Premium Writing

A sentence structured outline and work cited page (APA) format is required. Outline must have a minimum of 3 references and follow MPx3+TS format.

(“Main Points 3 Times and Transition Statements”) Follow the sample outline in files titled Virginia Apgar. Outline and APA citation page must be uploaded as one document in Canvas by due date.

Information in outline needs to be enough for delivering a 5-7 minute speech. Normally a two and half page outline is a 5-7 minute speech. I will post a video identifying how to craft the speech outline using the sample in “files”.

Your outline follows the sample outline in the following:

Rule 1, “Everything on the far left margin stays in your outline”. (Only the far left).

Rule 2, “Everything in parenthesis

will appear in your outline”. When you include the info in parenthesis that makes your outline the next outline for others to follow when writing speeches. Follow that format and your speech outline will be MPx3+TS. Main Points three times with Transition Statements.

Rule 3, “APA citation is required with 3 references. (Citation page is at the end of the outline and submitted as one document).

Students submitting assignments correctly early will receive “bonus points” for the assignment . I always give a zero for an outline until it is submitted exactly like the sample outline. The sample outline writes the speech for you. When you submit your speech outline is must be the next example outline for others to follow.

Create a flyer that targets a particular stakeholder and convince them that your solution or answer to the issue is correct- use rhetorical devices to persuade them based on their values and needs. This is an exercise intended to be low stress; a draft is fine so long as it is well developed and it is clear which stakeholder you are targeting and that rhetorical awareness was used. Then, create a reflection piece as a letter, etc. to consider the rhetorical choices that you made.

This should be 4 pages, one for the flyer. And the other three pages as part as the reflection. (this is intended to be reflective, not formal) that explores the choices you made and why based on the rhetorical situation and the purpose behind your artifact AND your artifact itself. You must use 2 of the sources from your research paper, modes, appeals, and evidence that you have carefully thought about audience, purpose, and intention.

My research paper is attached in the files below.

What Are the Basic Assignment Requirements?
The student’s multimodal argument can be entirely created from their own design and
artwork, or it may be a combination of their own art/design and repurposed assets,
such as digital photos, thoughtful adaptations of templates, etc.

▪Develop a persuasive/ argumentative multimodal artifact that is digestible by an
audience in one to three minutes,
▪Use at least some linguistic text to include evidence from at least two research
sources,
▪Substantially use at least two additional communication modes to convey the
artifact’s message, evidence, and appeals,
▪Make rhetorical choices that reflect some complexity in development and effort.
▪Select the audience and imagined a place of publication,
▪Select a genre with goal in mind and show some understanding of the genre’s
conventions,
▪Acknowledge sources and assets within the artifact whenever compatible with
the genre,
▪Include an asset & source list for the artifact, regardless of whether they cite
in-text within the argument,

Read “A Glossary of Haunting.” Create your own mini-glossary of haunting using at least three keywords/phrases (you can borrow them from the reading or come up with your own). The point is to connect experiences and representations of haunting and ghosts with colonialism. 300 words.

This is an assignment related to ethical discussion to coca cola company. The following are rubric and detailed description of assessment. There are same required framework and reference needed from lecture, I can send the powerpoint and reference to you. Three of the references need to from academic articles, and the rest from lecture.

I am going to attach the syllabus so you can see the teacher’s instructions. The conflict I chose to analyze is the conflict between Rwanda and DRC. The syllabus has teo highlighted paragraphs; the 1st paragraph asks us to write an outline or plan for the research paper, which i have already completed–so no worries there. The 2nd highlighted paragraph is about the sctual research paper. I have attached the syllabus so you know what materials/books/articles we have read in class and so you can use the concepts from those materials to incorporate in the paper. The field of study is Peace and Conflict Resolution, and the specific topic for this class is “Identity, Culture, and Conflict. Please be sure to follow the teachers instructions clearly. If possible, i will alos attach the outline I had made for this project. Also, as the teacher suggested on the 1st highlighted paragraph when talking about the research plan, if the research topic is too broad, you nay consider narrowing the research by sekecting how the conflict impacts a relatively small group of people. In this case, I’d choose to talk about child labor in mining sites in Eastern DRC, or how women are impacted by this conflict because the adversaries are using rape as a weapon of war.

Throughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.
You are required to post at least one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.
Submit, by way of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help guide this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

The completed paper should be from 2,200 to 2,800 words, with that total not counting the citations, the footnoted materials, or any bibliography or title page. The goal of the paper is to analyze a specific business law case (United States v. Apple Inc.) and analyze the allegations, evidence, etc.

These are the rubrics for the essay:

1. A well-stated thesis – Understandable? What is the author (the student) trying to do? – 5 pts.
2. Analysis of Topic – Has the author analyzed legal topics, the case, or related course materials? – 40
pts.
3. Clarity of Paper – 10 pts.
4. Strong Conclusion? – Has the author attempted to prove anything? If so, given the brevity of the
paper, has he/she been successful? – 10 pts.
5. Writing, Spelling, Punctuation You will receive fewer points on your paper for grammatical mistakes,
especially ones that I specifically advise against. – 20 pts.
6. Sources – Are there an appropriate number of quality sources, cited correctly? The author should
correctly cite at least nine different sources, unless there is an understandable reason. The sources
should be of different types, and most should be recent in origin whenever practical and appropriate for
the paper. You must use footnotes or in-text citations, correctly cite the court case(s), and include a
bibliography. Not doing so may result in a loss of points. – 15 pts.

Be sure to read the instructions all the way through to the end – there are 6 pages of instructions. The first 2 pages are an overview. The last 4 pages are the template you MUST use for this paper.
To maximize success:
1) Follow instructions carefully and exactly. Policy briefs have a specific formula for completion. Follow the format provided – this is not the assignment to get creative.
2) Be sure you fully address how food insecurity contributes to obesity as well as child development in the background section. You should cite a minimum of 2-3 empirical research articles in this portion of the paper.
3) Pick ONE existing nutrition policy or program to discuss and be consistent throughout the paper. This paper is a policy brief so discuss the policy, not generalized ideas about how to solve food insecurity and obesity.
4) Strictly follow instructions for the references and include citations in your paper. Do NOT directly quote any paper or article. Any “statement of fact” should have a citation.
5) Do not wait until the last minute to complete this assignment.

Write an argumentative essay (at least 2,000 words) that synthesizes and assesses the central arguments of Parthasarathi (2011), Piketty (2022), and Piketty (2020: 304-361) regarding causes of income and wealth inequality within India, and between India and the global North today.

Synthesis should identify the core argument(s) in each of these readings, focusing on the most significant aspects of each reading’s main claims about various historical causes of contemporary income and wealth inequality within India and between India and the global North. Synthesis should note specific causes that each reading identifies as the most important in shaping patterns of inequality within India and between India and countries of the global North such as Britain. Synthesize the findings of:
• the country sheet for India in World Inequality Report (WIR 2022: 197) regarding contemporary levels of – and changes over time in – Indian wealth and income inequality.
• The introduction, conclusion, and Chapter 3 of Parthasarathi (2011) “Political Institutions and Economic Life”
• Chapter 8 of Piketty (2020) “Ternary Societies and Colonialism: The Case of India”
• discussions of India in Piketty (2022), especially Chapter 3

Essay should also contain an assessment in which you craft and defend a central claim that clearly specifies and elaborates upon at least two or three reasons that one author’s arguments (those of Piketty or Parthasarathi) are more convincing than the other’s regarding the question of how and why wealth and income inequality levels within contemporary India – and between India and countries of the global North – reached the levels they had by 2022. Analyze the contributions and any limitations of the core arguments that each author makes regarding causes of wealth and income inequalities within India and between India and the rest of the world. It may also be helpful to specify what each author argues has NOT caused Indian inequality to look as it does today, and which of these causes Parthasarthi and Piketty might agree and disagree about.

Assignment Brief and Guidance:

In your role as Junior Insights Strategist, you have completed the industry insight analysis and your line manager has now given you another project. This is to complete research into the external and internal business environment. The company* is looking to expand their distribution channels to include both e-commerce players and physical retailers. To enable the company to make any strategic decisions, they need you to present a business case to the leadership team.

*As selected for Assignment 1 to meet local needs. ( I chose Lamborghini)

Completion of the project will involve a PESTLE analysis to research the sports retail market, develop insights and predict future growth potential in new markets. The project will also involve a SWOT analysis to determine the company position in the marketplace and the potential opportunities for distribution expansion while minimising risks and threats.

Your presentation will include the findings from an external and an internal audit:

● a PESTLE analysis to identify positive and negative impacts of external factors and influences on the company’s products’ retail market, including a ‘traffic light chart’ evaluating level of competition, funding activity, legal complexity and investment opportunity available

● a SWOT analysis to explore and explain the organisation’s internal strengths and weaknesses as a company

● critical analysis of both the external and internal factors, to determine whether the organisation should proceed with their expansion plans, presented as conclusions and recommendations

Submission should be in the form of a 15-minute presentation and five minutes for questions. The presentation slides for the findings should be submitted along with speaker notes as one copy. You are required to make effective use of PowerPoint headings, bullet points and subsections as appropriate. Your research should be referenced using the Harvard referencing system (or an alternative referencing system). Inaccurate use of referencing may lead to issues of plagiarism if not applied correctly.
The recommended word limit is 1,000–1,500 words, including speaker notes, although you will not be penalised for going under or exceeding the total word limit.
.