Best Writer

Discuss 3 major hindrances/obstacles to your academic success.

Technical Requirements:
500-750 words (not including in text citations or reference list)
Double-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, 1” margins, essay format
Less than 20% of the word count should be direct quotes
Submit to the correct link in assignments. This uploads your paper to TurnItIn a plagiarism detection device. See plagiarism information under Institutional Policies.
Correct spelling, grammar, and sentence structure
Use APA referencing style. Must cite all sources of information. See APA Style Citation Guide in Canvas.
Do not need to include APA formatting (for example, title page, running head, or abstract)
All information must be accurate
Use current (within 10 years), peer-reviewed journal articles (example: Journal of the American Medical Association) or non-partisan data (example: World Health Organization). Be wary of non-credible sources or biased sources.
1 reference must be a peer-reviewed journal article published within the past 10 years
All information must be from reputable and reliable academic sources
Note: Governmental publications, such as the MMWR, are credible but do not qualify as peer-reviewed journal articles. Peer-reviewed journal articles are externally reviewed for accuracy and content.
Students who submit a paper written on a topic other that one approved/assigned by the instructor will automatically receive a 50% point deduction.
Content Requirements:
Background information about the country in 1 paragraph (This is your introduction paragraph)
Include at least 3 different pieces of background information that are relevant to public health.
These 3 pieces of background information should be related to social, political, and economic determinants of health and how they contribute to population health and health inequities in your given country.
Some examples may include access to health services, population distribution by age, human rights and/or political issues, economic issues such as poverty, urban or rural distribution of population, social, religious, or cultural norms as it pertains to your topic. The connection to your topic should be made obvious.
This section should not deal directly with your health problem. Rather, it should help the reader understand your country from an outsider’s perspective, yet be relevant to public health, in general.
Brief description of the health problem in 1 – 2 paragraphs
First, define the health problem
Second, include risk factors (causes) and consequences (effects) for the health problem, specific to your country.
Last, include at least 2 pieces of epidemiologic data published within the past 10 years on the health issue and within the country of interest, which may include incidence rates, prevalence rates, and/or death rates. These two pieces of data should take the form of numbers.
At least one reference for this section must be from a peer-reviewed journal article published within the last 10 years.
Brief description of prevention strategies in 1 paragraph
Include at least 1 primary, 1 secondary, and 1 tertiary prevention strategy for this health issue in your country.
Identify each prevention strategy as primary, secondary or tertiary prevention.
Create an original goal statement (1-2 sentences) that addresses a way to improve the health problem/improve health. It must follow the structure as described below by being concise, measurable, specific, and realistic. In addition, it must include the following:
Who is the target population? All citizens of country does not represent a specific target population.
What is the health problem? Choose just one problem to address in your one
How much change (represented by a percent) do you anticipate? Tip: A 10% change within 10 years is a realistic goal for developed nations, such as the U.S. If your country is developing, then you may expect less change in 10 years.
By when will the change occur? This should be represented by a specific end date, not a range.
Realism. If you are unsure about a goal’s realism, I recommend you review goal statements from Healthy People 2020: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/ (Links to an external site.)) (Links to an external site.)
Example goal statement for the problem of Hearing loss among German elderly adults, leading to social isolation:
Our goal is to improve the identification of hearing loss in elderly adults. German adults between the ages of 70 – 85 (who) will experience an increase hearing screenings (what) by 10% (how much) within the next 10 years (by when).
Notice the goal statement includes the 4 required components: who, what, how much, and by when. It is also realistic.
Conclusion paragraph: Now, we want to look more broadly at the impact of globalization on global burdens of disease.
Describe the impact of globalization on worldwide population health, broadly, not just specific to your chosen country or health issue.
Describe how globalization helps and hinders health.

SCS 502 Final Project Milestone Two: Analyzing Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this milestone, you will begin your analysis of the studies that you have selected by continuing the work you began in Milestone One. Your analysis will focus on the research design of the studies and how the conclusions are or are not supported by the results of the studies. Use the same three articles you selected for Milestone One and expand upon the methodology. Be sure that your submission addresses the following critical elements: • Compare the research methodologies used in your chosen studies and explain why these methodologies were used over other methodologies. In other words, in your comparison you could include why methodologies are informed by the hypothesis created by the author of the study. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. • Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not valid. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. • Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not reliable. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. • Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not credible. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. • Explain how the results of your chosen studies appropriately support the conclusions that were reached. If the results do not support the conclusions reached, briefly describe the more appropriate conclusions given the results presented. In other words, you could consider the results section and how the authors used that information to reach their conclusions, even if their claims are inaccurate. For more detailed instructions, see the following steps: 1. First copy and paste the title page and reference list from Milestone One into a new document. Hopefully the running head copies over as well, but if it does not, add that back in. Be sure to address any feedback from your instructor on these sections so you have the best version moving forward. 2. Next, begin the new narrative by comparing and contrasting the research methodologies from the three articles. In Milestone One, you simply described the articles. Now you will begin to integrate them into a larger discussion, using material you have learned in this class. How are the methodologies similar? How are they different? Why might the authors have made these methodological choices, given their stated hypotheses? Be sure to incorporate specific points from all three articles to support your arguments. 3. Then, discuss each article in terms of reliability and validity. Do you think their methodology leads to credible results? Why or why not? It is certainly possible that you will reach different conclusions for some of the articles. Talk about how the individual methodology led you to those conclusions. Again, be sure to incorporate specific points from all three articles to support your arguments. Also make sure that for each article, you talk specifically about reliability, validity, and overall credibility (That is, should we trust these results? Beyond reliability, are the results logical? Current? Anything else that might concern or impress you?). 4. Close by discussing the conclusions reached by each of the articles. Again, you described this in Milestone One but now you are using the information developed in Milestone Two to critique the conclusions. Are those conclusions supported? If so, what specifically makes you believe the conclusions are valid? Are those conclusions not supported, given the information provided above? If so, cite specific reasons as to why we should question the given conclusions. Helpful hints for Milestone Two: ● Use citations appropriately so the reader can distinguish between each of the articles and your original thoughts. ● Remember this is a methodological discussion in a research methods course, so while it is OK to use some other information if you feel that is important for your argument, your primary focus should be on the methods themselves. ● If you are making any claims that are not directly from the articles or are not common knowledge, you should use scholarly research to support these claims. For example, you should not make claims such as “Addiction to alcohol comes from a genetic predisposition” or “Children respond better to an authoritarian parenting style” unless you can support them with a peer-reviewed research article. Feel free to reference your textbook if you need to define research terms or other basic methodology. Note that using this additional information or making additional claims is not a requirement, but an option for those who want to further support their arguments. The point is that if you are going to include this information, you are required to cite it.

Cultivating Cultural Responsiveness
Research suggests that for educators to become culturally responsive, they must first develop self-knowledge of their own cultures, attitudes, and beliefs. Use the questions to guide your responses and comments on the posts of at least two peers.
What preconceived ideas, stereotypes, or biases do you hold that would make it difficult for you to strengthen the literacy of your students?
Why is it important that you recognize your own preconceived ideas, stereotypes, or biases?
What steps can you take to alter those ideas, stereotypes, or biases?

3.What role does class play in A Letter From an Unknown Woman and one of the other short stories by Zweig? To what ends? Possible angles to consider would be the gap between rich and poor, the impact of of economic destitution, the frivolity of wealth, etc.

an introductory paragraph that introduces your topic, suggests how it will be approached in regards to the text, and closes with a clear and specific thesis statement; supporting paragraphs organized around points that support your thesis and that open with a strong topic sentence; specific evidence from the primary text itself; and a strong conclusion that reinforces your thesis and suggests something about its wid er implications.

Research question: “To what extent did Suleiman the Magnificent impact the economy of the Ottoman Empire?”
For this assignment, you will write a full draft of your investigation building off of your Annotated Bibliography, Investigation Outline, and Investigation Abstract. This is a draft, but it should reflect a focused research question, clear and defensible thesis, and range of primary and secondary sources that can be used to support your thesis. Use the attached Rubric as a guide. 1200-1300 words.

For your project this week, I want you to imagine that you are starting a company that provides marketing data to businesses. Rather than chasing lots of rabbits, you’ve decided to catch one rabbit–Farrington’s Farm Shop (see p. 80). Your product is marketing information to help Farrington’s continue to succeed against Tesco.
First, in general terms describe the differences between marketing to businesses rather than marketing to consumers. (See p. 74 et seq). Then describe the concept of a buying center. (See. 76). What kind of people would you need to contact at Farrington’s to get them to buy your product?
Your product is a market segmentation report. What kind of market segmentation would you use and why? How would you go about determining what market segment Farrington’s should monitor? (I don’t expect you to know which segment they should monitor, I’m looking for a process to figure out which segment to monitor).
Finally, end with a 3 sentence pitch to Farrington’s. Why should they buy what you’re selling?

Your paper should be 3-4 pages, double-spaced, 12 point font. Use any citation format you like, but make sure to cite any idea that is not your own.

Explain common medical terms for the structure and function of the gastrointestinal system.
Describe major diseases that affect the gastrointestinal system and the vital laboratory and diagnostic tests used to assess them.
Describe the main health care providers for gastrointestinal treatment.
Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed or similar references to support your assignment. Access the Center for Writing Excellence located in the Resources section for additional information about properly citing sources.
Format your citations according to APA guidelines.
Submit your gastrointestinal system assignment.

Resources
Center for Writing Excellence
Reference and Citation Generator
Grammar Assistance

Explain whether sports should be compulsory in schools, high schools, and colleges?

Marketing is all around you. Marketing is more than advertising – it is all decisions related to the 4Ps, as I outlined in my weekly memo.
Your assignment this week is a scavenger hunt. You will be a better marketer if you pay attention examples of good (and bad) marketing. This assignment will help you begin noticing how you are impacted by each of the 4 elements of the marketing mix every day.
Your task is to cite outstanding examples (good or bad) of marketing that you experience.
1. Product — Describe a product that is either so bad or so good that you remember it. Remember “Product” also includes the package, warranty, and service.
2. Price – Describe a product that you believe was priced too high or too low. Maybe the price was more than the money you spent, but was something else you gave up, like time to stand in a long line.
3. Place – Describe a restaurant or retail establishment that is in a great location or a lousy location. What makes that location good or bad? Or was a store not open when you expected it to be or was a product you wanted out-of-stock.
4. Promotion – Give examples of each form of Promotion: advertising, sales promotion. public relations, social media and personal selling.
Have fun with this. I’m looking forward to reading about the good and bad marketing you experience. We may get some ideas for our clients!
(Tip: The examples do not have to all be from the same company. For example, you might talk about product for Coke and place for Netflix)