Best Writer

What did you learn about peer-reviewed literature?

by

What did you learn about peer-reviewed literature? Why is the use of peer-reviewed literature important to the research community and to you as a practitioner leader?

Include APA in-text citations and a reference list.
What is a Peer-Reviewed Journal? (02:02)
Locating a Peer-Reviewed Journal (01:51)

To what extent should manufacturers be held liable for harms caused by their products?

by

To what extent should manufacturers be held liable for harms caused by their products? What constitutes negligence and is this the only standard for holding a manufacturer responsible for harm caused by their product? If a company brings a product to market is there an implicit promise of safety under normal use? Can the user be negligent? What if neither party is negligent; should the manufacturer pay for harm anyway, in such a case?

Provide examples to support your statements.

Discussion Question 2: Marketing Ethics.

What values should be considered for an ethically legitimate price? Does the market always ensure ethical pricing? Has the free market ensured ethical pricing during the supply chain shortages caused by the pandemic, or is there price gouging?

From a personal ethics perspective, if you were responsible for product pricing at your organization what ethical principles would be your moral compass regarding pricing?

What is the background of the author/editor (Jensen)?

by

1. What is the background of the author/editor (Jensen)? How is this relevant to understanding the purpose of the book overall?

2. What is the thesis of the book? How successful is the author/editor (Jensen) at getting his points across to the reader clearly and does the author ultimately prove what the thesis claims to show? Give factual examples of how and/or how not. Be sure to cite the Jensen text.

3. In the process of doing steps one and two above, choose three of the journalists in the book and use them as examples in the review itself. This implies a brief discussion about each of the three journalists selected, their writings, the significance of the issue addressed, and what happened as a result of his/her reporting. Please choose an author from the first third, middle third, and last third of the 20th century (spreading out your choices from across the book).

4. Do you think that investigative reporting and a free press are important to a democracy? Why or why not? How does Jensen address this issue in the intro, and throughout the rest of the book?

5. Finally, give an example of a contemporary muckraking journalist and the issue they address, one NOT included in the Jensen book, and one active writing in the past decade. In other words, if the book continued, choose someone whom you think would be included in its ensuing chapters. What is socially/politically compelling about the topic and what possible solutions are offered in the current example you chose? What role do these people play in the construction of our history? If you need ideas for finding contemporary muckrakers, see our work at www.projectcensored.orgLinks to an external site. (including our top censored news storiesLinks to an external site. and independent news sourcesLinks to an external site.).

6. Closing remarks/conclusion. BE SURE the paper is properly cited in Chicago StyleLinks to an external site., endnotes or footnotes (note style, not bibliography style, and not in APA or MLA).Here is some general information pertaining to the critical book review of the Carl Jensen work, Stories That Changed America: Muckrakers of the 20th Century.

*Due date- no later than Monday, April 24, 11:59 P.M. uploaded to Canvas here.

Here are the things you need to address in the process of writing your critical review. You should use the info below as a template for the review. This is not a book report, that is, it is not a recounting, nor a straight summary of the book, rather, it is an analysis of the overall book in historical context. The paper should be between 1,000-1,500 words, double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. font, cited in the Chicago Style with endnotes or footnotes. These are the formatting requirements, points will be deducted for not following.

Here is what the paper must address for full credit consideration:

1. What is the background of the author/editor (Jensen)? How is this relevant to understanding the purpose of the book overall?

2. What is the thesis of the book? How successful is the author/editor (Jensen) at getting his points across to the reader clearly and does the author ultimately prove what the thesis claims to show? Give factual examples of how and/or how not. Be sure to cite the Jensen text.

3. In the process of doing steps one and two above, choose three of the journalists in the book and use them as examples in the review itself. This implies a brief discussion about each of the three journalists selected, their writings, the significance of the issue addressed, and what happened as a result of his/her reporting. Please choose an author from the first third, middle third, and last third of the 20th century (spreading out your choices from across the book).

4. Do you think that investigative reporting and a free press are important to a democracy? Why or why not? How does Jensen address this issue in the intro, and throughout the rest of the book?

5. Finally, give an example of a contemporary muckraking journalist and the issue they address, one NOT included in the Jensen book, and one active writing in the past decade. In other words, if the book continued, choose someone whom you think would be included in its ensuing chapters. What is socially/politically compelling about the topic and what possible solutions are offered in the current example you chose? What role do these people play in the construction of our history? If you need ideas for finding contemporary muckrakers, see our work at www.projectcensored.orgLinks to an external site. (including our top censored news storiesLinks to an external site. and independent news sourcesLinks to an external site.).

6. Closing remarks/conclusion. BE SURE the paper is properly cited in Chicago StyleLinks to an external site., endnotes or footnotes (note style, not bibliography style, and not in APA or MLA).

What are the pros and cons associated with the issue?

by

Explores various pros and cons related to either the legal or industry issues.

What are the pros and cons associated with the issue? Are they based on evidence or fear related? Do the legal or industry issues help or hinder access?

Cites references from course learning to validate these approaches.

IV. Heading:

Evidence

How does this affect the population? Health, social equity, economically, Reviews the body of evidence related to the specific issues and identifies ways to improve them.

Includes a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed research-based journal articles published within the last 5 years. Approximately 1 paragraph per article.

V. Heading:

Plan/ Implementation

From one’s own professional perspective, define a plan to address the areas that need to be changed or process of working in the industry:

· Medical recommendation process in your state or a nearby medical cannabis state.

· Implementation process: supporting patient safe access and use of an evidence- based self-titration process.

· Educational and coaching needs: what resources would you refer clients to? How would you approach coaching or obtaining support?

· Use of holistic modalities to support ECS health.

· Safety and legal issues.

· Considers one’s professional standards and ethical concerns.

VI. Heading:

Evaluation

Reviews how effectiveness of plan will be evaluated in consideration of population needs.

Considers potential barriers and challenges to implementing plan.

VII. Heading:

Conclusion

Summarizes process. No new information nor citations, why you are sharing the

information, recap of intro and what the reader should do.

VIII. Reference Page:

References

In APA format, minimum 5 references peer- reviewed journals published in the last five years.


All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy