Best Writer

For your initial post, begin by reminding the class of your final project in a brief sentence or two. Next, identify the stakeholders (and potential stakeholders) of your chosen issue. Then identify any ethical considerations you believe may be of importance for your project, particularly as related to the sources you have identified for your analysis.
Describe any ethical challenges that have arisen as you have researched your social issue that may be related to the stakeholders involved. Be sure to include your references, in either APA format or with direct links to the sources.
In response to your classmates, comment with attention to what ethical considerations might be relevant for the research they are conducting.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric PDF document.

Welcome to Module #10! For this we are going to see some overlap between politics and economics; in fact, there is a field of study called “Political Economy.” That said, here’s what to do:
1. First, watch Requiem for the American Dream.
2. Watch my lecture on “Authority and the State.”
3. Watch my Zoom Recording on the election of Donald Trump.
4. Watch the PBS Frontline documentary, “American Insurrection.”
(Links to an external site.)
5. For your module reflection
In your discussion of Requiem for the American Dream, summarize the “Ten Principles of Concentration of Wealth and Power.” What principle did you find most thought-provoking, and why? Do you agree with Chomsky that political power is concentrated in the hands of the economically powerful? Connect the points in the documentary to Chapter 14 in our textbook on Economic Sociology regarding Political Economy. Do you agree with Chomsky’s solution to the problem (watch carefully at the end)?
In your discussion of my lecture on Authority and the State, regarding the United States which model were you raised to believe in? Which model seems most accurate to you now? Do you agree with Gelins and Page? Why or why not?
Discuss the people who support(ed) Donald Trump by referring to my lecture on “The Election of Donald Trump,” Arlie Hochschild’s “No Country for White Men,” and “American Insurrection.” Who are Trump’s supporters, and why do they support him? Why do you think some Trump supporters, but not all of them, organized and/or engaged in a violent insurrection?
Above I instructed you to refer to Chapter 14 in A Sociology Experiment and “No Country for White Men.” In your reflection somewhere make sure you refer to the rest of the readings:
A Sociology Experiment, Ch. 11, “Political Sociology”
Readings for Sociology, Ch.24, “The Birth of the New American Aristocracy”
Readings for Sociology, Ch.34, “The Black Family in the Age of Mass Incarceration”

Write a reflection paper over this video:

Reflection papers are based on outside material assigned such as articles or videos which pertain to the chapter material in some way. The reflection paper must be in APA format with pertinent citations to outside material (except for the instructor-provided material). The paper should consist of 2-3 pages of student reflection and response to the material. The emphasis of the paper is your response and reflection.
The format must be APA. Times New Roman 12 pt, double spaced with 1-inch margins. Turn off the Word function which automatically adds a line before/after paragraphs. Points will be deducted if you do not do this.
No cover page or abstract is needed. On the top line of the page put your NAME, and DATE. All on one line. Do not put my name or the course. I already know what those are.
Citations must be in the proper format. Use paragraphs appropriately. Do not turn in one long three-page paragraph.

ance
Hi there!

Thanks for reading this. Apologies in advance for a bit of a tight deadline, but I have a few other papers on my hands and I want this out of the way whilst I’m working on other stuff.

This work is part of a wider 5000 word Research Methods review which is in the style of a Systematic Review. Thus, it includes a decently detailed summary, synthesis and comparison of 5 (five) papers which I will also provide.

What would be needed of you kind person is exloration of Results, Discussion and Research Recommendation/Proposal sections as typical in a standard meta analysis/systematic review paper. (Introduction and Methods are not needed here, so you can go straight into action 🙂 )

The whole paper is on chiropractic care/spinal manipulative therapy and adverse effects. The five provided papers found no correlation between the two – THEY ALL HAVE DIFFERENT STYLES (RCT, Case-crossover), different populations tested, different countries. Hence there is a lot to explore when it comes to comparison of data and also style of research. This, in addition, might provide more opportunity to explore more on limitation of the papers and propose a more reliable research in the “RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS” section.

In terms of word count, Results and Discussion should definitely take a larger chunk of it. If you’re familiar with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, it would be awesome if you could assess the 5 papers for bias as well (see if the word count and time allow).

Here are some more details regarding to what is needed:

1) Results
The results section should report the extracted data from your selected 5 papers. You should develop a study characteristics table which summarizes the key information about each paper, which you should reference in this section, but should be put into the appendix. The results section should be presented as a synthesis of results arranged as subheadings of themes that were identified. This section should not only report the results of individual studies, but also demonstrate a good understanding of the literature and raise key issues identified in the synthesis of the studies. You should also demonstrate a thorough critical evaluation of the literature that links to the aim and objectives of the review. You should refer to the critical appraisal table, which should be put into the appendix. Do not repeat what is included in the critical appraisal table but synthesize the information in the text.
Study selection – Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review in the form of a PRISMA diagram
Study characteristics – Present characteristics in the form of a table
Quality assessment – Present data on the quality of each study
Synthesis – Present result of synthesis

2) Discussion
The discussion section should include a summary of evidence, with a clear link to the aim of the review. The discussion should discuss how the themes identified in the results section compare with other wider research literature. The discussion is summarizing and evaluating evidence about your topic, pointing out similarities and differences and offering possible explanations for any inconsistencies uncovered. Any controversies in the literature, strong agreement or disagreements, methodological issues, inconsistencies or recurrent themes and ideas should be discussed here. You should provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence, and implications for future practice and/or research. Discussion of the limitations of the review should be stated.
Summary of Evidence: Summarise the main findings including the strength of evidence for each main outcome
Limitations: Discuss limitations at study and outcome level
Conclusions: Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence, and implications for future research

What do I include in my discussion?
The point of the discussion is to actually address the research question. The main components of your discussion are:
The main findings of the review. Do not repeat the results section, just remind the reader of the overall key findings.
Outline how the findings fit with the previous literature. Do your findings contradict existing literature? Are they supportive of the research you included in the introduction? Do the findings make sense when interpreted with wider literature?
Consider the strengths and limitations of the included studies. If the quality of the studies is good, then you will have more confidence in the results and conclusion. How consistent are the findings across the different studies?
The end of the discussion should summarise the conclusions that can be drawn from your review and the implications of the review (clinical, educational, research, or policy). 

3) Research Recommendations and Protocol
Research questions/aims – based on the literature review what research ideas have emerged. This section should clearly state a research aim and research question with objectives that should be investigated.
Study design – Identify the method that would need to be employed to answer the research question. Noting any procedures, interventions, or models that would you need to consider for the research. Cite key literature to support your choice of method.
Participants – Identify the potential participants of the study, you should note the population that you need to answer the research question.
Outcomes – Discuss the proposed outcomes of the study and potential measurements of the outcome. Key literature should be cited to support your approach where applicable.

This is basically a RESEARCH METHOD comparison paper more or less. Obviously, it all applies to the content and the topic given.
I will upload the FIVE selected papers (and will label them with NUMBERS in front of the title).
I will also give an example of a Systematic Review with the Discussion part similar to what is needed (no need to mention confidence intervals, etc.), but a heavier emphasis should be on the research methods part: https://www.cureus.com/articles/4155-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-chiropractic-care-and-cervical-artery-dissection-no-evidence-for-causation
In addition, I will give a couple of papers which form a wider literature which you can use to compare the extracted data to:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2045-709X-20-30
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29371112/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161475413000687

Thank you so much in advance!!! 🙂

https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/
How your federal representatives vote on conservation issues
Here is the League of Conservation Voter Scorecard (Links to an external site.) – http://scorecard.lcv.org/

Go to the League of Conservation Voters Scorecard. It is user friendly. You can spend a few minutes poking through the links to find out the information for this extra credit assignment. For a total of up to 4 points extra credit complete the following:
Write down the names of your two U.S. Senators and your House of Representatives congress-person and their party affiliation. Use the “Find your Member of Congress” box on the right-hand side of the page. (1 pt)
Pick two climate change issues for 2021 in either the House OR the Senate and complete the following: (2 pts)
write down the name of the two legislations (“vote name”)
write down how your two senators or your representative voted for each of the two vote issues
Click on the “All members of Congress Scores (Links to an external site.)” link on the right-hand navigation column of the 2021 Scorecard and scroll down through the various members of congress. The higher the percentage score, the more times a congressperson votes for environmentally favorable legislation. A low percentage means the congressperson rarely or never votes for environmentally favorable legislation. Complete the following: (1 pt)
What pattern do you see in the voting behavior in Congress?
Why do you think we see this pattern?

In what ways do we see the impact of past discriminatory practices on today’s society? If you need help with some of the past practices, consider limitations on the right to vote, Jim Crow laws, and redlining as a start. Again, the question is asking you to consider what the long-lasting effects of these practices are that we can see today.

In Weeks 5 and 6, we will be watching films that offer both historical interpretations of divine women and contemporary manifestations of how the divine feminine is understood. In a short paper (roughly 600-800 words) your job is to reflect on one of these films. Issues that your reflection should consider include: who is the divine feminine that is being depicted, what historical assumptions does this film make, how does this depiction resonate with other depictions we have explored, what message do you feel that the creator was attempting to portray, and what was your response or reaction to the film? In addition to the assigned readings that touch on these films, students should also engage with other literature on the subject, and cite their work appropriately.

Find 5 sources related to the healthcare or nursing field Create an outline for all five sources and include Author(s), date of publication, title, and source type A summary (at least five sentences) of the source. What is it about? What are the main points? What conclusions are reached, and how are they supported? Why is this source useful or relevant to your topic? How might you use it to support an argument of your own? Include the following: An APA (7th ed.) reference entry for each source. Ensure they are in alphabetical order by the author’s last name and that each entry uses hanging indentation and double spacing. A summary of each source underneath its reference entry. Include a sentence or two about how you might be able to use the source in your argumentative essay at the end of each summary. This paper should be a minimum of 3 pages, double spaced, and not including the title page.

a case report summing up a skeletal analysis using provided analytical documents and images. all instructions are attached in the docs.

THESIS and CONCLUSION- 5 points each (10 points) your conclusion is going to be that last part of your paper and NOT part of the “What you’ve learned section.”

– CONTENT 20 points for each of the 3 schools researched (60 points). Each school should include 1) name and location, 2) names of tribes who attended, 3) how many students attended the school, 4) years of operation, 5) other significant information.

– WHAT I’VE LEARNED: What you’ve learned about boarding schools (10 points). This is different from your conclusion and should contain different than what you put in your conclusion

– STRUCTURE (10 points) all parts of the assignment are included in your paper.

– CITATION (10 points) at least 2 website addresses are included for each school.

WHAT NOT TO DO

– DO NOT USE THE ARTICLE- Flashback Friday: The Tragedies and Successes of the Genoa Indian School Flashback Friday: The Tragedies and Successes of the Genoa Indian School | History Nebraska if you’re going to write about the Genoa Indian School here in Nebraska as it doesn’t contain the correct attendance number information.

– DO NOT USE a school that is open today. They do not include historical information about the school.

– Some schools you may come across might not have a lot of information. In that case, you want to move on to a different school. DO NOT write something such as, “this school didn’t have a lot of information” OR “this school didn’t list how many students and/or what tribes they were from,” and have that be all you write for a paragraph. You will not receive points for this.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

– As you conduct your research, make sure to include Native American in your word search, you don’t want to write about Indian boarding schools in India.

– If you use the Carlisle Industrial School, you should know that it is the school with the most information available of boarding schools so all the information you need for this paper is available.

– If you look up the Genoa Indian School here in Nebraska, particularly the Genoa Indian School Digital Reconciliation Project, don’t be surprised when find my name there as I am one of its co-directors.

FORMAT FOR PAPER

– Size 12 Times New Roman or Calibri font.

– Black ink

– Your heading should be Single-spaced so it won’t take up 1/3 or 1/2 of your 3-page paper. The rest of your paper will be double-spaced.

– Each paragraph needs to be at least 5 sentences.

ASSIGNMENT: 3 full pages.

Research 3 different boarding schools- You will write 1 solid paragraph of at least 5 sentences for each school that includes

– the name and location of the school, Include the source (website) next to or underneath the schools you choose.

– what tribes attended the school (for instance at the Genoa school mostly Omaha, Sioux, Blackfeet, Winnebago, and Ponca students attended there),

– what years did the school operate and how many students attended there

– any other information of significance of the school such as number of students attended

These 3 paragraphs should comprise at least 1 1/2-pages to 2 pages of the assignment. the last 1 to 1 1/2 pages will be what you’ve learned about boarding schools based off of your research, power-point, videos, articles, etc. Please be specific about what materials you’re discussing. Include the sources you use in footnotes at the bottom of your paper.

ULTIMATELY, This should be 3 pages minimum, if you go over 3 pages that is fine, but the minimum is 3 FULL pages.
964679
16 minutes ago
Boarding schools must be Native American.