Best Writer

Guidelines for Paper
Your project paper should be 5-10 pages, single spaced. You will write it using the format of a professional paper. For examples, see the NASA ADS (link available under Docs & Assignments on mygateway). The elements of a professional paper are (1) title and authors with affiliations, (2) abstract, (3) introduction, (4) data and analysis section (5) results, (6) discussion and conclusions, (7) acknowledgements, (8) references.
Formatting:
Single spaced, 12 pt times or times new roman font, 1 inch margins
The abstract should be no more than 150 words and should have left and right margins of 1.5 inches. The abstract should give a very brief overview of the project you are discussing, including the telescope, type of CCD, and type of data (i.e. BV photometry) and a brief overview of the results. If you choose a modeling paper, you will discuss the type of model, computer code, or other relevant information.
The introduction should give background information about the topic. For example, if you are covering the topic of T Tauri stars, you would discuss some general star formation and where T Tauri stars fit into the star formation process (with references).
The data and analysis section should describe the telescope and CCD, the data acquisition procedure, and reduction procedure for papers describing observational projects and the coding for theoretical work. Since you did not do this work, this section can be brief. The results section should include what the researchers found, including any necessary plots or tables. You may reproduce a plot or image from your paper to illustrate your points (with proper citation). This is the meat of the paper. Your discussion/conclusion section should discuss what the results of the paper mean for the study and what needs to be done for future work. This is important. Do you understand how this focused work fits into the bigger picture?
The acknowledgements must include thanking anybody that assisted you (there may not be any acknowledgements for such a report paper, but if you talk to another professor for assistance, you should thank that person here).
References must follow standard guidelines. In your text you would say, for example
Wilking et al. (2007) found that blah…. Or This object is known to have a B-V color of 0.65 (Author et al. 2006).
In the references section, you must have every reference in your paper in alphabetical order as
Alberts, N., Steamer, P., and Gloss, J. 2006, ApJ, 516, 445
(list authors, last name first followed by initial, year, journal, volume #, page #).
All figures, tables, etc need to appear in numerical order in the same order as they are referenced in the body of the paper. While it may seem repetitive, the information describing each figure must be in both the figure caption and the body of the text. All symbols must be described in the figure captions.

1. Give an outline of The main argument, a discussion of salient points, with a briefish biography of the author.
2. Give a critical reading of the argument, remember that critical doesn’t always mean neagative,simply that the euro is given a close evaluative reading.
3.What are the big issues raised here,and how the book fit into a larger philosophical debate? You need a little more research here.
4. A recommendation: Should this book be required reading for next years students, and why. Give a substantive rational
5. A works cited page with at Least three sources including the central text.

Suggested Books:
Albert Camus – The myth of Sisyphus.
Jostein Gaarder- Sophie’s World.
Jim holt – Why does the world exist.
Bruce hood – The self illusion
Robert pirsig – zen and the art of Motorcycle maintenance
Russell Bertrand – The problems of philosophy
John Paul sartre – Nausea
Mark Rowland – The philosopher and the Wolf.
Stephen pinker- The Blank slate
Micheal walker -Quantum flux
Mario livio – Is God a mathematician?
Aaron James – Assholes: A theory.

Purpose: This is to help you understand how water gains and losses affect the body.

Dylan is working a construction crew in the summer, in Texas. She works a 6 hour shift in the afternoon. She also goes for a 5-6 mile run about 6:30 PM every day. She drinks several gallons of water every day.
Does this sound like an appropriate amount of water? Too much? Too little? Elaborate on your reasoning. Be sure to take into context other factors in the environment as a part of your response.
Discuss her water gains and losses. What are the processes by which this occurs?
What do water and electrolytes do for our bodies? How does Dylan’s water intake impact her body?
Discuss the symptoms of dehydration and hyponatremia? Which, if either, do you think she is in danger of?
What would you recommend for her to remain healthy as she works through the summer as a member of her construction crew?

What are the two ethical justifications for the economic model of corporate social responsibility? What are the most significant challenges facing these justifications?
Changing a corporate culture is very difficult. Imagine that you are asked after their recent scandals to help move a firm like VW or Wells Fargo toward a more ethical culture. How would you begin to set the stage for this transition? What reasons would you use to support the change? How would you change attitudes and values?
Provide evidence or support for your answers. Cite and reference accordingly.

Module 2 Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is for you to determine what an ethically effective culture would look like.
Action Items
Watch the videos below:
Chapter 3: Corporate Social Responsibility
The social responsibility of business | Alex Edmans | TEDxLondonBusinessSchool (17.25) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5KZhm19EO0&t=70s)
Chapter 4: Corporate Culture, Governance, and Ethical Leadership
Leadership & Ethics: An Interview with Lockheed Martin’s Shan Cooper (13.51) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbydVZJPW2w)
By Saturday, make your initial post by answering the following question:
Now that you have an understanding of corporate culture and the variables that impact it, how would you characterize an ethically effective culture, the one that would effectively lead to a profitable and valuable long-term sustainability for the firm? Provide a rationale, example, or evidence for your answer.

Discuss 9and argue with evidence in news reports and/or peer-reviewed articles on Covid-19 which sociological paradigm.

Respond to each prompt in a post with a minimum of 200 words.

1. The market structure of perfect competition has a lot of ideal qualities–hence the name perfect. For example, perfectly competitive firms are productively efficient, and perfectly competitive markets are allocatively efficient. It is, however, difficult to find many examples of perfectly competition in the real world. Perfect competition is really a benchmark against which we compare other market structures in the real world.
Explain how much actual competition occurs in perfectly competitive markets? Some make the claim that there is actually no competition between firms in a perfectly competitive market.
Do you agree or disagree with this claim? What is your reasoning?

2. We’ve observed that there are few examples of perfectly competitive markets in the real world, yet we use the model of perfect competition as a comparison with other market structures. Can you think of any examples of monopoly in the real world?Describe something you believe could possibly called a monopoly and explain why it fits the characteristics of a monopoly.
Is your example a true, unregulated monopoly? (For example, Microsoft has been called a monopoly, but it is not the sole producer of computer operating systems, so strictly speaking it’s not a monopoly.)
If there are few true monopolies, what can we learn from studying that market structure?

In the Chinn and Kramer (2018) reading, chapter 5, the authors discuss personal knowing and its impact on nursing theory and nursing practice. Consider professional development of nursing and apply the concepts of personal knowing on the development of nursing practice.
Please respond to all of the following:
What is personal knowing; how does your personal knowing affect your personal professional development?
Identify and discuss 2 professional strengths and 2 weaknesses that you have?
How can you apply nursing theory to address your weaknesses and further develop your strengths?
Be sure to supplement your discussion with your personal and professional experiences.
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Chinn, P. & Kramer, M. (2018) Knowledge development in nursing: Theory and process (10th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. ISBN 9780323530613
Chapter 5

Grandfathering is the term used to grant certain people working within the profession for a given time period or prior to a deadline date the privilege of applying for a license without having to take the licensing examination. Grandfathering clauses have been used to allow licensure for wartime nurses—those with on-the-job training and expertise—even though they did not graduate from an approved school of nursing.
Some professional nursing organizations are once again proposing that the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) become the entry-level requirement for professional nursing. Some have suggested that as a concession to current associate degree in nursing and diploma-prepared nurses, all nurses who have passed the registered nursing licensure examination before the new legislation, regardless of educational preparation or experience, would retain the title of professional nurse. Non-baccalaureate-educated nurses after that time would be unable to use the title of professional nurse.
DQ: Do you believe that the “BSN as entry level” proposal advocates the advancement of the nursing profession? Is grandfathering conducive to meeting this goal? Would you personally support both proposals? Does the long-standing internal dissension about making the BSN the entry level into professional nursing reduce nursing’s status as a profession? Do lawmakers or the public understand this dilemma or care about it?

Write a research paper on Effects of Culture on Family Structures.