Premium Writing

This task requires you to analyse the contexts and ideas of key biblical texts. This task is designed to allow you to display achievement of Learning Outcome 2.
LO1- Identify the narrative and literary features of biblical texts using modern biblical scholarship
LO2 – Analyse biblical narratives by considering their historical, geographical, social, and cultural contexts
Your assessment will be assessed on the basis of: content; written expression and presentation; referencing of modern sources; and referencing of biblical sources. See the rubric in the appendix to this unit outline for details.

Intro –
Start with a catchy sentence, interesting quote, or relevant
anecdote
• Define any major terms
• Set a clear direction for the essay
• State where you intend to go in the body of your essay and
ensure you go there
• Start with more general statements and end with a strong
statement on your main point

Body paragraphs
– grammar, level of words, genre.

Conclusion

As long as you engage clearly with the text at the levels of words, grammar, text (including genre), and (if relevant) modality and conclude by showing how careful analysis of the text can lead to a richer interpretation you can take either approach.

I need my assignment done. It is my first year in Arden University, London. I’m an undergraduate student Criminology and Psychology.
3 questions maximum 1000 words per answer.
Portfolio of Tasks
Task 1:
(a) Briefly explain, with examples, why some laws have been criminalised and/or decriminalised in the UK and other countries.
(LO:1)
(b) There are different definitions of crime. Research 2 different academic resources and create a graphic (e.g. a table, mind map) and clearly illustrate the main points of how each of the sources defines crime.
(LO:3) (Word Count: approximately 1000)(20 marks)
Task 2:
(a) In your opinion, does the media have a strong influence over how certain crimes are reported and the effect this has on the public and onhow victims are treated?
Provide examples, and evidence, to substantiate your answer. (Consider moral
panic, youth crime, domestic violence, gender-based crimes)
(LO:4)(Word count: approximately 1000)(40 marks)
Task 3:
1. Write a reflection on the historical aims of punishment and treatment of offenders
and how this has changed. Chooseone method of punishment (e.g., retribution,
rehabilitation, restorative justice) and provide an opinion, with evidence, as to why
you consider this method to be the most effective. The evidence can be in the form of statistics.
(LO:2)
(Word count: approximately 1000)

if this does not work, feel fre to choose a public nonprofit organization

Background and History of a public organization: Catholic Charities of America,
a. Major features, opportunities, and threats of the organization
b. Strategic issues facing the organization, what are potential solutions?
c. Include in the case analysis:
1. Background and history of the organization
2. Description of current organizational context
3. Field analysis
a. Analyze the most important strategic trends in the policy, that the organization operate, include economic and competitive characteristics
b. Identify strategic issues, use information that is publicly available to
include any additional information that is directly from the organization (if possible)
c. What part of the organization is most essential to its success in its field (EMPHASIZE)
d. What is the organization’s initiative, and most important SWOT
e. From the strategic priorities identified, what strategies can be recommended to
address the organization’s weaknesses, and build on its strengths, allowing it to
respond on its external environment
f. Implementation steps and concerns
1. what recommendation would implement the strategies being proposed?
Are there any roadblocks?
2. What steps are needed to implement an outline of metrics to determine if the
strategies are working?
4. Give a brief description of any alternative strategies, and propose a PLAN “B”

This should be typed in Times Roman 12 font, using APA, and follow the format above.

Task: Write a two to three-page paper that explains how Genghis Khan influenced the development of the modern world through his actions as EITHER an administrator OR as a military leader (pick one or the other, not both).
Research: You will need to conduct
research in order to gather evidence that you will use to establish your thesis. You must start researching far in advance of the assignment deadline, as this often takes as much time to accomplish as writing the paper.
• As you conduct research make sure you evaluate source materials, ensuring what you include is from a reputable source and clearly relates to the task.
• Use the library’s search tools and databases to find appropriate sources, such as books and articles from scholarly journals.
• DO NOT use Wikipedia. Doing so will result in an automatic 25% reduction to your score.
Format, Grammar & Style:
• Your paper will include the following:
◦ An introductory paragraph that contains a well-developed thesis.
◦ A paragraph for each of the ideas/evidence you selected, in which you present a clear and logical argument that directly supports your thesis.
◦ A concluding paragraph that provides a summary of evidence and argument.
• Make sure you write complete sentences.
• Paragraphs should contain at least three sentences.
• Avoid making basic/gross grammatical errors, such as:
◦ Incomplete sentences/sentence fragments
◦ Run-on sentences
◦ Verb-subject disagreement
▪ “They was late” should be corrected to “They were late.”
◦ Punctuation errors
▪ Some common errors include missing or misplaced commas and misusing apostrophes (they are not used to indicate something is plural).
• Your writing should be formal in nature and conform to the following style guidelines:
◦ Use active (NOT PASSIVE) voice.
▪ Passive: John F. Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald.
▪ Active: Lee Harvey Oswald shot John F. Kennedy.
◦ Do not write in the first or second person (no I, me, we us, etc.).
▪ Even if you’re paper is objective (based on evidence and critical thinking), using first-person injects the possibility of subjectivity (driven by personal bias or agenda).
◦ No contractions (can’t should be can not, isn’t should be is not, etc.).
◦ Do not end sentences with prepositions.
▪ Example: He did not know where he was at. Corrected: He was lost.
• Proofread! Proofread! Proofread!
◦ The BEST way to proofread is to exchange papers with a classmate and read each other’s work. It is far easier for someone else to spot errors.
Citing Sources:
• You MUST provide a citation when your paper includes either a direct quotation or paraphrased information (information provided by a source and put it in your own words).
• If using a direct quote from a source (only one or two brief ones allowed), you need to place quotation marks around the quoted passage and then place the title of the book/article, the author’s last name, and the page number in parentheses at the end of the sentence, followed by the period.
• If citing a website, place the web address in parentheses.
• If you paraphrase, all you need to do is put the page number you are referring to in parentheses at the end of the sentence, followed by the period.
• Examples:
◦ Citing a direct quotation: When Xerxes asked why the Macedonian army always won Alexander replied, “because you suck and I rock” (Some Book, Doe, 16).
◦ Citing paraphrased material: When Xerxes asked why the Macedonian army always won Alexander told him that it was because he was a better commander (Some Article, Doe, 67).
◦ If using a direct quote from a source, place quotation marks around the passage and include a citation.
• If you include direct quotations, make sure they are explained and contextualized and not stand alone “floating” quotations.
• Ensure that punctuation appears inside quotation marks.
• Using multiple and/or long direct quotations will be penalized — only use one or two and ONLY if absolutely necessary. Paraphrasing is almost always the best course of action.
Plagiarism
• Plagiarism occurs when an individual borrows words, ideas, original material, or data from another person, group, or organization without acknowledging the original source of the material. Students are expected to cite sources correctly.
◦ Your paper will be checked for plagiarism by Turnitin when you submit it.
◦ For more information about plagiarism and how to avoid it, check out the following resources.
• As stated in the syllabus, committing plagiarism in this course will result in one of the following:
◦ receiving a score of zero on the assignment
◦ being withdrawn and receiving the grade of F for the course
Submitting the Paper:
• Save your paper as a Microsoft Word file (.doc/.docx).
• Click Submit Writing Assignment (https://hindscc.instructure.com/courses/565696/assignments/10840050) and follow the instructions.
Grading: I will grade your submission following the criteria set forth on the rub
ric below, with each of the four categories worth 25% of your score.

Discuss how you will evaluate the effective your program Rekindle You, pre and post tests for clients involved in the program, focus groups, surveys etc.
• How will you collect the data needed to see whether the funds you received for your program are being put to good use by making a difference in the community?

I added some attachments to give you a background about my program Rekindle You .

1. What is the purpose of feedback journal for a student? (professors’ Feedback from the assignment submitted)
2. What to be learned from the Feedback Journal to advance writing skills?
3. Describe atleast two goals of scholary writing
4. Why are these goals important?

Overview and Preparation

In this assessment you will submit your project report and presentation, which are based on the work you have completed in the previous assessments.
This assessment is in two parts:

(USE THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED TEMPLATES TO COMPLETE THIS ASSESEMENT:)

Part 1: Project Report.
This report should be succinct, substantive, and written for a hypothetical executive leadership team. It is not a lengthy academic paper.

Part 2: Project Report Presentation.
This recorded presentation is an overview of the project, also intended for an executive leadership team.Overview and Preparation
In this assessment you will submit your project report and presentation, which are based on the work you have completed in the previous assessments.

Critically discuss the role, purpose, and functions of the Parliamentary Ombudsman in administrative law and what reforms might be considered to improve the effectiveness of the mechanism.
must be oscola refernced
must be less then 2000 words
reduce the plagiarism percentage
must be in english uk

All three composers were widely successful opera composers during their lifetime, and their works are still produced around the world to this day. Each composer has their own unique style, which is highlighted in the textbook. As listeners we tend to pick favorites, which composer are you siding with and why?
Before answering this question, go back and review the works by each composer, particularly in Chapter 18.
In your initial post, select a composer and give a specific description of plot, character development, and elements of music from one or more of their operas. Use the textbook for reference. You may also search the web for help in your description (always cite your sources!). Explain why your composer is your favorite.

Choose a diversity policy relating to your future profession from the list provided below. In a report format, evaluate the policy using research. (HUMAN RESOURCES IS MINE)
Ensure you provide an evaluation grounded in theory and scholarly research. Do not simply describe the contents of the policy. Instead, consider the role of diversity policies, the included details of the policy, the strategies employed, how these are implemented, and the role of leadership. Does the organisation have an effective policy that supports and enhances diversity and inclusion? Evaluations need to be more detailed than simply ‘good’ or ‘bad’, and evidence is needed to justify these conclusions.
The following areas could be included in your evaluation:
1. The purpose of the policy
a. The organisation’s justification of policy
b. Organisational commitment to diversity
2. The policy descriptions and readability
a. Accessibility of policy
b. Links to other policies or strategies
3. The implementation practices outlined
a. Measurement and monitoring
b. Recruitment and retention
c. Other strategies
4. The leadership governing the policy
a. Organisational structure
b. Specific leaders and their commitment to the policy and to diversity (e.g. CEO, diversity leader, managers, etc)
c. Organisational culture
2
In addition to your evaluation, provide 2-3 considered and justified recommendations to improve the organisation’s policy and/or practices. The report evaluation must be justified with high-level research.
For higher marks, ensure you draw on recent (within about 5 years) high quality (peer-reviewed journals) research in addition to any industry or government resources.Ensure you provide an evaluation grounded in theory and scholarly research. Do not simply describe the contents of the policy. Instead, consider the role of diversity policies, the included details of the policy, the strategies employed, how these are implemented, and the role of leadership. Does the organisation have an effective policy that supports and enhances diversity and inclusion? Evaluations need to be more detailed than simply ‘good’ or ‘bad’, and evidence is needed to justify these conclusions.
The following areas could be included in your evaluation:
1. The purpose of the policy
a. The organisation’s justification of policy
b. Organisational commitment to diversity
2. The policy descriptions and readability
a. Accessibility of policy
b. Links to other policies or strategies
3. The implementation practices outlined
a. Measurement and monitoring
b. Recruitment and retention
c. Other strategies
4. The leadership governing the policy
a. Organisational structure
b. Specific leaders and their commitment to the policy and to diversity (e.g. CEO, diversity leader, managers, etc)
c. Organisational culture
2
In addition to your evaluation, provide 2-3 considered and justified recommendations to improve the organisation’s policy and/or practices. The report evaluation must be justified with high-level research.
For higher marks, ensure you draw on recent (within about 5 years) high quality (peer-reviewed journals) research in addition to any industry or government resources.