Premium Writing

For Essay One, you will select one of the following stories (see the list below) and write a 3-4 page paper–a full three pages–in which you make an argument about one of the following components:
characterization
(Links to an external site.)
,
point of view
(Links to an external site.)
,
setting,
symbol
(Links to an external site.)
,
theme (see purple note below).
Be sure that your argument (I. e. claim or thesis statement) is one sentence and is located that the end of your introductory paragraph.
And remember a claim is a statement that another reader might dispute; a claim is a statement that you must prove with evidence from the textual.
Jack London’s “To Build a Fire” (1908)
(Links to an external site.)
John Updike’s “A & P” (1961)
John Steinbeck’s “The Chrysanthemums” 1938
Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” 1884
(Links to an external site.)
Chinua Achebe’s “Dead Man’s Path” 1953
(Links to an external site.)
Ray Bradbury’s “A Sound of Thunder” 1953
Theme: Be sure not to confuse the “theme” with the “topic”!!!:
Example:
Topic: Loneliness of the human experiment
Theme: This story demonstrates that the loneliness of the human experiment can be overcome by small acts of kindness.

Chief complaint: “I’m here for a medication refill because I ran out of my medicines”.

HPI: Mrs. Allen is a 68-year-old African American who presents to the clinic for prescription refills. The patient indicates that she has noticed shortness of breath which started about 3 months ago. The SOB gets worse with exertion, especially when she is walking fast, and it is resolved when she is resting. She reports that she is also bothered by shortness of breath that wakes her up intermittently during her sleep. Her symptoms of shortness of breath resolve after sitting upright on 3 pillows. She also has lower leg edema pitting 1+ which started 2 weeks ago. She indicates that she often feels light headed at times with intermittent syncope episodes while going up a flight of stairs, but it resolves after sitting down to rest. She has not tried any over the counter medications at home.
She started taking her medications, but failed to refill the prescriptions because she cannot afford the medications as she only works part-time and lives alone. In addition, she reports that she does not think taking all these medications would help her condition anyway.

PMH: Primary Hypertension, Previous history of MI 1 year ago

Surgeries:
1 year ago-Left Anterior Descending (LAD) cardiac stent placement

Allergies: Penicillin

Vaccination History: Up-to-date

Social history:
High school graduate married and no children. Drinks one 4-ounce glass of red wine daily. She is a former smoker and stopped 5 years ago.

Family history:
Both parents are alive. Father has history of MI and valvular heart disease; mother alive and cardiac history is unknown. He has one brother who is alive and has history of MI 5 years ago at age 52.

ROS:
Constitutional: Lightheaded and faint with exertion. Respiratory: Shortness of breath with exertion. + Orthopnea. Cardiovascular: + 2 pitting leg edema for 3 weeks. Psychiatric: Non-contributory.

Physical examination:
Vital Signs: Height: 5 feet 1 inches Weight: 175 pounds BMI: 32, Obese, BP 160/92, T 98.0, P 111, R 22 and non-labored
HEENT: Normocephalic/Atraumatic, Bilateral cataracts; PERRLA, EOMI; Teeth intact. Negative for gum disease.
NECK: Neck supple, no palpable masses, no lymphadenopathy, no thyroid enlargement.
LUNGS: + Mild Crackles on inspiratory phase not clearing with cough. Equal breath sounds. Symmetrical respiration. No respiratory distress.
HEART: Normal S1 with S2 during expiration. An S4 is noted at the apex; + systolic murmur noted at the right upper sternal border without radiation to the carotids. Pulses are 2+ in upper extremities and 2+ in pedal pulses bilaterally. 2+ pitting edema to her knees noted bilaterally.
ABDOMEN: No abdominal distention. Nontender. Bowel sounds + x 4 quadrants. No organomegaly. Normal contour; No palpable masses.
GENITOURINARY: No CVA tenderness bilaterally. GU exam deferred.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: + Heberden’s nodes at the DIP joints, hands. + Crepitus, bilateral knees. Slow gait but steady. No Kyphosis.
PSYCH: Normal affect. Cooperative.
SKIN: No rashes. Positive for dry skin.
Labs: Hgb 13.2, Hct 38%, K+ 4.0, Na+137, Cholesterol 228, Triglycerides 187, HDL 37, LDL 190, TSH 3.7, glucose 98.

A:
Primary Diagnosis: Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
Secondary Diagnoses: Primary Hypertension, Obesity, Osteoarthritis (OA)
Differential Diagnosis: Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD)

Plan:
Medications: Tylenol 650 mg PO Q4 hours as needed for arthritis pain
Labs: UA; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP); LFTs and TSH; 12-lead EKG, Chest X-ray; Initial 2D echo with Doppler; Ankle-brachial index.
Additional lab results: Echo results 1 week ago: Left ventricular EJ Fraction decreased to 35 %
BNP – not available.

As a future FNP, you need to determine the medications for CHF/ASCVD. (Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease).

Questions:
1. According to the ACC/AHA guidelines, what medications should this patient be prescribed?
2. Does he need medication(s) given his history of MI?

The final assessment on this module is an individual portfolio, equivalent to 3,500 words (+/- 10%) and made up of two parts: a case-study analysis, and a reflective essay.
Your final mark for this module will be a single mark, reflecting your achievement in both elements (30%/70% ratio) against the relevant assessment criteria.
You are required to submit your final portfolio assessment as a single document before 11:59 (UK time) on Monday 19th July 2021 using the online submission facility on the Canvas module site. Pay attention to the instructions provided at the time of submission.
Part 1: Case-Study Analysis (30% of the final grade)
You are required to write a 1,000-word case study analysis of ‘The Leo Burnett Company Ltd.’ in Lane, H.W., Maznevski, M.L., Dietz, J. and DiStefano, J.J. (2009) International Management Behavior: Leading with a Global Mindset. New York: Cambridge University Press, 157-173. Your work should evaluate LB’s virtual team management model (its efficiency and sustainability) and propose recommendations for the virtual team leader, Janet Carmichael.
This assignment is used to assess your knowledge of the subject area and ability to critically analyse, evaluate and make sense of different situations, scenarios and case studies using relevant theories and literature.
You should draw on the Week 6 and 7 discussions of this case and explain how the ideas and perspectives of your classmates have shaped your understanding of the situation. There is no set number of discussion posts that should be referenced in your work, but it is recommended that you refer to a minimum of three discussion posts.
The word count includes everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables, citations, quotes etc). It does not include your reference list. The word count for your case-study analysis should be clearly stated.
Part 2: Reflective Essay (70% of the final grade)
You are required to submit a 2,500-word essay reflecting on your learning about global project teams.
The purpose of this assessment is to assess your ability to estimate project parameters (including the required resources and constraints) to achieve project objectives, and to consider relevant theories and literature within the context of real-life projects.
The key question you must address in your essay is:
What did you learn about managing global projects from this module?
Your essay should include consideration of how global projects should be managed to achieve their objectives, and your reflections (or lessons) for how to function more effectively (as a team and individually) in the future as a result of your learning on this module. You may also draw on your own experiences of working as part of a global project team if applicable.
The word count includes everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables, citations, quotes etc). It does not include your reference list. The word count for your reflective essay should be clearly stated.

Legislative Spotlight-Sarbanes-Oxley (After analyzing prepare a 250 word reflection) .

Please limit your answer into 270 words.

Please answer the following questions:
Analyze the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and explain in detail how you would go about improving the legislation.
Identify five types of business information that are potential targets of economic or industrial espionage and explain why they are valuable to an adversary.
In the context of espionage, what are the key differences between the following terms: (1) Threats (2) Vulnerabilities (3) Risks.
Technical Requirements
Your paper must be at a minimum 2-3 pages for each question for a total of 6-9 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

Every other block you will have an article review to do. Please find an article from a credible source that relates to business/management, this could be a current event in the news, a think piece on types of management, or a scholarly article you found interesting. You will be required to write a reflection on your chosen article (no more than 1 page) and include a link to the article on the top of your reflection. In addition, please cite the article at the top of your paper. Your reflection should include, the article title and source, why you selected it, how it relates to the topics we are studying, and any other thoughts/reactions.
This assignment is meant to be a short exercise, do not focus on page length. It is an attempt to get you see management and its principles in the world around you.
When writing your article review, consider the following questions
Why did you select this article?
What is your personal connection (if any) to this article?
How does this article relate to what we are studying?
Any questions you have about the article, situation described in the article.
Any conclusions you can draw from the article

Paper structure

COHERENCE

-Abstract/Summary

-Introduction
Literature Review
Hypothesis | Research Questions

Method
Results
Discussion | Conclusion
Literature/ Bibliography

Assignment: Assessing
and Treating Pediatric Patients With Mood Disorders
When pediatric patients present with mood
disorders, the process of assessing, diagnosing, and treating them can be quite
complex. Children not only present with different signs and symptoms than adult
patients with the same disorders, they also metabolize medications much
differently. Yet, there may be times when the same psychopharmacologic
treatments may be used in both pediatric and adult cases with major depressive
disorders. As a result, psychiatric nurse practitioners must exercise caution
when prescribing psychotropic medications to these patients. For this
Assignment, as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning
Resources, consider how you might assess and treat pediatric patients
presenting with mood disorders.
To prepare for this
Assignment:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the
Medication Resources indicated for this week.
Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might
recommend for the assessment and treatment of pediatric patients requiring
antidepressant therapy.

The Assignment: 5
pages
Examine Case Study: An African American
Child Suffering From Depression. You will be asked to make three decisions
concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider
factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all
options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise.
Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option
and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research
each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the
case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this
Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may
impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided
in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision?
Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning
Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your
treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided
in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your
treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided
in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your
treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
Summarize your recommendations on the treatment
options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations
and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Note: Support
your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the
course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource
requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature.
Reminder :
The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page,
introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden
Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632).All
papers submitted must use this formatting.

Week 4: Therapy for
Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Posted on: Monday, June 21,
2021 2:00:00 AM EDT
Hello Students,
This week, as you examine antidepressant therapies, you explore
the assessment and treatment of three populations: pediatrics, adults, and
geriatrics. The focus of your assessment tool, a decision tree, will
specifically center on one of the most vulnerable populations, pediatrics.
Please remember, you must also consider the ethical and legal implications of
these therapies.

NB: – Minimum of five academic resourdes
– Include a tittle pae, introduction, in-texte headings by answering the questions asked, and a conclusion.

Grading Rubric:

Introduction to the case (1 page)

Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in detail the case for the Assignment.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.

Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.
Decision #2 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.

Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.
Decision #3 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.

Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.

Conclusion (1 page)

• Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient.

The response accurately and clearly explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that fully support the recommendations provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Citation needed for every reference i.e …..shortly after due to germination from a persistent (Menges et al. 2006)

1. Introduction:
* include reserach question and thesis. (research question: how does smoke effect of the germination in dormant embryo seedlings and stimulate plant growth?)
2. Aim of the study
*why this is an important investigation and what is the aim of the study
3. Relevant background information
*The background sets the research question into context.
*Appropriate and relevant background biology correctly described and explained.
*Citations relevant to the research question are used.
*Background information is used to form a hypothesis.
Keep complicated biolgy term in minimum. Also use sources uploaded as the main part of the bibliogrpahy (list of works from a publisher or author) and use as well for citation. include other sources you might find and citate.

Variables:
controlled (non-smoke/non-scarified)
smoked/scarified
non-smoke/scarified
smoke/non-scarified
soaked peas for approx. 24 hours
Seed used: Peas from Kelvedon Wonder (Pisum Sativum)
Equipment used:
nail filer
5 trays
soil
ruler ± 0.05 cm
peas seeds
screen net
metal bowl
Forceps
dried leaves for burning material
lab smoke suction
lighter
timer (countdown timer of smoking seeds 5 min.)
1000 ml ± 30 ml (used 400 ml water)
Seeds left to grow for 14 days.

compare the banking systems, fiscal policies, and monetary policies used in the US and Ukraine