Best Writer

Write an Analysis of cable and TV newsIf we want to analyze TV in any kind of systematic way, we have to watch it ourselves, so we have direct experience with it. This is what you will need to do for this paper assignment. Your goal will be to create an analysis of Cable TV news. There are two different ways to do this.
Watch three hours of Fox News, CNN, or MSNBC. What does this viewing teach you about the network? What does it teach you about its audience? To what extent does the network have a particular style or approach that makes it unique? What themes or topics are emphasized? How do they cover the stories they report on? Did your viewing reveal any of the biases we discussed in class last week? (These are questions to think about; you probably won’t address all of them in your paper.)
Watch two hours of two different networks and develop a comparison of them. How are they different? Similar? Think about the questions from the first option: audience, style, themes, biases.
Essentially, the first option involves you creating a kind of character sketch of one of these news networks. The second option involves developing a comparison of two networks. In both, you will need to produce a strong argument and then flesh it out with supporting ideas and specific details from and references to what you have seen.
In your paper, be sure to note the time and date of your viewing. I would strongly encourage you to watch in chunks of no more than 1 hour each, so that you’re getting at least a couple of different perspectives on the network(s). Don’t watch the network at the same time on different days, if you can help it; especially at night, you would end up getting the same program, just with different guests. If you’re analyzing MSNBC, try to avoid the sensationalistic news magazine/true crime that the network has been known to air on the weekends. On CNN, avoid documentary series like “The 90s.” Find something about current events.
It might be hard to watch and write about these networks without your own political bias coming into play, but you should try. You want to develop a “fair and balanced” assessment or comparison of the network(s) you’re watching for the assignment. It might be useful for you to admit your own political perspective – if it’s relevant – in your paper. The purpose of the paper is not provide a political interpretation of what you see, but it might be hard to avoid. In cases like that, it can be better to be upfront about where you’re coming from politically rather than pretending that you’re being a dispassionate, objective observer (as if that would even be possible). You can trust that I will not be considering your political position when it comes time to grade these papers. Rather, I will be evaluating the quality of your argument and the strength of the evidence and reasoning that you are able to bring to it.
Evaluation:
A high quality paper will have the following ingredients:
A focused, unified argument that offers a comparison of two networks or an assessment of a single network
Thorough analysis of your ideas
Specific evidence to support your argument. This includes specific references to what you’ve seen.
Some insight into how cable TV news works.
Engaging writing that is free of mistakes. Proof-read; I don’t want to see mistakes that could be easily caught if you had just read the paper over once. (Like, for example, homonyms: words that sound the same but are spelled differently.) Organize the paper into paragraphs, and avoid run-ons and fragments. And don’t forget a good, descriptive title.

Design a brochure to educate new college students and their parents on unintentional injuries on college campuses. Decide what information is most important for the reader to know, use plain language, cite current data on the problem from credible sources, don’t be too wordy, use eye-catching graphics and colors, use positive statements, use consistent fonts, be culturally sensitive.

Option B-Brochure Scoring Sheet

Criteria
Professional
4 points
Adequate
3 points
Needs Work
2 points
Unsatisfactory
1 point
Content
Demonstrates in depth understanding of topic.
Accurately utilizes researched information.
Demonstrates understanding of the topic.
Employs research information with an adequate degree of accuracy.
Demonstrates little understanding of topic.
Employs research information with a fair degree of accuracy.
Lacks understanding of topic.
Reports only the most basic parts of the information.
Written Presentation
Well organized content.
Attractive and well-designed format.
Clear and easily understood message.
Computer generated with strong visual appeal.
Content is organized.
Format is adequate.
Message is sufficiently understood.
Computer generated with acceptable eye appeal.
Content lacks organization.
Format is difficult to follow and poorly organized.
Message not clearly understood.
Computer generated but poorly designed.
Unorganized content.
Hard to follow.
Message difficult to understand; tendency to wander or ramble.
Handwritten or computer generated with little organization or skill.
Research Quality
Five sources used.
Use of reliable sources.
Accurate analysis of research.
Three sources used.
Sources have some reliability.
Adequate analysis of research.
Two sources used.
Questionable reliability of sources.
Basic information with questionable accuracy.
Less than two sources used.
Little reliability of sources.
Inaccurate information.
Visual Appeal
Imaginative; original.
Use of graphics make the message “come alive.”
Creativity is acceptable.
Use of graphics adequate to present message.
Little creativity used.
Poor selection of graphics.
No originality.
Graphics do not tie in with the message.

Scenario
LTD Acceptance is a private property and auto insurance carrier that specializes in sports cars and motorcycles. This organization is owned by LTD Capital, a large equity group with over 15 holdings. LTD Acceptance is the parent company’s single largest holding as it drives 70% of total revenue. Due to the inherent risk involved in that segment of the market, many of LTD Acceptance’s competitors do not offer policies for sports cars or motorcycles. This market segment is underserved which is why the organization has 20,000 active policies for a sports car or a motorcycle.

LTD is headquartered in Houston, TX. LTD does not sell insurance directly to the public. Instead, it uses third-party agents to sell its policies. LTD handles all customer service needs including claims intake, policy services, and general questions. The company operates in four states: California, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. Currently, LTD does not have an active system in place to ensure that its agents are in fact using LTD guidelines to screen potential policyholders. However, no evidence of negligence has emerged so far as the organization has yet to have a year in which it was not profitable. LTD has also had the good fortune of not suffering losses because of natural disasters or catastrophic events.

You have been hired for the role of Senior Risk Analyst. This means that you are responsible for overseeing and managing the organization’s all risk management activities. Before you can design a plan to manage risks, your first task is to identify the primary risk exposures the organization should acknowledge. The organization is also concerned about threats to its operational efficacy. Therefore, you need to also identify operational risk exposures and explain why operational losses must be categorized. The board is also seeking your input on the relationship between risk and reward and how it pertains to the company’s investment portfolio. Your supervisor has asked you to create a PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes of your report. Remember your audience when crafting your presentation, and include the following slides:
Title slide
Evaluate the significance of identifying risks and address the ramifications of failing to do so.
Identify two insurance regulations and analyze their roles in managing risks within the insurance industry.
Identify the market, business, and compliance risks LTD encounters.
Explain why the operational losses cannot be broadly managed. Why do they have to be categorized?
Examine the relationship between risk and reward and how it pertains to investing.
Explain why effective financial management correlates with risk management.
Your conclusion slide should include at least three risk management activities relevant to insurance (and your rationale for choosing them specifically) and how they link to enhanced organizational effectiveness.
Utilize speaker notes for each slide.

• Explain and evaluate the extent to which strategic marketing decisions or business needs of a company have an impact on the design of marketing research and the formulation of consumer behavior questionnaires.
• apply the appropriate research design methods to obtain insights into the marketing research problems or opportunities.

Leaders address issues and propose solutions. As a leader, you’ll need to stay on top of events that may facilitate or hinder productivity. You must create and implement solutions to address these issues.
In the assignment preparation, you chose an organization, described its organizational issue, and identified how it hinders organization efficiency. This assignment exposes you to complex modern organizational challenges. The solutions you devise should reflect your learning and research of organizational and individual influences in the workplace.
The new CEO has selected your consulting firm to provide an analysis of the organizational efficiency.
Write a 2–3 page, double-spaced paper in which you will present to the CEO your findings during your research steps. You must propose strategic solutions in your paper to include the following:
Describe the organization and the issue to resolve:
Provide a brief description of the organization you selected.
Present the organizational issue that adversely affected productivity and that you, the consultant, will review and resolve.
This information can be summarized from your assignment preparation last week. Make sure to incorporate any feedback that you received from your instructor.
Analyze current corporate culture:
How has the current corporate culture facilitated the development of the current issue? Research the organization, dig into the culture, and analyze how it contributed to this issue. Hint: Review the mission and vision statements as well as the corporate Web site.
Identify areas of weakness:
What are the organization’s areas of weakness as they relate to the issue? Apply your research on organizational behavior approaches to aspects of corporate culture—such as diversity, teamwork, and motivational strategies—to help identify the areas of weakness.
Propose solutions:
What organizational practices would you modify? What solutions would you recommend to management that would help solve the identified weaknesses? As a consultant, you will identify the suggestions and solutions you would present to the organization’s leadership with regard to modifying current organizational practices to resolve the issue.
References and citations:
Provide at least two quality resources such as the course textbook, a company Web site, business Web sites (CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.), resources from the Strayer Library, and/or outside sources. Note: Wikipedia and Web-based blogs do not qualify as credible resources.
You can find in-depth and quality company information using the Nexis Uni database through the Strayer University Online Library.
In-text citations are required when paraphrasing or quoting another source.
Formatting and writing standards:
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.

WINTER 2022 WGST/CHYS/SPMA 2P95 FILM ASSIGNMENT [20%]
*All films available for students to stream through Brock library*
The Empathy Gap: Masculinity and the Courage to Change (2015) 71mins
Access at: https://brocku.kanopy.com/video/empathy-gap
Tough Guise 2 (Clean): Violence, Manhood & American Culture
Access at: https://brocku.kanopy.com/video/tough-guise-2 (2013) 49mins
*There are 3 versions of Tough Guise 2 and I have assigned the shortest version
Due: Tues March 08 to SAKAI by 11:55pm
*Option to do individually, in pairs, or in groups of 3-4 maximum
1. a. Using specific examples, identify and discuss 4 ways in which the videos illuminate masculinity and/or masculinities in relation to the following content (APA style citations) – Any 4 required course readings (text chapters and/or journal articles) – 2 outside scholarly sources (i.e., journal articles or books)
b. Identify and briefly discuss two key connections between the assigned films and Angry White Men: American Masculinity in the Age of Trump (2019) shown in lecture on February 07
Access at: https://brocku.kanopy.com/video/angry-white-men-american-masculinity-age-tru
2. Briefly discuss your impressions of the videos. Did you find them effective? Troubling? In what ways? Given the opportunity to expand on or change an aspect of this assignment, what would this be? Note: *For those working in pairs or groups, this section should also include a collaborative discussion about individual views and how these were similar and/or different.
3. Additional questions for pairs and/or groups (combine your responses into 1 answer): How did you select who to work with? Describe your planning and organizing processes. How did you plan and organize the tasks involved to ensure that each member contributed equally? What, if any, challenges did you face?
In what ways did you benefit from working together? Suggest and complete 1 additional component for this assignment that would be fair for pairs or groups to complete (e.g., working with additional sources?) Please show how/where you have included the additional component in your answer.
4. For those working in pairs or groups, each individual must submit the same copy of the assignment to SAKAI. Include all group members’ names on the title page. One copy will be graded (typically, the first in alphabetical order) with comments provided in the instructor feedback summary box on Sakai. The same grade will be entered for each member and the same comments provided
5. Length: approximately 4-6 pages + Title page + Reference page. Please number responses (i.e., Question 1, etc.) and answer in single-spaced essay-style (e.g., sentences, paragraphs) with double spaces between each question.
Some things to think about when completing this assignment:
1. You are not being asked to provide summaries of the films
2. Consider technology and internet issues – leave enough time to access the films and review if needed
3. Make connections, provide examples and use citations throughout your work.
4. Demonstrate your understanding of course content in relation to the films
5. It is not necessary to cite and use all of your sources equally
6. It is not possible (nor is it expected) to cover every detail from the films. Focus on some central examples and ideas. Ideally, you will focus on content that has the most meaning or relevance for you
7. Ask for clarification when unsure
8. The rubric is in a separate attachment
9. Note additional requirements for pairs and groups
10. No additional readings, lecture or seminars the week of February 28-March 04. Please use this time to focus on the assignment

Final Prompt:
Rewrite and polish the first ten pages of your screenplay. The screenplay needs to be a complete story.(I only write 7 pages so you need to help me to write more details or dialogues)
Make sure you adhere to the industry standard for professional-looking screenplays.
While it’s entirely up to you what you write, we recommend that you craft a Set-Up sequence that fills the first 10 pages and ends with a scene containing your Inciting Incident.
Typically, you’ll want to introduce your antagonist too, but if setting up your protagonist requires the entire sequence, then all else can wait. Make absolutely sure we care about your main character, so that audiences will want to spend the next hour and more to follow his/her/their journey. Also, give us a sense of what they want, and don’t have. How will the inciting incident upset the balance of the protagonist’s life?

you need to use the app to write the screenplay
Final Draft. All pros use this, feel free to take advantage of their free 30-day trial. https://trial.finaldraft.com/

Write an essay in which you give your opinion telling if you would rather live in the countryside or city.

Write a comparing and contrasting paper on the Virtual and in person classroom.

1) This second half of the semester often focuses on juvenile justice. Now that you have had a chance to watch the documentary on the Central Park Five, what did you think? Do you find that it relates to No Matter How Loud I Shout? How so?
1a) What did you think of the essay Ain’t I A Person? Did the Central Park Five kids come up for you at all there?
2) Compare Marty Tankleff to Adrian P. Thomas. These are two false confessions from a young, White man struggling with the death of his parents, and an older Black man – a father, struggling with the death of his child. Did law enforcement fail these two individuals in different ways? Similar ways? Who had privilege – if anyone?
3) You have now read the practices and subsequent results of the Reid technique. Knowing how law enforcement illicit confessions, is this a technique that we should keep using? What would you have law enforcement do instead? (Consider the strategies listed at the end of the presentation, and maybe do your own research.)