Best Writer

PART ONE: Re-read the essay on pp. 50-52 in Fusion, Integrated Reading and Writing—Book 2, and annotate the essay as you read: highlighting main points, noting questions in the margin, and circling unfamiliar words.
Then compose a 200-250 word thread (your initial post) on the essay before Friday at 8:00 a.m. CT. Label your thread with your last name.
In your thread, address the questions below and offer a personal response.
What reading process did you use to help understand the essay?
What is the main idea (the thesis)?
Does the author describe both the pros and cons of fracking? Is the treatment fair and balanced? Explain your answer.
Do you think the details are reliable or unreliable? Explain.
Which would you prefer: paying less for energy produced in a manner that may harm the environment or paying more for energy produced in a manner that is environmentally safe?
PART TWO: After completing your thread, respond with a 75-100 word response to the threads of 4 of your classmates(for maximum points).

Watch The Listeners. What were some of the critical attributes of the volunteers in the film? Write a six-page response with a PowerPoint Presentation to answer the question.

https://csulib.kanopy.com/video/listeners

STUDY QUESTIONS

Please answer all of the following questions.

1. What are some of the main features of
Renaissance humanism?
2. Explain Petrarch’s stoic response to good and
bad fortune.
3. Explain Pico’s view of Plato’s three degrees
of created things, the great chain of being, and why humans are so unique.
4. What are the four key features of More’s
epicureanism in Utopia?
5. Explain Montaigne’s view of faith,
skepticism, and custom?
6. Explain Luther’s critique of Aristotle,
reason, and philosophy.
7. Explain the five points of Calvinism,
Calvin’s view of the sense of divinity, and his view of double predestination.
8. What are Herbert’s five common notions, his
view of non-Christian religions, and his view of faith and reason?
9. Explain Pascal’s view of skepticism, custom,
and the wager.
10. Explain Bacon’s view of induction,
Aristotle, and the three tables of investigation.
11. What is Galileo’s view about the role of
scripture in scientific investigation?
12. What are the three implications of the new
astronomy on conceptions of the world?
13. Explain Newton’s design argument from
probability and his view about God’s role as creator and sustainer of the
cosmos.
14. Explain Grotius’s views of just cause for
war and just conduct in war.
15. Explain Hobbes’s views of materialism, the
three causes of quarrel, the state of war, and the three laws of nature.
[Reading 1: Pico on Freedom and Dignity]
16. According to Pico, what are the common
explanations for why humans are unique?
17. Explain Pico’s account of God’s creation of
the world and humans.
18. Explain Pico’s reasoning for why it is
important to choose the higher type of life over the lower.
[Reading 2: Galileo on Science and Religion]
19. Explain Galileo’s reasoning on importance of
non-literal interpretation of scripture especially with science.
20. Explain Galileo’s reasoning on why salvation
is the primary purpose of scripture, not science.

Please answer all questions with at least two sentences similar information can be found at www.utm.edu philosphy 110 renaissance

How Statesmen Think, Robert Jervis on Z-Lib.org. REgister and you can download and email the pdf! Instructions from teacher below.

When reading a book report I am interested primarily in two things. I want to read a summary of the material that highlights the most important parts of the book. Equally important is taking that material and examining it. The best way this is done is by comparing the information you learned in this book to other material you have learned. You can also examine the material on its own merits. However, this does not involve an opinion section for advocating or expressing sentiments. For example, if I gave a history of a theory and then in my analysis I made an offhand remark say that was bad would not give any insight to the reader.

I’m also looking for thoroughness, clarity in writing, and original insights. I’m not looking for perfection but will mark papers if errors distract from reading. This material will be examined by turn it in for plagiarism issues.

Unfortunately, plagiarism is a problem.

One of the best parts of the college experience is learning new material and seeing how it relates to other things you’ve learned. Please contact me anytime you need assistance. I look forward to reading your work.

This paper will require you to interview a person juggling multiple roles (e.g., a single mother who works full-time; a father who is the primary caretaker and works from home).
While you do not have to record your interview, you are encouraged to take notes (with the permission of your interviewee) to help you write your paper later.
Your paper should be 3-5 pages and include the following:
Brief summary of the various roles held by the person you select to interview
Emotional/physical impact of these roles upon the individual
Buffers or barriers that support or hinder the individual (e.g., a romantic partner/spouse, scheduled time for self-care, financial or other resources)
Reference at least 3 terms introduced in lecture (i.e., motherhood mandate, second shift) that apply to the experiences of your interviewee
What changes the interviewee would like to see in the workplace or existing social structures that would benefit him or her in balancing multiple roles?
How did the research and theories we have discussed in class relate to your experience (include at least 3 references; one may be your textbook)?

You can find a masters prepared nurse leader, a nurse manager, a clinical nurse specialist, a nurse supervisor, a Dean. Conduct an interview using the questions I have provided in the announcement section. ( this must be original work and any submission of work submitted before will receive a zero “0” and an “F” for the course. You as the interviewer will pose questions to the interviewee and must place everything they say, their response to your questions in direct quotes, and cite using personal communication ( go to the 7th edition APA manual and look at the two format of personal communication). Personal communication is never placed in the reference section. You must obtain a consent to interview if you use this option. I will create a drop box for the consent.

You will interview (in person, face to face) a leader relevant to the designated specialty role of choice (e.g. Nursing Director, Nursing Professor, Nurse Entrepreneur, or the equivalent in an organization that would hire a BSN prepared nurse in your specialty.

You will incorporate both the assignment-required questions, as well as critically developed questions of your own creation. You may, if permitted, audio-tape/digitally record the interview so that you may progress through the interview in a timely manner and actively participate in the discussion (this is not possible if you are trying to write the conversation down as it occurs). You will need to obtain written permission from this leader prior to the interview. You will conclude the interview with a request for precepting by the interviewee. You must identify the agency’s student orientation requirements and your selected preceptor’s availability during the capstone experience.

The paper will begin with a brief introduction of the leader being interviewed, and will proceed to the questions asked and answers received. Additionally, the paper will need to conclude with a summary of the interview process. This information will address such elements as your critical analysis and evaluation of the interview process, information about your current personal professional status, and resultant plans for your capstone practicum within the selected organization.

The paper will be written in 7th edition APA format. This interview and resultant paper is required to be an individual effort. The paper length requirement is 3 to 5 pages. The paper detailing the content of the interview will need to be submitted through the assignment drop box by due date.

Leadership Interview Criteria

The paper should begin with an introductory paragraph that will include a brief biography of the interviewee and the name and description of the organization. Explain why this individual was chosen for the interview. Note: This is NOT a “job interview.” You are a self-invited guest interviewing this organizational leader and potential preceptor. Questions about such items as salary, benefits, job opportunities, etc. are not appropriate.
For this section use the headings.
A Learning Conversation (Level One Heading): State each question you posed along with the interviewee’s responses. The questions will be provided to you.
The questions should include (but NOT be limited to) each topical area delineated below Professor will provide the questions to include sections a-e. See the announcement section in the course.

determine from the interviewee what are the mission/vision/ goals of the organization.

describe the interviewee’s expectations of a BSN prepared nurse in their specialty.

discuss what the interviewee believes it takes for the student nurse to excel at the BSN level in this organization.

develop at least 5 additional, relevant questions that serve to further your understanding of critical elements as related to successful specialty role transition within the specific organization.

conclude the interview with a question on whether the interviewee believes there is a positive effect of a Capstone Practicum experience on leadership development in nursing students completing a bachelors degree.
The conversation should be well organized in terms of categories of questions sharing similar focus, and should be presented in such a way as to be helpful to other individuals attempting to transition into new specialty nursing roles within similar types of organizations.

Summary (Level One Heading): Summarize the key points of the conversation as they relate to the interviewee’s chosen nursing specialty role and how the student could make a successful transition to such a role within the selected organization.

Reflection and Follow-Up (Level One Heading): This information will address such elements as your critical analysis and evaluation of the interview process including (but not limited to) what you would do differently and resultant plans (post interview) for professional preceptorship within the selected organization. This section must include an initial plan for preceptorship, including with whom and a tentative schedule to begin the Capstone Practicum.

Your first heading will be A Learning Conversation. You will then type the questions and fill in the answer to the questions from the peer reviewed scholarly literature and your textbook. Use APA format.
Next heading will be summary. In the summary you will highlight how the RN-BSN student can make a successful transition to a nurse leader role.

Third heading will be Reflection and Follow – Up. Here you will place your perspective on the information you heard during the interview researched and wrote on. How will the knowledge impact your role as a nurse leader or your interaction with the nurse leader.y

The questions I have provided replace the questions from the interview guide found in the syllabus.

Direct quotes can be used but no more than 15 words followed by the correct citation. For the question dealing with the role of the bachelor’s prepared nurse you can use the AACN document on the “The Essentials of the Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice”

The paper will be written in 7th edition APA format. This interview paper is required to be an individual effort. You may need to combine headings for the paper. Use the questions to guide the content of your paper. The paper detailing the content of the interview will need to be submitted through the course drop box no later than syllabus due date. See the interview guide in the syllabus for more information.

This is going to be a marketing plan on sony. When it comes to making a new product for sony, we are going to be making a cellphone

Part 1: Background Analysis (ABC) — Your goal for this first unit of the marketing plan is to be objective and succinct when selecting and summarizing information that you pull from secondary resources related to each topic above. At this stage, you are creating a platform upon which you will base your marketing strategy.
Part 2: Strategic Analysis (DEF) — Your goal for this second unit of the marketing plan is be creative but within the bounds of the secondary data you collected in the first section. Your writing should reflect insights derived from integrating and analyzing the secondary information (the SWOT), to identify a new product concept that fits these internal and external conditions. Your strategy should be a believable, unique and compelling “story” you will tell to successfully launch your new product to a specific target audience.
Part 3: Tactical Plan (GHIJ+creative)– Your goal for this third unit of the marketing plan is to clearly and concisely specify the details of what, how, when, where and to whom you direct your marketing budget and efforts in order to successfully acquire your target audience. Your tactical decisions must be aligned with your strategy and must illustrate how your background analysis, strategy, and targeting are all put into action in order to meet your forecasted level of results.

research paper on why hiring a aviation attorney to review your contracts before siging with the charter airlines. Do all contracts hold up depending on the state your working, can contracts be broken, what else can a aviaiton attorney do for you.

Purpose: Further develop your analysis of your chosen short story with a focus on the importance of characterization.
Tasks:
Part 1. Choose a character from one of the short stories in this unit by Roanhorse, Liu, or Rash. Name the character and briefly describe them, considering some of the following elements:
What they are like–how are they described?
What we know about their past and present? Consider their relationships, their environment, their position in society, and their culture.
What do they want? What are their dreams and goals? What do they fear? What drives them?
What do they do? Why? What do we see in the story itself, and what can we infer about them from their behavior?
What do they say? What do they leave unsaid? Why?
What conflicts do they face–both internal and external–and how do they address these conflicts?
Part 2. Consider how taking the approach of psychoanalytic criticism–focusing on the mind, unconscious motives, and the roots of desire–can enhance our analysis of a short story. Feel free to consult the readings from Mary Klages or Michael Ryan on psychoanalytic criticism to help you make these connections.
Part 3. Taking into account all of the above, and reading the Building a Strong Thesis Statement page for guidance, craft a working thesis for your Unit 3 Essay and include it in bold at the end of your post. This is your opportunity to check your progress towards that essay and get feedback at a critical juncture. The thesis should focus on why and how your chosen story from this unit uses specific symbols, metaphors, uses of irony, or characters to depict one of the themes from Unit 1 (Love, Alienation/Otherness, the American Dream/Nightmare, Quest for Identity/Coming of Age, or Conformity/Rebellion) in a particular way.
Part 4. Respond to at least 2 of your classmates’ posts. Your initial post should meet all requirements, and your replies should be thoughtful and substantive.
Grading Criteria:
Your responses to the first 2 question(s) are substantial and thoughtful.
You’ve explored how your story might relate to one of our literary theories.
Your peer responses are substantive and thoughtful and advance the discussion by introducing new insights or perspectives, and/or significantly deepening or broadening the conversation with questions (Avoid generalized comments such as “good post” or “I agree”).
Your use of language: your writing should be clear, well-organized, and free from spelling and grammar errors. The post represents your original thinking unless otherwise indicated.

Is the current MiFid 2 regulation ensure adequate protection of personal data of robo advisory clients?