Defining counselling and psychotherapy

1.1 evaluate the underpinning theoretical perspective of counselling and psychotherapy
1.2 analyse the historical development of current practice within counselling and psychotherapy
1.3 demonstrate and awareness of the similarities and differences in therapeutic delivery of counselling and psychotherapy applications
1.4 describe the aims and objectives of counselling and psychotherapy
Please also provide 15 references, links, and graphs to support the evidence

Abortion: Why people should be Pro-Choice

Touchstone 3.1: Construct a Rogerian Argument
ASSIGNMENT: As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given the two articles linked below that present opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a concrete, workable solution or “middle ground.”

The essay should contain the following components:
❒ I) An introduction that presents both sources (i.e., author, title, year of publication, and position in the debate) and your middle ground thesis statement.
❒ II) A body paragraph that summarizes the pro-uniform rationales.
❒ III) A body paragraph that summarizes the anti-uniform rationales.
❒ IV) A body paragraph that critically compares and contrasts both sides of the debate.
❒ V) A conclusion that further develops your proposed middle ground solution and demonstrates how it satisfies both sides of the debate.

Article 1: “School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies”
Article 2: “Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms”

Sample Touchstone

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Introduction
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1?
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2?
❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement/claim that presents a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a “middle ground” between the two sides?
2. Body Paragraphs
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1 in the first body paragraph?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented Article 2 in the second body paragraph?
❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance?
❒ Have you adequately compared and contrasted both sides of the debate (with cited examples from the articles) in the third body paragraph?
3. Conclusion
❒ Does your expanded claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles?
❒ Have you backed up your claim using cited facts from both sides of the argument?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences)
How might the Rogerian approach help you gain insight into your own argumentative essay? (2-3 sentences)
Touchstone 3.1: Construct a Rogerian Argument
ASSIGNMENT: As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given the two articles linked below that present opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a concrete, workable solution or “middle ground.”

The essay should contain the following components:
❒ I) An introduction that presents both sources (i.e., author, title, year of publication, and position in the debate) and your middle ground thesis statement.
❒ II) A body paragraph that summarizes the pro-uniform rationales.
❒ III) A body paragraph that summarizes the anti-uniform rationales.
❒ IV) A body paragraph that critically compares and contrasts both sides of the debate.
❒ V) A conclusion that further develops your proposed middle ground solution and demonstrates how it satisfies both sides of the debate.

Article 1: “School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies”
Article 2: “Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms”

Sample Touchstone

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Introduction
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1?
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2?
❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement/claim that presents a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a “middle ground” between the two sides?
2. Body Paragraphs
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1 in the first body paragraph?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented Article 2 in the second body paragraph?
❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance?
❒ Have you adequately compared and contrasted both sides of the debate (with cited examples from the articles) in the third body paragraph?
3. Conclusion
❒ Does your expanded claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles?
❒ Have you backed up your claim using cited facts from both sides of the argument?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences)
How might the Rogerian approach help you gain insight into your own argumentative essay? (2-3 sentences)

Team Dynamics and Communication in the Workforce

Submit a research paper and reflection about the topic you picked in Week 1 and shared with your classmates through the discussion forum in Weeks 3, 4, and 5. Your paper should be eight to ten pages long, not including your title page and references. See the following guidelines for additional details.

1. Use APA formatting (title page, references page, citations, margins, etc.)

2. Your research paper should include the following (at a minimum):

Background on your topic
Major researchers/contributors
Overview of the topic – how does it influence organizations, leadership, management, etc.?
Major applications of your topic
References – at least three academic references in addition to the textbook (academic references should come from the Cleary Online Library).
3. Reflection – approximately one to two pages should be a personal reflection on your topic. Why did you pick the topic? What did you learn, and how will it impact you in the future? Will it change any of your own thoughts, perceptions, or behaviors in the workplace?

Topic: Team Dynamics and Communication in the Workforce

External Analysis for Industry

1. Perform basic INDUSTRY research for the ENTIRE industry
2. Use “Porter’s Five Forces” model and PESTEL model
3. Identify at least two current external circumstances (one favorable and one unfavorable) for EACH of the forces in the models.
4. Make sure you have AT LEAST one favorable and one unfavorable “current external circumstance” listed for each of the 11 model factors (6 each from the PESTEL and 5 from Porter’s), with no duplicates.
3. Using this information, create a “List of Current External Circumstances” that would apply to the majority of the companies in your firm’s industry. LIST THE FAVORABLE ITEMS BEFORE THE UNFAVORABLE ITEMS.
4. 4. Add an index number to the far left of each list item. For the favorable items, list them “F1”, “F2”, etc. and for the unfavorable items, index them as “U1”, “U2”, etc. Again, you should have at least 11 “F” factors and 11 “U” factors (but you can have more if you wish).
5. Make sure there is a citation for each item in list.
PLEASE OPEN AND READ ATTACHMENTS THAT FURTHER DISCUSS INSTRUCTIONS AND ALSO GIVES AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE AND CONSIST OF.

Environment of SCRM

Chapter 2 provided information on the “as is” environment of SCRM during the pa decade. Provide a report, incorporating up to three themes that are shared in the development of SCRM as a discipline in the years between 2009-2013. The paper should be a minimum of 500 words, but not more than 1000 words.

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Suppose the department of corrections in your state has developed a rehabilitation program for criminal offenders who have been granted probation or parole. The administrators of the program wish to conduct a study to determine whether the program is effective in reducing recidivism rates.
Consider what you have learned about hypothesis testing concepts this week and how they may be significant to researchers conducting the study.
Discuss the following with the class:
Is the study an example of descriptive statistics or inferential statistics? Explain.
Should researchers create a null hypothesis before conducting this study? Why or why not?
Should researchers also create an alternative hypothesis? Why or why not?
To test their research hypotheses, the researchers will need to select 1 or more statistical tests. This week you learned about three statistical tests commonly used in statistical research: t test, chi-square, ANOVA.
Which of these tests is most appropriate for evaluating the rehabilitation program? Explain.
Which of these tests is not suitable for evaluating the rehabilitation program? Explain.
Cite at least 1 scholarly source according to APA guidelines to support your thinking.
Suppose the department of corrections in your state has developed a rehabilitation program for criminal offenders who have been granted probation or parole. The administrators of the program wish to conduct a study to determine whether the program is effective in reducing recidivism rates.
Consider what you have learned about hypothesis testing concepts this week and how they may be significant to researchers conducting the study.
Discuss the following with the class:
Is the study an example of descriptive statistics or inferential statistics? Explain.
Should researchers create a null hypothesis before conducting this study? Why or why not?
Should researchers also create an alternative hypothesis? Why or why not?
To test their research hypotheses, the researchers will need to select 1 or more statistical tests. This week you learned about three statistical tests commonly used in statistical research: t test, chi-square, ANOVA.
Which of these tests is most appropriate for evaluating the rehabilitation program? Explain.
Which of these tests is not suitable for evaluating the rehabilitation program? Explain.
Cite at least 1 scholarly source according to APA guidelines to support your thinking.

Case Study Presentation (Info/Facts)

Please read this case study and fill in the bolded part. (Analysis & finances part)

Name of our consulting group: Resilience Consulting Group?
Key Problems
Limited Market Growth
Operates in a highly volatile market
Evolution of technology
Key Problems (Assumptions)
Limited Market Growth: They can try to maintain the growth and probability of the company by partnering with other key partners in the used car market to open up markets in different regions besides South Africa. By partnering or making deals with other companies WBC can also increase their productivity and develop sustainable growth by taking advantage of relationships with other companies, stakeholders, and markets.
Operates in a highly volatile market: The car market can change at any given point in time, the car market is constantly fluctuating with an increase in demand one day and a decrease in demand the next. Because of this WBC needs to study the market performance and dynamics which will help the company implement efficient and effective practices.
Evolution of Technology: WBC needs to stay updated with their technology by either constantly updating and bringing more innovative ways to purchase their cars online or by investing in teams to help the company relate to its customers. New technologies and social platform advancements provide businesses with opportunities to reach more customers and reduce marketing and operational costs. WBC can effectively market its brand by focusing on modeling its products and services based on customer demands.
Strategy/Solution
Partner or establish deals with already existing and established used car companies such as Copart, CarMax, AutoNation
Study the market performance by hiring research companies such as Nielsen, IQVIA, or Kantar
WBC can hire a social media team to increase their social media presence and reduce some of their marketing efforts.
WBC should also hire an IT team to maintain and keep their websites up to date to help make purchasing vehicles from their website easier.

*Analysis*

Reasoning

*Finances*

*Finding graphs to support the finances*

Conclusion