Best Writer

Evaluate the causes, course, and impact of the Reformation movement in Europe. What was
behind the movement and what factors contributed to its spread? How did the Catholic Church
respond to it? What effects did it have on Europe and the larger world, both immediately and in
the long term?

Write an essay that describes some of the most important experiences of your life and how they have shaped the person you have become. Also, describe how continuing your education at Southwestern Adventist University will fit into your goals for the future.

Each applicant must submit a personal statement, one or two pages in length, which addresses the following:
Your reasons for deciding to pursue graduate work in the field you have chosen. Please ensure you address these three points:
What previous experiences and commitments have brought you to consider applying for graduate education?
What are your chief objectives in applying now?
How do you think Rivier University’s graduate program will help you in the pursuit of your objectives?

I am applying for a psychiatric nurse practitioner program. I have been a registered nurse since 2008. I have worked in the psychiatric field for 13 of those years, predonimantly in the substance abuse treatment world. I currently work in a mothers in recovery program which has been my inspiration for returning to to school. The courage of these mothers who are looking to become sober to become better mothers for their children is inspiring. My goal is to become a psychiatric nurse practitioner so that I can give back to these patients and become a provider specializing in pregnant women and women with younf children who are struggling with substance use disorders. I will be graudating from Colby-Sawyer College in May of this year. In the past 13 years I was afraid to go back to school for fear of failing. Having my own daughter 3 years ago and working in the mothers in recovery program has given me the courage and strength to return to school and complete my BSN, and now apply for my masters.

If you could write something about Rivier University’s nursing mission statement is why their program aligns with my career objectives.

This is interview assignment. Must be someone related to chocolate and cookies. have to interview.

Culinary Traditions and Rituals
Conduct an interview with one or two people about their traditions involving cacao or chocolate including recipes/ cuisine and the meanings, rituals, culinary or dietary aspects, etc. Obtain verbal or written consent. Write five to six page double spaced summary of your interview findings and reference at least one culinary (cookbook) source and one scholarly reference that relates to the foods/traditions /recipes. Include recipes as appendix and any relevant photos.

Discuss how the grant process should be utilized to fund the benefit to the fire service,
the financial need, and justification of the need for grant funding.
This video should provide a clear visual of you speaking. Ensure you dress properly and speak naturally in a pleasant, social way. You may use any recording equipment to record your video, including a cell phone. Record your video in front of a local firehouse, fire apparatus, or other relevant backdrop. If you record your video outside, ensure that there are no distracting or overbearing sounds that hinder the ability to clearly hear you.
The following resources will aid you in developing your video. Please review them prior to beginning the assignment.
Video Recording Guidelines
Recording and Uploading a Video
After you record the video, you will upload it to YouTube. To submit your three-minute video, copy the link from YouTube into a Word document, and submit it through Blackboard along with the transcript of your video and a reference page containing any references used.
Remember to review the rubric before you submit the link of your original video. If you do not have a way to record a video, you are allowed to create an eight-slide PowerPoint presentation instead. For the presentation, you must follow the same prompt as above but also include at least four images; a title slide with your name, the date, and the title of your original project; a reference slide; and voice-over narration for every slide other than the reference slide. Ensure you follow APA guidelines. For assistance creating a presentation using PowerPoint, please visit https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-7690539-dt-content-rid-128216354_1/xid-128216354_1/ , or reach out to the Writing Center for assistance.

Task Overview:
Create a four-page research monograph with fellow teacher candidates as the intended audience. You will model your monograph on the ‘Inspire: What Works? Research Into Practice’ monographs and the Inspire Capacity Building Series Monographs:
Monographs: What Works? Research into Practice
Inspire: Capacity Building Series
Students may work individually or with a partner. Students will coordinate with classmates (in the discussion area) to ensure that topics are not duplicated.
The goal of your monograph is to leave readers with at least one new piece of theory or strategy that they can easily transfer into their practice; your monograph may also help them understand their practice at a deeper level.
* Option to complete with a partner
Instructions:
Clearly state the issue/question/problem. Make sure that your topic applies to improving student learning and well-being in Ontario schools. Consider issues or problems of practice that require unpacking or reconsideration. Choose a topic related to the Intermediate & Senior educational context.
Familiarize yourself with the style and tone of previously published monographs. Attend to the different ways that information is presented and the equal weight assigned to such things as research summaries and implications for practice. Be positive, respectful, and professional when offering research and evidence-based strategies.
Describe the research in a clear and readable fashion. Compile and summarize the most salient and trustworthy resources and studies that report on this topic. Emphasize how these research findings can help teachers to solve the issue/question/ problem identified. Aim for 5 – 7 references
Provide implications for practice for the classroom, school, or district level. Implications are the crux of linking research and practice. Identify creative, innovative, and cutting-edge ways to address the issue/question/ problem identified at the outset. Ensure that there are practical strategies that can be easily implemented by teachers in day-to-day practice. Provide links to texts or other resources, including websites, YouTube, or podcasts, that allow teachers to access the information in different and more in-depth ways.
Write with purpose and in a reader-friendly style. Avoid including excessive tables, figures, and transcripts in favour of short anecdotes that illustrate the points. Ensure that language use is straightforward. A maximum of 1800 words (including references) requires a writing style that is clear and concise. Use a system of numbered citations and references so that the reader may move through the monograph in an uninterrupted way.
*Task description is based on the ‘What Works? You Tell Us Monograph’: Mobilizing Research into Practice in Meaningful Ways
Evaluation: Teacher Candidate Assessment Rubric
Learning Outcomes:
B1. Demonstrate the ability to apply educational theory to teaching practice.
B3. Demonstrate the ability to use reflective practice to evaluate one’s engagement with educational theory to enhance teaching practice.
C2b. Demonstrate the ability to identify problems, formulate questions, and employ advanced search strategies using various electronic retrieval systems.
C3. Demonstrate the ability to assess the quality and relevance of information found through various means.
C4. Articulate an understanding of educational research procedures including action research.
C5. Demonstrate the ability to write brief literature reviews and write up action research conducted by themselves and colleagues.

Write a brief summary that explains Quality Improvement (QI) one of QSEN competencies and then discuss things you do in your current practice that relate to (QI)_. You can also talk about things you could implement to meet the objectives of(QI ). Finally, explore the ____QSEN__<< website and identify something you read/learned from this site.

How will SOF – in this case Australia’s Special Air Service Regiment – conduct operations against a “peer”, or “near-peer”, adversaries when all the previously enjoyed advantages of technological superiority no longer exist. What competencies will provide out future Special Operation Forces (SOF) the edge?

This essay is to focus heavily on assymetric / irregular / hybrid warfare against adversaries that significantly outmatch Australia’s current and future Defence capability. As per Defence Strategic vision – adversaries such as China.

While I have stated I would like 15 sources – this list is not verbatum. The more the better, but understand if limited on resources.
Journals (eg. smallwarsjournal.com), academic writings, podcasts (eg. irregular warfare podcast), etc, are all permitted.

Happy to use coalition SOF models as examples (eg. UK/US/CANSOF), however please relate to Australia’s strategic outlook where, and as much as, possible.

I expect frequent back and forth, and happy to provide additional resources and/or context should you need.
831096
37 minutes ago
You would have noticed that the essay has a number of drafts. These are from writers that misunderstood the guidelines and provided inaccurate information. Happy for you to use them as required, as with the sources, however make sure you fact check.

This is to be regarding Australian SOF.
The three focal areas I would like to approach are:
1. Acquisition and procurement – specifically how it has failed and put Australia on the back foot. If there is to be any way of staying on the heels of our peer adversaries, we need to reevaluate and restruction our procurement guidelines in order to streamline acquisition. This can be related to relationship building with allies (AUKUS for exmaple) and how information sharing, amongst technology and equipment can enhance this area.

2. Irregular Warfare – specifically persistent international engagement and relationship building at strategic level (country to country), and at the lower (tactical) levels. Specifically, capability strengthening and development not just through traditional means (room floor combat), but also through robotics and automated systems, cyberspace exploitation and even the space domain. while these capabilities are necessary, it should be understated that the human domain (the personnel behind these capabilities and the human-human engagement) is of most importance.

3. Cyberspace operations – traditional / conventional means of war has changed. Australia no longer has the luxury it once enjoyed of technical overmatch. Peer competitors like China, Russia, North Korea and Iran all have technical superiority in military equipment, technology and budget. Australia must focus on asymmetric modelling to achieve maximum results with minimal effort. This can be achieved through irregular warfare (as above), and also through Cyberspace Operations. (Eg. Russia-Ukraine case study, Stuxnet, Operation ARIES). By investing personnel and resources into cyberspace capability development, and the integration of remote and proximity utility from a special forces unit, Australia can influence adversaries and populations through information warfare and offensive cyberspace operations.

I would like to explicitly say that I want the resources I have provided utilised – specifically the AARC Occasional Paper 9, the AUSSOF paper, Dragons and Snakes – David Kilkullen’s book, War 2.0 book, JSOU Paper.
Additionally, there are a number of podcasts from Irregular Warfare podcast that would be of use.

Thanks

DO NOT WASTE TIME ON HISTORY OF SPECIAL FORCES OR SASR – this is where most of the inaccuracies arise. Leave it out. Relate past success with the necessity to adapt.
831096
34 minutes ago
“The military model pioneered by US Forces in the 1991 Gulf War – the high-tech, high precision, high cost suite of networked systems that won the Gulf War so quickly and brought Western powers such unprecedented battlefield dominance in the quarter century since then – is no longer working. Our enemies have figured out how to render it irrelevant, have caught up or over-taken us in critical technologies, or have expanded their concept of war beyond the narrow boundaries within which our traditional approach can be brought to bear. They have adapted, and unless we too adapt our decline is only a matter of time.” – David Kilkullen, ‘Dragons and Snakes’

I find it easier to have guidance on topics when drafting a paper so for this assignment I want you to pick one topic from the list below.
The colonies initially had a weak national (federal) government under the Articles of Confederation. This form of government did not work and led to the development and adoption of the U.S. Constitution. Explain the problems with the Articles of Confederation and why a strong federal (national) government is necessary. You can go further and explain how our federal government has too much power or perhaps explain why it is still too weak.
The Federalist Papers were propaganda articles intended to sway opinion in favor of the new Constitution. Select two of these papers and explain how the writings were effective in gaining support for the Constitution. In your essay be sure to explain the argument from the Anti-Federalists and what influences the Anti-Federalists had on the U.S. Constitution.
Details:
Prepare a 1000 – 1200-word essay addressing one of the above topics.
You must utilize a minimum of three scholarly sources, and APA format. Your textbook can be a source. Wikipedia is not allowed as a source. Be careful if using news articles, blogs, or social media as a source. Opinion pieces are not scholarly sources.
This assignment is to be submitted on Canvas no later than Sunday, February 13, 11:59pm.
PAY ATTENTION TO THIS GUIDANCE:
This is not an opinion essay. You can state a premise and argue to support your premise. However, do not use phrases such as – “In my opinion” – “I think that” –“I believe”
Use scholarly references and articles to support your premise. Make sure you cite your sources. A good general rule is to have at least one or more citations in each paragraph of your paper.

You’ll focus on the question: Discuss the significance of the Scientific Revolution to European thought and society. What was the relationship between the Scientific Revolution and the Renaissance? Between the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment?

With this question, the solution can be written in three paragraphs; a brief introduction paragraph with a thesis statement, at least one body paragraph, and a brief conclusion paragraph. (350 words minimum).

References (sources) for you to use
The textbook “A History of World Societies, Volume 2: Since 1450, Twelfth Edition” (Information is on chapter 19) (if you have it or can access it)

Britannica.com

Any other source is fine as long as it’s credible.

Note: This does NOT have to be a long answer. Just please keep in mind what is required.