Best Writer

Capital budgeting is utilized to determine if a project is worthwhile. The net present value (NPV), payback period, and internal rate of return (IRR) methods are used to rank and select which project to undertake. The following video outlines the NPV and IRR method of capital budgeting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFFkFMfotT0
In this assignment, you are required to prepare a PowerPoint presentation reviewing 3 projects. You will calculate the NPV, IRR, and payback period for each project. Utilizing the capital budgeting calculations, you will need to select the best investment for the company. These calculations will be based on the following scenario:
AIU Industries has 3 potential projects to consider, all with an initial cost of $1,250,000. The company prefers to reject any project with a 4-year cut-off period for recapturing initial cash outflow. Given the cost of capital rates and the future cash flow for each project, determine which project the company should accept.
Cash Flow
Project A
Project I
Project U
Year 1 250,000 450,000 250,000
Year 2 250,000 450,000 400,000
Year 3 250,000 450,000 600,000
Year 4 250,000 450,000 800,000
Year 5 400,000 400,000 200,000
Year 6 400,000 400,000 800,000
Year 7 400,000 400,000 600,000
Year 8 400,000 400,000 200,000
Cost of Capital
4%
6%
8%
Please submit your assignment.
Submitting your assignment in APA format means, at a minimum, you will need the following:
Title slide: Remember the running head. The title should be in all capitals.
Length: 15 slides minimum
Body slides: This begins on the slide following the title slide and must be double-spaced (be careful not to triple- or quadruple-space between paragraphs). The typeface should be 12-pt. Times Roman or 12-pt. Courier in regular black type. Do not use color, bold type, or italics, except as required for APA-level headings and references. The deliverable length of the body of your presentation for this assignment is 15 slides. In-body academic citations to support your decisions and analysis are required. A variety of academic sources is encouraged.
Reference slide: References that align with your in-body academic sources are listed on the final slide of your presentation. The references must be in APA format using appropriate spacing, hanging indent, italics, and uppercase and lowercase usage as appropriate for the type of resource used. Remember, the Reference slide is not a bibliography but a further listing of the abbreviated in-body citations used in the paper. Every referenced item must have a corresponding in-body citation.
Your assignment will be graded in accordance with the following criteria. Use this link to view the Grading Rubric.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
If you are planning to repurpose an assignment or submit one you have used before, please let your instructor know. If an instructor is not made aware of work being repurposed or reused, he or she will treat the assignment as a plagiarized task and reserves the right to post an F grade and submit a task for review to administration until proof of originality is provided. View the full AIU Policies on submitting papers.

The following are some tips if you have problems submitting your assignment:
Resave in the proper format per the Assignment Detail instructions, and resubmit.
Submit with a different Web browser.
Submit from a different computer.
Call Technical Support at 877-221-5800, Menu Option 2. They are open 24/7.
If you are still having difficulties after trying steps 1 to 4, please contact your course instructor.
Make sure you submit this assignment by the listed due date. Late deductions will apply for this assignment as follows:
Assignments submitted within 7 calendar days after the stated due date: 10% penalty of total assignment points.
Assignments submitted 8 to 14 calendar days after the stated due date: 20% penalty of total assignment points.
Assignments submitted 15 to 21 calendar days after the stated due date: 30% penalty of total assignment points.
Assignments submitted 22 to 28 calendar days after the stated due date: 40% penalty of total assignment points.
No assignments, including late assignments, will be accepted after the end of the course unless an approved Incomplete has been granted.
Reference
Edspira. (2013, September 18). Net present value (NPV) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFFkFMfotT0

Compose an essay of at least 1,500 words, double spaced, and typed in 12point font. Include an introduction, body, and conclusion. Five sources of information must be cited in footnotes; three of which must be non-internet. Wikipedia may not be used as a source. Include a bibliography. Your essay should be to the point, clear and free from grammatical errors. Your topic is:

One page, roughly 200-250 words, per question. Don’t combine answers as they are completly different questions. Answers should be based off of chapter listed below.

1. What are some of the ways that models are employed in science, and how are they related to scientific theories? Give an example of a scientific model to explain your answer.
-Chapter 1 and 4

2. Explain the role that simplicity plays in the acceptance of scientific hypotheses. Why is simplicity a pragmatic criterion?
-Chapter 2 and 3

3. Why do empiricists want to put the concept of law prior to the concepts of cause
or necessity, and explain the latter through the former?
-Chapter 5

4. How did Hans Driesch employ his experimental results in embryology to argue for the autonomy of biology?
-Chapter 6

Must use the article I upload. Metformin versus insulin for
gestational diabetes mellitus:
a meta-analysis
Instructions: what should be incluced in the annotated bibliography
APA 7th edition format and style
Purpose of the Study
Research questions/ hypotheses
Research design/evidence rating
Summary of how findings contribute to the PICOT question.
my picot is: How does insulin compared to metformion reduce the risk of pregnancy induced hypertension unitl delivery?

Cognitive Psychology Module Coursework

The title of the essay is as follows:
What perceptual information processing problems would a designer need to address
to create a machine with humanlike perception? With reference to relevant cognitive
psychology literature, relate your answer to human visual perception.

You are also asked to
submit, as an Appendix, your essay plan (10% of the coursework mark). The total word
count for both your essay and your essay plan is 2,500 words excluding references.
A good piece of work will answer the essay question, will be logically and clearly
structured, with fluent and well-signposted content, and will be referenced
throughout both in-text and with full references at the end. Avoid being overly
descriptive; make use of critical analysis. You should not rely solely upon material
from the textbooks and course platform but make full use of the Library to research
the content, for example, to see if there have been any up-to-date studies. You should
aim to cite a minimum of 8-9 peer-reviewed references, to include both theoretical
and empirical literature.
Your essay plan does not need to follow any specific format as this will largely be a
personal thought process, but part of the discipline of good writing is in planning and
structuring the content in advance and then sticking to the plan. It is recommended
that this uses no more than 10% of your total word count.

write about a Leadership Technology issue- improving healthcare quality by the use of information technology.

DISCUSSION BOARD SCENARIO
The House Judiciary Committee passed a bill 10/6/2011 that would make it a federal crime for U.S. residents to discuss or plan activities on foreign soil that, if carried out in the U.S., would violate the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) — even if the planned activities are legal in the countries where they’re carried out. “Under this bill, if a young couple plans a wedding in Amsterdam, and as part of the wedding, they plan to buy the bridal party flavor, some marijuana, they would be subject to prosecution,” said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance.
Based on your knowledge thus far, answer the questions listed below in paragraph forms. Ensure to support your answers pros/cons.
Should the U.S. government punish American citizens traveling in foreign countries for committing acts that are legal in those countries but illegal here?
Should the U.S. legalize drugs that are legalized in other countries?
Should the U.S. follow European countries in how they treat addicts?

CHAPTER 12 SUMMARY: CHAPTER 12 SUMMARY
Global Drug Policy
In this weeks learning, we will focused on the Decriminalization, Legalization, and Harmful reduction of drugs. Most of the harmful aspects of heroin use are the result of its being illegal. We permit a wide assortment of dangerous behaviors such as cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol, skydiving, and football, acknowledging freedom to enjoy activities that may be injurious to health. Why do we single out psychoactive chemicalsbut only some of them?
Decriminalization would allow drug criminal justice resources to be used elsewhere, curtail secondary criminality, weaken or destroy drug-trafficking organizations, and allow drug users to lead healthier and more normal lives by using pharmaceutical-quality substances.
On the pro side of the argument, decriminalization would allow drug criminal justice resources to be used elsewhere, curtail secondary criminality, weaken or destroy drug-trafficking organizations, and allow drug users to lead healthier and more normal lives by using pharmaceutical-quality substances.
The con side argues that greater availability would mean that more people would be tempted to use drugs and would signal a societal acceptance of drug use. There would be no incentive for addicts to enter drug treatment, and drug use might continue beyond the typical age of remission.
Offering intelligent policy alternatives requires understanding the cause(s) of drug use: is it biological, psychological, sociological, or a combination of these? Although medical maintenance using opiates or methadone has been suggested for heroin addicts, cocaine is more problematic.
A number of countries have decriminalized marijuana, but even its medical use is a federal crime in the United States (although it is legal in some states).
In Western Europe, official and unofficial harm reduction policies have become popular, most notably in the Netherlands. Dutch drug abuse prevention efforts treat alcohol and tobacco, as well as heroin and cocaine, as dangerous drugs; legal versus illegal is not considered a sound basis for differentiation. Despite U.S. objections, Canada has been experimenting with harm reduction.

Week Four Assignment – Comparative Critical Review
Please read the Course Outline for the detailed description of this assignment and for its due date.

Click on the “Week Four Assignment – Comparative Critical Review ” link above to submit your assignment, as well to get more information regarding the due date and grading rubric.
Checklist:
Do I have a cover page in APA format?
Do I have a short (about 100 words) abstract, on its own page, labeled “Abstract,” which states my research question, which two disciplines I’m comparing, and gives a single-sentence summary of what the answer to my research question is, based on the articles I compared?
In the body of the paper, did I clearly state my research question? Something like, “This paper compares how the disciplines _____ and ____ address the question, ” …your question here…”
Is my research question:
Technology focused
Comparing two groups or two situations in a measurable way
Stated in terms of a specific technology and a specific measure
Free of the word “technology” per se?
Do I have two, and ONLY TWO, papers I am comparing?
Are both of them peer-reviewed? Note that books, any website, government reports, and PhD theses are NOT considered peer-reviewed.
Are each of those from a different discipline?
Did I find the discipline of each one by looking up the background of the first author? And did I cite where I found it?
Did I report on why I am assigning each author to that discipline, and state clearly what discipline I think the author falls into? For more on disciplines, read the Week One discussion in the classroom on Disciplines.
Did I cite my authors, in APA format, in the text? Example citation for a three-author paper: (Smith, Jones & Blue, 2015, p.3).
Did I cite my authors in full in APA format at the end of the paper, starting on a new page labeled “References”? For more on citation see the “APA cheat sheet” in Course Resources.
Did I write a conclusion that compares how the two papers ANSWERED MY RESEARCH QUESTION?
Did I clearly state the answer to my research question?
Did I avoid first person (me, my, I) and keep my opinion out of it?
Did I avoid pasting in too much from my sources? (A sentence or two a few times is about right.)
Did I run a grammar check and fix issues?
From the course outline:
Comparative Critical Review (module 4): The assignment must be submitted to the NU dropbox as a Word file.
You will select two relevant academic essays from two disciplines (the two articles must be from different disciplines, based on the background of the first author of each one). Analyze the articles similarities and differences in light of each discipline’s point of view. This assignment should use your research question as its focus. It will be useful to see how two disciplines are different, how they overlap, and perhaps how they may spring from a common source. NOTE: ONLY use two articles for this assignment, no more and no less, from different disciplines. Detail the qualifications of each author to represent his or her discipline.
When tackling this project only choose articles from peer-reviewed academic journals. For example, if one of your disciplines is economics, one of your papers needs to be written by an economist AND published in a peer-reviewed journal (not necessarily an economics journa, though- the author’s discipline is the criterion for the article’s discipline.)There are wide assortments available in the National University Library as well as journal databases online. If you want to propose using other sources please see the instructor for approval. Wikipedia is never an acceptable source for this course in general and this assignment in particular.
The material for this assignment should use as its core the same research question you plan to use for your research (recommended) or a different one. The assignment must be submitted as a Word file in the dropbox, and should be between 1400 and 2100 words. APA style must be used. See the items under Module 1 (“Read Me: The Research Process” and “Read Me: Disciplines” for more details.)

Urinary Obstruction
Case Studies
The 57-year-old patient noted urinary hesitancy and a decrease in the force of his urinary
stream for several months. Both had progressively become worse. His physical examination
was essentially negative except for an enlarged prostate, which was bulky and soft.
Studies Results
Routine laboratory studies Within normal limits (WNL)
Intravenous pyelogram (IVP) Mild indentation of the interior aspect of the bladder,
indicating an enlarged prostate
Uroflowmetry with total voided
flow of 225 mL
8 mL/sec (normal: >12 mL/sec)
Cystometry Resting bladder pressure: 35 cm H2O (normal: <40 cm H2O) Peak bladder pressure: 50 cm H2O (normal: 40-90 cm H2O) Electromyography of the pelvic sphincter muscle Normal resting bladder with a positive tonus limb Cystoscopy Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) 0.5 units/L (normal: 0.11-0.60 units/L) Prostate specific antigen (PSA) 1.0 ng/mL (normal: <4 ng/mL) Prostate ultrasound Diffusely enlarged prostate; no localized tumor Diagnostic Analysis Because of the patients symptoms, bladder outlet obstruction was highly suspected. Physical examination indicated an enlarged prostate. IVP studies corroborated that finding. The reduced urine flow rate indicated an obstruction distal to the urinary bladder. Because the patient was found to have a normal total voided volume, one could not say that the reduced flow rate was the result of an inadequately distended bladder. Rather, the bladder was appropriately distended, yet the flow rate was decreased. This indicated outlet obstruction. The cystogram indicated that the bladder was capable of mounting an effective pressure and was not an atonic bladder compatible with neurologic disease. The tonus limb again indicated the bladder was able to contract. The peak bladder pressure of 50 cm H2O was normal, again indicating appropriate muscular function of the bladder. Based on these studies, the patient was diagnosed with a urinary outlet obstruction. The PAP and PSA indicated benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). The ultrasound supported that diagnosis. Cystoscopy documented that finding, and the patient was appropriately treated by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). This patient did well postoperatively and had no major problems. Critical Thinking Questions 1. Does BPH predispose this patient to cancer? 2. Why are patients with BPH at increased risk for urinary tract infections? 3. What would you expect the patients PSA level to be after surgery? 4. What is the recommended screening guidelines and treatment for BPH? 5. What are some alternative treatments / natural homeopathic options for treatment

A 47-year-old male patient (A) presents to your office c/o painful and bleeding defecation that started a
couple of days ago. Pt also states that he noticed some intermittent pruritus on his back. Pt comes to
your consultation accompanied by his male husband of 45 years old (Patient B), who suddenly states to
you that he had noticed a painless blister on his genital area, but he is not quite sure when it
appeared.
Patient A: With no past or family relevant history and with no known allergies (NKA).
Patient B: With a PMH of seasonal allergic rhinitis and NKA. No other family or relevant history.
On complete physical examination of both patients your assessment reveals the following findings:
On Patient A: You noticed a visible anal fissure in the inferior region of the anal sphincter. Besides, you
also noticed disseminated papules in the trunk and macules on palms and soles (as shown below).

Patient B: On examination, you noticed a visible ulceration in the genital area, and patient denies any
pain on palpation. On general assessment, no adenopathy noted or reported by patient (B).

Since both patients are a marital couple, you proceed with serological testing for each patient (A & B).
You suspect a sexually transmitted disease. On your verbal assessment, both patients (A&B) deny having
or being treating in the past for STDs in the past, to which you believe.
Lab Results:
Patient A: Leukocytosis – Treponema (Positive) Non-Treponema (Positive) HIV (Negative) Hepatitis
(Negative)
Patient B: Treponema (Positive) Non-treponema (Negative) HIV (negative) Hepatitis (Negative)——————— Do not include the above section in your paper. ONLY THE QUESTIONS BELOW——-
Please answer the following questions in APA format and include in-text references.
1) What serological lab works would you order to obtain the above results? (Be specific with the lab
names)
2) What is the diagnosis for Patient A?
3) What is the diagnosis for Patient B?
4) What would it be the differential diagnosis for patient A and patient B? (be specific. Your diagnosis
contains stages. Therefore, be specific on them)
5) How are you going to treat Patient A? (Be specific and include the time of treatment)
6) How are you going to treat Patient B? (Be specific and include the time of treatment)
7) What would be the possible cause of this infection if both patients did not have any sexual encounter
outside their relationship in the last year? Again, you believe both patients did not have any sexual
encounter outside their marital sexual relationship.