What can you observe about the way visual rhetoric is used in the article including document design and layout as well as actual images or data visualizations?

Both of your readings in this unit analyze the rhetorical (persuasive) strategies used in various disciplines. For example, Bahls et al. analyze mathematical writer’s strategic use of compression techniques, 1st person plural references, transitions and metacommentary, and visual rhetoric to appeal to and persuade their target audience, while Hyland’s article analyzes how articles across 8 disciplines use 1st person references and self-citation to build credibility in different ways.
For this discussion, write a 300-word post in which you apply some of the specific strategies Bahls et al. and Hyland analyzed to the article you are analyzing for your Unit 3 assignment. In your response, you might consider some of these of the following questions. However, you do not need to answer all of these – do focus your response on one or a few related rhetorical strategies that seem particularly important or compelling.
How do the writers in your article establish and build their ethos (credibility, authority, reliability)? Why might these methods suit or particularly persuasive to members of this discipline?
Does the article use 1st (plural or singular) or 3rd person and to what extent– and why might that be persuasive to other members of their discipline?
What can you observe about writing style, tone, jargon, or compression in your article? How does that compare to what Bahls et al. observe about writing in mathematics?
What can you observe about the way visual rhetoric is used in the article including document design and layout as well as actual images or data visualizations?
How are references/citations of other sources used to build the credibility and persuasiveness of the article (whether written by the authors themselves or other scholars in the field)? Why and how are other sources used (for what specific purposes?

Find Peer Reviewed Scholarly Article to complete discussion post.

Describe the process used to conduct a curricular technology needs assessment using a gap analysis.

No page # requirement but on average essays have been 20-30 pages including references.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Develop a formal proposal using the attached “C922 Curriculum Technology Proposal Template” that integrates the chosen emerging technology for a curricular change to the previously developed course, “The Role of the BSN Nurse in Promoting Community Health.”

A. Write an executive summary (suggested length 1 page) that includes a synopsis of the key points of your proposal.

Note: The executive summary is written after you have completed your proposal; however, APA-style formatting should be referenced and used. And APA-style formatting requires this summary be placed at the opening of your proposal.

B. Write a literature review on the use of technology in education by doing the following:

1. Provide five credible sources published in the last five years that are relevant to your curriculum proposal project in the “Literature Review Summary Table” found in the attached “C922 Curriculum Technology Proposal Template”

2. Provide an evidence summary of the academic literature you found in part B1 on the use of technology in education.

3. Based on your literature review, discuss gaps in the use of technology in nursing education.

C. Complete a needs assessment by doing the following:

1. Describe the process used to conduct a curricular technology needs assessment using a gap analysis.

a. Identify three academic stakeholders (e.g., faculty, students, preceptors, IT personnel) and their roles in the gap analysis.

b. Explain methods of collaboration with interprofessional teams.

2. Compare two current or emerging technologies by describing the advantages and disadvantages of each as they apply to “The Role of the BSN Nurse in Promoting Community Health.”

3. Discuss three anticipated challenges with the current state of technology in the “The Role of the BSN Nurse in Promoting Community Health” course.

4. Explain how you will overcome the three challenges from part C3.

5. Summarize your findings of the curricular technology needs assessment.

a. Describe the collaboration with your stakeholders to reach a consensus on one technology from part C2.

D. Identify the emerging technology and complete a force field analysis to identify forces for and against your curriculum technology proposal using Table 3 in the attached “C922 Curriculum Technology Proposal Template.”

1. Identify factors that could impact the adoption of your proposal by doing the following:

a. Analyze two internal and two external organizational factors that may facilitate or impede implementation.

b. Describe three forces that will facilitate integration of the identified emerging technology in the “The Role of the BSN Nurse in Promoting Community Health” course.

c. Describe three forces that will impede integration of the identified emerging technology in the “Role of the BSN Nurse in Promoting Community Health” course.

2. Identify a change theory appropriate for your technology integration and adoption.

a. Justify the selected change theory from part D2.

b. Describe potential resistance and barriers to the technology change.

c. Discuss how you plan to implement the change theory identified in part D2.

E. Write a conclusion focusing on the impact and significance of your proposal by doing the following:

1. Discuss the rationale and purpose of your proposal.

2. Explain how your proposal fills the identified curriculum needs gap.

3. Discuss why implementing this proposal is significant and the impact it will have on the broader field of nursing.

F. Submit your formal proposal in APA style, including but not limited to title page, headers, in-text citations, and references.

G. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Identify, define, and analyze the problem: what generates the problem?

This kind of essay, however, is different. This is a journalistic inquiry essay, in which you will choose a topic that has some inherent controversy and is contemporary (excluding medical marijuana, legalizing drugs, lowering the drinking age, and others we will discuss in class). You will research the topic, using both academic (peer-reviewed) and “lay” sources, including magazines, other news sources, interviews, case studies, etc. Whatever you do should interest you. Your prose can take a journalistic narrative style (think New Yorker, Harpers, The Atlantic) or, if you are too uncomfortable, you can default to a regular academic essay. Graphics incorporated into the text and into your discussion and analysis are fine as well. You will need to make an argument/advocate for some action. You need to consult a variety of sources for your topic. All sources should be properly cited within the text and again on a works cited page. Your paper must have at least six sources, at least three of which are from scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources. You will also need a works cited page at the end of your paper.

Remember to think about framing for this essay: how will you construct the fruits of your investigation, discussion, and well-crafted writing into a readable, searching, and memorable essay that will invite a well-educated audience, such as found in the New Yorker, etc., into your work? We will be reading a variety of models for this assignment; it is up to you to choose a framing device that works for you. Remember: communications research demonstrates that how one frames a topic has a direct bearing on how the audience will receive it (think political campaigns). How one backs up one’s argument lends credibility (think research and analysis). And how well one chooses words, crafts sentences, and writes creatively will determine how memorable your writing will be (think Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.).

From this beginning, you can initiate the Investigative Paper process, which might include:

Identify, define, and analyze the problem: what generates the problem? What is given, what is unknown, what are the criteria for solving the topic? What are factors – historical, contextual, systemic, economic, etc.?

Determine the information that is appropriate for solving the problem, and then research/find it, and assess its validity and authority

Assess the information critically (don’t just “throw the research” into the paper) – analyze it for how it addresses your controversy). Remember to include a counterargument

Determine what graphics might further illustrate your topic. Remember to cite them, and discuss them in your text.

Offer a range of potential solutions to the problem

Evaluate your solutions according to your criteria, choose the most viable option, and take a stand. Think about the contribution you will be making to this field.

Length – 6-8 pages plus Works Cited page

Explain the development of executive power, applying examples of executive behavior implemented, during the Obama and/or Bush observed from the movies, to assess the nature of conflict or conformity with the framer’s intent and what they envisioned for this officeholder’s power when writing the Constitution.

Assignment Overview & Purpose:
You are going to be watching two 50 min. videos length, and writing a reflection that analyzes presidential action of Bush and Obama in order to assess the development of executive authority, and analyze constitutionality. I have provided you with multiple objectives, relative to this topic. You will select 1, from those provided, below, to write your response.
The purpose of this assignment is two fold. First, it provides you with resources that can be used for future independent research outside of the reading and writing methods–especially useful for those of you audio and visual learners. Second, it gives you an inside look into two Presidential administrations that have been surrounded by bias and partisan media criticism and praise. Now that you have a better understanding of executive authority it is time for you to apply what you have learned, as evidence, to analyze presidential power in relation to modern political debates of “constitutionality of action” from you own personal perspective.
Formatting Requirements and Submission When writing your essay, respond to the prompt thoroughly, and completely. Essays must be a minimum of 2 pages in length, double spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font, and written in Times New Roman.
Your response should be your own thoughts and analysis. Research and resources should be incorporated with scholarly application. I.e. used as examples or evidence to support your analysis. Citations may be formatted in APA, MLA or Chicago style, as long as they are consistent throughout. You must include in-text (parenthetical) citations, as well as a bibliography.If you have questions about citation formatting, please ask me, or utilize the tool easybib.com. You must provide in-text citations, to show ownership of any information that you include, in your essay, which is either
1. not considered common knowledge
2. paraphrased
3. directly quoted
Failure to cite information, properly, will result in students receiving an automatic zero.
Completion Expectations
“A” papers should include a critical analysis of the video’s by applying at least 1 example from each film to support your position.
A bibliography, references or works cited page, must accompany submission. This page does not count towards the minimum length, of the paper. Students must provide proper in-text (parenthetical) citations. Failure to cite paraphrased work or direct quotes, from the original work, thoughts and/or ideas of someone, other than your own, will result in an automatic 0, with no make-up work being accepted.
Video Access Directions:
The videos you are watching are provided by Frontline PBS, and include Cheney’s Law and Obama’s Deal. I have provided you the links, below. Copy and paste the links into a new tab in your browser so that you can view both of the movies. Make sure to thoroughly read the objective before watching the videos so that you know how to apply the content you will be watching to the purpose of this assignment and lesson material.
Cheney’s Law:
(Links to an external site.)
http://video.pbs.org/video/1082073775/
Obama’s Deal:
(Links to an external site.)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamasdeal/
Response Objectives:
You may choose from one of the following objectives to write you response to.
1. Compare the strategies implemented by the Bush and Obama administration; and apply these as examples to explain presidential discretion and prerogative.
2. Explain the development of executive power, applying examples of executive behavior implemented, during the Obama and/or Bush observed from the movies, to assess the nature of conflict or conformity with the framer’s intent and what they envisioned for this officeholder’s power when writing the Constitution.
3. After watching the movie(s) apply what you learned to defend your interpretation of Article II in relation to types, limitation, or necessary conditions presidential power by assessing if informal powers, outside of the constitution, exist; or if what is enumerated is what the president has executive authority to do.

Discuss important issues in the business world.

The purpose is to encourage students to read about business everyday and discuss important issues in the business world. Full points are dependent on a sufficient number of students participating in the assignment. To access the assignment, please go to the discussion board in Blackboard. Step one is due by Friday, June 4. However, please post before that if you can. Discussion responses on posts will be accepted until Sunday, June 13, 11 pm.
Step 1 – Posting Article (20 points):
Choose a current article (no more than 1 week old) from the Wall Street Journal. Complete the following items:
Summarize the article – tell the main points of what is happening and why it is important. (8 points.)
Relate this article to something we have covered in the class textbook. (7 pts.)
Explain why you picked this particular article. (4 pts.)
Was there anything in the article that you didn’t understand or wanted more information about? (1 pt.)
Your discussion post will likely be at least two paragraphs. To post your assignment, click on the Extra Credit Discussion Board tab. Then click on “Create a Thread” and then post your assignment.

List the major findings of the study as reported in the results.

Please use one of the following, websites listed to use for the review as it has to be on smokeless tobacco.

After reading the article and viewing the video outlining how to analyze a research article, use those tools to read and analyze an article related to your research. Then write a 1-2 page paper (double-spaced, 12-point font, 1” margins). Your essay should address the following:
1. Summarize the information contained in the abstract.
2. Write down the major purpose of the study.
3. Summarize the introduction. Pay specific attention to the topics presented, the reference citations provided, and how reference citations were used.
4. Evaluate why the authors chose to include the information found in the introduction.
5. List the hypotheses of the study.
6. Evaluate whether the hypotheses follow logically from the arguments presented in the introduction.
7. Briefly summarize the information contained in each of the subsections included under the method section.
8. Evaluate whether there is sufficient information in each section to allow the study to be replicated. If you think there is not, list what is missing.
9. List the variables that were measured.
10. Evaluate the adequacy of the measures for testing the hypothesis.
11. Specify any control measures taken to rule out alternative explanations (for example, factors held constant, special subject samples, etc.).
12. List the major findings of the study as reported in the results.
13. Show how statistics were used to determine the significance of the findings (what statistics were reported and how they were used?).
14. Summarize and evaluate the information in the discussion. Did the author’s conclusions follow logically from the results reported? Why, or why not? Did the author stray too far from the data when speculating the meaning of the results? Were any alternative explanations offered for the results? If so, what were they? What future research can be suggested?
15. Indicate whether the study adequately evaluated the hypotheses stated in the introduction. Why, or why not?

Why is an understanding of semantic and pragmatic principles important to the teaching of ELLs?

Activity
5.1
1)Explain
the semantic ambiguity of the following sentences by providing two or more
sentences that paraphrase the multiple meanings. Example: “She
can’t bear children” can mean either “She can’t give birth to children” or “She
can’t tolerate children.”
1. He
waited by the bank.
2. Is
he really that kind?
3. He
saw that gasoline can explode.
4. You
should see her shop.
5. From
a textbook: “Under its terms, Louis’s grandson was allowed to remain king of
Spain so long as the thrones of France and Spain were not united.”
Develop a mini lesson (approximately 10-15mins) for a group of
students that develop semantic and/or word knowledge. Presume that the group of
students are at the beginning or low intermediate level of English language
development.
2)In
250 or a maximum of 800 answer the following questions below:
1. Why is
an understanding of semantic and pragmatic principles important to the teaching
of ELLs? 2. How does semantics and discourse affect L2 reading and writing
development? 3. How might presuppositions affect ELLs? 4. How does this
knowledge affect your teaching practices?

Describe the three sectors of the economy, distinguish the two major economic systems in the world today, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.

This essay should cover the first two chapters in Unit 5. The essay should be no less than 1500 words. Do not use direct quotes and do not use bullet points. Make sure your essay is in narrative form and is written in your own words. Make sure to cite the text book. Be sure to cover the following all of the follow topics from the first two chapters in unit 5:
Describe the three sectors of the economy, distinguish the two major economic systems in the world today, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
summarize conflict theory’s critique of work and the economy and explain the overall approach of symbolic interactionism to understanding work and the economy.
discuss the assumptions of the functionalist, conflict, and symbolic interactionist perspectives on health and medicine.
explain the health-care model found in industrial nations other than the United States.
explain how the United States could improve the quality of health and health care and discuss strategies that will improve global health.

Describe in detail five concepts, strategies, and/or theories that you learned in the course and how you will use them going forward.

In this course, you will produce a final 2-3 page, double-spaced, and well-edited (thoroughly checked for grammatical/technical errors) reflection. In this writing assignment you will critically consider your own speech communication skills and practices, including verbal and nonverbal communication and listening. Describe in detail five concepts, strategies, and/or theories that you learned in the course and how you will use them going forward.
In the reflection, please be sure to BOLD these concepts, strategies, and/or theories. Also, please be sure to UNDERLINE all quotes you are using from the assigned textbook.
Finally, please reflect on and offer a detailed description of how you aim to improve your communication with others. This should include employing strategies that you learned in this course. All aspects of the written reflections must adhere to formal APA citation style.

What are at least two everyday analogies that you could use to help describe any aspect of firearms identification/ballistics/firearm functionality to help a jury understand what is going on?

Research Daubert/Frye cases where firearms examination was at the center of the case. Are the majority of firearms identification cases not admissible in a Daubert/Frye hearing? Could you find any cases where firearms identification was not admissible and what was the reasoning?
What are at least two everyday analogies that you could use to help describe any aspect of firearms identification/ballistics/firearm functionality to help a jury understand what is going on? Discuss with your classmates.