Premium Writing

Please follow the instructions: If you do not know
anything about the subject, please do not take
on the assignment. Please read all instructions carefully. Please
recheck your work before you submit it to the client. Please
do not submit a paper to me that has errors, such as
Run-on Sentences and Grammar Errors, FRAGMENT SENTENCE
Please Notice: I do not need a cover page unless I ask for one.
I only need two to three sources unless I ask for four references.

Notice

Please do not input 2 references on any of the pages
I only need one source for each page.

Topic The types of Legal Questions Ask When Conducting an Interview

In 3 pages, research and discuss the following:

• What types of questions are legal and illegal when a person is conducting an interview?
• What could be the possible consequences of asking illegal questions?
• Do you believe you have ever been asked illegal questions in an employment interview? Explain.

All information gathered from sources must be cited in APA format.
• No Plagiarism, Please
• I need a Plagiarism report.
Please, Do Not Turn in Your Work Without Checking for mistakes.

IHP 200 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
For the final project in this course, you will analyze a health issue from the perspective of an individual patient dealing with the health issue and the age-specific population that individual belongs to. Your analysis will include potential prevention options that might help the individual and the population prevent or mitigate the health issue. Finally, you will take this information and develop a short presentation directed to an audience that might be able to help prevent or mitigate the health issue.

Prompt
In Module Five, you will work on the prevention section of your final project (Section II). As you are evaluating prevention strategies for your scenario, you must consider the individual as well as the larger age-specific population that you identified in Milestone One. Before you begin, be sure to review the rubric below to understand what is expected of you.

Address the following questions:

What are the best practices of the field regarding prevention options for the age-specific population for this health issue? Depression In Middle Aged Men is the health issue
What are potential prevention options that could be recommended for the population? The individual? Explain why you chose these methods, and support your answers with research.
How does the age of the individual or population influence the modes of prevention that you can recommend?
What to Submit
It is suggested that your Milestone Two journal be between 4 and 5 paragraphs in length. You are expected to support your claims with scholarly sources referenced in the most recent APA format.

Annotated Bib Final Draft (Proposal + 10 annotations)

Our research project is broken into component parts to make it more manageable. The current assignment, the annotated bibliography with proposal, is such an essential component that it “weighs in” as an essay. All critical writing and research skills will be applied in generating a solid annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a list of sources related to the topic for your paper. An annotated bibliography has several components: 1) the source citation (you will be using either APA or MLA), 2) an annotation which will summarize the source, evaluate the source, and apply the source to your paper. I HAVE ALREADY CHOSEN MLA FOR MY ANNOTATION.

The Assignment: Generate an annotated bibliography featuring ten (10) potential sources to later employ in an argumentative research essay. You will be expected to include a variety of sources in your bibliography (see below for requirements). You will not necessarily need to USE every source you find in your final research essay. Part of the point of this exercise is to help you find high quality sources for your paper. You may decide one source you use on the bibliography doesn’t ultimately fit with the direction your essay takes.

You will also need to generate a short proposal that states what you want to cover in your paper and what you think your thesis will be. The proposal should not be more than a page.

Please note the format of an annotated bibliography in the examples linked below. It is different from a Works Cited or Reference page, so you will need to make formatting adjustments between this assignment and the final research essay.

Your Annotated Bibliography must include at least 10 sources that meet the following requirements:

1) No more than 1 of your sources may be a general web source and this source must be used as an example rather than evidence;

2) At least 6 of your sources must come from a database (this includes Google Scholar);

3) No more than 6 of your sources may be newspaper articles, magazine articles, Issues and Controversies pages, or Opposing Viewpoints pages;

4) At least 1 book, either in print or electronic form;

5) At least 2 journal articles that qualify as academic sources.

6) Is alphabetized, includes a hanging indent, and meets the other formatting requirements outlined on the annotated bibliography assignment page.

NOTE:

I just have already do rough daft this assignment for my teacher. I have chose 6 sources and I have done Proposal but I need you fix for me those proposal and now I need you help me find 4 more source and write summary, evaluation, appliaction for each entry on my annotated biblioghaphy.

( The ciation: you will use either MLA, depending on the format you have chosen to conduct the research project in. You are expected to be consistent regarding your formatting, so if you use MLA, be sure all the ciations are in MLA.

The summary: the summaries will be main point only. Your summary should be 2-3 sentences in length, completely objective, and represent, concisely, the thesis of the source and perhaps just a bit about the evidence for the thesis. do not use quotes in this summary.

The evalution: This, essentially, is rhetorical context evaluation for your source. think about the author, the audience, the purpose, and the subject of the source. Is the source, therefore, credible? why or why not? Again, 2-3 sentences for evaluation.

The application: Here, I’m asking you to think ahead to your paper. how will you be using this source, specifically, in your paper? In the into, for background? For a specific point or sub-topic? in your counterargument? This requires that you have some idea about where your paper will bw going, even if in a vague wsy. Thw application should be 1-2 sentences lomg.

MY ROUGH DAFT:

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

Al-Menayes, J. J. (2020). Social Media Addiction and Its Impact on Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e22399. doi: 10.2196/22399 This meta-analysis examines the impact of social media addiction on mental health. The study finds that social media addiction is significantly associated with increased risk of depression, anxiety, and stress. The study concludes that reducing social media addiction could be an effective intervention to improve mental health outcomes.
Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001 This article reviews the existing literature on the relationship between social media use and adolescent wellbeing. The authors find that while social media use can have both positive and negative effects on adolescent wellbeing, the overall impact is unclear. The article emphasizes the need for more research on this topic.
Bowes, L., Joinson, C., & Wolke, D. (2015). Peer victimization during adolescence and its impact on depression in early adulthood: Prospective cohort study in the United Kingdom. BMJ, 350, h2469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2469 This study examines the relationship between peer victimization during adolescence and depression in early adulthood. The study finds that adolescents who are victimized by their peers are at increased risk of depression in early adulthood. The study also finds that social media use exacerbates the negative effects of peer victimization on mental health.
Hampton, K. N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the cost of caring. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/01/15/social-media-and-stress/ This report from the Pew Research Center examines the impact of social media on stress and wellbeing. The report finds that while social media can provide social support and connections, it can also lead to stress and anxiety, particularly when users feel pressure to respond to messages and notifications.
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., … & Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PloS one, 8(8), e69841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069841 This study examines the relationship between Facebook use and subjective wellbeing in young adults. The study finds that increased Facebook use is associated with decreased subjective wellbeing over time. The study concludes that reducing Facebook use could improve subjective wellbeing.
Liu, M., Wu, L., & Yao, S. (2018). Dose-response association of screen time-based sedentary behavior in children and adolescents and depression: a meta-analysis of observational studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(23), 1504-1511. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098485 This meta-analysis examines the relationship between screen-based sedentary behavior and depression in children and adolescents. The study finds a dose-response relationship between screen time and depression, with longer screen time associated with increased risk of depression.

MY PROPOSAL:

The purpose of this research paper is to explore the impact of social media on mental health. In recent years, social media has become increasingly popular and pervasive, with billions of people around the world using platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. While social media can have many benefits, such as facilitating social connections and providing access to information, there are also concerns that excessive use of social media may have negative effects on mental health. To investigate this topic, this paper will address the following questions: What are the potential negative effects of social media on mental health? How does social media use affect different age groups, genders, and socioeconomic groups? Are there particular types of social media use (e.g., passive scrolling vs. active engagement) that are more likely to have negative effects on mental health? What are some strategies for mitigating the potential negative effects of social media on mental health? Based on the research and analysis conducted, the working thesis of this paper is: Excessive and uncontrolled use of social media can have negative effects on mental health, and it is important for individuals to understand these risks and to take steps to mitigate them.

What NOT to do:

Use abstracts, summaries, or condensations from the actual articles: that is PLAGIARISM. You should write your own summaries, paraphrases, and evaluations.
Cut/paste abstracts and substitute them as your annotations
Employ inferior sources

View Rubic:
Proposal: Includes a one paragraph proposal that introduces the topic and its significance, and tells the main points of the paper. The proposal also gives the paper’s working thesis.

Formatting: The annotated bib is perfectly formatted with great attention to MLA or APA citations and correct indentation. The annotated bib is also alphabetized.

Annotations: The bibliography includes ten annotations of about 100 words each. The annotations summarize the source, assess the source, and tell how the author will use the source.

Source Quality: The sources meet the quality requirements as stated on the assignment page

Evaluation: The annotated bib includes a thorough evaluation for each source that is 2-3 sentences long and focuses on elements that show why the source is credible.

Read the following chapters –

a) Introduction (Perry) The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog

b) Tina’s World (Perry, Chapter 1) The Boy Who Was Raised as a DogThe Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog

c) Surely Doomed (Stevenson, Chapter 6) Just Mercy

In one forum post write the following:

1) Identify 2 things you found useful from the introduction to the Perry’s book

2) After reading Tina’s world (Perry Chapter 1), pretend you are in a case staffing meeting with other professionals, and you are introducing the case to the team. The team knows nothing about the case. Practice writing a 1 paragraph case description with details about the case. (While this is not a full paragraph the following is a partial example – Winnifred Sansa is a 67-year-old white chronically ill mother of 3 adult children, married for 47 years to John, age70. She has a significant health history with 4 surgeries (gallbladder, hernia, heart pacemaker, and back) over the last 20 years. She is seeking help along with her husband for the following problems: depression, housing, home health, and financial support. Winnie met with a clinical social worker for one year to reduce her depression using CBT and supportive therapy. She was able to find housing with her husband and receive PT and nursing support for 3 months before stabilizing.)

3) Write a personal response to the events described in Surely Doomed (Stevenson Chapter 6) in one to two paragraphs. Read the following chapters –

Instructions:
Write a two-page APA report answering the questions below. Do not just answer the questions, but use the questions to formulate your report. Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

Questions to be answered in your report:

You are asked to make recommendations that will help Solutions Plus prepare a bid. Your report should address, but not be limited to the following issues:

• If Solutions Plus wins the bid, which production facility (Cincinnati or Oakland) should supply the cleaning fluid to the locations where the railroad locomotives are cleaned? How much should be shipped from each facility to each location?
• What is the breakeven point for Solutions Plus? That is, how low can the company go on its bid without losing money?
• If Solutions Plus wants to use its standard 15% markup, how much should it bid?
• Freight costs are significantly affected by the price of oil. The contract on which Solutions Plus is bidding is for two years. Discuss how fluctuation in freight costs might affect the bid Solutions Plus submits.

Requirements of the assignment:
• All papers must follow all APA requirements including an abstract. (10% deduction if not)
• All papers must have a reference page. The textbook is an acceptable source.
• Body of the paper 2 -3 pages, no more or less.
• Title page, abstract, and reference pages are required. However, they do not count towards any page count.
• Writing should reflect an understanding of the chapter’s basic concepts, thorough research, and logic and critical thinking skills.
• The introduction is attention getting with sufficient background information to establish the topic and a clear thesis statement.
• The conclusion summarizes the main points and leaves the reader with a strong comprehension of the paper’s significance and the author’s understanding.
• Grammatically correct – No spelling, grammar, or mechanics errors.
• Do not use the first person. (10% deduction if used)

For this project, you will need to choose a current White House Cabinet member representing a government
agency or council or a member of Congress who advocates a position on a public policy issue with which you
disagree. (USE KAMALA HARRIS, CLICK LINK BELOW TO SEE HER VIEW ON GUN
CONTROL). Next, you will research this person’s position and compose a Rogerian argument in the form of an
Open Letter. (YOU ARE ARGUING FOR HAVING A STRICTER LAW ON GUNS, WHICH MEANS YOU ARE ARGUING AGAINST NOT HAVING A STRICTER LAW).

An Open Letter is intended to be read by a wide audience, so it has two levels of audience: explicit (the person to whom the letter is addressed) and implicit (a wider public audience).

Project Deliverable:
Open Letter Rogerian Argument, about 800 words using MLA or APA documentation style to format the paper
and cite sources.
Audience: Letter recipient (explicit) and supporters (implicit).
Purpose: To build a bridge between opposing viewpoints

Decide the Explicit Audience. Use the links posted to the project page to help you choose a current White House Cabinet member representing a government agency or council or a member of Congress who advocates a position on a public policy issue with which you disagree. This person will be the recipient of your Open Letter. You may use the same policy issue you chose for project 2 or use another.

2. Find a Primary Text by the Explicit Audience. A primary text is one that has not been analyzed by
others. All of these officials have written articles, delivered speeches, or testified publicly, so you will first need to
fully orient yourself to your letter recipient’s policy position by finding a primary text the recipient has generated
that is part of the public record. Although you may use more than one primary text, it will likely be easier if you use just one, so that you are directly responding to it in how you construct the Rogerian Argument.

3. Identify the Implicit Audience. Remember, the explicit audience is the letter recipient, but the implicit
audience would be those who support this person’s position. Use the Implicit Audience Analysis worksheet to help you.

Formatting. You may format your letter using standard business letter conventions or the less formal Open
Letter format. See examples of Open Letter format posted to the project page.

4.2. Citing Sources. In an open letter, writers do not cite sources using an academic documentation style such as MLA or APA. Instead, they use attributive tags and conversational, in-text references to sources, so use that
same approach. You can also forgo a list of “Works Cited” or “Bibliography” page.

4.3. Content. Apply the following principles of Rogerian argument to arrange and develop the content of your
Open Letter. Refer to the slidedoc on Rogerian argument for examples of each principle.

• Principle 1. Introduction Emphasizes Unity by pointing out how both the author and the audience are similarly
affected or share the same concerns.

• Principle 2. Acknowledges and Presents Opposing Viewpoint Fairly by using neutral language to accurately
describe the letter recipient’s (and supporter’s) position and the circumstances and contexts in which the position
is valid. The writer supports claims by citing from a primary text the recipient has produced that are in the public
record. The writer builds good will and credibility by establishing an Ethos that is heartfelt and sincere.

• Principle 3. Writer States His or Her Own Position Fairly by using neutral language to accurately describe the
circumstances and contexts in which the writer’s perspective or position is valid and presents evidence that
supports claims

• Principle 4. Closing Seeks Compromise by not asking the letter recipient to give up his/her position but ends by
laying out the ways a compromise or alternative solution benefits both the letter recipient and the writer under a
wider variety of circumstances than either can account for alone.

• Principle 5: Argument is Balanced. The writer makes the case for his or her position in a balanced way by giving more than superficial consideration to the opposing positionFormatting. You may format your letter using standard
business letter conventions or the less formal Open Letter format. See examples of Open Letter format posted to
the project page.

https://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htmhttps://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htmhttps://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htmhttps://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htmhttps://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htmhttps://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htmhttps://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htm

ABOVE IS THE LINK TO USE FOR KAMALA HARRIS VIEW ON GUN CONTROL, SHE IS ON OUR SIDE FOR HAVING A STRICT LAW!

8-10 pages, not including cover page and reference page
● APA format
● Double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, 1inch margins, stapled in top left corner
● A minimum of 5 scholarly sources
Your goal in preparing the case should be to end up with what you think is a sound, well- supported analysis of the situation and a sound, defensible set of recommendations about which managerial actions need to be taken. The aim of case analyses is for you to become actively engaged in diagnosing the business issues and managerial problems in the case, to propose workable solutions, and to explain and defend your assessments.
In preparing a written case analysis, you should:
(1) identify all the pertinent issues that management needs to address;
(2) perform whatever analysis and evaluation is appropriate; and
(3) propose an action plan and set of recommendations addressing the issues you have identified.
Identification:
It is essential early on in your paper that you provide a sharply focused diagnosis of strategic issues and key problems and that you demonstrate a good grasp of the company’s present situation. Make sure you can identify the firm’s strategy (use the concepts and tools in Chapters 1 – 7 as diagnostic aids) and that you can pinpoint whatever strategy implementation issues may exist. Consider beginning your paper with an overview of the company’s situation, its strategy, and the significant problems and issues that confront management. State problems/issues as clearly and precisely as you can. Unless it is necessary to do so for emphasis, avoid recounting facts and history about the company.
Analysis and Evaluation:
Check out the firm’s financial ratios, its profit margins and rates of return, and its capital structure, and decide the strength of the firm’s financial ratios. Similarly, look at marketing, production, managerial competence, and other factors underlying the organization’s strategic successes and failures. Decide whether the firm has valuable resource strengths and competencies and, if so, whether it is capitalizing on them. Check to see if the firm’s strategy is producing satisfactory results and determine the reasons why or why not. Probe the nature and strength of competitive forces confronting the company. Decide whether and why the firm’s competitive position is getting stronger or weaker.
In writing your analysis and evaluation, bear in mind four things:
1. You are obliged to offer analysis and evidence to back up your conclusions. Do not rely on unsupported opinions, over-generalizations, and platitudes as a substitute for tight, logical argument backed up with facts and figures.
2. If your analysis involves some important quantitative calculations, use tables and charts to present the calculations clearly and efficiently. Don’t just tack the exhibits on at the end of your report and let the reader figure out what they mean and why they were included. Instead, in the body of your report, cite some of the key numbers, highlight the conclusions to be drawn from the exhibits, and refer the reader to your charts and exhibits for more details.
3. Demonstrate that you have command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools to which you have been exposed. Use them in your report.
4. Your interpretation of the evidence should be reasonable and objective. Be wary of preparing a one-sided argument that omits all aspects not favorable to your conclusions. Likewise, try not to exaggerate or over dramatize. Endeavor to inject balance into your analysis and to avoid emotional rhetoric. Strike phrases such as “I think,” “I feel,” and “I believe” when you edit your first draft and write in “My analysis shows,” instead.
Recommendations:
The final section of the written case analysis should consist of a set of definite recommendations and a plan of action. Your set of recommendations should address all of the problems/issues you identified and analyzed. If the recommendations come as a surprise or do not follow logically from the analysis, the effect is to greatly weaken your suggestions of what to do. Obviously, your recommendations should be made with caution. State how your recommendations will solve the problems you identified. Be sure the company is financially able to carry out what you recommend. Also, check to see if your recommendations are workable in terms of acceptance by the persons involved, the organization’s competence to implement them, and prevailing marketing and environmental constraints. Try not to hedge or weasel on the actions you believe should be taken. By all means, state your recommendations in sufficient detail to be meaningful—get down to some definite nitty-gritty specifics. Avoid such unhelpful statements as “the organization should do more planning” or “the company should be more aggressive in marketing its product.” For instance, if you determine that “the firm should improve its market position” then you need to set forth exactly how you think this should be done. Offer a definite agenda for action, stipulating a timetable and sequence for initiating actions, indicating priorities, and suggesting who should be responsible for doing what.
In proposing an action plan, remember there is a great deal of difference between being responsible for a decision that may be costly if it proves in error and, on the other hand, casually suggesting courses of action that might be taken when you do not have to bear the responsibility for any of the consequences.
A good rule to follow in making your recommendations is: Avoid recommending anything you would not yourself be willing to do if you were in management’s shoes. The importance of learning to develop good managerial judgment is indicated by the fact that, even though the same information and operating data may be available to every manager or executive in the organization, the quality of the judgments about what the information means and which actions need to be taken does vary from person to person.
It goes without saying that your report should be well organized and well written. Great ideas amount to little unless others can be convinced of their merit—this takes tight logic, the presentation of convincing evidence, and persuasively written arguments.

Use the at-risk population, “students of poverty,” to research and compile a list of evidence-based strategies and practices that have proven effective in working with the students of the poverty population. Create a presentation through PowerPoint presentation that:
• highlights a minimum of three (3) evidence-based strategies/interventions/programs that work with this population of students to improve teaching and student achievement.
• includes a description of each of the strategies (the WHAT)
• includes an authentic example(s) of each of the strategies to show how they are used or what they might look like in actual teaching practice (the HOW)
• provides the intended or actual results on student achievement for each of the strategies – if it’s an evidence-based practice, it should have some data showing how effective it is (utilize charts, graphs, research-study results, effect sizes, etc.) (the WHY)
• engages and motivates the teachers’ audience to understand the strategy’s impact and incorporate it into their current teaching practice through the format and visual appeal of the presentation AND through embedded audience participation opportunities.
• cites all sources using APA style references throughout the PowerPoint as needed and with formal references at the end of the presentation.

See the attached file to view an example of a presentation.

The paper should exam a condition, situation, scenario specific to a stage in the life-span (ex.
Crises, aging, “failure to launch”, marriage/divorce, empty nest, sandwich generation, etc.). The paper must be typed with 1″ margins, double spacing and a 12-point Times Roman font. The paper should also include a reference list. A minimum of three credible references must be utilized. The American Psychological Association format must also be utilized for the paper. The paper should be between four and six pages in length (not including cover page, abstract, references, exhibits, etc.).The paper should exam a condition, situation, scenario specific to a stage in the life-span (ex.
Crises, aging, “failure to launch”, marriage/divorce, empty nest, sandwich generation, etc.). The paper must be typed with 1″ margins, double spacing and a 12-point Times Roman font. The paper should also include a reference list. A minimum of three credible references must be utilized. The American Psychological Association format must also be utilized for the paper. The paper should be between four and six pages in length (not including cover page, abstract, references, exhibits, etc.).The paper should exam a condition, situation, scenario specific to a stage in the life-span (ex.
Crises, aging, “failure to launch”, marriage/divorce, empty nest, sandwich generation, etc.). The paper must be typed with 1″ margins, double spacing and a 12-point Times Roman font. The paper should also include a reference list. A minimum of three credible references must be utilized. The American Psychological Association format must also be utilized for the paper. The paper should be between four and six pages in length (not including cover page, abstract, references, exhibits, etc.).

Your journal entries offer a time to reflect and record your
thoughts about the reading, class discussion, and other
materials. SYour journal entries offer a time to reflect and record your
thoughts about the reading, class discussion, and other
materials.

Journal entries will be graded using the following rubric:
– Submitted on time (on or before due date) = 10 pts.
– Appropriate length (min. 2 paragraphs/max. 2 pgs.) =
20 pts.
– Clearly stated topic supported by examples = 30 pts.
– References to the reading/course materials provided=
30 pts.