Best Writer

Talk about a time you failed at something. How did it affect you?

APA 8TH EDITION
You will write a 6-8 page, 5+ source research based argumentative essay that accomplishes one of the two objectives below:
Identifies a finds a product or service with multiple main claims and come to a conclusion on whether it really does deliver on its promises and is worth it.
Identifies a topic of conventional wisdom, a common place belief or something like a myth, legend, lore that is generally believed (possibly beyond all logic) and decides whether it is real or not.
The essay should be an examination, using a mix of scholarly and popular (expert based) research, of the main claims of your topic. Your essay should ultimately show whether your research supports or refutes the claims made by your topic.
Your decision should be based on scientific/expert consensus. You should not be making decisions based on pure belief, unverified accounts or studies that are not replicated or representative of consensus. For example, that one study/article you read about aliens causing global warming, should not be one of your resources.
Essentially, you will be arguing, using outside sources (no personal experience, anecdotal evidence or customer reviews) whether your audience should use a product, service etc. or not—or—whether your audience should accept or ignore common belief or a myth etc.
Your thesis should answer this question: Does the scientific research or expert opinions support the main claims of your topic?
Your essay should follow the paragraph-by-paragraph guidelines provided below. How well you accomplish the tasks below will determine your grade.
***Be aware that if you do not make the full-page requirement you cannot receive higher than a C for the essay.
Sources to use are in the files and need for one more.

Hypothetically, you are the Director of Public Health for a small farming town, Myrtelville county, population 9,000 people. 90% of the residents are farmers. The problem is that current farming is not producing enough products to help feed their population as well as surrounding counties which rely on their crops. Soil erosion and pesticide issues are very problematic. The state is subsidizing the first year of production starting May 2022, but in order to obtain financial help, the decision to go GMO ( Genetically Modified Organisms ) vs. Various types of Naturally grown/Green sustainability farming for food production needs to be made by you.
This information needs to be passed on to your people of Myrtelville county by December 2022 for farming production to begin. Based on your research and the videos/articles provided, your textbook briefly mentions the use of GMO farming, answer the three questions:
1. What type of farming would you, the role of “Public Health Director,” for the county recommend- Natural or GMO use? Give your reason(s) why. I would also like to see a comment regarding either Natural or GMO usage- reason why you did not pick this type.
2. What would be one pro and con of your decision? Have literature to back up both decisions.
3. Provide one restriction you would place on the state, as the Public Health Director in this town, which would help the consumers know what they are ingesting. ie: harmful runoff water, pesticide usage, food labeling are just some examples. I need to see an actual plan of attack because this is what Public Health worker do!

USE THESE REFERENCES

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/gmo-pros-and-cons#identification

*You also can find your own resources to document- BUT remember they have to be true scientific evidence based articles!!! I will not accept u-tube or other non-reputable media based videos/articles that are NOT science based. I have only provided such UTube videos so that you all can gain knowledge on this topic.

Part 1: Humans as Social Animals
Watch the three following video clips and then answer the questions below.
Candid Camera: Social Norms – Elevator Behavior

Brain Games: Conformity at the doctor’s office

Brain Games: Social Norms – Standing Ovations

1. Most of us giggle when we watch these clips because the “subjects” behave in
strange ways. However, most of us underestimate the power of the social situation. In
all honesty, how would you have behaved? What would you have done if you were the
subject in these “experiments”?

a. For the Candid Camera clip, would you go along with others and face the
back of the elevator if this happened to you in real life? Why or why not?
b. What about the doctor’s office? If you saw everyone in the waiting room
stand up, would you? Why or why not?
c. Finally, if you are in a room where the entire audience gets up to give a
standing ovation, would you do the same even if you didn’t know or
recognize the person being applauded? Have you ever done this in real
life?
d. What similarities did you notice amongst all three situations? What
nonverbal communications did you see and what do you think these
people were thinking went they conformed?

2. How are you influenced by the behavior of others (strangers, co-workers, peers,
family) in real life or on social media? Name some examples of real-life social norms
that you conform to. Please describe at least two real-life conformity experiences.

3. In your opinion, why is it so hard to go against what the group is doing, even when
the “group” is just a bunch of strangers in a shared public space?

Part 2: The Human Need for Social Connections
Go to the following website and read more about the human need for social
connections. Click on and read the info on all three of the following tabs/pages
https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/social_connection/definition#what-is-social-
connection

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/social_connection/definition#why-practice-social-
connection

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/social_connection/definition#how-cultivate-social-
connection

1. How do psychologists define social connections?
2. Why is it important to practice social connection?
3. How can we create and cultivate social connections (write a one paragraph summary
of some of the presented options)?
4. There are several possible strategies listed on this page. Pick ONE strategy and try it
out in real life. Who did you try to connect with? Which cultivation strategy did you select
and why? How did you try this out in real life? Describe what you did and whether the
strategy was effective in making you feel greater social connection.

What is one thing every high school student should learn before they graduate?

Assignment: Utilizing the research based articles located for your annotated bibliography write a 5 to 6 full page literature review.
A literature review establishes familiarity with and understanding of current research in a particular field before carrying out a new investigation. Conducting a literature review should enable you to find out what research has already been done and identify what is unknown within your topic.
What your literature review should include:
* Overview of the subject and the objective(s) of the review.
* Analysis of works in favor, works against, and works with neutral views on the subject. These should beclearly divided.
* Explanations of the similarities and differences between the works.
* Comparison of different views held by other authors.
* Critique of the methodology.
* Examination of gaps in the research.
* Evaluation of how each study contributes to the argument in question.
* Conclusion that summarizes the literature review.

Now that Michelle has all of the pieces of her marketing plan in place, the board is ready to see the final plan. She is apprehensive about this because the board needs to approve the plan for it to move forward. It is imperative that the plan addresses all of the marketing issues discussed to this point, and that it also includes a discussion of how MM will measure the success of the plan after it has been implemented.
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Michelle is happy with how the plan is being put into place. The date and time for the final board meeting has been set when she calls you.
“How will we know if the new product launch is a success?” she asks. “How will we know if what you have suggested really worked? Since I started this company as an entrepreneur years ago, I feel like everything that happens here is my fault or my responsibility. Does that make sense?”
“You’ve been so supportive to me during this whole process,” you say. “Leave it to me. I’ll think about what you’ve said over the long weekend and I’ll be ready to sit down and discuss the details as I prepare the final draft of the plan.”
Based on your original goals and the plan you are putting into place, what will you tell Michelle?
What will you measure to determine whether or not your new product plan for MM is a success?
What about a contingency plan?
Do you need to make recommendations for MM if things do not go the way you hope and expect them to?
FORMAT
Based on your original goals and the plan you are putting into place, what will you tell Michelle? Michelle wants you to bring it all together. Please address the following questions (copy each question into DB post then respond underneath the question).
What will you measure to determine whether or not your new product plan for MM is a success?
Your response
What about a contingency plan?
Your response
Do you need to make recommendations for MM if things do not go the way you hope and expect them to?
Your response

There are many types of criticisms students might choose to use when analyzing a work of literature. We tend to live in a patriarchal society, thus our viewpoints are often skewed. Intentionally using a different criticism when analyzing a piece of literature can completely change the direction a student may think.
Students will read the different types of criticism and select three different criticisms to complete the activity. (students cannot use Reader Response)
Students will write a paragraph of at least eight sentences explaining how a particular criticism is reflected in a work. Students may use one work to apply all three criticisms or a different work for each criticism.
First sentence of paragraph should contain work being discussed, along with type of criticism.
Make sure to use present tense when discussing works.
Writing About Literature from Different Perspectives
Formalist Criticism
Formalist criticism emphasizes the work as an independent creation, a self-contained unit, something to be studied in itself, not as a part of some larger context, such as the author’s life or a historical period. The emphasis is on the form of the work, the relationships between the parts – the construction of the plot, the contrasts between characters, the point of view, and so on. Formalist criticism is intrinsic criticism for it concentrates on the work itself, independent of biography, history, etc. It begins with a personal response to the literary work, but it goes on to try to account for the response by a close examination of the work. The assumption that meaning is fully presented within the text is not much in favor today, when many argue that the reader makes the meaning. Formalist criticism usually takes one of two forms: explication or analysis. Explication is usually used when discussing short works – line by line. Analysis is usually used when discussing long works – ex. a character analysis from a novel. Formalist criticism also is called New Criticism. (If I handed you a poem and did not tell you the period and author, asked you to read it, and requested you discuss what it means to you, this would be formalist criticism.)
Deconstruction
Deconstruction, or deconstructive or poststructuralist criticism, begins with the assumption that language is unstable, elusive, and unfaithful. It holds that a work has no coherent meaning at the center. Deconstructionists interrogate a text, and they reveal what the authors were unaware of or had thought they kept out of sight. The problem is deconstruction becomes reductive, telling the same story about every text.
Definition of Deconstructionism
Have you ever seen the scaffolding that goes up during the construction of a building? The frame shows what the building will look like, but that’s not the only part. Shift your focus a little, and you’ll see the spaces between the frame’s ‘bones.’ It’s the whole of the metal itself and holes in between that make up the future building’s shape. Similarly, deconstruction looks at what makes a text whole and what holes are in between its pieces, in other words, what’s said and what’s left unsaid.
Reader-Response Criticism
The meaning is an interpretation created or constructed by the reader.
Students may not use this criticism in their activity.
Archetypal or Myth Criticism
Few people today believe in an inherited “collective unconscious,” but many people agree that certain repeated experiences, such as going to sleep and hours later awakening or of the annual death and rebirth of vegetation manifest themselves in dreams, myths, and literature. Ex. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner – deathlike calm of ship is restored to motion; mariner has spiritual death and renewed perception of the holiness of life.
In addition to archetypal plots, there are archetypal characters; an archetype is any recurring unit. Ex. Cinderella (three sisters, repeated trying on of slipper).
A weakness in this criticism is that the critic looks for certain characters or patterns of action and values the work if the motifs (dominant themes) are there, meanwhile overlooking what is unique. A work is regarded good if it resembles or works with the usual motifs and characters.
Historical Criticism
Studies a work within its historical context. Hamlet and Macbeth both have ghosts. A student might look at how Elizabethans felt about ghosts. The historical critic assumes that writers are shaped by the particular social contexts in which they live.
Marxist Criticism
Named for Karl Marx. It sees history as a struggle between socioeconomic classes, and it sees literature as the product of economic forces of the period. It reflects the interests of the dominant class. Literature is a material product produced to be consumed in a given society. It believes the deepest historical meaning is found in what it does not say. One example in works would be social classes.
New Historicism
New Historicism insists that there is no history in the sense of a narrative of indisputable past events. There is only our version of the past. In this view, each age projects its own preconceptions on the past. Discuss how history is recorded. Example: Victories by Native Americans are called massacres and when villages were destroyed are called victories. History is told from the view of the victor.
Biographical Criticism
It includes biographies and autobiographies, diaries, journals, letters, and so on. They tell us about the life of the author and enable us to return to literary texts with a deeper understanding. Example: Night by Elie Wiesel
Psychological Criticism
It usually examines the author and the author’s writings in the framework of Freudian psychology. A central doctrine of Sigmund Freud (the Oedipus complex) is the view that all males wish to displace their fathers and sleep with their mother, normally repressed, but may appear in dreams.
Gender Criticism (Feminist, and Lesbian and Gay)
Feminist criticism can be traced back to Virginia Woolf, but it grew out of the women’s movement of the 1960s. Feminist critics point out that men have established the conventions of literature and the canon. Men are strong and women are weak (think of fairytales). We condition boys to not cry and encourage girls to do the opposite.
Lesbian and Gay criticisms have their roots in feminist criticism. Through the years, the acceptance of this group has evolved.
Beginning of a Sample paragraph
In The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, one could use gender criticism in discussing the roles of women during the 1920s. (Next, students would discuss the roles/treatment of Daisy, Jordan, and Myrtle from the story.)

Please choose any ONE of the following questions and write an essay (2-3 double spaced typed pages). Make sure to check for grammar, organization, and give direct quotes from the text and the film of “A Midnight Summer dream” theres a text and film.
Write an essay about the two sets of Athenian lovers and show how the play gently pokes fun at the idea of love, its immaturity, and vacillations even when the playwright seems to support the individual right to assert one’s freedom to choose one’s mate.

The Terra-Cotta Warriors | National Geographic.
[Video File] Retrieved from https://youtu.be/RsUE-ZtcUFg
Assignment: Watch the video and then write a full page reaction to what you saw. Consider the following questions:
What was your first reaction after you saw the video? What objects captured your attention the most? Were you already aware of this excavation? (If you’ve seen the movie The Mummy: Tomb of The Dragon Emperor, 3rd Mummy movie, the sets and objects were duplicated as closely as possible.)
Thousands of artists and craftsmen created this amazing array of military men, horses and gear over many years and then it was all buried in the ground around the Emperor’s tomb to protect him in the afterlife. Are there any contemporary artworks that you can think of that compare to this colossal undertaking in terracotta (a low-fired clay) from almost 20 centuries in the past?
Note: Remember to include at least ten or more terms in your minimum one-page critique in order to display what you’ve learned so far. 10 terms (used correctly) = 10pts.