Best Writer

City: Knoxville, TN
Event: Banff Mountain Film Festival ( https://knoxbijou.org/bijou-events/banff-mountain-film-festival/)
You Must Include the Following or the Paper WILL NOT BE GRADED: Submit as a Word Document containing a link to a website marketing an event you find interesting and provide an evaluation of the site as well as the overall event as marketed. If your document will not load as a Word document, you may convert it to a .pdf, which will automatically resize your project with photos, to permit uploading. Check with Canvas BEFORE doing this…making sure your project will submit.
Use 12 point font in Courier or Times New Roman style, 1/2 inch (.5) margins all around, double-space between headings and all text under the headings (except for main title of paper, see below). Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics. Your document must be no less and no more than 3 pages of content (excluding photos), numbered (center the page number at the bottom of each page).
Start with:
Main Title/Title of the Event (not a separate page from the document)– begin project with the following information at top of document, centered, using Upper and Lower Case lettering. This information is at the top of page 1 and considered the first page of the project. Single space under each…Type of Event (first line under main title), Date of Event (second line), Location of Event (fourth line). On the fifth line, Insert the LINK for the event.
Double space after the above information and begin with the headings:
Headings are to be as in your first project paper; indented five spaces with the text under them introduced with the first sentence indented five spaces, and the remaining text in each paragraph flush left with right ragged edges. This is the default in Word.
Headings
-Marketability
-Type of Client Most Likely to Attend (describe–demographics such as age, interests, why they would be attracted to this event, etc.)
-Ease of Website Navigation
-Payment Options and Guarantees/Return Policy
-Likelihood of Success
-My Opinion of the Event (this is worth 5 points of the 75 total points possible)
References (if needed for photo or other material resource citation)
Again, points will be deducted for writing as you speak (you must use collegiate mechanics), improper spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
As indicated, the Total Point Value of this project is 75 points. Enjoy it and offer your opinion of the assignment if you would like. We appreciate your feedback! Include photos of the event, but remember, you must have at least 3 pages of content (words), excluding photos to adequately present the event.
Please understand that there are many students in this class, so this will take some time to grade. We will post your grade with feedback, if needed, when we have completed the evaluation process.
Have Fun and pick a media-rich, exciting event that you would consider attending!

Question #1 (Response should be no longer than 4 pages, double-spaced)
Two of the major proponents of structural-functionalist theories of modern society were Talcott Parsons and Robert K. Merton. Using course readings and relevant lecture materials, write an essay which a) defines and explains the general structural-functionalist theoretical approach to society; and b) compares and contrasts the approaches to structural functionalism developed by Talcott Parsons and Robert Merton. Based on what you have read about structural functionalism generally and the works of Parsons and Merton in particular, what is your assessment of this theoretical approach? And, if you were to meet Parsons and Merton for conversation today, what questions and/or critiques would you offer to them on their work?
Information Needed for this Essay: Relevant Class Lectures; Dillon (2020)-Chapter 4; Parsons E-Posting Reading (1959); and Merton E-Posting Reading (1938).
AND
Question #2 (Response should be no longer than 4 pages, double-spaced)
Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore offered in their 1945 American Sociological Review article a very provocative and still controversial explanation for the necessity of stratification in contemporary society. Based on your reading of this article, write an essay which a) presents the key assumptions and arguments developed by Davis and Moore; and b) your critical evaluation of those arguments. In evaluating Davis and Moore’s work, either explain your support for or critique of Davis and Moore’s theoretical propositions and arguments. How relevant (or not) do you find Davis and Moore’s theory for contemporary society? Information Needed for this Essay: Relevant Class Lectures; Dillon (2020)-Chapter 4; and Davis & Moore E-Posting Reading (1945).

Here is the prompt provided by my professor:
write a final capstone paper encompassing the impact of COVID-19 on the aerospace industry. You need to research the major U.S. airlines (Delta, United, American, Southwest, Alaska…), manufacturers, MRO’s. In your research you should attempt to ascertain the health of the companies pre and post COVID. Financial stability, liquidity, flexibility…
You paper should discuss the aerospace industry. You should make suppositions regarding the aforementioned industry health. I want you to go as far as predicting if you believe certain airlines, MRO’s, manufacturers will not survive the downturn. I want you to also explain specifics as to how COVID has impacted the entire industry, not just the airlines. Remember, this is a fact based paper, so it must be supported by facts not your opinion. You should be able to access stock information and economic viability from corporate reports and research articles. Remember, Wiki sites are not considered credible for the purposes of academic writing. That is not to say the information is incorrect, but avoid them for your academic writing unless otherwise directed.
Your final paper will be a minimum of 5 pages, 12 font, double spaced. It must be submitted in a Word document and will be submitted through Turn it In for plagiarism. I will not grade any document not submitted in Word format. Do not get creative with spacing and headers to gain length. See the syllabus for writing requirements. Your paper must be submitted in APA formatting and you must cite and provide a minimum of 5 references. In order to have a thoroughly researched paper, you will likely have many more than 5 sources. It is very important that you properly format and cite your work. If you do not properly cite your work, you will receive a failing grade. You are encouraged to include charts/graphs, but these do not count toward your 5 page minimum length

Introduction
State your research question and explain how it relates to your specialization and professional interests.
Synthesis of Literature Into a Cohesive Review
In the preparation study in Week 5, you identified at least three key themes, or focuses of inquiry, that are relevant to your research question and present in each article. These themes may be based on:
Related aspects of research questions.
Related or differing conclusions.
Other factors or ideas the studies have in common.
Other points of contrast between the studies.
Use concise formulations of these themes as headings for the next sections of the paper. In these sections, compare and contrast your resources ‘ positions relative to each theme, and then synthesize your own position relative to the theme. Support your conclusions by citing your references.
Granello’s 2001 article, “Promoting Cognitive Complexity in Graduate Written Work: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Literature Reviews,” provides a framework and strategies to help you work through this part of your assignment.
Conclusion
Restate the conclusions you came to regarding the themes you explored with your research. Support your conclusions by citing your references. However, if you find that more research would be needed to decide a question, briefly outline ideas of how you could undertake that research.

Select a recent Health Care Legislature (within 5
years)
• Literature review regarding issue (3 peer reviewed articles)
• Statistical data related to issue: population impacted, and
health outcome of issue and legislature
• Nursing role in passing the legislature
• APA Format
• References within 5 years

Gerrymandering: One person, one vote?
In this assignment, students have the opportunity to try their hand at a simplified districting exercise and learn about the common gerrymandering practices of packing and cracking districts. Students will complete an online exercise in which they play mini-golf to see how elections are tilted using maps.
Complete the online exercise here https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2022/redistricting-mini-golf/
After completing the online exercise students will write a 2-3-page paper reflecting on their online simulation and addressing the following prompts.
After completing the mini-golf simulation; How do redistricting and gerrymandering work? (Use this article https://www.choices.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/choices-twtn-gerrymandering-info-1.pdf and your textbook to support your analysis)
What is your understanding of the use of gerrymandering and the effects of gerrymandering on democracy? Does gerrymandering silence voters?
Who should decide how legislative districts are drawn?
Do you think we as a society should pay more attention to the issue of redistricting and gerrymandering? What should we do to address this issue?

It is a Postion Paper

Also i would like the topic to end in going into the role out of vaccines

Scoring Rubric:
Position papers are scored out of 100 according to the following rubric:
• Content (50 points)
– Member States Policy Specificity and Accuracy – 10 points
– Member States History and/or Involvement with Topic – 10 points
– Relevance to Topics – 10 points
– Recommendation for Change – 10 points
• Format (36 points)
– Document Length (2 pages max) – 5 points
– Heading Specifications (Member State and Committee Name 12 pt font) – 5 points
– Font Size (10 pt font) – 3 points
– Font Type (Times New Roman) – 3 points
– Title – 5 points
– Margins – 5 points
– Citations (Chicago style) – 5 points
– Single Spaced – 5 points
• Style (14 points)
– Spelling/Grammar – 7 points
– Diplomatic Tone – 7 points

The primary purpose of each film/podcast essay is to confirm that you watched the film, and that you did some thoughtful analysis of the film. Each essay should be about two pages. Write efficiently and be specific. Thus, your instructions are to 1) summarize the movie/video/podcast, 2) connect it to class material [e.g., symptoms depicted, potential diagnosis, what other information you would need to inform such diagnosis], 3) describe something you found interesting/novel, 4) reflect on one bias you experienced or a new perspective that you gained [e.g., had not thought of the caregiver’s perspective]. Last, at the end of your assignment, include one reliable source for information on the disorder you discuss (with hyperlink to website) and the phone number for the Suicide Prevention Hotline. These last two items do not count as part of the 2 pages, and should be simple additions to the end of your paper as pictured below:
More information on Anxiety: NIMH- anxiety disorders Suicide Prevention Hotline: 1-800-273-8255f
LINK TO VIDEO: https://youtu.be/PxuM-WgotHw

Design a pay structure for CapraTek that is commensurate with job classifications. The deliverable is a 3-4 page recommendation memo to upper management.
Introduction
The challenge in this assessment is to focus on creating a strategic pay structure that should include considering the number of pay structures, market pay line, defined pay grades, and pay ranges (Martocchio, pp. 172–179). Additionally, analyze merit pay systems, sales-incentive plans, and person-focused programs. Keep in mind the alignment of job classifications and pay structure.
Reference
Martocchio, J. J. (2020). Strategic compensation: A human resource management approach (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Preparation
It is critical to know that a successful compensation strategy will gain more acceptance by senior management when HRM can demonstrate a link between the rewards strategy and the attainment of the organization’s strategic goals.
For your next HR Challenge, your manager has asked you to design a pay structure for CapraTek that is commensurate with job classifications.
CapraTek
CapraTek is a virtual technology company. The assessment is based on the CapraTek scenario.
CapraTek: Strategic Pay Structures.
Get the perspective of CapraTek employees and determine the elements needed for a strategic pay structure.
Assessment Building on your work in the previous assessment’s HR Challenge: Internally Consistent and Externally Competitive, design a pay structure for CapraTek that is commensurate with job classifications. The deliverable is a recommendation memo to upper management.
To develop the recommendation memo to upper management, do the following:
Create a strategic pay structure for CapraTek using Martocchio’s five-step system, including the number of pay structures, market pay line, defined pay grades, and pay ranges (Martocchio, pp. 172–179).
Analyze merit-pay systems and their applicability to CapraTek.
Analyze sales-incentive compensation plans and their applicability to CapraTek.
Analyze person-focused programs and their applicability to CapraTek.
Evaluate the alignment of job classifications to this pay structure.

Write a 4-5 page report for an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek, based on one specific job structure.
Introduction
The real-world challenge in this assessment is to focus on three areas: building consistency, being competitive, and recognizing employee contributions. Keep in mind you are building a total rewards system for an imaginary company, CapraTek. First, focus on consistency for your system, which will include job analysis and job evaluation. Second, review how to create a competitive package that includes surveying the market (which you do not do for this assessment). Finally, consider how to design a pay structure and evaluate various approaches, focusing on an overarching strategic approach.
The assessments, based on CapraTek scenarios, must be completed in sequence.
Preparation
As a newly hired compensation specialist, your first challenge is to design an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek.
Your manager gives you the following advice: “First, focus on consistency for your system, which will include job analysis and job evaluation. Second, review how to create a competitive package that includes surveying the market.” (You will construct an action plan with recommendations, but you do not actually conduct a survey). “Finally, consider how to design a pay structure and evaluate various approaches, focusing on an overarching strategic approach.”
CapraTek
CapraTek is a virtual technology company. The assessment is based on the CapraTek scenarios.
CapraTek Key Issues and Initial Analysis.
This simulation walks you through identifying key issues that will affect a strategic compensation plan and how to analyze the basic organizational information necessary to make decisions and recommendations about a strategic compensation plan.
CapraTek: Job Structures and Compensation.
Examine the strategic and tactical decisions that need to be considered, as well as the various contextual influences.
Assessment Choose one specific job structure on which to conduct your analysis (administrative, research and development [R & D], sales, marketing, production).
Using CapraTek’s division structure, as well as online research, analyze and create an overview of an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek. The specific pay structure and benefit structure will be further developed in the next assessments.
The deliverable for this assessment is a 4–5 page proposal of an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek.
Structure your proposal with the following headings:
Job Analysis and Job Evaluation
Conduct a job analysis and job evaluation for CapraTek to ensure internal consistency.
Analyze jobs and job classifications to understand how they work together and evaluate the impact of job classification systems on compensation.
Strategic Analysis
Conduct a strategic analysis, including internal and external considerations.
Market Compensation Survey Action Plan
Construct an action plan with recommendations for a market compensation survey. (You do not need to conduct a survey.)
Conclusion
Develop an overview of an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek.
Validate your strategy as to why it is or is not an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system.