Best Writer

Read the article “What’s Wrong with Heteronormativity?” by Meg-John Barker and write your essay following the
instructions given below :

Reflective is a term utilized in critical thinking that can be defined as the analysis of one’s own thoughts. Reflective
thinking examines the formation of our judgements and requires introspective study of where our ideas develop.
Additionally, being reflective embraces applying new knowledge to prior understanding. It is the pursuit of
comprehending how we have learned and the impact that learning has had. Our experiences in our relationships &
families can be so deeply embedded within our lives to such an extent that we may not even notice its impact without
paying close attention. This assignment is a weekly opportunity to document our continual process throughout this
course in utilizing gender as a means of analysis. While reading is an important task in academia, it is far more crucial to make the effort to think about why what we read matters.

Reflective Analysis Essays will be a weekly, couple page exploration of the assigned article and class concept/s. This
assignment is intended to encourage your engagement with the topics; it is not simply a summary. Keep in mind, despite the personal nature some entries may take, well-organized writing and an academic tone are required. Your writing
should be concise, however it must exhibit a strong dedication to the exploration of class readings and their larger
societal implications. You are responsible for citing what aspect of the reading is of most interest to you and then you
must delve into the impact of that information in your life.Sociology of Families is a course that pertains to your personal life & future, so you are required to focus a portion of your analysis on contemplating how you will use these concepts
throughout your life.

Your reflective analysis essays should…

Have a minimum length of 430 words

Have three paragraphs: a small one introducing what you felt was the most important aspect of the article.
Second, a significant paragraph discussing why and how this concept matters in your life.
Finally, and most importantly, a paragraph addressing how you will use this learning in your future life/relationship

Include at least one in-text citation to each week’s assigned article in the first paragraph. The citation needs to be in parenthesis include the article authors’ last name/s and the page number where you found the information

Not quote excessively. If you must quote, keep it as brief as possible.

Make sure your writing is well-organized with a strong and coherent presentation of ideas.

Demonstrate careful proofreading of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please review the National Gang Center’s About the OJJDP Comprehensive Gang Model
(Links to an external site.)
webpage. Select one of the program evaluations available on the National Gang Center web page for review. You may also want to review the recommended resources, Chapter 3 in your text which covers theories of delinquency, as well as the help guides for PowerPoint and Screencast-O-Matic. Then develop a short presentation the case. Your presentation should:
Identify the program evaluation you selected.
Describe the program’s approach, goals, and intended outcomes.
Explain how outcomes were measured.
Which of the theories identified in Chapter 3 does the program align with?
Explain whether the program has been deemed effective.
If the program was deemed effective, what were the key elements that contributed?
If the program was not deemed effective, what key elements were missing?
Evaluate the evidence on effectiveness and outcome measurement provided.
Is it evidence- or anecdotally-based?
Your presentation will be a combination of slides containing visuals and bullet points, as well as narration of the content. PowerPoint or any other presentation software may be used to create a visual presentation of your research design. Narration is required so you will need to record your presentation using Screencast-o-matic or similar software. You are not required to be on camera but may choose to be on camera if you want to do so. Support your claims with examples from the required materials and a minimum of one journal article that you find using the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. You can use your research article in your Final Paper, due in Week 5.
The file for the presentation should be attached or embedded in your post for your peers to review, please do not link to outside locations. The following presentation resources are available in the Writing Center for you to use:
How to Make a PowerPoint Presentation Guide
(Links to an external site.)
Presentation Tips
(Links to an external site.)
Screencast-O-Matic Quick-Start Guide
(Links to an external site.)
Your presentation should have a minimum of five content slides (excluding title and references slides) and be at least three minutes long. Support your presentation with examples from this week’s required materials and other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references either in-text on bullet points or in the notes section and reference slide. You must use at least one scholarly or credible professional resource to support your presentation. The presentation must include a title and references slide for sources cited in the body of the presentation.

INTRODUCTION: In the Legal Traditions chapter on civil law, Glenn covers quite a bit of intellectual territory. Especially interesting for our peacemaking purposes are his discussions about the assumptions of legal rationality and the goal of law (p. 152), the objectivization of law (p. 158), interactions amongst traditions (p. 164 and beyond), and identities (p. 170). In this paper, you’ll delve into these ideas and connect them with your own peacemaking practice by formulating strategies and tactics for respecting identities and utilizing the example of diversity engagement.
INSTRUCTIONS: Write an essay answering the following prompts:
Glenn observes that civil law’s rationality is created based on classical logic. While classical logic lets you build things such as pyramids, temples, and legal codes, it does seem to lack in the tolerance found in other traditions, such as the Talmudic tradition’s “these and these” (p. 153). He says there are other ways of thinking about it besides classical logic. In your opinion, how does our culture’s thinking about objectivity, logic, and facts color our understanding of dispute resolution? Does mediation’s open posture towards ambiguity and multiple views clash with the law of non-contradiction (pp. 151-151)? Why or why not?
Glenn notes that Roman law co-existed with canon law (sometimes taught together in a single text – see the Brundage reading for more on canon law) and the various laws of places under Rome’s control. Moving forward in history, he looks at how Europeans have viewed unifying, and now harmonizing, continental law (pp. 167-168). After reading about this tolerance within the civil system (see also, cthonic, Hindu, and Talmudic traditions), what lessons of tolerance and co-existence can you take into your own peacemaking practice? Briefly describe two or three lessons.
Identity is relevant both in legal traditions and in conflict (we have a whole course on it, after all). In our text, it’s mentioned that Europeans hold several identities, but that they’ll “defend any of them against external challenge” (p. 170). The book also discusses an increase in localization (a revolution itself). In the course creator’s opinion, intellectual and social localization are some of the driving factors in contemporary social conflicts. Based on this module’s “I Contain Multitudes” discussion choose a couple of forms of identity (ex. multiracial, comic book nerd, Texian) and using them as an example brainstorm and formulate specific ways that you as a peacemaker can respect and honor diverse forms of identity in your practice.
PAPER SPECS:
800-900 words
APA style and format
Include the prompts in your paper
Include an introduction and a conclusion

Introduce yourself to the class! Why are you at Middlesex College and what do you plan on doing in the future with your education and experience?
2) What are the overall messages from the responses? (are the positive, more negative, scary, etc.) Give examples to support your claim.
3) Which category had the most positive messages? Why was it positive? Give examples to support your claim.
4) Which category had the most negative or scary messages in it? Why was it negative or scary? Give examples to support your claim.
5) Were there any major topics you noticed were missing from the categories? Which ones? (meaning, when you look at all the categories, there is definitely a theme of topics and some topics that were NEVER mentioned – what topics did you notice that no one mentioned. I am not looking for new categories, what topics within those categories did students not mention)
6) With all of the conflicting messages, how do you use the messages you learned about sexuality? (ie how do you deal with so many different messages – how do you formulate your own views to these topics?)

From the point of view of an audience member, briefly describe the differences you might observe between attending performances of “Oedipus the King” and a medieval cycle play like “Noah and His Sons.”
Please write a 250 to 500 word, double spaced, essay over your findings. Make sure you account for grammar, spelling and flow of ideas, as these are all important to understanding your thoughts and ideas.

Write a thesis-driven rhetorical analysis of two texts
or sources, related to your semester topic on a social, environmental,
economic, or local issue. You need to look specifically at texts that directly
address a contemporary ethical problem or question related to your issue of
choice. This involves researching and finding articles in the library or online
relating to your topic.
Ideally, you should choose
two texts that offer two different views on your topic. Remember, they need to
be making an argument about the topic.

TELL ME THE TOPIC OF YOUR CHOICE

A
successful essay will:
1. Bring readers into the context of the reading. In
what larger conversation is the author participating? What ethical problems or
questions appear in this text? Why are they important? What is at stake?
Introduce the text to the reader, briefly summarize its main idea, and make a
claim (thesis) for each author’s rhetorical strategies. A strong claim is both
contestable – reasonable people might disagree – and predictive – it will set
up expectations for your reader.
2. Develop your
main points around specific rhetorical strategies. Consider how the author
constructs the argument, not whether or not you agree. Analysis relies on
objective judgments. Remember also that rhetoric encompasses any tools
available for persuasion. For example, would it be useful to talk about the
argument in terms of ethos, logos, and/or pathos? Or on purpose, audience,
and/or genre?
3. Support your main points with concrete examples
(evidence) from the text. To develop and support your own points, you will need
to include specific examples in the form of paraphrase or short direct
quotations.

Formatting
Specifications and Due Date:
MLA formatting with 12-point font (preferably Times
New Roman)
Provide a works cited page for the sources researched
(there should only be two sources)
Section headers should be used throughout the paper
(a road map for your reader)
4 to 5 pages (excluding the works cited page)

Structure of Paper:
Introduction
Section:
•
Purpose (Introduces two sources to include author names and title of text,
along with the subject matter.)
•
Claim/Thesis/Main Idea from Authors (Provide the main claim or thesis statement
of each author.)
•
Analysis Parameters (What methods of analysis will you use to analyze the
sources? Explain what criteria are used
in your paper.)

Analysis
Section:
•
Provide at least three characteristics by which to analyze each text (i.e.,
Ethos, Pathos, Logos or Style, Tone, Sentence Structure, Toulmin Model,
etc.)
•
Compare and contrast elements of each text/author arguments (What are the
similarities? How are they different?)
•
Provide specific examples from each text in order to support your comments (at
least 3 quotes with in-text citations from each source)
•
The details should be thorough and logical

Conclusion
Section:
•
States the major inferences that can be drawn from the analysis.
•
It is based entirely on previously stated information.
•
It does not introduce new material or evidence to support your analysis.

Works
Cited (new page – last page of paper):
•
MLA format must be use for both sources listed
•
Works cited page contains each source used in the in-text citations.

Rough Draft Paper:
Submit 8-10 double-spaced page literature review based on your topic.
Submit your Final Paper in a Word file for grading.
Provided at least 10 references to support selected topic in the reference area.
Specific Instructions for the Term Paper:
1. Customize the title page for your own paper. This includes editing the “Running Head” in the page header, the title of your paper, and your name. If you don’t know how to edit a header in Word, Google for instructions on how to edit a header in the version of Word you are using and follow the instructions.
2. Add a table of content with an outline of all your major points and subpoints.
3. Write a 150-250 word abstract for your term paper (on p. 2 of the Paper Template). The abstract should be a brief summary of your paper.
4. Add an Introduction
Introduction goes after the Abstract. Be sure the students include all of the following using level 2 heading:
The background of the topic
Statement of the Problem
Statement of the Purpose
Research Questions
Significance of the Study
5. For each major section of the paper, you need to customize the sub-headings. You may add additional sub-headings, as needed, but each section must have a minimum of three sub-headings, except for the Recommended Improvement section, which must have a minimum of five sub-headings. Be sure to be descriptive in your sub-heading names, so that I know what content you intend to cover in each sub-heading.
6. Add your references.
**Please use attached outline for roughdraft.

In 650 words or more please briefly discuss (2-3 sentences) what stood out to you from all of the readings.
Use the rest of the time discussing why this information stood out to you. Please include specific stories or interactions/experiences you may have had or seen in your life.

TED TALK: Please watch

WHO Youth Violence: Please read
https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/youth-violence

Local History Assignment is to be 800 to 1000 words long. This may be a review of one of the local museums.
Photographs are encouraged but not required to supplement your essay. Chicago Style footnotes are required if you are quoting any reference or interviewing anyone. If you are going into a museum you may use the first person “I” to describe your visit and any items of interest that you saw there. What does the museum do well? What things caught your eye? What things surprised you? What things could they improve? If you are not able to get to a local BC museum in person you may do a review of its website.

Watch the video and answer the following questions. You do not need any more sources besides the video. The link to the video will be posted here along with the questions. This essay will need to be at least 150 words, but no more than 250.
Please watch the video below and answer the following questions in the discussion board using 150 words or more.
1). What are the nutritional contents of the brain? (List and describe the function of each.) 2.) What is the relationship between proteins/amino acids and neurotransmitters in our brain? 3.) What percentage of our nutritional resources does the brain use? Think about what you have learned from this module. 4.) What would be the ultimate effect of not eating a diet that has a variety of rich nutritional content?

This is the link to the video. Thank you