A Wand or Spilt Secrets: Safeguarding Legal Profession in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.

Requirements and Context:

General:

– Sources from the internet in the footnotes must include actual links;
– Please use the submitted sample of the actual article with the ready formatting.
– CITE anything that is possible;
– Sources must be about the United States law and lawyers, not India, or anywhere in the world.
– Sources in the order of priority: apart from ABA and state bar Rules, academic articles or research papers (e.g., ResearchGate, SSRN, etc.), law journals, ABA and State Bars publications, Copyright Office or USPTO guidelines or instructions for lawyers, American media (primarily Atlantic, WSJ, NY Times, etc.), news publications.
– Sources must not be of commercial/promotional nature (when a blog site was paid for publication by the company developed the product).

A in Part I (no solution proposals, only describing and analyzing):

– must include the description and examples how the US law firms and in-house legal teams use AI now, whether when AI is a separate product (SaaS or Software) or is a part of product (Contract lifecycle management product), whether proprietary (build in-house) or developed by companies for lawyers; describe the terms of service of these products; how the AI is being trained; with what data sets.

1 in B in Part I:

– Must start with the explanation of what duty of competence is under ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and under US states bar codes (see latest example); include analysis of material differences of US states bar codes rules comparing to the ABA Model Rules – which are more and less strict compared to the ABA duty of confidentiality;

a. Based on how lawyers currently use AI, must analyze and give examples to the extent of what quality it can support the effectiveness and fulfillment of duty of competence of lawyers; what impact using the AI brings to the probability of lawyer’s mistakes (malpractice or negligence) + describe the known cases of when lawyers used it and it produced the low quality or non-existing facts in litigation, briefs, literally anywhere you can find and cite (mandatory to include: fake citations in litigation ).
b. Based on how lawyers currently use AI, must analyze how lawyers as human beings currently control the use of AI in substance of their work, what are the guardrails, what are the risks of that use, what they do mitigate those risks.
c. Based on how lawyers currently use AI, must describe and analyze what is current potential responsibility lawyers may face under the currently-enforced and applicable rules, frameworks (ABA Model Rules, state bar guidelines, civil, administrative, regulatory, and criminal liability) when AI use in legal work causes harm, false statements, etc.

2 in B in Part I:

– Must start with the explanation of what duty of confidentiality is under ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct; under US states bar codes; include analysis of material differences of US states bar codes rules comparing to the ABA Model Rules – which are more and less strict compared to the ABA duty of confidentiality;
– Must explain what is privileged/confidential information within this duty;

a. Must explain how privileged/confidential information and the clients privacy rights intersect and that there is another implied dimension of lawyer’s responsibility for clients privacy rights framework; where the latter is more strict (CA, Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, etc.);
b. Analyze what cybersecurity frameworks and practices lawyers use; how effectively they use them and what bottlenecks they face; how easy it is for law firms to get cyber liability insurance; do they train their attorneys about cyber threats (phishing, DDoS, ransomware, etc.); describe and analyze the examples and consequences of cyber security or data breaches occurred in specifically law firms or in-house legal teams.

Describe Patient/caregiver inquiry.

The conversation below is taken from two separate (participants were not together) research interviews with patients and their caregivers. Unique to these transcriipt sections (recorded and transcribed)—both participants have cancer AND care for the other. The study sought to learn if patients and caregivers are similar in their approach to and understanding of care, or different.

Apply ideas from the Relational Health Literacy Model, specific to Patient and Caregiver, to complete this analysis. Also integrate one other resource we used in Week Four or Five. You may also consider the role of transactional communication in your analysis.

Transcriipt

Harold: She went through, you know, radiation. She went through chemotherapy. Umm, she had the initial operation, which was in January 2011. She had ended up in the emergency room over here like four times. And finally they decided they needed to go back in, and she didn’t weigh very much at the time. She was like 107 or 110. They indicated that there was a bowel obstruction so they fixed that. But she’s still going through, uh ovarian, there was some cancer in the liver too. So they had the operation; they took a couple of pieces of the liver out.

Harold: I think it just started with uh you know just a yearly exam. Maybe that might have been 10 years ago. And, the guy, the doctor said, “uh, you have a slightly enlarged prostate” . . . so that’s where it started. Two years ago they found uh, I had a needle biopsy, where they shoot ah, you know, um a-a laser beam or whatever and they found that there was some cancer in the prostate you know. And then we started talking about whether or not, treat it with drugs or do um, do the seeds where they put seeds into the prostate, or just completely remove the prostate. It just so happened that you know after my next exam they said we’ll wait another 6 months and do it again. To see what your PSA level is, and that became pretty high and then all of a sudden they said well we can’t do the seeds anymore and chances are we are not going to be able to remove the prostate either. So, we’ll just you know use drugs and things to take care of things.

Harold: At first she kinda said, “I don’t know if I really want to go through this [surgery]. You know, she had radiation, like in 2010. And a few other things. And then it got to the point where, you know, the doctor that was there kind of, he, you know he actually talked her into saying you shouldn’t do it [remove part of the liver]. You know, otherwise you’re gonna die. You know, you’re not gonna make it. Cause it’s gonna get you. So it was pretty, it was like, um, you know, like fourth stage cancer. She was real reluctant. But I kind of told her it. I think I persuaded her enough to have the operation.

Harold: I was really the only caregiver, you know, cause we had no other family that lives around here. As for her, I don’t remember anybody driving us anywhere or doing anything. She drove, you know. She really took on the bulk of the caregiving. I’d say she took on 99%, yeah. Her sister, who lives in Illinois, and my sister, who lives in Illinois, and our daughter who lives out in California. They know, they get first-hand knowledge. We talk to them. You know, it might be a few days later. We don’t pick up the phone and tell them, you know, that we had, uh, had this and that. You know, not daily or weekly. Not as much as, you know, uh, you know, a close family. If they ask me something, I say, “We’re fine. You know, we went to the doctor and he said this and that.” And I don’t go through you know, what happened daily. She’s [Vivian] much more of a sharer.

Harold: It’s about even. You know, I mean, we both, you know, we both ask questions and things, so, you know, to the doctor or nurse or whatever. I might go 60/40 in my favor. Especially when it’s in regards to her, because I want to know how she’s doing. I always try to interject things that she might miss, you know. They might say, “How are you . . .”, How are you doing in a certain aspect. Like, “Are you dizzy?” And she’ll say “No.” and I’ll say “Well, you know, two weeks ago you didn’t feel too good.” So, it’s filling in the gaps.

—–

Vivian: He was having trouble getting up at night and going to the bathroom and couldn’t go. He was feeling like he really had to go and couldn’t go then it’d be a drip. Well, we didn’t know a urologist or who to call. So he called up that doctor that did his double hernia surgery and they sent him over to a doctor and they did the PSA and I don’t remember. They did several different tests on him. X-rays and stuff. And they came and said it was prostate cancer. Oh, I know what they did; they did biopsies. At first they thought they were going to do the seed thing, but when they did the biopsies it was too late for that. That was this year. During the summer. And he is on some hormone therapy. Every three months he gets a shot and chemo.

Vivian: I think this had been going on a while before he actually told me about it. Then I saw some blood come out on his underwear and he hadn’t said anything. I got on him about that. He usually, he just doesn’t like to complain. The last couple of days he had been tired. I can understand now, but he never complains. He tries to protect me.

Vivian: He didn’t eat very much and I said, “doesn’t it taste very good?” and he said, “nah, I’m not hungry.” And I said “well that’s kind of unusual” because we don’t get up very early. We don’t get up until maybe 8 o’clock. We have a big breakfast. We always have fruit, eggs, pancakes, there’s always meat and we don’t really have lunch but we don’t finish breakfast until ten and then we have dinner, trying to eat around 5. So, when he gets off the feeding wagon, I start asking questions. “Nah, I’m just not hungry. I haven’t done enough to be hungry.” So, I just have to kind of watch him.

Vivian: We each have a sister. They both came because I had four surgeries in one year. They came and helped out. Well, twice they came. Our neighbors next door. They are really our support. Our families aren’t that big. Maybe once a week we’ll talk. Either they call or we call. But they are pretty busy.

Vivian: We are both there to hear it. Sometimes that’s good because sometimes you don’t hear everything. I hear it one way and he says, “no, I don’t think he meant it that way.”

Write a paper discussing Utilitarianism.

In this paper you will (1) introduce your topic, (2) give a brief overview of utilitarianism, (3) describe an important decision in your life, (4) explain how a utilitarian would evaluate your decision, (5) explain why someone might disagree with the utilitarian evaluation of your decision, and (6) conclude with your own personal evaluation.

Discuss Leaderships key characteristics in today’s work place.

Changing Motivators in the workplace
Remote Workforce post COVID-19
Employee Engagement
Creating a Motivating Workplace
Job Satisfaction or job dissatisfaction
Organizational Structure and its impact on motivation, etc.
Organizational Commitment
Corporate Social Responsibilty
Ethics within the workplace
Managing Stress or Work Life Balance
Organizational Culture
Innovation and Change
Leadership in Organizations
Power and Politics in the workplace
Generational Differences
Below is a potential outline for your paper (depending on your topic):
Introduction
Background (define and describe the OB issue)
What significance does this have in the workplace?
Who does this issue impact? How?
How does this issue play out in the workplace? Provide an example.
What are the consequences if left unaddressed?
What laws, policies, or procedures have been enacted to address the issue?
How are organizations addressing and overcoming these issues in the workplace?
Any established best practices or organizations that have been praised for their initiatives/actions?
What did you learn from this project? What was your biggest ah-ha moment or takeaway?

Write a research paper outlining the typical issues with e-cigarettes.

Write a research paper outlining the typical issues with e-cigarettes.

Nelson, R. & Staggers. N. (2018). Health informatics: An interprofessional approach (2nd ed.). Elsevier.

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapters 12, 13, and 14 of Health Informatics: An Interprofessional Approach.
Using the scenario below respond to the discussion question provided to you by your instructor. Based on your University of Arizona Global Campus major of study (e.g., Health Information Management, Nursing, Health Administration, Health and Human Services or Public Health) analyze benefits and issues associated with these informatics systems and exchange of data in these settings. Specifically, formulate your response from the standpoint of a professional working at a community health center as part of an interdisciplinary team addressing the issue of young consumers and electronic cigarettes.
Scenario:
Health consumers of all ages, including youth, are engaging in the use of electronic cigarettes. Using information found at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Electronic CigarettesLinks to an external site. web page, analyze the CDC recommendations regarding persons age 18 and younger and the use of electronic cigarettes. The IT department of the community health center started the design of an informatics application to collect data on electronic smoking in youth consumers who visit the center. Their data intake form includes consumer identification and demographic information fields.
Imagine you are working on a team within your organization to further develop the overall design of this informatics application aimed at collecting data related to electronic cigarette use and youth consumers who visit the health center.
For your initial discussion post you will be drawing a data form picture using Microsoft Word drawing functions to build the data form and attach it to your referenced discussion post in the Canvas classroom. If you need assistance using Microsoft products, you can review Microsoft’s Office Help & TrainingLinks to an external site. web page.

Write a research article providing an explanation of what constitutes an evidence-based intervention.

Write a research article providing an explanation of what constitutes an evidence-based intervention.

– Description of population (parents of Child Protective Services and long term cases)
– Name of EBP model
– History of EBP model (e.g. founder, year founded, what populations it has been tested on)
Description of EBP/summary
– include 6 peer reviewed sources and cite

CITE YOUR SOURCES
This will be a 10-12-minute presentation