Best Writer

please complete paper in ASA style
this paper should include a hypothesis and a hook
Accurate charts, data, graphs and class surveys
i’ve uploaded a paper for you to see
please include table of contents
Please be sure when citing sources, or doing in text citation, to use the others actual name instead of saying “the reachers or studies shows” be sure to include conclusion

In this paper you will argue For a Policy. You can find your policy anywhere there are a large enough group of people that rules are required: your university, your workplace, your place of worship, social clubs, your city, etc. This is a library research paper, so it is a good idea to make the policy as local as possible, since state, national, and international policies have a lot of material to master, and therefore might require a great deal of research time; the smaller and more local the policy, the less material there is to master. If you choose non-local issues, therefore, choose smaller national issues rather than larger, more controversial ones (the national policy on abortion, etc.).
Regardless of the policy you write about, in your paper you should carefully define it, thoroughly investigate its history and current status, and examine its consequences. You should decide whether the policy actually addressed the problem or issue it was intended to, if it is now outdated and no longer useful. You will need to evaluate it objectively in terms of its fairness, popularity, utility, enforceability, effectiveness, cost efficiency, and any other relevant factor.
Since policies are formulated and implemented by people around us every day, you are required to Interview as a part of your research. Essays without an Interview will have one-half of a letter grade deducted from the assignment. You may want to interview those who have created or enforced the policy (keeping in mind that they will be naturally defensive of the policy), and perhaps anyone of some authority or insight who is opposed to the policy. It would also be helpful to formulate or discover alternate policies to the one currently in use. In order to determine if a policy is popular, you might want to take a poll of the people affected by the policy — but make sure your poll is as scientific as possible.
Ultimately, you must have a strong, arguable (debatable) thesis. You are
1) For the Current Policy, or 2) For a Revision to the Current Policy, or 3) For an Alternative to the Current Policy. In this case you cannot merely be arguing against the current policy.
REQUIREMENTS: The paper should be about 4-7 pages in length (not counting a Works Cited Page). You must have at least 6 sources including the current policy, an interview, three library sources, and another source of your choice. Pick a topic quickly, so you can allow yourself enough time to do your research and conduct interviews.
Sample Policy Topics:
School / Work City Social Religious State/Society Entertainment
parking leave time zoning rules phone sales football playoffs
dorm food benefits noise doctrines toll roads media censorship
alcohol dress codes water restrictions tag agents
tuition/fees club policies membership student loans
marijuana
Checklist:
1) Don’t argue Against a Policy: Argue For One (Counter-Arguing when helpful)!
2) 4-7 Pages! 6 Sources (the Current Policy, an Interview, 3 Library Sources, and 1 other)!
3) Have good MLA format, both In-Text and on the Works Cited page.
4) The works you cite on the Works Cited page must be cited in the body of the essay as well!
5) Make strong arguments! Present both sides. Counter-Argue against the opposite side.
6) Avoid grammatical errors, especially Fragments, Fused Sentences, and Comma Splices.
Existing Policies: Some Lines of Attack and Defense
Here in capsule form are some of the strategic possibilities for deliberating existing policies:
Attacking a Current Policy Defending a Current Policy
1. The goals of the policy are unac- 1. The goals of the policy are valid,
ceptable today, even though they even though some people have sup-
may have been acceptable at one ported it for the wrong reasons,
time. or even though the results have
not been praiseworthy.
2. From the beginning, the policy 2. With all of its flaws, the policy
was based upon a flawed percep- remains the best long-term response
tion of the problem. to the underlying causes of the
problem.
3. The policy was an adequate re- 3. Although the policy may need to be
sponse to the problem at one adjusted somewhat to account for
time, but now the situation has changing circumstances, the basic
changed. plan is a good one.
4. The policy is no longer necessary. 4. If you think that the policy is no longer necessary, just consider these facts….Then consider what might happen if the policy rescinded.
5. The policy is not working. It 5. There have been some problems in
has not achieved its goals. implementing the policy. Slowly but surely the policy is working; it just needs more time. The policy has been sabotaged by special interests. Detractors have not given the policy a chance to work.
6. The policy is, or has become, too 6. In the long run, this policy will be the least expensive. expensive. It is causing other problems Compared to acceptable alternatives, the costs are not too
that outweigh the benefits. high. Although there have been some unfortunate side-effects, it would be better to deal with these one-on-one rather than to
abandon the whole policy.
7. Although the goals of the policy 7. We believe in these basic values but policy-opposers
are praiseworthy, its methods conflict are defining them too narrowly (or loosely) Seen
with basic values, morals, and Seen in the proper perspective these methods are
principles. fully compatible with the values and principles in question.
Some Hints on Interviewing
1. Find out the name and position of the person you need to talk with. You can start by calling or visiting the department (or whatever) and asking the administrative assistant (or the department head, etc.) who would be an expert in the specific area or field. Make sure that the person really is an expert on the subject.
2. Make an appointment to see the person. Make sure you allow yourself plenty of time between the interview and the paper deadline.
3. Do most of your research before the interview. Do not rely on the person you’re talking with to give you background information on your topic. Do not go into an interview without already having some knowledge of what you want to talk about.
4. Have specific questions prepared and written down on a piece of paper. It is often useful to write down the questions in a notebook, leaving pages or appropriate space to write the person’s response in.
5. It is very helpful to tape record any interview. However, you must get the person’s permission to record! If the person doesn’t wish you to record the interview, then don’t.
6. Show up to the appointment on time.
7. Before you start asking questions, be sure to tell the person what you are working on and what you will do with the information. Be sure to be polite, and thank the person for his or her time.
8. If you are recording the interview, set up the equipment before you start asking questions.
9. Ask questions you have written down in your notebook. Even if you’re mechanically recording the conversation, write down the person’s responses, since your recorder might break down. It is proper and often helpful to read back a quote you think might be particularly helpful, to be sure you’ve gotten just what the person said.
10. Whenever possible, ask questions that can have specific answers. Try to avoid questions that are too general or are too leading.
11. If a person does not wish to comment on something, respect that. You might be able to get the information elsewhere.
12. If you think of a good follow-up question to a person’s response, write down the question and answer.
13. After you finish with your questions, see if there is anything else on your topic the person might want to comment on. You might also want to ask the person if there is someone else he or she might suggest you talk with to get a different perspective.
14. Be sure to thank the person for the interview. If the person expresses an interest in the final product, be sure you send him or her a copy.
15. Right after the interview, go back over your notes. Write out quotations again while they are fresh in your mind. Make sure you can read your own writing and rewrite anything you might have a hard time remembering.
Evaluating Library Research Policy Argumentation Essays
The Writing
___ The paper was grammatically clear.
___ The paper was well worded.
___ The paper was well organized.
The MLA Format
___ The student had at least six sources: the current policy, an interview, three library sources and one other.
___ The student used these sources in a convincing, compelling manner.
___ The student used the correct MLA format for in-text citations.
___ The student used the correct MLA format for the Works Cited Page.
Structure
___ The Introduction was interesting and caused the reader to want to read more.
___ The Policy was stated clearly and early.
___ The Policy was not too broad or narrow to be covered in a 4-7 page paper.
___ The Background History which led to the formulation of the Policy was explained clearly
and early.
___ The Conclusion captured the essence of the body without merely summarizing it.
The Thesis
___ The Thesis was stated clearly and early. It was (check one):
___ For the Current Policy (and against Alternative Policies).
___ For the Current Policy with a specific Revision (Arguing against alternative policies
but for this specific revision).
___ For an Alternative Policy (and against the Current Policy).
The Argumentation
___ The Argumentation overall was strong. It was especially strong in (mark whatever applies):
___ Rogerian (Early on: finding common ground with the opposition).
___ Pro (Making arguments FOR the student’s position).
___ Con (Making arguments AGAINST the opposite position).
___ Concession (Admitting your position’s weaknesses and/or your opponent’s
strengths).
___ Counter-Argument (Making arguments to rebut the Concessions).
___ The Writer’s Ethos: Overall, the student came across as reasonable, fair, well balanced, and
likeable.
___ Overall Grade (Optional for in-class revisions)
General Comments (use the back if necessary):

In this discussion you will describe a short plan for lifelong learning and self-awareness. If you can share it professionally, you can describe a
culture you might want to learn more about.

**Understanding it does not mean you will become ore accept it, you are just understanding this culture a bit more. Any post that is not
constructive will receive zero points.

How can you build continue lifelong learning habits to follow you after this class is over?
This plan can include events, travel, research, new friends or groups of people, etc.
You will need to include specific steps for the most possible points.
Include a culture you might want learn about, if it is professional and appropriate (optional).
Share any additional information you would like that furthers understanding and class discussion.
Finally, this is optional, discuss the researcher’s take on education and the ‘War on Boys.’ Before responding, remember, this is a class that asks us to step outside ourselves to learn about another person’s journey or experience. Be open-minded and discuss things from a social science perspective and offer thought and understanding in your answer. If you are shocked or offended by this as new information, you might ask yourself why that is? Wouldn’t you want to validate and understand another culture, especially a child? Take a moment before responding and think how you might help a boy in your classroom who is having this negative experience.

Check out this researcher’s information about how there needs to be more critical thinking about how we see boys in school. Are we
stereotyping boys and how they learn and grow? Dr. Christine Hoff Sommers argues that boys are being left behind in many areas. I raised a
boy and did experience this for much of his K – 12 experience.

What I find really interesting and a bit disturbing is that she has received death threats from feminists and has been banned from some
speaking engagements some are at universities. This is not critical thinking.

PragerU. (May, 2014). War on boys. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFpYj0E-yb4

Sommers, C.H. (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York, NY. Simon and Schuster.

Research the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Discuss several of the
most common GMOs, how each was developed (including what happens at the cellular level),
and the reasons for the development of each. In the research paper, include pros and cons of
human use of GMOs and the pros and cons of introducing GMOs into an ecosystem. During the
discussion of the pros and cons of introducing GMOs into an ecosystem, include three
examples of GMOs and how they directly impact a food web and energy pyramid. Cite all
•sources used in the research paper. Sources cited in the research paper must also be included
on a separate reference page which lists each reference in the proper format. Sources are
expected to be those that are readily accepted by the scientific community, such as
peer-reviewed articles, government websites, scientific magazines, and research-based

Based on your research findings what did you find most problematic about the issue of opioid addiction?
What do public health experts think of the impact of Covid-19 on opioid addiction?
Is there a post-pandemic plan to re-focus on opioid addiction?
Based on your research what Social Determinants of Health seem to be associated with Opioid Addiction or substance abuse in general?
Overall how do you feel about what you have learned about the topic of Social Determinants of Health and how has this learning helped you better understand public health issues?
Use APA formatting (APA 7th. Edition), Times New Roman font size 12, double-spaced with a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 10 Pages (this page count excludes title and references pages).
It should contain a title, introduction, discussion, conclusion, and references. Review the attachment ” APA Titles” in this folder to help you understand what each section should contain.
Please review the grading rubric for the reflection paper on the syllabus. Use no less than 10 appropriate references, remember to use in-text citations using APA formatting, and have all sources cited in the references list.
Below I added the rubric for this paper. A template a professor provided for us and the references I have chosen for this paper. This paper has to be 7 pages written on this topic but the title and references page are not counted on the page
count.

Assignment Requirements:
Article/Summary Review about any topic in Anthropology you have found interesting
Summaries should be 2 pages MINIMUM of text written in your own words
Double-spaced, one-inch margins, a standard font, and 12 point font.
Indentations, titles, and/or citations do not count toward summary length
Articles may be on any subject pertaining to anthropology, but they must be substantial (8+ pages of text), recent (2000-present) and taken from a Peer-Reviewed Anthropology Journal
Paper should include a full citation of the article at the end of the summary/review, and a link to the original article must be included in the document as well.
The first 70-80% of the assignment should simply be a summary of the article itself. The rest of the assignment should be one or two paragraphs providing your personal reactions to the article.

Assignment Content
Inventories of patient satisfaction are important tools to help health systems receive feedback from patients regarding the quality of care they received. Hospitals have long done their own surveys and inventories, but the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey was the first standardized survey in the United States designed to capture, directly from patients, their perspectives of the hospital care they received.

The HCAHPS survey contains 19 core questions asking patients about everything from communication with nurses and doctors to the cleanliness and quietness of the hospital environment. A random selection of patients who have had a recent hospital stay are contacted to participate in the survey via mail or telephone.

The English version of the HCAHPS is posted within our weekly folder (of note, Spanish, Chinese, Russian, Vietnamese, Portuguese and German versions are also produced).

For this week’s assignment, in a response of at least 1.5 pages, (Times New Roman, 12-point font), review the survey and respond to the following questions:

-Why is it important to survey patients and what are some factors that can affect the accuracy of the responses received?
-Critique the survey. What are positive and negative aspects and opportunities for improvement?
-Does this survey accurately capture feedback from patients about the cultural competency of the care they received?
-Write two additional questions to add to the survey to directly ask patients about their experiences with staff and the hospital environment regarding this topic.

References are to follow the APA 7th edition intext citations and reference format – See the Start Here folder.

A background about who she is, what was her childhool and adulthood like. Where does the offender comes from?Does she have an education? Why did she commit the crime? who did they killed? what was the relationship betwwen the offender and the killer? Did she had any family members? What was the sentence for the crime committe?do i agreee or desagree with the sentence? Also create a 6-7 powerpoint slice with the most importnat info on France Newton.

1.Write a personal narrative experience in your life that you think may be a good fit to showcase a story where you experienced gratitude.

2. Imagine the experience as a story. Use the storytelling graphic organizer to brainstorm the sequence of events.

HUM 1020
ESSAY 2: Virtual Explore
Assignment: Explore one or more sites in Google Arts and Cultures. Compose an essay reflecting on what you
found, what you saw, what puzzled you, excited you, etc. Make connections between the explore to your own life,
and to the course content. Explain out these connections using supporting details. Your essay should be no less
than 1000 words. Use MLA format and observe standards for college-level written work.
At a minimum, your essay should address or include some elements of the following:
✓ An Introduction —Where did you “go” and what did you see? Why did you choose these location(s)?
✓ Text(s) — Describe the works you see. If you are exploring a museum this might be the museum itself. It
could also refer to the contents of the site. Describe at least two specific objects (painting, building,
sculpture, drawing, performance, poem, dance, installation, etc.) encountered using appropriate discipline
vocabulary. Be precise and clear. Include dates, locations, scale, materials, as appropriate.
✓ Context— Describe the setting for your tour. Is it a museum? Is it an archaeological site? Find out
something about the original context—the history of what you see. Are there interpretive materials
provided? If these are ancient works, what efforts are being taken to preserve them for future
generations? How does technology impact the way we view these works or experience these sites?
✓ Take-Aways and Conclusion—Make a connection between your virtual experience and your own thinking
or experiences. Explain out the connection. Make at least one connection between your virtual experience
and the course content. Explain out the connection. What can you take away from your “explore?”