Best Writer

After studying the assigned reading Sociology: The Social Construction of Gender and considering the concept of “gender as socially constructed,” answer the following questions and prompts.

A) How does media create meanings about gender?

B) Provide examples of how this is manifested in our everyday lives.

C) Provide a link to a commercial/ad that stereotypes gender. Even though it is natural to find humor in some of these portrayals, in what ways is this problematic.

Also, consider that sex is a system of classification based on biology and physiology, while gender reflects the cultural meaning that is ascribed to a person’s sex, thus resulting in labels of “masculinity and femininity.” Furthermore, our biology is not distinctively male or female and a significant number of people are born “intersex” with variations in chromosomes or sexual organs. Most biological researchers agree on the estimation that intersex people are about as common as encountering someone with green eyes.

It is important to understand that masculinity and femininity are not oppositional, although it seems to be portrayed so in media. In Western society (such as in the U.S. and Western Europe) we typically adhere to certain ideas and values that define masculinity and femininity as we perform the roles. What if the list was different? All of us, in honesty, could reveal that we interchange among the qualities. Take a look at the list and answer the following questions:

Masculinity

Femininity

strength
dominance
aggression
independence
empowerment
active
rational thought
production
breadwinner
subject
outdoors
technology
weakness
submission
compliance/vulnerability
dependence
disempowerment
passive
emotion
consumption
nurturer
object
indoors
nature

Provide answers to the following questions or prompts in your assignment submission.

D) How is the list being currently challenged?

E) What traits do you have that are typically considered “on the list” of the other sex?

F) What examples do you see in your daily life of people challenging the historic list?

G) What about examples in media of characters or people challenging the list?

H) Finally, do you agree or disagree that gender is socially constructed? Provide evidence that backs your opinion.

The response should be in 12pt type, at least 1-1.5 pages in length, double-spaced. I suggest that you make sure that you have information on the second page to be safe and avoid loss of points.

Support your responses with research from the Learning Resources. Use APA in-text citations where necessary and cite any outside sources. Create an APA reference list at the end of the document.

DIRECTIONS
In this assignment, you create a Rhetorical Analysis of a single image from an advertisement. Specifically, you will answer several questions and post your answers in the Module Three Discussion Forum. In the same Discussion Forum, you will also respond to another student’s post. It is time now to apply what you are learning about writing and research from our text.

Locate a single image that advertises a product, service, or brand that was published within the last 12 months and that can be found online. To understand what is meant by a single image that advertises a product, service, or brand, review this blog post to learn more. And review this post on BoredPanda as well. Do not choose an ad from these two sources, so look for an ad that does not appear on these two blogs. A single image means one static image, not a video, not a gif, not anything other than an image. Then start reviewing websites, blogs, social media, anywhere online, to find an ad with artful, provocative content that will allow you to answer several questions.

Answer the following questions:

1. Consider the rhetorical situation, in particular the purpose and the audience of the ad you are analyzing. What is outstanding (good, bad, outrageous, noteworthy, unusual) about the ad? Paste the link to the image at the beginning of your paragraph. You can first save the image and then upload it to Imgur so that you have a permanent link to the image.
Write one paragraph.

2. Who would be the typical viewer or customer for this ad, and does the viewer need any special knowledge, vocabulary, or background to understand the ad?
Answer in 3-5 sentences

3. What is the designer’s goal in creating the ad, and what other information does the designer include that suggests their purpose? Go beyond simple statements such as “The ad wants you to buy the product” and look at the deeper reasons why this ad might affect someone’s ideas about the product advertised.
Answer in 3-5 sentences

4. How does the style and design of the ad reflect both the subject matter and the reasons someone would want to buy the product advertised?
Answer in 3-5 sentences

5. Craft an analytical thesis that identifies the pattern you observe or a decision you have made about the ad. Refer to Chapter 4-5a at the end of Chapter 4 to learn more about an analytical thesis.
Answer in 1-2 sentences

-‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ Please complete the abstract section. – Please address the comments in the pdf with the title that ends in “- Comments”. I already addressed the comments from the Results section to the end of the paper. – In my paper the gap wasn’t mentioned and the comments talk about this. I got the gap in research from Yasmeen’s research (Article 15). On page 40 it says, “Though limited studies have investigated the nepotism & favoritism effect on employee performance in the literature. Yet, the review of the extant literature shows that there is no study which investigates the effect of nepotism & favoritism respectively as a form of organization politics on employee performance and H‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌RM practices.” – Please create a final conceptual framework of theory (Figure 2). Is there an extra feedback loop that wasn’t seen in my initial conceptual framework? If nothing changes, the research wasn’t needed…. – Please complete the Description of Data Set and Coding sections. I attached examples of what I had in a previous project as an example. – Results section: add in what some of the categories were for each theme – Coding tables (Appendix E). I need to turn all of these tables and combine them into one diagram that compiles everything. The tables are just intermediate. Below was what the instructor provided a picture of. I will use the diagram below instead of th‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌e 12 tables I have.

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌rior to beginning work on this assignment, Review Chapter 7 and Chapter 36 of the course textbook. Review the cases Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 N.C.2d 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986) Download Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 N.C.2d 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986), and Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 P.3d 1011 (Colo. 2006) Download Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 P.3d 1011 (Colo. 2006). Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver’s license. Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of the work day. Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment application in which he stated that he had a valid driver’s license and had not been cited for any traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the work day. About a year after hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the work sites. Superi‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌or intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones’s work hours had ended and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted solely from Jones’s negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision and they sued Superior. The Carson’s alleged two theories of recovery against Superior: respondeat superior and negligent hiring. Write a four- to five-page paper (not including title and references pages) that addresses the following: Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring. Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case. Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring. Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior. Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case. Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds. The Negligent Tort Liability paper Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the UAGC Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted References: Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986) Prenkert, ., Barnes, ., Perry, ., Haugh, T, & Stemler, . (2022). Business law: The ethical, global, and digital environment (18th ed.). Retrieved from Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 1011 (Colo. 2006) Please add 3 more references in addition to the 3 I supplied (2 case‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌s and 1 textbook)

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ssignment: Readiness in Transforming Healthcare – Write a 2000-2500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Support your ideas with at least three (3) scholarly citations in your essay. Use strict APA guidelines to format the paper. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount and an abstract and table of contents are not necessary and if included are not part of the overall word count. Describe a recent change you experienced in your professional practice. Describe in detail three things that were successful and three things that were not successful. Include a discussion of why the successes worked and what could have been done to make the less successful actions effective. Recently promoted from assistant manager to nurse manager. Successful= moved from small facility to larger facility (good for growth), promotion as I grow the leadership ladder, goal of decreasing commute accomplished (went from 1.5 hours to 15 mins.). Unsuccessful= Less staff interaction because I now have assistant managers to be mediators or liaisons for me, seems lonely at the top as people appear more afraid or nervous to interact with you and I lost my work family that I had groomed and grew to love for the last five years however we’ve managed to stay in contact through various ways (dinners, social media, text, visits etc) Assignment Expectations Length: 2000–2500-word essay; answers must thoroughly address the questions. References, title page and Table of contents are not included in the word count. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. Pages must be numbered and must include table of contents (if applicable) References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims. MUST BE FIVE YEARS OLD OR LESS Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document and a Word document (.pptx) and (.doc or .docx) or Open Office Impress. IMPORTANT: Must be less than 15% on Turnitin (Plagiarism site) READING/BOOKS • Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Edition) – 9781433832154 • Health Care Systems Transformation for Nursing and Health Care Leaders – 978-0826196439 GRADING RUBRIC/CRITERIA Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score MY GOAL IS HIGHLIGHTED IN PURPLE BUT NOTHING LOWER THAN 86% Content Weight: 30% 0 points Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. 21 points Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. 24 points Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. 30 points In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. Score of Content Weight: 30%,/ 30 Organization Weight: 25% 0 points Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. points Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. 20 points Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. 25 points Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. Score of Organization Weight: 25%,/ 25 Logic/Argument Weight: 15% 0 points Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. points Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. 12 points Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. 15 points Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. Score of Logic/Argument Weight: 15%,/ 15 Support Weight: 20% 0 points Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. 14 points Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. 16 points Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. 20 points Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. Score of Support Weight: 20%,/ 20 Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10% 0 points Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose,‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. 7 points Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 8 points Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 10 points Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Score of Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%,/ 10 ? Writing Style for an APA Paper Description Guidelines and Examples ORGANIZATION and STRUCTURE Read the assignment; highlight the elements that must be in the paper – be sure that each of these elements in addressed in the purpose. IF you are unsure about what you are to do, for example –critique, look up the term to be sure that you are ‘doing’ what is expected. Failure to complete the full assignment will result in loss of grade points. Organization is the internal structure of a piece of writing, the thread of central meaning that ties the piece together from beginning to ending. Begin with perhaps one to two sentences about the general topic. Followed by one to three sentences that describe in detail the purpose of the paper. A piece of solid academic writing: • begins with an introduction regarding the piece’s primary purpose or theme, which prepares the reader for what is to come, (., thesis statement). Students are asked to paraphrase the stated purpose of the assignment including all components in the introduction • ends with a conclusion that summarizes the key points of the piece, draws conclusions, and generally provides closure for the reader. The conclusion is a mirror image of the introduction; there is never new material added to the conclusion. The body of a piece of academic writing can be organized around a variety of structures. Students are not considered experts; therefore, any statements made that have not been previously developed and supported by references is considered unsubstantiated; fails to meet academic writing standards. SO, use references; not many quotes, but be sure that your definitive statements are supported. Examples of organizing structures: • Main Idea/Thesis with Supporting Details/Evidence; internal consistency within the paper—if in the introduction there is (a), (b), & (c), then in the paper each point is to be presented in order in the body of the paper. • Comparison-Contrast; know the difference (APA uses Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; this can be accessed online) • Critique versus Analyze; know the difference (APA uses Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; this can be accessed online) • Deductive Logic • Point-by-Point Analysis • Development of Central Theme • Chronology or History (., of an event, process, era) • Strategies versus Action Plan Solid academic writing uses transitional words and phrases to provide logical connections and sequencing. Graduate students are expected to have a greater word use than undergraduates. Practice using new words that ‘mean’ what you might usually say. However, be careful with use of word strings that have little meaning and diminish clarity; APA calls this ‘wordiness’ Examples of transitional words: • Addition: also, again, as well as, besides • Consequence: accordingly, as a result, consequently, for this reason • Generalizing: as a rule, as usual, generally • Illustration: for example, for instance, for one thing • Emphasis: above all, chiefly, with attention to, especially, particularly • Similarity: comparatively, coupled with, correspondingly • Exception: aside from, barring, besides, except, excluding • Restatement: in essence, in other words, namely • Comparison: in contrast, by the same token, conversely, instead, likewise • Summarizing: after all, all in all, briefly, in any case, in any event, in conclusion, in short, in summary, finally MECHANICS Download: Free version of Grammarly Description Guidelines and Examples Solid academic writing is characterized by the proper use of conventions and mechanics and sentence structure, including: spelling, grammar, paragraphing, capitalization, and punctuation. Examples of Conventions and Mechanics in Academic Writing: • Proper Use of Capitalization, Punctuation, Quotation Marks • Subject/Verb Agreement • Proper Use of Pronouns; if you have a question, check your APA guide; if it’s not there, reword the sentence or use the noun. • Technical Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Units of Measurement • Paragraphs that are indented; consisting of three or more sentences • Use of Title Page, Headers: APA 7th edition is expected • Avoiding the Use of: Contractions, Incomplete and Run-on Sentences WORD CHOICE and USAGE In solid academic writing, the use of language is precise, with correct word usage and appropriate word choice. In good descriptive writing, strong word choice clarifies and expands ideas. In persuasive writing, careful word choice moves the reader to a new vision of possibilities; your writing should have the reader say “wow that was terrible”; the writer doesn’t write ‘that was terrible’. Effective word choice depends less on an exceptional vocabulary and more on the skill to use everyday words well. Use a thesaurus for new words with more specific meaning: For example, “pronounce” for “say”, “embarkation” for “start.” In academic writing, “it” is not acceptable. Make sure the‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ reader knows what the subject of each sentence is; clarity is key to effective APA format and Graduate level writing skill

For this essay, you will represent an essay about photography, and then raise a question about that writer’s thinking. You will then introduce a photograph of your own choosing in order to explore the question. Through your interpretation of the photograph and exploration of its context as well as additional research, you will create a larger idea about how images work. Your ending should revisit the essay and the photograph in light of what you’ve discovered in your sources.

Sources: You must include representations and analysis regarding one source in each of the following categories–
A conceptual essay–A complex idea based essay that you can use as a lens to consider your image through, as assigned (from: “Understanding a Photograph” by John Berger, “Getting Others Right” by Teju Cole, and
“Regarding the Pain of Others” by Susan Sontag). (1-2)
Photograph–Use a photograph and any accompanying text to address your inquiry (1)
Additional contextual research–Seek out additional sources–to help you understand the photograph, or the first essay, or anything connected you find useful. This might be another photograph or news story (which might be in your native language) or perhaps an eyewitness account or personal experience (1-2)

Source： https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/style/chen-man-dior-controversy-1235053203/#!

Instructions:
• There will be two team case analyses, the purpose of which is to comprehend real-world, organizational dynamics through material covered in the course.
• A minimum of 10 course concepts should be employed, and should appear in bold.
• Teams of 4-6 will be created and disseminated by late January. There will be different teams for the two cases. (Virtual teams are difficult to manage to be sure, but they are part of the modern workplace and are especially suited for electronic learning).
• Each analysis should be approximately 2,000 words (eight pages).

Rubric – Total 25 points:
• Connection/Breadth (5 points): Meaningfully associates a breadth of course material (5 concepts* minimum) to situation. Material includes Digital Sessions and/or the various readings.
o NOTE*: Concepts are not just theoretical terms from the course materials, but rather ideas/theories/models/broader opinions from authors in the readings that can be applied to the situation. Multiple terms from the course should be used to apply these concepts to demonstrate understanding and proper terminology used to describe them.
• Comprehension/Depth (12 points): Demonstrates depth of intellectual/cognitive command and meaningful application of the course material in the context of the situation. Clearly provides a concise descriiption of the situation and how it relates to course content. Analyzes the situation, identifies & diagnoses issues; points out strengths and weaknesses (of processes, characters, institutions etc.) and provides justifiable recommendations and solutions to problems and improvements.
• Conclusion (5 points): Clearly states how completing this assignment provided insight into social and personal knowledge and/or dynamics, as related to the course. This needs to provide a clear poignant summary of the key take outs/ lessons from the analysis.
• Presentation (3 points): Presentation refers to the organization and readability of the paper, indicative of an effective and collaborative team effort.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ssignment: Conceptual and Theoretical Models- Write a 1600–1750-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Support your ideas with at least three (3) scholarly citations in your essay. Use strict APA guidelines to format the paper. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount and an abstract and table of contents are not necessary and if included are not part of the overall word count. Choose a theoretical premise in healthcare delivery. Develop a conceptual model with words and graphics. You may choose a premise that has a conceptual model, but you MUST revise the model both in words and graphics. I CHOSE THE HUMAN BECOMING THEORY Assignment Expectations Length: 1600–2500-word essay; answers must thoroughly address the questions. References, title page and Table of contents are not included in the word count. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. Pages must be numbered and must include table of contents (if applicable). These do not count toward the minimal word amount for this assignment. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims. MUST BE FIVE YEARS OLD OR LESS Format: Save assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) IMPORTANT: Must be less than 15% on Turnitin (Plagiarism site) READING/BOOKS • Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Edition) – 9781433832154 • Population-Based Nursing: Concepts and Competencies for Advanced Practice (3rd Edition) – 9780826136732 • Research for Advanced Practice Nurses: From Evidence to Practice (3rd Edition) – 9780826118264 GRADING RUBRIC/CRITERIA Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score MY GOAL IS HIGHLIGHTED IN PURPLE BUT NOTHING LOWER THAN 86% Content Weight: 30% 0 points Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. 21 points Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. 24 points Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. 30 points In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. Score of Content Weight: 30%,/ 30 Organization Weight: 25% 0 points Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. points Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. 20 points Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. 25 points Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. Score of Organization Weight: 25%,/ 25 Logic/Argument Weight: 15% 0 points Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. points Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. 12 points Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. 15 points Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. Score of Logic/Argument Weight: 15%,/ 15 Support Weight: 20% 0 points Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. 14 points Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. 16 points Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. 20 points Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. Score of Support Weight: 20%,/ 20 Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10% 0 points Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. 7 points Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audienc‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌e and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 8 points Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 10 points Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Score of Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%,/ 10 ? Writing Style for an APA Paper Description Guidelines and Examples ORGANIZATION and STRUCTURE Read the assignment; highlight the elements that must be in the paper – be sure that each of these elements in addressed in the purpose. IF you are unsure about what you are to do, for example –critique, look up the term to be sure that you are ‘doing’ what is expected. Failure to complete the full assignment will result in loss of grade points. Organization is the internal structure of a piece of writing, the thread of central meaning that ties the piece together from beginning to ending. Begin with perhaps one to two sentences about the general topic. Followed by one to three sentences that describe in detail the purpose of the paper. A piece of solid academic writing: • begins with an introduction regarding the piece’s primary purpose or theme, which prepares the reader for what is to come, (., thesis statement). Students are asked to paraphrase the stated purpose of the assignment including all components in the introduction • ends with a conclusion that summarizes the key points of the piece, draws conclusions, and generally provides closure for the reader. The conclusion is a mirror image of the introduction; there is never new material added to the conclusion. The body of a piece of academic writing can be organized around a variety of structures. Students are not considered experts; therefore, any statements made that have not been previously developed and supported by references is considered unsubstantiated; fails to meet academic writing standards. SO, use references; not many quotes, but be sure that your definitive statements are supported. Examples of organizing structures: • Main Idea/Thesis with Supporting Details/Evidence; internal consistency within the paper—if in the introduction there is (a), (b), & (c), then in the paper each point is to be presented in order in the body of the paper. • Comparison-Contrast; know the difference (APA uses Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; this can be accessed online) • Critique versus Analyze; know the difference (APA uses Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; this can be accessed online) • Deductive Logic • Point-by-Point Analysis • Development of Central Theme • Chronology or History (., of an event, process, era) • Strategies versus Action Plan Solid academic writing uses transitional words and phrases to provide logical connections and sequencing. Graduate students are expected to have a greater word use than undergraduates. Practice using new words that ‘mean’ what you might usually say. However, be careful with use of word strings that have little meaning and diminish clarity; APA calls this ‘wordiness’ Examples of transitional words: • Addition: also, again, as well as, besides • Consequence: accordingly, as a result, consequently, for this reason • Generalizing: as a rule, as usual, generally • Illustration: for example, for instance, for one thing • Emphasis: above all, chiefly, with attention to, especially, particularly • Similarity: comparatively, coupled with, correspondingly • Exception: aside from, barring, besides, except, excluding • Restatement: in essence, in other words, namely • Comparison: in contrast, by the same token, conversely, instead, likewise • Summarizing: after all, all in all, briefly, in any case, in any event, in conclusion, in short, in summary, finally MECHANICS Download: Free version of Grammarly Description Guidelines and Examples Solid academic writing is characterized by the proper use of conventions and mechanics and sentence structure, including: spelling, grammar, paragraphing, capitalization, and punctuation. Examples of Conventions and Mechanics in Academic Writing: • Proper Use of Capitalization, Punctuation, Quotation Marks • Subject/Verb Agreement • Proper Use of Pronouns; if you have a question, check your APA guide; if it’s not there, reword the sentence or use the noun. • Technical Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Units of Measurement • Paragraphs that are indented; consisting of three or more sentences • Use of Title Page, Headers: APA 7th edition is expected • Avoiding the Use of: Contractions, Incomplete and Run-on Sentences WORD CHOICE and USAGE In solid academic writing, the use of language is precise, with correct word usage and appropriate word choice. In good descriptive writing, strong word choice clarifies and expands ideas. In persuasive writing, careful word choice moves the reader to a new vision of possibilities; your writing should have the reader say “wow that was terrible”; the writer doesn’t write ‘that was terrible’. Effective word choice depends less on an exceptional vocabulary and more on the skill to use everyday words well. Use a thesaurus for new words with more specific meaning: For example, “pronounce” for “say”, “embarkation” for “start.” In academic writing, “it” is not acceptable. Make sure t‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌he reader knows what the subject of each sentence is; clarity is key to effective APA format and Graduate level writing skill

Step one: I would like you to choose a safe, albeit comfortable and broadening experience that stretches your thinking or challenges you in some way. Here are some examples (watching a documentary about something that interests you, attending a zoom meeting in an area that interests you, listening to a podcast, reading a book about a different culture, participating in a ritual, attending a workout class, watching a livestream ceremony or spiritual experience, going for a hike, doing a challenging workout routine, having a difficult conversation with someone etc…) Keep in mind your choice to do an experience is solely based off your comfort and health restrictions. DO NOT ATTEND AN EVENT IF YOU FEEL UNSAFE OR AT HEALTH RISK. (There are plenty of options here where you can stay in the comfort of your home.) Please feel free to think of more options and get creative!!!! One last note, if you attended an event that was impactful during the time of our class you can use it for the plunge.(ie: protests, PRIDE, schools related online events) BE SURE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF THE ATTENDANCE OR PLUNGE 🙂

Step 2: After the experience please answer the following questions

Question 1: What experience have you chosen for your Cultural Plunge and why did you choose it?

Questions 2: How did this experience broaden your thinking or help you dive deeper in a certain area of your life?

Question 3: Did you learn more about a certain culture?

Question 4: What emotional response did you have as you were participating in this experience?

Question 5: When the restrictions of COVID lessen what cultural plunge would you like to experience and why?

Question 6: Any lingering thoughts or responses that you would like to mention:)

I need to do a research proposal and eventually an anotated bibliograpghy and the research paper(if you would like to do these i can make another order and request you that way the project is seemless). For now just the proposal. The proposal needs to be 3-5 pages long and use scholarly sources and I can provide a few of these, the rest i will need you to find. The research should cover things such as how covid impacted things like worker availability, material shortages, high material cost and how small construction businesses have been affected. I will eventually need to use all this info to write a annotatted bibliography and a8-10 page research paper so i need as much info as possible and i can pay to have you do the paper which i would prefer. For my sources i can have 4 scholarly, 2 primary, and 2 popular the rest can kind of be whatever