Premium Writing

THIS ESSAY IS 100% BASED ON THE LECTURE THAT WILL BE PROVIDED. YOU CAN NOT USE OUTSIDE SOURCES SUCH AS GOOGLE OR ANYTHING ON THE INTERNET.

Research paper directions
You will write an 8–10 page research paper (references
excluded) on a health care topic of your
choosing. This is a course on Health Care Organization and Administration—and
you take it to apply the lessons to what you do or will do in organizations.
For your Research Paper, you may write about any health care topic that
interests you, and that you think holds value for you as you pursue a career—or
contemplate doing so.

Your Research Paper should have the following sections, all
formatted according to current APA format. A minimum of ten (10) scholarly
references are required. This would include journals, peer-reviewed articles,
books, professional publications, dissertations, etc. Your Research Paper
should include these sections in this order:

Title Page
Introduction
Literature Review
Conclusion (Summarize and analyze the literature findings,
discussion of the current issues and application of the findings, identify
areas of future research)
References (the works cited in your paper)

*1st Part is due tomorrow Wednesday June 23rd before 8pm

In preparation for the Summative Part B Assignment, you are required to submit 5-7 sentences clearly defining the focus of your summative project. One of these sentences should be your hypothesis and, another, your prediction statement. You also must include FOUR of the EIGHT research articles you will be using for your research proposal.

**2nd Part is due Friday June 25th before 9:30pm

Final Summative Assignment:
Length: 7 to 8 pages excluding the cover page, abstract, and reference pages, double-spaced, formatted in APA style.
Cover Page: containing Title of Paper, Running Head, Your Name, Course Number and Name, Professor’s Name, and Date.
Abstract: 5 to 7 sentence summary of the content and purpose of the research proposal; briefly describe the problem under investigation, the hypothesis, the method and essentials about the variables, and a prediction of the findings (Keep voice in 3rd person: avoid “I think I will find…”; try “The predicted outcome of this study is…”)
Literature Review: The first 3 to 5 pages of the paper are a review of previous research on your chosen topic. Discuss the background, importance, and relevance of the topic. Must include 8 peer-reviewed journal articles (You can use the articles from the Annotated Bibliography). Two of these 8 articles MUST BE related to an area of diversity. At the end of this section, also include a statement of the hypothesis, independent and dependent variables, your operational definition and prediction of outcome.
Method Section: The last 2 to 3 pages are the revised Methods section, including Participants, Materials/Equipment, and Procedures designated by subheadings. Be as detailed as possible. If you do not revise this section, you will be marked down.
End the Methods section with a concluding paragraph re-summarizing the background, hypothesis, and prediction and why your research study is important to the area you intend to investigate. In other words, explain how the proposed research furthers the field on your chosen topic and brings new light to the subject.
Remember, this proposal must be in the form of an Experimental or Quasi-Experimental design, meaning there should be clearly outlined independent and dependent variables, and a clear procedure of manipulating the independent variable and measuring the outcome or dependent variable.
Instructions:
Being that this project is a proposal for research, this section must be written in future tense – what you plan to do for research.
Do not include hypothetical or made-up results, only a prediction of the outcome. (Do your best to keep the voice in 3rd person in this section as well: avoid “I will recruit participants from…”; try “Participants will be recruited from…”)
References: At least EIGHT peer-reviewed journal articles, reference page formatted according to APA style. This may include the original study, Bandura, Ross, and Ross’s (1961) study, Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.
Citations of all EIGHT research articles must be included in the research proposal AND the reference page. Make sure that the articles on your reference page are all included in the proposal and that all cited studies an author’s are included in the reference page.
***RUBRIC- This paper is worth 170 points

1. Abtracts – 10 points
Abstract is formatted properly on its own page; brief, concise, descriptive summary of study topic, hypothesis, method, and predicted outcome.

2. Literature Review – 55 points
Introduction is thoughtfully developed, relevance and importance of study is clear, highly competent description of previous research in application to current study, Hypothesis and prediction are clearly articulated.

3. Method Section – 30 points
Project demonstrates strong, in-depth approach to experimental research on selected topic, all parts of Method Section are fully and articulately explained.

4. Synthsis of Course Material- 40 points
Clearly synthesizes course material in completing the project; displays excellent use of significant concepts/ideas presented in the course.

5. Use of References – 20 points
Compelling and proficient evidence from peer- reviewed journal articles are used to support current study; minimal number of references met.

6. Citations- 15 poins
Excels at citation requirements, citations included where necessary. Errors are at a minimum and all citations also appear on the reference page. Good citation formatting.

Hello.

Please compose a discussion post with 1 article of your choice out of the 4 articles that are attached here.
The guiding question is: What texts/discussions impress you most during the course and help you think ‘otherwise’?

This is from the education & ethics course, so please write the post from a beginning teacher’s point of view.
And you can use any type of citation style (not so important) so please pick any style you want.

identify and research an ethical situation/dilemma/case that relates to business. may choose to research an ethical issue related to the field that they are studying.
The paper should be 7 pages double spaced. The page count does not include your references pages. Use the APA writing and citation style.
for the other pages use it as PPT that relate to the paper.

INSTRUCTIONS: You will want to watch the following videos, consult the Readings below, and your Textbook in order to complete this assignment.
CULT OF DOMESTICITY VIDEO (Links to an external site.) Women in Lowell (Links to an external site.) Frontier: Harriet L. Noble
Discourse on Lowell Mill Operatives
Catharine Beecher on the Duty of Women in the United States
Online Blog: Discussion of Domestic Service in US (Links to an external site.)
STEP ONE: Review materials
STEP TWO: Think about the ways the Cult of Domesticity changes women’s role in US society. Consider why the Cult of Domesticity might have developed in reaction to the changes brought about by the Market Revolution.
STEP THREE: Respond to one of the following questions below (one only):
A) How did the ideals of True Womanhood (Cult of Domesticity) exclude women in the United States? Who would be unable to claim this role and why?
B) How did women embrace the role of True Womanhood (Cult of Domesticity)? List three ways and explain how these women were laying claim to this ideal.
C) How did women who were not in the Middle Class or Elite classes attempt to portray themselves as worthy of True Womanhood (Cult of Domesticity)?
STEP FOUR: Pick two peers and support their argument with one quote from the primary sources (Harriet L. Noble, Lowell Mill Operative, Elizabeth F. Ellet) to support their answer.

For the step four I will extend the time about 8 hours more but after the submitting step three . The deadline that I put it for until step four then after you’re done that i will extend the time for step four and will upload peers works for the assignment. But please follow all instrucyions so you just need to choose and answer in ONE question

Imagine that you want to answer the following question: What makes a person a good team player in the workplace? Your assignment is to interview a person from your network for at least 40 minutes to collect his/her knowledge, opinions, and beliefs in this regard.

Write a brief memo describing your interviews. Make sure to address the following Questions:

Why and how did you choose your interviewee?
What does your interviewee believe makes a good team player?
What are your interpretations of the answers given by your interviewee?

You will need to come up with a person you will do the interview with and answer the questions accordingly.

Written Analysis of My Dream Vacation:

(Write the title of your artwork here)
(Write the medium used for your artwork here)

Write descriptive details about the location of your dream vacation. Write what you plan to do while on vacation, as shown in your artwork. You can participate in an activity with which you are familiar, or you can do something you have never done before and would like to try.

Write the names of the colors and shapes used that define your focal point (the one small area of your composition that is designed to draw the viewer’s attention first.). Write the location of your focal point (upper right, lower left, center, or elsewhere.)
Use correct grammar, and complete sentences, avoiding “run-on” sentences. Forget abbreviations and contractions. Write clearly and concisely. Use “spell check.” Write between 75 and 300 words. Limit your writing to no more than 300 words. I will grade only the first 300 words written.

Helpful definitions of common writing errors to avoid:
“Run-on” sentence- two or more complete sentences connected improperly. Divide them into two sentences.

Contraction- a word made by shortening and combining two words. Avoid words like can’t (can + not) and don’t (do + not). Use two words.

Plagiarism- a writer copies someone else’s words, phrases or ideas and passes them off as their own.

Proof read- check, correct, edit, rephrase or cut your writing. Proof read your writing before submitting it online for grading.

This case is the Introducing Scrum at P2P. It can be found
at the end of Chapter 16 of your textbook in the case section after the blue
pages. Additional questions have been added, so please use the textbook only
for the case material and not the assignment. To complete the assignment follow
the steps below:
·
Read the Introducing
Scrum at P2P case at the end of Chapter 15.
·
Create a paper
responding to the following questions (ignore the questions in the textbook and
only answer these questions):
o Critique
the effectiveness of Scrum at P2P. What was successful and what was
unsuccessful? Was this the best choice for Agile Project Management for this
company? Why or why not? Offer specifics.
o Consider
you are Kendra, and you were faced with the challenges presented in the case.
Should she have spoken up to Prem Gupta? What should she have said?
o If
you were training a new project manager to take over a project like the one
Prem Gupta is in charge of in the case, what would you tell your employee? Why?
Write
a 3 page paper in Word format. Use the American Psychological Association (APA)
style (most current edition) for writing your assignment. Keep the following in
mind as you write your paper:
·
Check spelling and grammar
·
Do not use first person (I, we,
us, etc.) as it is not scholarly, use third person instead
·
Use in-text citations to credit the
ideas used in your paper to the original authors
·
At least three quality references
should be used (one may be your textbook)

Choose two (2) questions from the following four (4) options:
QUESTION 1
Green business guru Andrew Winston has argued sustainability can provide a ‘win-win’ for both business and the environment. To what extent can this be considered a ‘compromise’ as outlined by Boltanski and Thévenot (2006)? In your answer identify specific features of corporate environmentalism and the orders of worth to which they appeal.
QUESTION 2
The Prime Minister Scott Morrison has argued a ‘gas-led’ recovery is the best way of responding to the economic threat of the COVID pandemic. Through reference to recent political arguments for the expansion of gas extraction, to what extent can this focus on new fossil fuel extraction be considered a form of ‘hegemonic’ discourse?
QUESTION 3
Extinction Rebellion is an example of a global grass-roots social movement. What do you believe are the dominant ‘emotionologies’ that this movement promotes and what other ‘emotionologies’ have emerged in response to this movement? Illustrate your answer with indicative examples of key discourses, debates and proposals from key actors and institutions.
QUESTION 4
Australian government and business responses to the 2016/7 coral bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef have emphasized discourses of ‘resilience’ and ‘adaptation’. Outline the ways in which these terms might form a ‘political myth’ as outlined in Chapter 8 of the textbook (Wright & Nyberg, 2015).
Choose two from the above 4 questions
I provided my lecture slides