Best Writer

Reference Table 8.1 on p. 166 in Ch. 8 of Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship and the organization you selected in the Wk 2 – Innovation and Competitive Advantage: Changing Environments assignment.

Choose from one of the following options:

Option 1
Write a 1,200- to 1,400-word paper using the same organization you selected in Wk 2.

Create a business plan for this organization to enter a global market in which they are not already doing business (see Section 2 of Table 8.1). Be sure to include the following:
Description of the business
Description of the industry
Technology plan
Marketing plan
Financial plan
Production plan
Organizational plan
Operations plan
At least 2 of the 7 recommended appendices (exhibits) as listed in Section 3 of Table 8.1

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

This assessment will require you to research the elements of criminal conspiracy. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with at least three (3) credible resources, which may include the class textbook as well as journal articles or periodicals from the Internet or from the KU Library.
Comprise a minimum 2-page essay, and please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. For this assessment, the content should address the following questions presented:
Identify and describe the four elements of a conspiracy?
Distinguish among at least two (2) tests used to determine if there has been adequate action to establish the crime of criminal conspiracy.
Propose any changes or modifications to these tests, which you would support as a federal or state legislator.
Upload your Assignment as a Microsoft Word document.

“Identify, analyse, and compare two national health systems of your choosing in respect to a
political, economic, and social environment. Distinguish the two health systems and analyse
the problems these health systems face.”
(If you could use the health systems of Germany and England that would be great! However, any two work)
The word count limit for this assignment is 3000 words, +/- 10%. The word count must be
adhered to.
You must use the APA Referencing style when referencing this piece of coursework. All work must
be referenced correctly and appropriately.

Section

Criteria

Weight

Introduction

There is an introduction to the
assignment that establishes the importance of the topic.

15
Marks

Discussion
and Analyses

A clearly structured essay which uses relevant and up to
date
evidence.
There is a clear and
concise
synthesis of the overall thoughts demonstrated throughout the assignment.

30
Marks

Language
and Structure

There
are little to no grammatical errors. Sentences are clear and
well
worded, following a logical structure appropriate writing
style and flexibility in
expressions. Paragraph’s flow and transition work well.

25
Marks

Conclusion

Conclusions are effective and
summarise the key points of the discussion.

15
Marks

Presentation
and Referencing

High
quality presentation that conforms to the principles of good scientific
writing and contains minimal errors in sentence
construction,
grammar, and punctuation. The work is correctly referenced.

15
Marks

Total: 100 Marks

Title of the experiment.
Purpose of the experiment. One to two sentences that summarize why the experiment is done. (1 point)
List of chemicals for the experiment AND safety precautions for major chemicals. Search “SDS sheet for chemicals” on Google and list major hazards for each chemical. (1 point)
Balanced chemical equation (If any). (1 point)
Procedure for the experiment. (1 point)
Hand-written copy of data sheet/ report form. (1 point)

Instructions:
Participation is a requirement for this course, and the Packback Questions platform will be used for online discussion about class topics covered during that lesson. Packback Questions is an online community where you can be fearlessly curious and ask open-ended questions to build on top of what we are covering in class and relate topics to real-world applications. This assignment requires that you apply the reading material to create discussions with your peers that will evidence your ability to synthesize what you read and engage in a critical analysis of the topics. See below for the topic guidance.
Grading Criteria:
Potential points: 50 pts
minimum posts completed (one initial, two peer posts)
Quality writing: No spelling/grammatical errors, font and format is professional, citations included within the body of the text, required reading/terminology used withing the post, your discussion remained on topic.
Timely: Submission of posts were completed during first week the topic opened. Students will have an opportunity to improve their grade if they post during the first week. See Course Calendar for the date the discussion board closes.
Review the reading material and engage in a discussion on the topic of Criminal Law/Crimes
Read Chapter 9 (Miller)
You may find the Optional Reading Material/Videos helpful in formulating your discussion responses
Packback Question format
You must create an original question that is in “open-ended format” and then respond to your own question in about two paragraphs. You are required to cite your sources (Textbook chapters must be included in your citations). After completing your initial post, you must then engage with your classmates by responding to their initial posts (a minimum of two peer posts). These peer posts must either: 1. agree with your peer, explain why and add citations, OR 2. disagree with your peer, explain why and add citations. Your peer posts can be to one other classmates (go back and forth) or you can select two different classmates to engage in a discussion. Remember that you are having a discussion, so anticipate that your peer will reply to your post and you may go back and forth. You are only required to post three (3) times (one initial + two peer posts), however, discussions are a great way to apply what you learned, so feel free to post as many times as you wish.
Topics of your questions for the Criminal Law/Crimes lesson must cover at least one of these competencies:

Describe the nature of crimes and the types of criminal penalties for crimes.
Distinguish between the different types of white-collar crimes.
Explain the crimes of larceny, robbery, burglary and destruction of property.
Identify the myriad of computer crimes and penalties assessed for these crimes.
Explain the procedures and rights for defendants in a criminal proceeding.
Distinguish between the contract, tort, criminal law and intellectual property issues associated with cyber law
Tips for Success
Your participation on Packback will count toward 50% of your overall course grade.
There will be a Weekly Sunday at 11:59pm EST deadline for submissions. In order to receive your points per week, you should submit the following per each deadline period:

1 open-ended Question per week worth 25 pts of each assignment grade
2 Responses per week 12.5 pts of each assignment grade
You must stay on topic (see above the list of competencies to choose from for your discussion question)
You must cite your sources within the post using MLA format
The SOURCE is always the lesson we are covering (not the web sites of articles you cited in your post)
You will only earn points during the week the lesson is open – you cannot post early or late (Monday to Sunday)
Partial credit may be provided for questions and responses that do not meet the minimum curiosity score of 40.
Professor recommends that you draft your discussion posts in Microsoft Word, check it with Grammarly.com (or seek the assistance of the Writing Center) before submitting your work into Packback
Packback provides guidance using artificial intelligence (AI) to help you improve your work before you submit – it is adviseable to make the changes the AI recommends.
Once another person responds to your post you will not be able to edit your post without the assistance of Packback Helpdesk (do not write the professor). Contact Packback directly for technical assistance using Packback: https://help.packback.co/hc/en-us/categories/203990168-Student-Support
NOTE: All links will open in a new window, please make sure to disable pop-up blockers.

For my part only need to read (it is a short one)
Unit V. The Phenomenological Tradition
Introduction to Unit V
15. The Problem of Experiencing Someone Else
Martin Buber

This is the textbook link:
https://books.google.ca/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=L-jAeC5F3v8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=theorizing+communication:+readings+across+traditions+pdf&ots=M7lkw52SE5&sig=trBYQTbeLN3C9Bc7deqgMJCYpio#v=onepage&q=The%20Problem%20of%20Experiencing%20Someone%20Else&f=false

Assignment 1: Comparative Analysis of readings from the textbook
Each small group selects five original texts that belong to different traditions (one per tradition).
Each member of the group works on one text – familiarize themselves with the text, with the author (some biographical data and major works), and the school of thought they belong to.
Secondary sources are consulted and assembled in a References list to be attached to the group paper (between ten and fifteen sources).
In the group paper, the five texts are compared and critically discussed in relation to several comparative dimensions:
• How is communication conceived and defined?
• What is the unit of analysis – an individual, group, message, etc.?
• How is the relation of communication to society presented?
• Which are the particular theories of communication that can be traced back to the five traditions? –
The list of comparative dimensions can be extended, and the critical analysis deepened, as a result of the collaborative work of the group – discussions on the approach to the assignment, the paper structure, the conclusions, etc.

Write a one-page paper (12 point type, double spaced) on The Metropolitan Museum of Art in new york. Choose work displayed in the collection of ancient art in the museum you visit and critique it based on the elements and principles of art, and its aesthetic properties. Include image of the work chosen.

Last week I decided to have breakfast for dinner. As I cooked eggs, I began to think about that statement, “breakfast for dinner.” Was I really eating breakfast for dinner? Wasn’t I really just eating eggs? Why are eggs considered breakfast? Why do many restaurants stop serving egg dishes after a certain hour? How had I gotten to the point where I associated that particular food item with a specific meal and time of day? Who taught me this idea? Using the sociological imagination can help us understand more about ordinary everyday events and decisions in our lives.
Ultimately, C. Wright Mills’ concept of the “sociological imagination” allows us to critically examine our society and our life, by considering the way social, historical, and cultural forces impact us and those around us. For example, we can consider how our society and culture have established expectations about our food choices. This first activity will ask you to engage with the sociological imagination, one of the core ways of thinking within sociology. We will then use the sociological imagination throughout the rest of the semester, as we consider the global society.
Part I – Data Collection
Make a list of the foods U.S. culture associates with breakfast, those that are considered lunch, and those that are dinner. Your list should include at least 45 entries. You can ask friends and family members to help you generate your list. Then, select another country, and research what they eat for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Make a list of the food items they associate with the meals. If they don’t have breakfast, lunch, and dinner, what do they do instead. You must include your lists with your paper when it is submitted on Canvas.
Part II – Reflection
After generating your lists, write a 3 full page paper (typed, double-spaced, in Times New Roman 12-point font) in which you use the sociological imagination to examine your data (i.e. your lists). You should draw from our course material in your paper, but as with all assignments in this course, you cannot quote material from any source in your answers; use your own words. You should upload your paper to Canvas where it will be run through the Turnitin Originality Checker.
Start your paper by explaining the sociological imagination. Why is it important to consider the social forces that impact our lives? Why does this context matter? How could the sociological imagination help you in your college career? How might it help you once you begin working in your chosen field? Be specific.
Next, discuss our societal expectations regarding food. How does our society set guidelines for what we eat, and when we should eat it? In other words, how did you know which foods to put in the breakfast category, and which to place in dinner? Use specific examples. Who taught you about the foods that should be eaten for these different meals? Think beyond family and friends; what entities in society established these eating habits. What societal institutions (family, education, economy, religion, sports, etc.) impact our decisions regarding food, and how do they do so?
Finally, compare and contrast our societal ideas about breakfast, lunch, and dinner to the country you researched. Comparing and contrasting asks us to consider the similarities and differences, so make sure you discuss both. Using a global perspective, discuss how globalization and glocalization impact food options in the U.S., and how they could impact options in the country you researched. Why is it important to take a global perspective as we examine our own society? How can understanding the broader global society help you in your college career and your chosen field of study?

Find and analyze a recent news article relating to food sustainability from a reputable online source. Your choice of focus is almost endless: food security, water management, pesticides, animal welfare, fair trade, agriculture. The purpose of this exercise is to apply the foundational sustainability concepts we have covered thus far while digging deeper into a topic that interests you!

1. In your own words, summarize the key points of the article.  The summary should function as a way for a reader to understand the most important information without needing to read the article itself. (150+ words)

2. What economic, environmental, and/or social sustainability topics does the article directly address? Identify which part(s) of the food system are related to each issue and the primary stakeholders involved. (150+ words)

3. Are there any aspects of environmental, social, and economic sustainability related to the topic not directly discussed in the article?  What concepts require further exploration? (75+ words)

4. Reference your article in APA format.

What does Things Fall Apart tell us about precolonial African societies? (Please use the reading, lecture and documentaries in your essay. Please reference the three sources in your essay).

Remember to indicate the reaction paper prompt or question you are focusing on. Please reference the lecture, reading(s), and documentaries in your essay. Every paragraph must have a reference. A bibliography or works cited must be provided at the end of the essay. Whatever style/format of reference you use should be applied consistently.

Also there are videos on classroom.google.com, Code: ecfrdoi. Lecture 11 (week 5)