Immigration and Labor-Explain in moderate detail (3-5 sentences) the concept of “skilled migration”. In your opinion, has intra-EU skilled migration from post-communist Eastern Europe to Western Europe either cumulatively fomented EU division or cumulatively facilitated EU integration since 1992? Why?

Assignment Question

Explain in moderate detail (3-5 sentences) the concept of “skilled migration”. In your opinion, has intra-EU skilled migration from post-communist Eastern Europe to Western Europe either cumulatively fomented EU division or cumulatively facilitated EU integration since 1992? Why? Provide country-specific qualitative and quantitative data to support your argument. (You must argue for either division or integration. You cannot choose both or neither.) ***note: while your response likely will (and should) involve significant/frequent references to the Bossavie, et.al. (2022) report/monograph support your opinion, said report/monograph must (and should) not be the only source to which you refer. You also must make some references to the other assigned/required Week 9 readings and viewing and listening materials.

Examine the slide attached and identify at least four problems that you notice. Discuss how you would correct these problems.

Assignment Question

Examine the slide attached and identify at least four problems that you notice. Discuss how you would correct these problems.

Choose a topic that relates to the class topic, Nazi Germany. You may choose the topic, but must have it approved by the professor.

Assignment Question

Choose a topic that relates to the class topic, Nazi Germany. You may choose the topic, but must have it approved by the professor. Remember the 5 W’s in your presentation – Who, What, When, Where, Why and depending on your topic, possibly ‘how’ as well. Each paper should be around 1 page to 11/2 pages.

Pick an artist who has a disability BESIDES KAHLO OR CHUCK CLOSE. and write a 4-page paper. Page one will be a biographical analysis (including disability). Page two will be a formal analysis of a selected work of art from that artist.

Assignment Question

You will pick an artist who has a disability BESIDES KAHLO OR CHUCK CLOSE. and write a 4-page paper. Page one will be a biographical analysis (including disability). Page two will be a formal analysis of a selected work of art from that artist. Page three will be an analysis of your selection from the ones we discussed in class. Page four will be a conclusion and interpretation by you, the viewer, on how disability influences the work. All papers must have a title page, works cited page and copy of the image you are analyzing. If you would like to present rough drafts prior to the deadline, that is welcome. APA citations use only. page 3 discussed in class: 1. What is the name of the artwork? 2. What is the name of the artist who created the artwork? When was this artwork created? 4. Where was this artwork created? 5. What kind of an artwork is it? (painting, scultpure, etc) 6. What medium does it appear to be made from? 7. List all the literal objects you see in the composition (trees, people, animals, shapes, mountains, etc.).

What is the current problem? What does the literature say about the problem? What is the solution? What gaps in the literature will my solution address? What do my critics say about the problem and my particular solution? What are the implications of my research? And a conclusion. 

Assignment Question

Research Paper: Final Assignment Overview Research is the essence of scholarly discourse. The graduate student should, at a minimum, be given to critical thought in a way that exposes gaps in the literature and offers new insight to more improved methodologies and policymaking. The Socratic method is the workhorse of the young scholar. Succeeding in failing to disprove a hypothesis is the hallmark of achievement in this regard. For this course of study, you should identify critically apparent flaws in current cybercrime policymaking and offer improved pathways to digital intelligence, enforcement, crime reduction and prevention. The exact requirements of the assignment are outlined as follows: · Length of assignment: 15-20 pages; double-spaced; Arial or Times New Roman font; 12 pt. o Title page, abstract, reference sections are excluded from the page length requirements · Format of assignment: APA · Number of citations: 15 · Acceptable sources: Peer reviewed scholarly articles published within the last five years, scholarly volumes and books, and white papers or technical journals. You will submit an original Research Paper based upon a current problem or trend in cybercrime today. By the end of Module 3: Week 3, you have selected a topic and developed a hypothesis statement summated in the Research Paper: Annotated Bibliography Assignment. This topic was closely associated with a certain or a specific problem in the cybercrime profession or discipline today that the student will now develop and defend in this research paper. The literature review in the body of this paper must cite at least 8 scholarly resources that are specifically related to the hypothesis (current, relevant, credible, and each carries its weight) with a clear and meaningful connection between all the resources and how the sources add to the literature or expose gaps in the methods of study. As the body of your Research Paper will require an argumentative paper, be sure to identify scholarly resources that serve to answer the following questions (as the research paper must provide answers to all of the questions a person would ask if one defended the hypothesis to another person): What is the current problem? What does the literature say about the problem? What is the solution? What gaps in the literature will my solution address? What do my critics say about the problem and my particular solution? What are the implications of my research? And a conclusion.

Use the scenario below to answer the following question, What findings are likely over the following days?

Assignment Question

Scenario: A 30-year-old man with depression ingests most of a bottle of acetaminophen in an attempted suicide. After several hours, he experiences nausea, vomiting, and malaise and goes to the ED. Question: What findings are likely over the following days?

Identify the actor(s) involved. Who or what is involved in the implementation of this policy? Justify why this policy should be adopted over other alternatives. Discuss any potential barriers to adoption. What might prevent this policy from being adopted or implemented, and what can be done to reduce these barriers?

Assignment Question

The final step of the case study project is the construction of a “policy paper.” A policy paper is a distinct type of argumentative paper, where the central goal is to recommend a concrete set of actions that an actor should take to address a specific problem. We’ve already worked through many of the necessary steps for this process – including identifying the central challenge that we are trying to remedy, and surveying the scholarly research on the topic, with a particular focus on what this literature says regarding the causes of the problem and potential solutions. If your literature review emphasized the causes of problem X, then this offers some implicit solutions to problem X, namely by addressing and mitigating the causes. If your literature review emphasized specific studies that proposed and evaluated actual solutions to problem X, then you can also draw on those studies to formulate and advocate for a specific policy response. Policy papers have a few key points of difference from the kind of writing that you may be more familiar with in the college classroom setting. First, policy papers are written mostly for non-academic, policy-maker audiences. Writing a recommendation for a policymaker at the World Bank, the US Agency for International Development, or the State Department will look quite different than writing a paper for a professor. We want to minimize academic jargon, unnecessary filler or complicated language, and get directly to the point. Your audience does not have much time to read about the subject, so you need to write efficiently. More specifically, your policy paper should have the following components: An executive summary on the first page – a single paragraph summary of the main argument Description of the context and importance of the problem. Think of this as a brief review of the first two parts of the case study assignment (the country background and the identification of a specific development challenge). This part should be no longer than 1 page. The policy recommendation itself. What are the specific choices, policies, decisions, and/or behaviors that an actor or actors should make to mitigate the problem? As noted above, this policy recommendation should be anchored in what the scholarly literature has discovered about the problem. However, it is not a repetition of what you said in the literature review. Instead, you must present a specific set of recommendations. This means it should: Identify concrete steps to be taken. “Reduce corruption” is not a concrete step. “Tie the disbursement of bilateral official development assistance to the creation of an independent auditor that examines a country’s budget” is a concrete step. Note – your policy recommendation may have muliple steps. Identify the actor(s) involved. Who or what is involved in the implementation of this policy? Justify why this policy should be adopted over other alternatives. Discuss any potential barriers to adoption. What might prevent this policy from being adopted or implemented, and what can be done to reduce these barriers? Discuss how we will judge the effectiveness of this policy approach. What will signal that the policy achieved its stated goal? How will we know if the policy was successful or not? What are the metrics we will use to judge success? A bibliography of works cited Final policy papers are likely to be in the 4-5 page range, double spaced. Note that they tend to be more effective when they include graphs, tables, or other non-text items that help convey the extent of the challenge and the proposed solution.

Introduce and provide a brief historical background of the event or incident you choose. Describe the nature of the unethical activities involved with a particular party, and explain their effects or damage to the community and society. Enron Scandal (2001)

Assignment Question

Content: select a past event or incident that happened worldwide that has allegedly been involved in unethical, and even illegal activities that put people and society in danger.

For this research paper, 1. Introduce and provide a brief historical background of the event or incident you choose 2. Describe the nature of the unethical activities involved with a particular party, and explain their effects or damage to the community and society. 3. Show a critical understanding of the concepts, theories, and methods of microeconomics by analyzing the effects of the unethical activities on the well-being of the society and the economy. 4. Conclude by proposing strategies that can help prevent more similar unethical incidents from happening.

Write a theme research paper on one of the stories. Describe another scene from story related to this point. Cite an outside source to analyze and prove the point.

Assignment Question

Write a theme research paper on one of the stories. OUTLINE Introduction Title Author Cultural and historical context Brief Synopsis of story

Thesis: main idea in one sentence (theme sentence) Body (Point 1 from the Thesis)

Topic Sentence: first point about the theme Explanation: explain topic sentence in a few sentences

Details: describe a scene from story related to this point Specifics: cite the story to analyze and prove the point Body (Continue Point 1)

Details: describe another scene from story related to this point Specifics: cite an outside source to analyze and prove the point Concluding Sentence: summarize the first point Body (Point 2 from the Thesis)

Topic Sentence: second point about the theme

Explanation: explain topic sentence in a few sentences

Details: describe a scene from story related to this point Specifics: cite the story to analyze and prove the point Body (Continue Point 2)

Details: describe another scene from story related to this point Specifics: cite an outside source to analyze and prove the point

Concluding Sentence: summarize the second point Body (Point 3 from the Thesis) Topic Sentence: third point about the theme

Explanation: explain topic sentence in a few sentences

Details: describe a scene from story related to this point Specifics: cite the story to analyze and prove the point Body (Continue Point 3)

Details: describe another scene from story related to this point Specifics: cite an outside source to analyze and prove the point

Concluding Sentence: summarize the third point

Conclusion Review Thesis Statement: use different words Review Topics: use different words Resolve cultural and historical issues Clincher Sentences: a clever, fresh way to summarize the paper, put it in perspective, and make it important to the reader

REQUIREMENTS MLA format for heading, page numbers, and title Meet length requirement: (introduction/conclusion: 8 sentences minimum) (body paragraphs: 12 sentences minimum) Double-spaced Times New Roman Style Size 12 point 1 inch margins all sides0 Avoid plot summary Upload final draft to Grammarly and correct grammar mistakes Upload paper to Assessments in iCollege before the deadline Write in third person point of view only (avoid first person “I” “us” “we” “our” and second person “you” and “your”) Do not write cliches and slang terms: “today’s society” “thing” “supposed to” “talks about” “end up” “a lot” “author tells the story about” Do not write contractions

Read the report from the focus groups and write a memorandum to the Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, that describes what sort of intervention the American people want (or don’t want), public expectations for a “successful” intervention.

Assignment Question

Bush Focus Group, Persian Gulf 1990 Claiming his neighboring country of Kuwait of stealing oil from his country, Iraqi president Saddam Hussein invades with 100,000 troops on August 2, 1990. Here is a short history: https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/persian-gulf-war. The use of force is a no-brainer for America, right? Not so fast. After years of struggle and loss of blood and treasure in Vietnam, the American people were skittish about another lengthy and taxing war. The Bush White House recognized this reluctance but could not ignore the serious foreign policy problem bubbling in the oil-rich Middle East. The White House turned to focus groups in December of 1990 to help them understand the dynamics of public opinion on the subject and the boundaries of possible intervention in Iraq.

Read the report from the focus groups and write a memorandum to the Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, that describes what sort of intervention the American people want (or don’t want), public expectations for a “successful” intervention, how far a military strategy can go without violating public opinion, and what language the White House can use to persuade the American people that intervention may be necessary