Best Writer

During the pandemic, much of education has gone online. However, with students having easy access to the Internet and no instructor physically present during tests/exams, many educators fear these factors have contributed to a rise in cheating among students. Has the pandemic contributed to an increase of cheating among students?

Instructions: Below are the questions for the final exams. Please download the three files you will need for this assignment.

1. In your opinion, what is causing the turnover at Columbus Custom Carpentry? .

2. Are the assembly technicians overpaid? Explain. Are the craters underpaid? If so, why? Will they still be underpaid if the custom hand-work portion of their job is eliminated by the jig system? Explain.

3. Given the case and market information, is the CFO position best aligned with that of an accounting manager, director, or a CFO? Explain.

4. Are there differences in pay that appear to be based on sex/race/ethnicity rather than performance or length of service? How so or why not?

5. Given your answers to the previous questions, exactly how would you rectify the key issues within Columbus Custom Carpentry? What resources/references support your plan of action?

complete a 5page double-spaced document outlining the following information: The research document will be written using the following questions and a Bibliography in MLA format.1. A short introduction on the background of the ethnic or racial group.2. Why did they come to America?3. Where did they settle and why?4. When did they come?5. What occupations did they labor at?6. What was their religious affiliation and how did this affect their existence?7. Describe their philosophy of life if known, and the language they spoke.8. Describe their contributions to American culture.9. Where are they living today according to the latest census reports.10. names some famous Irishman11. Discuss the obstacles they face.

Protected Health Information
You are a health information professional working at a health information department at a major surgical center in a large Northwest city. The surgical center has entered into an agreement with ScannerX company, a company that provides large-scale scanning services of paper materials. You have been asked to work with the lead project manager from ScannerX in scanning paper-based protected health information into a digital format.

Analyze whether ScannerX is a business partner (associate) of the surgical center.

Include the following aspects in the discussion:

Explain the term Protected Health Information (PHI).
Describe the difference between electronic, paper, and oral PHI.
Research the minimum necessary requirements by HIPAA.
Discuss what policies and procedures should be put in place to ensure that minimum requirements are met.
Respond to your peers’ posts.
Cite any references. Use proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling at all times. Copying and pasting is not allowed. Always use your own words.

O‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌verview Planning, preparedness, and response to an influenza pandemic involve balancing potentially conflicting individual and community interests. In crisis situations, the enjoyment of individual human rights and civil liberties may have to be limited in the public interest. However, efforts to protect individual rights should be part of every policy. Measures that limit individual rights and civil liberties must be necessary, reasonable, proportional, equitable, non-discriminatory, and in full compliance with national and international laws. Pandemic planning should include details that address expectations concerning staffing. If a plan is written that expects healthcare workers to “volunteer” during a pandemic event this should be expressly documented in the plan and discussed beforehand. Instructions Discuss the feasibility of mandating healthcare workers to report for duty and treat potentially infected patients during a pandemic. Do governments and employers have a right to mandate this? To what extent can healthcare providers be expected to tolerate a risk of infection that might possibly be fatal to themselves or their families? Answer the following questions in your initial post: 1. Describe and experience you have had regarding ethical decisions made by staff which conflict with agency prerogatives. How might agencies and staff resolve these dilemmas? 2. Review the following case study: Then comment as to whether you support Hospital A or B’s decision. How did you arrive at your decision? How does this potential issue impact the role of an emergency manager? The context is as follows. An influenza pandemic has been underway for 6 weeks, and the health care system has been burdened beyond capacity, with every hospital bed full, every ventilator in use and all health care providers working extended shifts. To increase the number of beds to accommodate the surge of influenza patients, all scheduled operations have been postponed for the past 2 weeks. The postponed procedures include diagnostic and palliative operations for patients with pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, and malignant brain tumors. The expected survival of many of these patients is less than 6 months, but, without an immediate operation, they will probably die within 2 weeks. As a result of the pandemic, medical resources are scarce, and the usual critical care that would follow such operations could not be provided to all those who need it. Hos‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌pitals throughout the country are independently making decisions to modify the standards of critical care in order to provide limited interventions and processes for many additional patients. Hospital A decides to provide critical care according to the usual standards on a first-come, first-served basis. Hospital B decides to provide important critical care interventions only to those patients who are expected to survive for more than 6 months. A surgeon, Dr. Smith, deeply opposes hospital B’s decision. This new rule requires that Dr. Smith cancel bowel obstruction surgery was scheduled for later in the week. Without surgery, his patient, a 36-year-old mother of three with ovarian cancer will die within 2 weeks. Dr. Smith is considering whether to perform the operation in violation of hospital rules, potentially risking his career. In light of this disagreement with recent hospital policies, Dr. Smith is torn between his professional mission to use his skills and expertise to help the patients who need him and his obligation to observe the rules of his institution ( Levine et al. 2009). Reference: Levin D, Cadigan RO, Biddinger PD, Condon S, Koh HK, on behalf of the Joint Massachusetts Department of Public Health – Harvard Altered Standards of Care Working Group (2009) Altered standards of care during an influenza pandemic: identifying ethical, legal, and practical principles to guide decision making. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness 3(Suppl 2):S132 – 40. First, you will share your initial discussion post based on the assignment guidelines. • Submit an analysis • Use course content and external sources to support your thoughts. o Cite using APA style • Write a 500 – 750 word-initial discussion post • Please be sure to provide references to the peer-reviewed literature. For graduate-level scholarship this is a requirement. I am looking for you to go beyond the assigned readings and use the literature to support your conclusions and analysis. At the graduate level, we are not able to simply assert our opinions but it must be linked to the theories and supported by scholarly work. For this class, in particular, I would like you to support your analysis with the most current literature possible. Use of external non-peer reviewed sources can also be utilized in conjunction with your peer-reviewed sources such as government websites and think tanks. • A minimum of 2-3 references from academic peer-reviewed jou‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌rnals is required

u‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌se internet resources to locate an article or a case involving Statute of frauds. state your topic, provide a link or‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ cite to the article or case, briefly summarize it, and then provide your personal opinion/comment about what you rea‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌d

For this critical thinking essay, students will write a brief one to two paged, double spaced (12-point font) reflection on a predetermined topic. Students will summarize the key points of contention/debate and focus primarily on the facts. Students will then briefly conclude with a written portion on their own position with regards to the issue.

Students must choose only one topic below.

Topic #1) What social psychological aspects of the white majority are involved in the race problem? (The use of SI or CT must be used here. This relates to previous discussion but specifically the idea of white privilege.)

Topic #2) Select one of the minority groups described in the chapters covered and read a novel, autobiography, or biography that will allow you to gain an understanding of the group from the perspective of a member of that group. Then, write a review of this book. After completing the review, apply two of the theoretical perspectives, as well as related concepts, that best explain the experiences of the person about whom you are reading. You should also explain the historical context in which the person is writing to make linkages between the context and the experiences and perceptions of the individual.

Topic #3) Observe and notate various television programs to see how minorities are portrayed. For example, you can select a comedy, a drama, or a reality show. Then, draw some conclusions about whether the people are portrayed in a positive, negative, or neutral manner, whether the roles they play are realistic when compared with American society, and the extent to which the programs enhance or deter greater understanding of the minority group. (Media chapter is best used here. Additionally, students must use SI or CT in their analysis.)

Furthermore, this must be done in APA format. Refer to Purdue Owl APA (google it!) for help with formatting, including citations. Remember – since you are using sources in the paper, you must also have a reference page at the end of the paper. (In other words, the essay should have a title page, an introduction to the issue, the discussion and a conclusion. The reference page comes last. You do not have to have an abstract or literature review!)

R‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌esearch Paper This must be a theology paper. Not a history or sociology paper Each student will write a six to eight-page research paper (minimum 1500 words) free of grammar errors. For the research paper you need to: (1) state and describe the topic/movement being addressed (2) consider the interplay between religion and its socio-historical, economic, and political context [How do these mutually influence each other?] (3) consider theologically how the study of this topic helps to better understand American religious faith, and (4) provide a correlation between the topic being addressed and contemporary American religious exp‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌erience. You should have at least six academic sources, at least two of which are books. You may of, course, use the course texts but they do not count in your five sources. The Bible also does not count as one of your five sources. Papers should be double-spaced with 1” margins and 12-point font. Citations and bibliography can be APA format but should include page numbers. Turnitin will be enable. Attached: – Two papers that received grade A (they should only be used as a reference of good work and not as a source of content) – Evaluation criteria – Essay structure – Topic Approved (some grammar errors were detect‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ed)

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌rite a paper applying a theory of your choice (feminist theory, multicultural, critical race theory, Latino critical perspective, empowerment theory, systems theory, ecological, theories of masculinity, intersectionality, etc) that is being covered to a case from a podcast series. For this assignment, review and consider from a micro, mezzo, and macro perspective how you would approach the case using the theories you have chosen as the foundation for your choices. Describe your reasons for your approach/decisions for each level. For instance, if I am choosing to do analyze the case from the podcast, Dirty John, I might choose feminist theory and empowerment theory to conduct my analysis. Selected podcast STown (Depression and mental health) https://stownpodcast.org/ Please send pdf of your chosen article along with your paper. Please ensure to provide the following: 1] Choose a combination of theories for analysis. 2] Introduction-Introduces the purpose of the exercise: to conceptualize an individual case using the application of a combination of theoretical perspective to micro, mezzo, macro aspects of the case. 3]Identify needs- Evaluates unique needs in detail after reviewing chosen theories. 4] Approaches-Identifies at least 3 approaches (micro, mezzo, macro). Describes each process in detail. 5] Descr‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ibes reasons for the choice of approaches to use for each level and in relation to the theory. 6] Rationale- Provides reason and with detailed explanation for the choice of approaches to use for each level. Explains the rationale for each approach given. Reading Resources Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (US). (2014). Trauma-Informed care in behavioral health services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 57. Chapter 1, Trauma-Informed Care: A Sociocultural Perspective (Links to an external site.) Miller, K. K., Brown, C. R., Shramko, M., & Svetaz, M. V. (2019). Applying Trauma-Informed practices to the care of refugee and immigrant youth: 10 Clinical pearls. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 6(8), 94. Optional Videos Center for Health Care Strategies. (2019). What is Trauma-Informed care? [Video]. Matanick, N & Matanick, C. (Producers). ReMoved part 3 – love is never wasted [Video]. Scholarly sources, current within ten years Please provide Permalinks for all citations used‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

Individual Rights
As the new HIPAA privacy officer at General Hospital, you are asked to audit a number of forms to ensure they are HIPAA-compliant. During your review, you notice that there are several discrepancies in the General Hospital’s use of the patient authorization and consent forms. You discover that patients were denied access to requests for psychotherapy notes.

Analyze the facility’s legal responsibilities to the patient.

Include the following aspects in the discussion:

Describe the need for continuous auditing practices for covered entities.
Explain why psychotherapy notes are provided additional privacy protections.
Research the legal ramifications of failing to protect patient individual rights.
Discuss the specific steps you would take to rectify the discrepancies found in your audit of the authorization and consent forms.
Respond to your peers’ posts.
Cite any references. Use proper grammar, sentence structure, and spelling at all times. Copying and pasting is not allowed. Always use your own words.