Best Writer

1. Obtain a loan application online from a bank or the SBA for your small business. (See attached for made up Real Estate Business Executive Summary)

2. Fill out the application and avoid providing personal identifiable information.

3. Prepare a defense plan for any weaknesses discovered during the application process. You can consider addressing a history of bad debts, bankruptcy, a poor credit rating, or a similar issue. For example, if your small business has a history of serious bad debt, your strategy in tackling customer delinquency through tightened credit policy and reinforced collection will be effective approaches.

Please do not simply consider your small business is free of weakness. Here you can improvise a little bit by taking into account of a commonly encountered scenario for small business and create your improvement plan accordingly. When writing, consider your audience being a lender from which you try to get loan approval.

4. Attach the loan application form(s) you filled out in the assignment section preferably in one file.

CO8 Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care.

Directions
Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Integrate outside scholarly sources when required
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.
Best Practices include:
Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.
Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.
Select different classmates for your reply each week.
Discussion Question
Prior to posting your answer, complete the Week 8 AACN Essentials Self-Assessment (Links to an external site.) linked here. Compare your scores from Week 1 to Week 8. How far have you come? How will you apply this information to continue to improve your informatics knowledge in nursing practice?

Read the resources provided on team building in healthcare. Discuss some methods you would use to build a successful healthcare team in your department.

Please remember, Discussion Board posts should be at least 350 words and you must respond to at least two classmates to receive full credit.
I need the writer to review this article and the attached articles before writing this paper. Discussion post needs to be between 400 and 450 words only.
http://www.management-issues.com/teams/

Provide some direct quotation of the text it is discussing; avoid unnecessary repetition or excessive generalizations; not simply rely on plot summary, but offer your own critical commentary, assessment, or interpretation.

Go to the website for the non-profit hospital that serves your chosen community and read the Community Health Needs
Assessment (CHNA). Most CHNAs are on the hospital’s website. For large health systems, you may need to search on the health system website.
Hospital: Tampa General Hospital
Link:
https://www.tgh.org/-/media/files/about-tgh/community-health-assessment/tgh_chna_9-30final_v2_.pdf?rev=377e7ba968cf4343a6a38c09525d7369&hash=7A2AA1EA77F14B8E13F94A5247907D74

Critique the Community Health Needs Assessment. Submit your critique in a formal paper using the guidelines below. Use
subheadings based on the 10 criteria below.

1. Which hospital system conducted the CHNA and in what year?
2. What is the geographic community described by the CHNA?
3. What data in the CHNA surprised you? Why?
4. Discuss the positive and negative factors in the CHNA that affect population/community health
5. What health priorities or needs were identified? Provide a brief descriiption of each priority/need.
6. Do you agree with the identified health priorities/needs? Why or why not?
7. Select one of the health priorities/needs that you want to further explore.
8. Research and select one scholarly journal article that adds further understanding of the selected health
priority/need. Include information from the article in your paper.
9. Who would you ask to serve on a coalition to develop solutions and recommendations on the selected health
priority/need?
10. Conclude your paper with a general summary of what you learned from the assignment
Provide a conclusion with thoughtful
summary and reflects student
learning

Paper should be 4-5 pages in length; excluding the title and reference pages. Subheadings must be used. An abstract is
not required. The paper must be written using the American Psychological Association (APA), 7th edition guidelines,
including a title page and reference list. Be sure to give in-text citations for all references used.

Develop a cyber security policy that you would use in a fictitious organization. Further directions and instructions are attached.

Read the article by Sevigny, E. L., Pollack, H. A., and Reuter, P. (Sevingy et al (2013) Module 4.pdf) and submit a word document with answers to the following questions. Each question is worth 10 points – answers to each questions should be at least one, and no more than two, paragraphs in length. You must number you answers to receive credit.

1. Drug courts, like many other social service innovations, face familiar challenges associated with serving severely disadvantaged or criminally active populations, what are these challenges?

2. Discuss in detail the difficulty with drug court capacity constraints.

3. What does the text discuss about the legal consequences of program failure?

Demonstrate how the writings of Edgar Allan Poe fulfill his philosophy that literature should have a single, emotional effect. Apply what he writes in “The Philosophy of Composition” to three stories and two poems. Cite specifics from his “Philosophy of Composition” (You need not confine yourself to the emotional effect if you prefer another point) and work an essay as to what points you see in a particular work.).

Instructions
In this discussion, you will examine power and relationships between school districts and stakeholders.

For this discussion, use the district of your choice. Create a new thread with a 500-word response—in which you cite at least two scholarly sources—that addresses the following points:

Identify a group of stakeholders and the one issue that is most important to them at this time.
Describe the power relationship(s) between the groups of stakeholders involved in this issue.
What factors could alter the power relationship(s)? How?
How is the district currently engaging with the stakeholders with respect to this issue?
What could make the engagement with stakeholders more effective?

Part of your assessment for this course is based on a presentation you will make to your seminar group.

You are expected to prepare your presentation for the main required reading for the week you choose. You are welcome to discuss a wider range of texts in your presentation and to draw on your independent research. If you are unclear as to what text to focus on, please seek your seminar tutor’s assistance in advance.
My topic is “Criminalization of HIV Transmission” and the reading it has to be based on is “Reckless trials? The criminalization of the sexual transmission of HIV” by Daniel Monk. I have also attached a couple of more useful reading/cases + the lecture slides that might helpful.

The format and focus of the presentation is up to you, BUT SHOULD GO BEYOND SUMMARISING THE READING. Strong presentations will demonstrate a thorough reading of the text, a critical approach to the topic and an ability to pose thoughtful, discussion-oriented questions for the seminar group.

Some issues you may want to consider in your presentations are listed below. You can use the following questions as guidance, and since your time is very limited, it will be sufficient to consider one point/question under each of the three headings. Please note that it is very important not to suffice with a synopsis (a), but to also formulate your response to the reading (b), and also a couple of discussion questions arising from the reading for the seminar group to consider as a whole (c).

(a) Provide a very brief synopsis of the reading

Identify the central thesis / main argument; or the key points if it is a case report
Highlight key points and evidence used to support the thesis
Identify the theoretical perspectives / methodological issues raised in the analysis
What is the author’s claim about the significance of the work?
How does the selected reading relate to other articles or issues in the module?

(b) Formulate your own critique / analysis / response to the readings

Do you agree with the central thesis or argument? Why or why not?
Does the evidence / examples support the main thesis or argument? What other evidence could have been used? Is there counter-evidence available?
What are the strengths and limitations of the theoretical perspectives or methodologies used in the text?
Do you accept the author’s claim about the significance of the work? Do you see other points of significance or relevance?
Can the arguments or ideas be applied to other situations, and if so, with what impact? Who benefits from the argument? Who does not?
Who / what is included in the discussion and who / what is excluded? What perspectives are missing? Who is absent?
How are people / organizations / ideas / power structures represented in the reading? Do these representations challenge or reinforce dominant social norms?
What assumptions are made by the author? What basic principles, values or ideas do their arguments rely on? How does the author use and define (both explicitly and implicitly) key terms and concepts?
What contradictions or tensions can be found in the arguments? What patterns?
What feelings, emotions, reactions came up for you as you read the text? Why do you think you responded that way? What do those reactions tell you about the reading, but also about yourself?

(c) Formulate 1 or 2 questions to raise for class discussion:

What theoretical, political or substantive questions arise from the reading?
What questions arise from your own critique and analysis?