholder. In addition, make clear why you choose these stakeholders. What position do the stakeholders take and what arguments do they put forward? Base your description and argumentation of the stakeholders as much as possible on sources from the stakeholders themselves.
• Analysis
You analyze the position of both stakeholders based on three different perspectives:
– Ethical: Which values and norms play a role in the arguments of the stakeholders?
This can literally be called that by the stakeholder, but if the stakeholder
does not: which values and norms do you derive from the argumentation of the stakeholder?
– Legal: What legal principles do they refer to? How do they see the rights and obligations
of the doctor and the patient?
– Philosophical: Which view on health and disease is used (holistic?
mechanistic?) and what is the underlying vision of the role of the physician? Which philosophical theme plays a role in this debate? (Eg. manufacturability, urge to control, vision on health and disease, individualism, etc.). Do not just name philosophical movements here, but define them and use sources to substantiate them.
Make this part the core of your essay.
Tip: immerse yourself (eg via the internet) in the debate on your chosen topic, which often provides a lot of inspiration for the ethical, legal and philosophical analysis. Do not forget to mention the source!
• Discussion and conclusion
In this part you weigh up the positions (What are the strengths of both stakeholders? Which vision and argumentation are convincing? Why?) and you formulate your own position in the debate. Support your position with the aforementioned arguments from the analysis. Your conclusion should follow logically from the introduction and the analysis. Keep the basic question in mind for this. Please note: this is the first moment in the essay that your opinion is clearly stated

the stakeholders are a doctor who practiced euthenasia on a patient with demetnia vs the IGJ who sued her

Write a 1,500-1,800-word, double-spaced paper

1) In its most basic sense, democracy means “the rule of the people.” However, this definition only tells us that the people exercise power; it does not tell us exactly how they exercise it. In other words, this minimal definition tells us very little about the kinds of participation that democracy requires or expects. What forms of political participation do different models of democracy require? Specifically, what forms of participation do liberal, republican, and deliberative models of democracy expect of citizens and why?
You may answer this question either in the form of an expository essay or in the form of an imaginary dialogue among the thinkers who represent each model of democracy. Your response must refer to at least three of the following thinkers: James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Jürgen Habermas, and Alexis de Tocqueville. Whichever format you select, you must 1) describe the primary form of participation expected in each model of democracy, and 2) explain why each thinker believes that that particular form of participation is preferable or superior to the alternatives. Whenever possible, you should also point to criticisms that each thinker might make about the ideas expressed by the others.

Helpful hints and reminders:
Make sure you address the assigned topic directly and thoroughly. Avoid digressions and tangential discussions that do not relate to the topic and focus on building a persuasive argument.
You should use properly cited evidence from the texts to support your argument. Whether you are using direct quotations or simply paraphrasing, you should always indicate page numbers, either in parentheses or in footnotes. Avoid using quotes that have no obvious connection to the topic under discussion. Make sure the meaning or significance of a quote is apparent.
Your papers should reflect independent thought, not a recitation of irrelevant facts or other extraneous information. Feel free to draw upon material covered in lectures and discussions—as long as such material helps you make relevant points that advance the discussion. You are cautioned against using internet sources, which are notoriously unreliable. You do not need to do any outside research for this paper, but if you do decide to use outside sources, including internet sources, you must provide full bibliographic information. Any quotes you use must be placed in quotation marks to indicate that you are using someone else’s words. Failure to do so will result in a failing grade for the course and additional disciplinary action.

Directions: Please
download the exam as a word document and submit it in Exam 2 in the Assignments
section in Canvas. Exams must be
uploaded by 9:30 AM on Friday, February 25th.
Failure to do so will result in a zero for this assignment. The exam consists of five questions worth
a total of 75 points (15 points per question).
You should write as much as is needed for each answer. Please read each item very carefully and
thoroughly. You should address
each question for each number.
Remember to
save your answers early and often!
If you are using a MAC
computer, please make sure that you save your exam as a .doc or a .docx or a
.pdf file. Make sure that it is NOT
saved as a .pages file.

Please select any 5 of the 7 questions below to answer.

1-Chapter
9 discusses three main ways to analyze an audience. Discuss how you might analyze an audience
before delivering a speech in each of these three ways (provide an example for
each of these three ways). Discuss how
you could analyze the audience in our COMM 100 course to select your persuasive
speech topic.

2-For
the following five topics, locate one reference for each topic that you think
would be appropriate and effective to use for that topic. Provide enough details regarding the
reference that is needed (details regarding the source, author(s), date of publication,
date accessed, etc.) The five topics are: (1) Home prices in Storm Lake, Iowa,
(2) How to plant and grow tomatoes, (3) iPhone 13 Pro, (4) Famous football
stadiums, and (5) Natural disease resistance in plants.

3-Describe
all parts of what an effective introduction should look like for a speech (can
be informative or persuasive). Write
your own example introduction to either an informative or persuasive
speech.

4-Chapter
10 discusses the importance of delivery when giving a speech. Discuss why delivery is important to a
speech. Discuss four areas of verbal
delivery and four areas of nonverbal delivery that are important to a speech
and provide an example of each.

5-Discuss
four different patterns for organizing a speech. Be able to provide four different
speech topics that could lend themselves well to particular patterns of
organization and briefly discuss how you could organize the speech’s main
points.

6-
Discuss the four main types of delivery methods, what the strengths and
weaknesses are of each, when you might use each type of delivery method, and an
example of each delivery method.

7-Identify
which fallacy matches correctly with each of the five following fallacies.
Describe how or why each example is an example of each fallacy:

Ad Hominem:

Slippery Slope:

False Cause:

Bandwagon:

False Dilemma:

A – Today, marijuana is outlawed for
recreational use in Iowa. Tomorrow it will be alcohol and cigarettes;
eventually, you and I will not be allowed legally to buy a cup of coffee
without being arrested.

B – You can either dedicate yourself to
karate, or just live on your couch eating chips.

C – Since everybody is buying electric
vehicles these days, it must be a wise decision for me to do the same.

D – Mr. Smith’s economic arguments make no
sense because he is completely insincere and is just after our votes.

E – No way I’m voting for Mr. Jones. Years
ago, when he took over as the mayor, the city had plenty of money. When he left
a few years later, the city was in lots of debt.

watch short films from youtube(links will be provided)
answer questions in detailed essay form
“the facts in case of mr hollow” https://southtexascollege.blackboard.com/ultra/courses/_318228_1/outline/edit/document/_12671474_1?courseId=_318228_1#:~:text=.%C2%A0Watch%20Facts%20In%20The%20Case%20of%20Mr.%20Hollow%20on%20Youtube%3A
“Oculus chapter 3 -the man with the plan short 2006” https://southtexascollege.blackboard.com/ultra/courses/_318228_1/outline/edit/document/_12671474_1?courseId=_318228_1#:~:text=Watch%20the%20short,Plan%20Short%202006
“true horror stories-midnigt jog”https://southtexascollege.blackboard.com/ultra/courses/_318228_1/outline/edit/document/_12671474_1?courseId=_318228_1#:~:text=.%C2%A0Watch%20the%20short%20film%2C%20Midnight,Horror%20Stories%20%2D%20Midnight%20Jog%20(POV)
Using details from the information provided in Facts In The Case of Mister Hollow, you will describe the following:

1. What happened before the photo?

2. What is happening during the photo?

3. What happens after the photo?

And answer these questions for the other two films of your choice:

1. What happened before the film?

2. What happened during the film?

3. What happened after the film?

The field of interpretation is wide open here, especially in Mister Hollow. There are no right or wrong answers. But there are still challenges here. Whatever story you create needs to use the most important details from the photo. Not everything specific detail needs to be included. For example, the sinister woman looming over all could simply be watching, but not directly involved. Be sure to reference the details of the photo that guided you to this interpretation.

Enjoy the opportunity to be creative and an active viewer. After all, this short film and stories like those of Joyce Carol Oates and Paul Tremblay are so much richer and more fascinating when you take an active role in the creation of meaning. There would be no Facts in the Case of Mr. Hollow unless you take an active role in deciding what those are.

Watch The Facts in the Case of Mr Hollow and these other films that ask you to participate in the creation of meaning, and then tell me based on what you see in the films what you think happens before, during and after them. Be sure to go into detail.

Write a paper about Bitcoin Strategy in regular APA style.

The Short Analysis Essay
will provide you with an opportunity to deepen your understanding of a fabulist
short story, particularly the story-telling strategies it uses to achieve
meaning. This assignment will allow you
to examine the construction of a story through the lens of a story-telling
element discussed in class.
Understanding how a story is constructed will raise your awareness as
writers of the many options you have for constructing stories. It will also give you a foundation for
analyzing stories you encounter in the future.
Lastly, analysis is something you will be asked to do throughout your
schooling and in the work world, so this assignment helps prepare you to do so.

So far this semester,
you have prepared in various ways to accomplish this assignment. You have read multiple fabulist short
stories. In addition to reading these
tales, you have also read extensively on the elements of fiction, including
characterization, plot, and point of view.
You have practiced analyzing how various tales employ particular
elements of fiction individually and in groups.
You have shared this analysis with the class, and together we have added
to and refine your points. Now you will
have the opportunity to pull together all of what you have learned by analyzing
a storytelling element within a fabulist short story and articulating its
significance. Doing so will give you
practice reading a fabulist short story closely, identifying instances of an
element of within a short story, and explaining the significance of the element
of fiction to the story’s overall meaning.

For your Short Analysis
Essay to be successful, you will need to complete these preparatory and action
steps.

Preparatory Steps:

1)
Re(read)
this assignment carefully and note where you have questions so that I can
answer them for you.
2)
Select a fabulist
short story of interest from the ones we read for class. ( which I selected who will greet you at Home by Lesley Nneka Arimah
3) discuss characterization in the story chosen note that you must select the most relevant passages.

4)
Review the fabulist
short story with the element of fiction in mind. Identify passages that you think are relevant
to the element of fiction chosen. Try to
choose a range of passages that illustrate different aspects characterization,
6)
Free-write
on passages selected. Explore how you
think the passage exemplifies the element of fiction and what it means to the
overall story.
7)
Group
passages selected together and come up with a working outline that presents the
order of ideas to be covered in the final essay.

Action Steps:

Focus your attention by
writing a 5-6 page essay. Begin by
imagining you are writing this essay to an audience interested in fabulist
fiction, though one that has not read the tale you will be analyzing.

In the first part, try
to interest the reader in the short story and the element of fiction you will
be analyzing. Transition to the thesis
statement. Include a statement that
asserts the element you will by analyzing and why you think it’s significant
for the understanding of the short story.

In the body section,
develop thesis by focusing paragraphs around claims about how the element
appears in the fabulist short story.
Inform audience about chosen element of fiction with passages from
assigned reading. Support claims about
element with textual evidence from select fabulist short story. Explain how the passages illustrate the
chosen element of fiction and what that means for the overall story. (In the drafting stage, pay special attention
to how the textual evidence selected may lead you to refine the overarching
claim of the paragraph.)

Conclude the essay by
reiterating for your audience the central claim of the essay. End by stating how you think your analysis of
the element of fiction deepens our understanding of the short story but also may
fail to consider noteworthy aspects.

Submission Details:

The Short Analysis Essay
should be 5-6 full pages, typed, times new roman, 12 point font, and double
spaced. Your name, Instructor’s name,
course, and date should appear in the left-hand margin. Include a title, centered, without boldface, italicized,
or underlined. Number pages and include
last name in the right-hand margin. See
the Owl Purdue Website for example
MLA formatted essays. Final drafts
should be submitted to Blackboard by due date, even if absent.

Reminders

·
All essays
should adhere to MLA format
·
All essays
should adopt standard grammar and punctuation
·
All essay
should include a Works Cited page
·
All drafts,
including rough drafts, should be turned in on time, regardless of absence, to
receive full credit
·
All rough
drafts should fulfill the required page length to receive full credit
·
All rough
drafts should receive feedback
Final
drafts should incorporate helpful peer suggestions and/or instructor feedback
to receive credit; in other words, final drafts need to be revised to achieve
assignment criteria

Students will illustrate their conceptualization and knowledge of historical, social, political, economic, and cultural effects of the U.S. time period found in the early years of the Seven Years War.
Write an essay that explains the origins of The Seven Years War and discussing specifically how did Britain emerge victorious? Your essay should explain the series of events between the early 1750s and 1760s that culminated with the Treaty of Paris 1763.

Explain an aggressive act captured in the media recently using social psychological theory, and you will incorporate knowledge about gender, culture, and situational factors to further explain the aggressive action. Please include the following in your paper:
• Select a social psychological theory of aggression that you did not use in Assignment 1.
• Apply this theory to explain a highly publicized act of aggressive behavior.
• Integrate/add to your discussion gender, cultural, and situational factors to help explain the aggressive behavior. Be sure your discussion of gender, culture, and at least one situational factor is woven into your discussion of the theory. Adding factors to a theory that are not already included in the theory helps you to practice with how to expand theoretical frameworks.
Remember to incorporate your professor’s feedback from your annotated outline submitted in Week 6.
Length: 12-15 pages
References: a minimum of five resources
Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

THIS POWERPOINT PRESENTATION NEEDS TO BE BASED ON THE PAPER WRITTEN BEFORE IT. I WILL INCLUDE IT IN THE ATTACHMENTS, LABELED Unit5Assign1EXTRA.

Do a presentation for one of the stakeholder groups identified in your Week 5 policy proposal that addresses current performance shortfalls, the reasons why new policy and practice guidelines are needed to eliminate those shortfalls, and how the group’s work will benefit from the changes.

POLICY PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
Introduction
It’s important that health care leaders be able to clearly articulate policy positions and recommendations and garner buy in and support from stakeholder groups for policy and practice changes in their organizations. Unfortunately, effective communication is often lacking. Consequently, it’s important for health care leaders, when leading change, to ensure that clear and open communication is ongoing and informative.
An important aspect of change leadership is the ability to address diverse groups of stakeholders and create buy in and support for your ideas and proposals for change. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate and hone these skills.
DO a slide presentation for one of the stakeholder groups you identified in your Assessment 5 Policy Proposal. Inform the group of current performance shortfalls, introduce the proposed policy, explain why the policy is needed, and present policy-driven practice guidelines to resolve the performance issue. You must also obtain buy-in from the group by explaining the positive effects of the policy and practice guidelines on their work.
Requirements
The presentation requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for presentation format and length and for supporting evidence.
Summarize your proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines.
Identify applicable local, state, or federal health care policy or law that prescribes relevant performance benchmarks that your policy proposal addresses.
Keep your audience in mind when creating this summary.
Interpret, for stakeholders, the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for the proposed policy and practice guidelines.
Make sure this is a brief review of the evaluation you completed in your Assessment 1 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation.
Make sure you are interpreting the dashboard metrics in a way that is understandable and meaningful to the stakeholders to whom you are presenting.
Explain how your proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how the stakeholder group does its work.
How might your proposal alter certain tasks or how the stakeholder group performs them?
How might your proposal affect the stakeholder group’s workload?
How might your proposal alter the responsibilities of the stakeholder group?
How might your proposal improve working conditions for the stakeholder group?
Explain how your proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for the stakeholder group.
How are your proposed changes going to improve the quality of the stakeholder group’s work?
How will these improvements enable the stakeholder group to be more successful?
What evidence supports your conclusions or presents alternative perspectives?
Present strategies for collaborating with the stakeholder group to implement your proposed policy and practice guidelines.
What role will the stakeholder group play in implementing your proposal?
Why is the stakeholder group and their collaboration important for successful implementation?
Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.
Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.
Stay focused on key policy provisions and the impact of practice guidelines on the group.
Adhere to presentation best practices.
Proofread your presentation slides to minimize errors that could distract the audience and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposed policy and practice guidelines.
Presentation Format and Length
Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:
Title slide.
Presentation title.
Your name.
Date.
Course number and title.
References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.
Your slide deck should consist of 8–12 slides, not including a title slide and references slide.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly, professional, or policy evidence to support your analysis and recommendations.

This corrections were made by the Proffesor ” First, most of this paper is discussion of what are very simple and repetitive regulations to protect individuals from getting covid. For example, you have to maintain your hygiene when you go from your house to the place that you are staying near the airport, from there to the airport, from the airport to the plane, from the plane to the arrival airport, from the arrival airport to the baggage collection point, from there to the place you are staying (which should be the ship) and from there to the ship. All of these pages could be summarized in at most one or two. Then you speak about Panama for only one page. This is not the paper that we agreed that you would write. What you describe about Panama is vague. For example, the Atlantic to Pacific transfer, are the buses allowed to stop to enable the seafarers to use the toilet or eat? Given that all the ships have active covid infections, are any Panamanians allowed to go to their homes and not stay isolated for 14 days. How is that isolation enforced? What does it include? And then, you ignore the bog issue. Panama is the flag for many cruise ships. What are the obligations of the flag state in these circumstances? For example, under the MLC, of which Panama is a signatory, what repatriation obligations does Panama have? What obligations to maintaining health on the ships? Has Panama declared that seafarers are “key workers?” If so, what legal obligations follow?
https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/MSC%201636%20protocols/MSC.1-Circ.1636%20-%20Industry%20Recommended%20Framework%20Of%20Protocols%20For%20Ensuring%20Safe%20Ship%20Crew%20Changes%20And%20Travel.pdf

https://amp.gob.pa/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Instructive-for-Repatriation-and-Crew-Change-Panama.pdf

CREW CHANGE DURING COVID-19

https://www.edumaritime.net/stcw/what-is-stcw-an-introduction