Best Writer

Big data and data analytics
Define it and discuss how businesses are using these concepts
or tools and how it is impacting the accounting profession; use examples. Also
research the major supporting technologies and provide a discussion on pros and
cons.
1)
Argument thesis statement
2)
Conclusion
3) Work sited.

MID-TERM EXAMINATION
Spring 2022 (MW 3)
CRJ 102: Crime and Punishment
Read each question carefully and completely before you start answering. The amount of information you present is not as important as the quality of what you present. Remember, this is an essay (not a short answer) examination, therefore collegiate quality essays are expected. Well thought out and constructed, clear, articulate, and insightful responses are more likely to receive favorable evaluation. Three (3) responses are required, and all answers will be equally weighted. Submit your responses via e-mail (dokada@csus.edu), by Monday, March 28, at 11:59pm (2359 hours). Responses received after that time will not be accepted. Good luck, I have every confidence that you will do well. Be safe, try and be healthy. Hope your Spring Break was rejuvenating.
Mandatory Question (all respondents MUST answer this question)
1. Judicial reform became widespread in the 1700s led by what is now known as the Classical School of Criminal Law. While this Classical School was not a theory constructing movement, some contemporary explanations are based on its fundamental principles. However, it was specifically a political-cultural paradigm that generated thoughtful assessments of crime, those who became criminals, and what to do with them once they did. The principles that framed this movement ultimately gave rise to what is now the American criminal justice system. Assess and discuss the Classical School by identifying the contributors, what they contributed, and then how this perspective influenced the American practice of criminal justice, or did it? Explain.
Option Questions (answer ANY 2 of the following):
2. Various theory construction models were presented offering visual depictions of the process involved in creating reasonable explanations of crime and criminal behavior. Select any one of the models presented in class, describe it, and explain the process of how a theory of crime is developed based on it. Use a criminal justice related example to illustrate your understanding. Be comprehensive and clear. Explain.
3. A discussion of morality/ethics was presented suggesting that humans may possess basic beliefs that guide their social behavior. Provide a discussion of this consideration. Are there things you would or would not do because of your sense of morality/ethics? Would you ever violate your own beliefs? Why? Discuss.
4. Much was said about the so-called ‘science v society’ debate. (A way of thinking of this is could be the difference between criminology v criminal justice.) What is the role of science; what is the role of society? What are the basic considerations/points-of- view of each ‘side’? Since each complements and informs the other, why might there be any sort of conflict between them? What is the substance of this debate? Be insightful. Discuss.
5. Micro-analysis theories, as compared to macro-level theories, of criminal behavior explain conditions under which individuals have little to no control. One of the foundations of criminological understanding comes from human biology. Provide a discussion of this perspective and offer either support or refutation of its principles, insuring that you include enough information to demonstrate your knowledge of its basic precepts. Be critical and insightful. Discuss.
6. The world of psychology has produced scholarship focused on the acquisition, process, and outcome of brain development and the way and how we think. Our personalities, ability to understand, and even our sense of morality is based on our psychology. Discuss the basic elements of this perspective and whether or not you believe it is a useful tool to understand criminal behavior. Provide an argument in support of this endeavor.

Plagarism free along with turn it in report pls
5 pages
Due tomorrow by 5

Write a reflection essay that describes the primary influence you believe this characteristic had on a major event from your past. Give three reasons that support this claim.

Discuss about Doris Salcedo and what ideas resonated with you?

Paper Two: The Yellow Wallpaper
PAPER TWO: TOPICS FOR THE YELLOW WALLPAPER
Due Date: Thursday, April 7th no later than 5:00
Length: Minimum 5-7 pages (no shorter than five pages, no longer than seven), double spaced, MLA format (and Works Cited required on this one)
1. What role does writing play in this story? What is the role of her journal/diary and why does her husband want to prevent her from writing? What does this imply about the power of creativity?
2. What does the story imply about gender roles (men and women) in typical Victorian marriages?
3. What does the story imply about male medicine and female patients during the Victorian era?
4. Discuss Gilman’s use of symbols in the story. What symbols does she employ? How does she use them? What are they meant to represent? How does each connect to her mental state or situation?
5. Trace the narrator’s feelings for her husband through the text. How do her feelings about him change? Why do they change? Look at her language and tone, carefully.
NOTE: If there is a topic you wish to pursue that is not on this list, please okay it with me, first, because I won’t grade papers not on the provided topics unless I have approved it.
Regardless of which topic you choose, the paper is a critical analysis, meaning you need to formulate a thesis statement relevant to your topic, pull examples and quotes from the text that support your case, and fully explain yourself. In addition, this paper will require you to use some outside material. You should find and use material from TWO different sources in this paper, and those critical essays must come from one of the CSI databases. Your research should be very narrowly focused on material you can bring to support what you think. Given the paper is 5-7 pages, no more than two outside sources should be used, since I want to really see you develop your own critical insights.

Analyze public opinion and civil society in Russia under Putin. How has public opinion towards Putin changed over time and why? What government laws and policies have had the greatest impact on public opinion and civil society in the Putin years? Do you think that dissent and popular grievances in Russian society pose a real challenge to Putin’s government, why or why not?
Dont forget to use book “Code of Putinism”

Discuss the key differences between “traditional” racism and “modern” racism. Why has “traditional” racism declined? Which appears to be less difficult to confront and eliminate, “traditional” or “modern” prejudice? Why? Explain what our chapter discusses about this topic, and cite the chapter’s authors. Also, do additional research and cite properly.

Instructions: Select one of the topics below. Do empirical research (at least 5 sources), and write about your findings; if you don’t know how to do empirical research, please contact the UTRGV Writing Center, or any of the centers listed on the table located below. Your paper should be about 5 pages long including the reference list; 12pt. font size, double spaced, Times New Roman font. Avoid plagiarizing; practice in-text citations, and include a list of references. Follow a format such as ASA, APA, etc; that means that your paper should contain for example, headers, titles, subtitles, etc. to indicate what the paragraph is about. if you don’t know how to follow a format, contact the UTRGV Writing Center or any of the centers listed below. Submit the assignment through Blackboard. Additionally, prepare a PowerPoint presentation about your paper and send as attachment. The PowerPoint slides should be a max. of 10 slides and min. of 5 slides. No audio recording is required, only optional. If you are not able to attach the PowerPoint slides then do a screen shot of the presentation slides and include it with the paper. There will be a 10% point late penalty per day late for the paper. Also, if the PowerPoint presentation is missing you will receive a 10 point deduction. After 5 days of lateness, Blackboard will reject your late paper.

The essay consists of a critical comparison of the de la Cadena and Wolf books. It is, in essence, a larger scale version of the position papers you will make throughout the course. It should include, but is not limited to, a consideration of the following questions: a) whose theoretical approach do you feel is more Page 4 of 9 insightful for addressing issues of social importance, and why?; b) How does each author think about patterns of social organization? Which author’s conceptualization do you prefer, and why?; and, c) How does each author see the past and future of anthropology/social justice? In other words what are their respective political, moral, and ethical positions toward the role of anthropology as a discipline? Whose position do you prefer and why? Each question should provide 1 or 2 detailed examples from each book to support your arguments. Also taken into consideration for the grade is: 1) the incorporation of chapters not covered in class lectures; 2) logical consistency; 3) clarity of argumentation; 4) the ability to incorporate pertinent material from the course readings; and, 5) the ability to make the 3 questions cohere and inform each other. It is to be 12- 15 pages long, typed, double-spaced, 2.5 cm/1″ margins, using a Times New Roman (or comparable) font in an 11 or 12 pt. size. The essay style is expected to conform to the standards of the American Anthropological Association (look at any issue of American Anthropologist or American Ethnologist to see how sources are referenced, notes are included, and bibliographies constructed)

Write an essay that compares and contrasts the reasons for World War Two with those of the Cold War. What is the most important reason for each? What is the most important result of each?
breeeeee….. .
Mar 31, 4:45 AM
use the book Give Me Liberty!: An American History
Seagull Sixth Edition

For this assignment, you will critique a persuasive or informative speech.
Instructions:
Review the guidelines for critically evaluating speeches given in the textbook and in the learning activities.
View one of the following speeches:
Depression is an Illness, Not a Weakness https://youtu.be/vYR9JPztdn4
Tyler Perry Gives | BET Awards 2019

Admiral McRaven | University of Texas at Austin Class of 2014

Priyanka Chopra | Full Power of Women Speech

Write a three- to four-page critique, not counting the title page and the references page, of the speech you chose. It might be helpful to watch the speech you have chosen to evaluate, twice.
Use the following checklist to guide your critique, and write your critique in paragraph form:
Did the speaker choose a topic that was relevant and interesting to the audience, with a clear purpose?
Did the speaker ensure that his or her topic was researched adequately?
What in particular interested you most in this speaker and their topic?
Did the speaker deliver an introduction that gained attention and oriented the audience?
Was the speech clear, vivid, appropriate, well-organized, and powerful?
Was each main point adequately supported?
Did the speaker create a speech with personal style by asking direct questions and creating immediacy?
Did the conclusion summarize the thesis and provide closure?
Did the speaker use effective volume, eye contact, speech rate, pausing, and gestures?
What recommendations, if any, would you give the speaker to improve upon their speech?
4. Do not include the questions in your response. Instead, answer the questions in paragraph form. Include an introduction at the beginning and a conclusion at the end.
5. Cite tips and concepts from the text as support for your critique.

View one of the following speeches:
Depression is an Illness, Not a Weakness https://youtu.be/vYR9JPztdn4
Tyler Perry Gives | BET Awards 2019

Admiral McRaven | University of Texas at Austin Class of 2014

Priyanka Chopra | Full Power of Women Speech