Best Writer

Part I. Define your topic of concern and conduct a relevant needs assessment.
Description: Define the topic you are addressing. How are you conceptualizing the issue? Consider the following questions– How many people does this impact nationally or locally? Why is this issue important? How does this social problem impact people?
Needs Assessment: Apply the four types of needs assessment as appropriate. Use professional sources to gather information when possible. If you are not able to capture enough information with current resources, state how you would collect needs assessment data.
Notes on this section: This section will require at least 4-6 references. Be sure that all references are professional and appropriate (peer review, government documents, etc). This section is setting the stage for your program so the background and needs assessment data should clearly state why this is important.
Part II. Rationale for the Proposed Program
Program Hypothesis. Provide a rationale for why the program you are proposing is needed and appropriate for your issue. Clearly state the program hypothesis.
Logic Model. Present a clearly articulated logic model for your program. The logic model should identify specific inputs and expected outcomes.
Part III. Program Description
Program Overview. Clearly describe the type of program you are proposing. The program overview should align with Sections I and II of the proposal. The program overview should also address the context or scope of the program.
Specific Activities. Describe the specific activities that will occur in your program. Who will implement the activities? Where will they happen? How many people will be served by your program?
Part IV. Evaluation Plan and Budget
Evaluation Plan. Describe how you propose to gather information related to your program and how that information will both inform improvements and also how information can demonstrate the effectiveness of the program (process and outcome).
Budget. Identify the costs associated with your program. Be sure to include space, technology, staffing, etc. Include a budget spreadsheet and a narrative portion that explains the costs.

Utilization-focused evaluation is founded on the notion that an evaluation design must be responsive to the needs of those who will use its results. Other schools of thought may not view utilization as the driving force in the same way. Nonetheless, the point of all evaluation research is to have the findings used.
For this Assignment, step back from the evaluation you have been planning for your Final Project, and think about how the results will be used.

Submit by Day 7 a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Identify which stakeholders you would involve and their roles in the evaluation process.
Identify what you see as each stakeholder’s interest in the program you selected, and in the evaluation results.
Identify any ethical issues that should be considered.
Determine whether you will be able to meet their needs with the evaluation you have planned so far.
After thinking about your evaluation from various angles, analyze ways in which you envision the need for the evaluation and the end results being put to use.
Explain any changes that this analysis suggests for the remaining sections of your design that you have already developed.

Answer the following: What we know about Russia’s alleged hack of the U.S. Government and Tech Companies. How will that effect U.S. security? What alternatives can be offered? Please use academic resources to support your position.

Requirements:

•Your paper must be at least 1500 words.
•Please double space your paper and use Times New Roman 12-point font.
•Make sure to proofread your paper before submitting.
•APA format. Please utilize appropriate citations and references for sources. A minimum of three (3) academic sources is required.
•Please include your word count at the end of your assignment.

Based on the readings, what was new about the “new science” of the seventeenth century? What were the reasons that natural philosophers like Descartes, Galileo and Francis Bacon pointed to when claiming that the old, settled truths of traditional science should be reassessed or even rejected? How did they support their position?

be sure to cite specific quotations as examples from the texts assigned.

Scholarly
Paper Assignment Guidelines
In a
5-7-page paper (not including title page and references), describe a
gerontological chronic health problem you have been assigned,
investigate one resource that is available for services, support, and/or education locally, regionally or on the Internet, and
be prepared to present this resource in class.
Assignments can be found under groups in BB. This paper is NOT a group assignment. Use the
guideline below for your paper.

1.
Explain the pathophysiology, clinical
manifestations, and impact on daily living of the illness. (25%)

2.
From a discussion
of the epidemiological features of the selected chronic illness (incidence
and prevalence), identify the need for resources in this community for
patients with this chronic illness. Use national, state, and local data.
Sources for this data should be included in text and on your reference
list. (10%) (Rochester NY area)

3.
Thoroughly investigate and describe one relevant resource in the community
for patients with the assigned chronic illness. Detail how resource was
researched. Suggestions for resources are listed below: (Rochester NY area)
(25%)
·
Resources associated with local
institutions/hospitals
·
Resources independent of inpatient health care
facilities
·
Consumer education and support from
not-for-profits, internet
·
Other resources you have found

4.
Evaluate the resource
(25%)
· What is
your overall evaluation of this resource for a patient with the assigned
chronic illness?
·
Make recommendations about how the resource might
be used by patients.
·
What are barriers to the service/program for
individuals or families
e.g. financial, mobility, access,
motivation, culture, language?

5. APA format,
writing, editing (15%)
I did not find any resources yet to be used in my paper, i can find some if you need me too.

Choose a human services issue that you think needs more advocacy, either from your researched information or a new issue. Define the issue and discuss how you would begin to advocate for this issue. Also discuss the importance of the issue, including any relevant background history.

General Discussion Research the discussion topic and obtain college-level, credible sources. Credible sources can be found using the HCC library in the form of books, databases, and scholarly articles. *Refer to the Plagiarism, Citation, and Format Unit for information on how to create MLA citations.
Prepare your original research discussion post. (300 words minimum)
Type your original discussion post directly into the Rich Content Editor text box. This is the only acceptable format for this assignment.
Complete two peer response that contributes to our learning. (150 words minimum for each response)
You must embed an image in this discussion. You can embed an image file directly into discussion replies using the image icon. Images can be embedded from the web, your Canvas user files, or Flickr. If a change is made to the source of your image after you have embedded it in a discussion reply, the image added to your discussion reply will not be changed. Before you can embed an image from Canvas, the image must first be uploaded to your user files.
This discussion requires you to complete and post your original research discussion first. After you post, you will be able to view what your classmates have presented. *Any empty or incomplete post will be score with a grade of zero.
Original Post Discussion Topic: How do public works of art influence the physical space in which they are located? How do communities react to works of art within their everyday space?
For our unit discussion, you need to:
Read the following information on Public Art Download Public Art
Go out into the community and locate a work of public art.
Spend some time interacting with the work of art. Take note of what you do and how you feel.
Take a selfie with the work and include the photo in your original post. (Make sure your photo is saved as either a Jpeg. or Png file)
Be sure to embed the selfie of you and the work of art in your original discussion.
Create an original research-based discussion, minimum 300 words, by answering the following questions. (Be sure to number your answers)
How did you interact with the work?
How is unity achieved between the work and the environment in which it resides?
Do you think that this work adds to or takes away from the community in which it is located?
Research to see what the community reaction was to the work you selected.
Finally, what is your judgment of the work? Pay attention to both the artisanship qualities and what the work is communicating.
Peer Response Respond to two of your peers, minimum of 150 words for each response. You can address any of the following in your peer responses.
You can compare and contrast your view with the view of your peer.
You can comment on the critical position your peer has taken.
You can discuss the example provided by adding additional connections.
You can include additional sources that provide additional credible information.
Do not limit your response to what you like or dislike about your peer’s post.

Write a paper talking about my opinion of human trafficking.

The instructions are all in the file titled “Assignment.pdf”, and further instructions are in the file titled “Handbook.pdf”. For your sources, use the file titled “Sourcebook.pdf”, and any other sources of information you can find for this assignment, aside from sites like wikipedia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Ancient History Encyclopedia, the Khan Academy, National Geographic, National Geographic Kids, History.com, YouTube, etc.. Aside from that, follow the instructions in Assignment.pdf and Handbook.pdf.

Discuss a U.S. court case ruling that impacted how law enforcement operated and how law enforcement changed police practices to comply with the law.