Best Writer

This first assignment this term asks you to write a short essay analysing the biography we are using as a textbook this term. It is Matthew Stanley, Einstein’s War : How Relativity Triumphed Amid the Vicious Nationalism of World War I (New York, New York: Dutton, 2019). This biography, as the author explains, follows Einstein’s life and ideas into and out of World War One. Assess the purpose of this framework. Is the book’s focus on the impact of war on Einstein and others trying to convince us that science and scientists are more political than we imagine? Or, is the book’s focus on the impact of war on Einstein and others trying to convince us that, ultimately, science is beyond politics (after all, Einstein did succeed in finding his calculations for general relativity)? Or, neither?
Criteria for Evaluation:
Participation in tutorial discussion on the biography to develop this essay.
Level of your understanding of the biography’s arguments about science, scientists and politics.
A clear argument that responds to the question, above, supported with evidence from the book.
Writing style, including good paragraph structure, clarity, and organizational structure.
Correct grammar and essay-mechanics (title, spelling, punctuation)
Ability to follow presentation instructions for format.
Format:
1. Your work should be typed, double-spaced, using 12 point Times New Roman font.
2. Use 1-inch margins, and number your pages.
3. Submit a doc or docx file – if you use another format for writing, like Google Docs, you must convert it before submitting.
4. Submit to the 1911 website by the deadline with your doc or docx file properly labelled: last name first name, course name, assignment name and date.
E.g “LastnameFirstname1911Assignment62022.doc”
5. Follow University of Chicago format for any quotations, as with your other assignments.

Explain how both Winthrop and Bradford represent the role and the importance of the community and the individual.
First identify the role and its goals.
How do these authors conceptualize the role of the individual? Explain.
Be sure to provide a specific example from both Winthrop and Bradford in support of your claims.
POST MUST BE 250-300 WORDS, 12 FONT, TIMES NEW ROMAN
MUST INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE QUOTE TO SUPPORT YOUR IDEAS/CLAIMS
YOU MUST ONLY USE THE RESOURCES ATTACHED-NO OUTSIDE SOURCE-MLA FORMAT FOR CITATION ONLY

Discuss and analyze the arguments made by climate change critics. Are they correct, partially correct, or wrong in their opposition to policy measures addressing climate change?

Discuss why we need African American History?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/florida-school-district-cancels-professors-civil-rights-lecture-critic-rcna13183
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/01/florida-sb-148-racism-discomfort
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/148/?Tab=BillText
https://youtu.be/8hClszoD-pM 26:50-36:00

As we conclude our discussion on the importance of Black History, you will be writing about your position and answer the following:
A: Do you believe that some or all of the elements of Critical Race Theory should be taught at all levels of education? Why or why not?
B: What are your thoughts on the passage of state laws that place boundaries on what can and can’t be taught in history classes? Explain.
C: Explain your thoughts on the James Baldwin speech “Living and growing in a white world.” Do you feel that it relates to the issue in Florida and the overall teaching of history in America?
D: Any other thoughts/comments on anything we discussed on this topic.
Your reaction paper should contain these elements:
Define the Issue: How do you see the issue? Perhaps some aspects are more important than others, choose those aspects on which you will be able to state a clear and concise opinion.
Formulate and clarify your position: This should be a little more than a simple statement of your opinion. Prove a controversial point, critique a flawed assumption, and demonstrate that you have an accurate understanding of the competing or opposing views. I want you to Convince me, persuade me to buy into your argument.
Defend your position: Identify the most important argument needed to support your position. Provide the facts and information which helps make your case. New and creative arguments rather than traditional ones will be appreciated. Be clear, logical, and consistent.
Lastly, conclude: Sum up your argument in a clear and precise manner. While reading your paper, I should not have any doubt as to where you stand. If you are on the fence on a particular issue/discussion, speak to that in your paper and explain why you are in the middle.
Format
The paper should be long enough to accomplish an analysis without padding. Usually this means 2-3 typed, double-spaced pages. (500-750 if you are counting).
It should not be your first draft. Have someone read it and critique it, and then revise and submit it. Proofread, proofread, proofread.
It should be headed by a title page that should include the following:
Your own title for the paper followed by a “reaction to” the topic assigned
By: your name
HIS 105, Union County College, Fall 2021
Date

Write about in the article shown in the pictures how popular culture stereotypes are based on race, gender, and many
other factors. Needs to discuss the main argument of the article and summarize the main points. NO outside
research.

Which enterprise application should a business install first: ERP, SCM, or CRM? Explain your answer.
2

In 2-3 well supporting paragraphs answer the following questions and include examples from texts in sources below.

According to Holmes (and Cohen), in what sense is the free trade in ideas the best test of truth? How might a culture influenced by political correctness impact the idea of freedom of speech and free trade in ideas as Holmes proposes? Use specific examples from the text, and explain and support your interpretation of Holmes. Next, provide a brief account of Valenti’s argument. Is her criticism consistent with Chait’s thesis?

Sources:
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/01/not-a-very-pc-thing-to-say.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/616#writing-USSC_CR_0250_0616_ZD
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/28/pc-culture-freedom-of-speech-freedom-to-be-offended
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/08/the-most-powerful-dissent-in-american-history/278503/

Just do half of the page for each question
1. Research the different social goals of the criminal law as described in Chapter I. In your opinion, which of these goals is the most important and should receive priority? Why do you feel this way?
SOCIAL GOAL: Retribution

2. Discuss a criminal event and detail how it might illustrate the conflict model, which emphasizes disparity between the various components of the criminal justice system.

Explain how the Black Death represent an interaction between the “material world” and the “trading world” of the fourteenth century? And, what kind of connections or parallels do you see between the current Covid crisis and the Black Death?

Write a paper detailing the individual experience of administering 2 alcohol screening tools. The student will conduct a mock interview with a friend or family member using two of the following tools: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, T-ACE, and/or Michigan Alcohol Screening Test.
Students will briefly describe the tools and describe their experience administering each tool including both the strengths, weaknesses, challenges with administering the tool, and suggestions to improve the tools.
Refer to the attached rubric for the grading criteria.