Best Writer

Describe credible and scholarly sources relevant to a particular theory.
Summarize the case study.
Describe credible and scholarly sources relevant to a particular theory.
Apply a social psychological theory to a chosen case study.
Explain how social psychological research studies relate to a particular social psychological theory.
Apply an ethical reasoning concept to a chosen case study.
Apply a critical thinking concept to a chosen case study.
Address the appropriate audience and use discipline-specific language.
Use APA-style citations and book and journal references.
Complete the Riverbend City: Self and Self-Control Case Studies media piece if you haven’t already or if you would like to make changes to the choices you made. Review the case study you want to focus on and the social psychology theory, behavioral ethics concept, and critical thinking concept you want to use in the assignment.

If you didn’t finish your research last week, use the Capella library to find a scholarly journal article related to the social psychology theory you chose. You are required to use two articles. The second article should be one of the following:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00849/full

Read and understand the provided excerpt and draft a summary of the information that is no less than one page. Then respond to the 3 questions regarding the excerpt. Answer completely and in detail, and each answer must be Atleast 3 sentences long.

Use the Popular Versus Scholarly Sources Worksheet Template [DOCX] to complete this assignment.
Select a popular media source like a video or a website that covers a topic from your course text.
Provide the full reference for the source.
Summarize the content of the source using bullet points in complete sentences or a 5–8 sentence paragraph..
Identify at least three peer-reviewed journal articles on the topic covered in the source and explain their relevance to the topic. Provide the full references for the articles in APA format.
Compare and contrast information provided in the source with the three articles by answering the following questions:
What information provided by the popular source is supported by research or information provided in the articles?
What, if any, information in the articles conflicts with the popular source?
Do you consider the media source you selected to be valid? Why or why not?
What questions do you have about the topic based on your analysis?
Explain how the topic you reviewed can be applied to solve problems in the real world. Feel free to also illustrate with examples, including personal examples.
Provide a self-evaluation of each of the criteria for the assignment with a level of performance and a rationale for your selection.

Write a discussion paper on Stewardship and Hospitality Hallmark: StewardshipHallmarks: Stewardship and Hospitality
Hallmark: Stewardship (Paper #8 Due April 25th)
Watch the following video:
Benedictine Hallmarks A Monk’s Perspective on Stewardship with Fr. Benet Phillips,

Read the following article:

“Lifestyle.” 1997. Ecotheology: Journal of Religion,Nature & the Environment 5 (2):
110.
https://search-ebscohost-com.libweb.ben.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=5668647&site=ehostlive&scope=site
(This article begins in the middle of a page. There is noHeading or
Byline.)

Write a paper on your Personal Business Plan

(Below I included step by step instructions/information for what is required to make the writing process more understandable) / (Additionally I included 2 of 3 sources needed, therefore please find a third source that is in the same topic with the other sources that will allow you to synthesize the articles)
Introduction:
This second major assignment will ask you to find two other sources/voices participating in this conversation and to synthesize these three articles in an essay that maps out the various points of view within your chosen conversation. In other words, you will write an essay that analyzes closely your three sources and explains how they relate to each other. This is the next step in the process of writing an academic research paper: finding other sources that participate in the conversation you are exploring and understanding how they “speak to” each other. Most research projects will require more than three sources, but in order for us to practice and hone our synthesis skills, we will focus only on three. Mapping out the conversation (i.e. figuring out what writers are currently saying about this issue surrounding Pixar films) will help to set you up to figure out your own point of view and how you will situate your ideas into this larger conversation.
Instructions:
Task 1: Conduct research to find two other sources/articles that participate in the conversation around Pixar films that you have chosen. These sources should offer different points of view on the conversation from the source you used in MA1, so that you can demonstrate the different “sides” or “perspectives” writers have on this issue.
Task Two: Synthesize your sources. Once you have found your two new sources, it is time to think about them in relation to your reading from MA1 and map out the conversation they represent about Pixar films. Mapping out the conversation means identifying the important points of agreement and disagreement among your sources. Your synthesis essay will not make an argument or support your own opinion on this conversation. Instead, it should show that you’ve become familiar with the different responses that credible writers have had to this conversation about Pixar films and that you’ve analyzed their arguments carefully enough to identify points of agreement and disagreement among them. We will talk extensively in class about how to identify points of agreement and disagreement among readings, but in general you should focus on discussing agreements and disagreements among the readings that help demonstrate the major concerns of the conversation and that point to places with other voices might join/participate. Sometimes, these points of connections will be explicit, though often they are implied. Task Three: Draft and organize your synthesis essay. Your essay should include the following components:
1. Introduction Paragraph [1 paragraph]: What is the conversation around Pixar that you are focusing on and what motivated you to pursue it? What are the main synthesis claims (points of agreement and disagreement) you will support and develop in your essay? Why are these points of view important to consider (i.e. why should readers care?)
2. Synthesizing the Conversation [4 paragraphs at least]: Present your synthesis of the conversation. Analyze the different points of view of the conversation by demonstrating the important agreements/disagreements among your sources. Your goal is to show how sources relate to one another, not what they mean on their own. You should identify four synthesis claims to develop. Make sure that paragraphs focus on the connections among sources — avoid creating a separate paragraph for each source. Make sure to introduce a source fully when referencing it for the first time — indicate author name, their credentials/expertise, and article title; provide a very brief (1-2 sentence) summary of their argument before quoting directly or discussing how they relate to another source.
3. Assessing the Conversation [1-2 paragraph(s) at least]: After carefully synthesizing these sources and presenting the relationships among them, explain what you think is missing from this conversation. What problems, questions, or kinds of evidence would you propose investigating further? What points of view would you explore further? Why? What are the benefits or drawbacks of the different arguments or points of connection among your sources?
4. Conclusion: Reflecting on where you’ll go [1 paragraph at least]: This is where you determine how you will participate in the conversation you’ve laid out (the focus of Major Assignment 3). Now that you’ve had a chance to look closely at what writers are saying about this issue, what do you think? How will you join this conversation? What is something new that you can add to the discussion? What film(s) or other primary evidence might you analyze to help you participate in this conversation? Why is your addition to this conversation important?

Write a Strategic Analysis and Development of Mr. Clean (Report)Final Teamwork Project: Strategic Analysis and Development (Report
and Presentation)
Strategic Analysis and Development

Using your experience from the P&G strategic analysis mid-term project, for the final
project please provide a strategic analysis and development report and presentation on
a new/customized product/service (category) from any industry of interest that a company
(could be P&G unit as well) will introduce. The report should contain Introduction with
Executive Summary, Main Framework, and Conclusion. The Main Framework should
contain all the elements:

1. Marketing Mix analysis used to market the selected brand/product category and
information about segmentation, targeting, and positioning strategies.
2. Customer analysis
3. Competitor analysis
4. Market/submarket analysis
5. Environmental and Strategic Analyses (with SWOT analysis)
6. Strategic options (select any two)
7. Value elements and value proposition
8. Offer 3-4 marketing strategy decisions the company should develop and
implement to thrive in this marketplace now and into the future. Focus on
strategic, not tactical, decisions for the company with:
• Any alternative functional and growth strategies
• Any preference for global strategies (if so)

Please prepare 15-20 double-spaced pages with Times New Roman 12 font.

This paper should be the extension of the previous paper, which I have added in the files section of this order.

For this research project, you will choose TWO agencies who have missions that include improving the sexual health of their clients.
Research your chosen agencies with emphasis on the following:
Overview of each agency’s history, target clientèle, and sexual health services that the agency provides
How the agency’s services are typically accessed or distributed
Evidence of the impact that the agency’s services have had within their target communities
Specific social, political, financial, or other barriers that the agency contends with
Has the agency needed to make any specific changes to its access or distribution of services in response to the Covid pandemic
A Word file documenting your research findings. There is no word or page requirement; be concise yet comprehensive.
Creating an original print advertisement (no more than a single page), commercial (audio or video), or some other mechanism to advertise each of your chosen agency’s services. The key to this component of the project is for you to be creative, informative, and engaging in a manner that influences your intended audience into action. You may use different formats for each of your agencies. Submit these as separate files from the research findings Word document within your Discussion Board post.

Write a literature review which is about best strategies for discharging patients from the NICU and based on my findings develop a discharge list.

It is written but only 4 articles were OK and it was only 4 pages but it needs to be at least 6 pages, but I need more articles and I need someone to edit the article accordingly and adding content from the new articles too. I also need the checklist to be more detailed.

I have uploaded the articles and the literature review.

In John Stuart Mill’s book, Utilitarianism, he develops a moral philosophy based on the utility principle. The utility principle states that actions are good or bad depending on whether they tend to lead to the results of pleasure or pain in the world. This leads to a dilemma: are ineffective martyrs (or people who sacrifice much for the greater good but with no results) acting immorally?
In your short one full page paper, explain Mill’s analysis of martyrdom and come to a conclusion whether trying to be a martyr but failing is still valuable for Mill. The paper is due Wednesday, May 4th via the blackboard extra-credit paper link. The paper should be free of plagiarism and include references to the book.