Premium Writing

Research the recent First Step Act criminal justice reform bill. The video gives only a brief overview. Critically evaluate the First Step Act. What does it get right? What does it get wrong? What is missing? Use everything covered in this course as well as any of the research you dug up throughout the semester to help you.

Book Report Analyzing Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy

Instructions on Book Review Format:
Book Review Format: your book review essay should be organized in the following format:
Include book citation at the top of the first page of your book review
Citation of the book: Author’s name (last, first name), title of book (capitalized and underline or italicized), place of publication: name of publisher, year of publication.
Sample citation: Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Norton 1963.
Introduction Paragraph: This is where you introduce the author(s), the topics that the book covers, and why you have selected this book. In addition, you should briefly provide a brief overview of the objectives of the book, and layout your thesis statement about the book.
Summary of Content: This is where you provide a summary of the book focusing on the topics, themes, evidence, and resources the author used and how he/she organized and presented the information to support his/her thesis. This section SHOULD NOT take up more than 2 pages of your essay for you are writing a book review, not a book summary.
Again, Do NOT spend more than 2 pages of the paper summarizing the book. The summary should consist of a discussion and highlights of the major arguments, features, trends, concepts, themes, ideas, and characteristics of the book. While you may use direct quotes from the book (make sure you always give the page number), such quotes should never be the bulk of the summary. Much of your grade will depend on how well you describe and explain the material IN YOUR OWN WORDS. You might want to take the major organizing themes of the book and use them to organize your discussion. This does NOT mean, however, that I want a chapter-by-chapter summary. Your goal is to write a cohesive and organized essay.
So what do I want, if not just a summary? Throughout your summary, I want you to provide a critique of the book. (Hence the title: “A Book Review.”) A critique consists of thoughts, responses, and reactions. It is not necessarily negative. Nor do you need to know as much about the subject as the author (because you hardly ever will). The skills you need are the ability to follow an argument and test a hypothesis. Regardless of how negative or positive your critique is, you need to be able to justify and support your position.
Analysis and Evaluation of the Book: This is where you analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the book. Think about the topic, the evidence, and the structure of the book— did it convince/persuade/expand/contribute to your knowledge of the topic? Did you like the book? Would you recommend the book to a friend? Why or why not?
What is your overall opinion of the book? On what basis has this opinion been formulated? That is, tell the reader what you think and how you arrived at this judgment. What did you expect to learn when you picked up the book? To what extent – and how effectively – were your expectations met? Did you nod in agreement (or off to sleep)? Did you wish you could talk back to the author? Amplify upon and explain your reactions.
Identify the author’s thesis and explain it in your own words. How clearly and in what context is it stated and, subsequently, developed? To what extent and how effectively (i.e., with what kind of evidence) is this thesis proven? Use examples to amplify your responses. If arguments or perspectives were missing, why do you think this might be?
What are the author’s aims? How well have they been achieved, especially with regard to the way the book is organized? Are these aims supported or justified? (You might look back at the introduction to the book for help). How closely does the organization follow the author’s aims?
How are the author’s main points presented, explained, and supported? What assumptions lie behind these points? What would be the most effective way for you to compress and/or reorder the author’s scheme of presentation and argument?
How effectively does the author draw claims from the material being presented? Are connections between the claims and evidence made clearly and logically? Here you should use examples to support your evaluation.
What conclusions does the author reach and how are they stated? Do these conclusions follow from the thesis and aims and from how they were developed? In other words, how effectively does the book come together?
Identify the assumptions made by the author in both the approach and the writing of the book. For example, what prior knowledge does the author expect readers to possess? How effectively are those assumptions worked into the overall presentation? What assumptions do you think should not have been made? Why?
How does the author see history as being motivated: primarily by the forces of individuals, economics, politics, social factors, nationalism, class, race, gender, something else? What kind of impact does this view of historical motivation have upon how the author develops the book?
Does the author’s presentation seem fair and accurate? Is the interpretation biased? Can you detect any distortion, exaggeration, or diminishing of material? If so, for what purpose might this have been done, and what effect does it have on the overall presentation
Conclusion: This is where you sum up your thesis statement and state the contributions of the book and how it is relevant to the class. AVOID meaningless generalities such as “It was well written.” or “I found it interesting.” Be specific as to how the book contributes to your understanding of American history and only by doing so will you convince me that you have read and understood the book.

Most criminologists would categorize Scandinavian criminal justices systems as some of the least punitive in the world. Research either Sweden, Norway, or Finland’s criminal justice system. Describe its level of punitiveness in comparison to the United States. What factors can you find that have led to a much less punitive system in the country you chose?

For one source use the textbook Unusually Cruel Prisons, Punishment, and the Real American Exceptionalism
Marc Morjé Howard

Student will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The student may also choose to work with an interprofessional collaborative team.
Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed.
Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following:
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal.
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed.
A description (providing a high level of detail) regarding the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
Effect of the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
Significance of the topic and its implications for nursing practice.
A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice.
You are required to cite to a minimum of eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Plan your time accordingly to complete this assignment.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
*** Capstone change proposal topic:*** COVID 19 and it’s impact on physical and mental health( to include psychological effects of the quarantine)
334622
7 minutes ago
Capstone change proposal topic: COVID 19 and it’s impact on physical and mental health on Nurses and the general public.

For this assignment I have to answer these informational interview questions and also a summary of what you have learned about the company, the interviewee’s
career path, your potential career path, the company culture, skills that you
may need but still need to develop, etc.

Below attached the question

Write a five (5) FULL-page paper (double spaced) addressing the following:
Explain why the United States must understand the importance of the cultures of other countries regarding organizational development and trends.
Explain why it is important for us to learn to adapt to those other cultures when doing business in the global marketplace.
Identify and discuss five critical factors when conducting business internationally.
Identify two appealing characteristics of an informal and formal organization.
Which type of organization would be likely to be more successful in the global market, informal or formal organization? Explain?
Cite a minimum of five outside references to support your research using APA formatting guidelines.
Your paper must be in APA format, including a title page, typewritten, double-spaced, font size no larger than 12 pt., and references with your name on it. The title and reference page do not count as part of the 5-page.

Health Care Workforce: Describe future trends in the physician, nursing, and pharmacist workforce. Where do you see the future of our workforce and how can we influence its future?

Part II- Each worth 25 points. Cite your sources and minimum of 150-200
words. First essay make sure you compare
and contrast all three accidents. Second essay- 150-200 words.
Part III- a. answer each question and may require some additional
research. 100-150 words.
For all essays full credit make sure you focus
on the topic or subject matter throughout the essay.

Part II.
a) Compare and contrast the Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania nuclear core
partial meltdown accident in 1979, the Chernobyl, Ukraine nuclear meltdown
accident in 1986 and the nuclear accident in Japan on March 11, 2011. Provide similarities and differences in the
way each accident was handled. Use
credible sources, e.g. cnn, abc news or
news articles. Please cite your sources. Please write your answer below in your own words and 150-200 words (25 points)
b) Do you need to re-think about our nuclear
power plant near NCCU? The Shearon Harris Nuclear Station located in New Hill,
North Carolina, about 20 miles southwest of Raleigh. What do the people in the
zoning area need to prepare for any accident? Please write your answer below
after the link and 100 -150 words (25 points): In your
own words”ABC News: Can Shearon Harris withstand a disaster?” http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=8013118
Part III

a. A DNA sweep or dragnet is a process where
police ask for all men in a given area to give samples of their DNA voluntarily
to identify a possible suspect in a crime scene. What are some of the
advantages and disadvantages of this process. Please write your answer 100-150 words (15
points):
b. The governor of New York had proposed that
DNA samples be taken from all people suspected of having committed a crime.
What are the possible benefits and risks of such a program? 100-150 words(10
points
c. Should genealogy or ancestry databases be
used to track down criminals, e.g.Golden state killer? Give at least one advantages and one disadvantage.
100 -150 words.(10 point)

Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 250 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 1 academic source, published within the last five years.
Will it be possible for you to add in-cite citation on every paragraph, and write the references as follow: “When referring to the titles of books, chapters, articles, reports, webpages, or other sources, capitalize only the first letter of the first word of the title and subtitle, the first word after a colon or a dash in the title, and proper nouns. Note again that the titles of academic journals are subject to special rules. Italicize titles of longer works (e.g., books, edited collections, names of newspapers, and so on). Do not italicize, underline, or put quotes around the titles of shorter works such as chapters in books or essays in edited collections”.
TIP: If the paragraph comes from one source, cite at the start and end of the paragraph and/or when stating facts such as statistics. Those are tips suggested by my professor on previous assignments.
My school is very strict with the APA.

Thanks in advance

Will it be possible for you to add in-cite citation on every paragraph, and write the references as follow : “When referring to the titles of books, chapters, articles, reports, webpages, or other sources, capitalize only the first letter of the first word of the title and subtitle, the first word after a colon or a dash in the title, and proper nouns. Note again that the titles of academic journals are subject to special rules . Italicize titles of longer works (e.g., books, edited collections, names of newspapers, and so on). Do not italicize, underline, or put quotes around the titles of shorter works such as chapters in books or essays in edited collections”.
TIP: If the paragraph comes from one source, cite at the start and end of the paragraph and/or when stating facts such as statistics. Those are tips suggested by my professor on previous assignments.
My school is very strict with the APA.

Thanks in advance

How to write a research proposal (word count from 1000 to 1500)
1.Research title (15~20 words)
-The title of your research
2.Objective and research questions (100~200 words)
-Provide overall objectives that the research will address based on the research questions.
3.Literature review (600~800 word)
-Try to find some relevant references (books, article journals, media, website, etc.)
-No more five references
-Show how your research can improve the existing knowledge and practice in the field.
-Show how your research can contribute to the academic or professional field.
4.
Methodology (100~200 word)
-Describe what kind of methods you use in your research.
-Provide detail of the date source and any resources that you use.
5.Expected outcomes (100~200 word)
-Summarize the outcome that you expect from your research