Best Writer

This assignment will require you to conduct research.
You can use the following resources: textbook, Internet, local police department or KU library database.
You will need to find two quality references on police officer discipline within police
departments.
Write an APA, two-page paper, that addresses the following topics:
Explain the various forms of disciplinary action that can be taken by police leaders
against officers.
Explain the Brady decision and how this affects police officers.
Describe how a citizen can file a complaint against a police officer.
Create at least three recommendations on how police leaders can improve the complaint process against an officer and how to improve ways of effectively investigating police misconduct.

Please discuss the different types of reports that an officer may be required to complete as well as when those reports might be required.
Please explain the importance of each type of report as well as the importance for accurate, legible writing and how illegible writing might impact the investigation and prosecution of the crime being documented.

The Foundation of Data-Driven Decisions
Skill(s) Being Assessed: Problem Solving – Data Analysis (Mathematical Reasoning)
What to Submit / Deliverables: Word Document uploaded to the Blackboard Assignment
What is the value of doing this assignment? You’ll practice your problem solving skill by identifying foundational statistical concepts and explaining how data-driven decision making can help inform real world problems. This will provide you with a solid foundation that will help you to not only be successful in this course, but to learn to make smarter, data-driven decisions in your personal and professional life.
Your goal for this assignment is to: Practice your problem solving skill by answering questions about statistical concepts and the benefits and uses of data-driven decision making.
Steps to Complete:
STEP 1: Answer the questions below in a Word document.
STEP 2: Save and submit your Word document in the Assignment link in the Week 3 Submit page in BlackBoard.
1. Explain the difference between descriptive and inferential statistical methods and give an example of how each could help you draw a conclusion in the real world.
2. You would like to determine whether eating before bed influences sleep patterns. List each step you would take to conduct a statistical study on this topic and explain what you would do to complete each step. Then, answer the questions below.
What is your hypothesis on this issue?
What type of data will you be looking for?
What methods would you use to gather information?
How would the results of the data influence decisions you might make about eating and sleeping?
3. A company that sells tea and coffee claims that drinking two cups of green tea daily has been shown to increase mood and well-being. This claim is based on surveys asking customers to rate their mood on a scale of 1–10 after days they drink/do not drink different types of tea. Based on this information, answer the following questions:
How would we know if this data is valid and reliable?
What questions would you ask to find out more about the quality of the data?
Why is it important to gather and report valid and reliable data?
4. Identify two examples of real-world problems that you have observed in your personal, academic, or professional life that could benefit from data driven solutions. Explain how you would use data/statistics and the steps you would take to analyze each problem. You may also choose topics below (or examples from the weekly content) to help support your response:
Productivity at work.
Financial decisions and budgeting.
Health and nutrition.
Political campaigns.
Quality testing in products.
Human resource policies.
Algorithms for programming/coding.
Accounting & financial policies.
Crime reduction and trends.
Environmental protection / Emergency preparedness.
5. How does analyzing data on these real-world problems aid in problem-solving and drawing conclusions? Be sure to note the value and benefits of data-driven decision-making.

What are the pros and cons of your results? How will your results affect your staff nurse team?

Summarize the content of the video in your own words. Use concepts from ALL PARTS of the video. (150-200 words) *It must be crystal clear that you have watched the whole video.*
Analyze how the content of the video would help you to advocate for medical patients in the real world. (25-50 words)
Describe how the content of this video connects to something you already know and/or have learned in another class. (25-50 words)
https://uhdowntown-my.sharepoint.com/personal/hiebelerd_uhd_edu/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fhiebelerd%5Fuhd%5Fedu%2FDocuments%2FMCM%20Lecture%20Series%20Sp%2021%2FCM%20Assessment%20Lecture%20Spring%202021%20%283%29%2Emp4&parent=%2Fpersonal%2Fhiebelerd%5Fuhd%5Fedu%2FDocuments%2FMCM%20Lecture%20Series%20Sp%2021

Above is the link to the lectue video

Review the following examples and identify which of the three basic principles of the Belmont Report is being violated in each example. Be specific and explain in what way you think this principle is being violated and how you think this issue could be made right based on what you learned this week on ethics:
A researcher recruits poor minorities to be participants in a risky experiment.
A researcher tricks people into participating by suggesting that they might win a contest.
A researcher knows that people will feel ashamed after one part of the study.

The discussion should be about a page long. The discussion should answer the question in language that takes a strong position and makes your answer to the question abundantly clear. Avoid writing a response that offers only a general discussion of the topic. Rather, write in such a way that makes clear you are trying to prove a point—to convince somebody of your perspective.
–Students will also respond to a classmates’ post. Your response to a classmates’ post should be about a paragraph long. The response should try to make a substantive point. Be cordial in your response to a classmates’ post.
–The discussion needs to reference at least one piece of historical evidence drawn from the list of required module readings/videos. The evidence will help explain your answer to the question. You must cite evidence with parenthetical citations.
–No need for a works cited page.
–Failure to complete the requirements will result in lower scores.
This discussion is based on the resources associated with module 1 and 2.
Question:
Imagine you were living in the late nineteenth century, would you rather have been an African American share-cropper in the Jim Crow South, or an immigrant worker in the urban, industrial North? Why?
Explain by referencing at least one piece of evidence. This is important. There must be a piece of historical substance (actual evidence and reasoning) behind your opinion.

The discussion should be about a page long. The discussion should answer the question in language that takes a strong position and makes your answer to the question abundantly clear. Avoid writing a response that offers only a general discussion of the topic. Rather, write in such a way that makes clear you are trying to prove a point—to convince somebody of your perspective.
–Students will also respond to a classmates’ post. Your response to a classmates’ post should be about a paragraph long and of substance. Be cordial in your response to a classmates’ post.
–Because this discussion is less formal than the essays and allows students to express their “opinions” without the accompanying “academic research,” students do not need to reference sources. Still, the discussion should be informed by the readings associated with module 2 on American industrialization.
Here is the question:
Over the last 30 years or so a number of “Tech Giants” have emerged. These individuals (Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, or more recently Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, etc.) have exercised great influence over the domestic and global economy, amassed remarkable fortunes, and in some instances have helped shaped government policy. In the context of our learning relating to module 2, to what extent should contemporaries or future historians think of these “Tech Giants” as “Robber Barons” or “Titans of Industry.” How should the public today think about the leaders of Silicon Valley—in a favorable or negative light, or somewhere in between? How do you think future historians will write about today’s “Tech Giants”? Will they be compared to Carnegie, Rockefeller, Gould? In a good way or a bad way?

For our this reading response forum, I’d like you to respond to EITHER the article titled “Are Colleges and Universities Obligated to Compensate” OR “Laura Ingraham to Lebron James”
Directions:
If you only had a few minutes, how would describe the article to someone who hasn’t read it? In other words, SUMMARIZE the main point(s) in a sentence or two.
What was INTERESTING to you? What were the bright spots? (Key quotations, compelling ideas, etc.) Note: For full credit, you must weave in at least one quotation.
What, if anything, was TROUBLING for you? What did you bump on? (Unfamiliar words, hard-to-understand passages, ideas that upset you, etc.)
Do you agree or disagree with the author? Why or why not? In other words, add YOUR OPINION to the conversation.
Important to Note:
Don’t list your answers. Write in paragraphs.

1)
List and describe the five types of
organizations that hire paralegals. Where do most paralegals work?
2)
List and briefly describe each of the paralegal
specialties discussed in this chapter. Which specialty area or areas interest
you the most?
Why?
3)
How can paralegals locate potential employers?
How does networking help paralegals find jobs?