Best Writer

Essays must have
multiple citations from Plato, Machiavelli and Sokoloff that are properly documented (with page
number). Students must advance their own argument through a critical engagement with Plato and
Machiavelli and Sokoloff. This means that you are required to criticize (e.g., say why Plato,
Machiavelli and Sokoloff are wrong about something in their published writings we are reading
by them) and advance your better idea that is backed up with evidence and argumentation
Sources
“Apology” by Plato
“Prince” by Machiavelli

You are a manager at an organization that has decided it needs to create and support the goal of a more diverse workforce.

Describe and evaluate the specific steps or techniques you will plan to use to attain this organizational goal of creating a diverse workplace.
What steps will you take to retain diverse employees once you have successfully recruited them? (Daft, R. L. (2021). Management (14th ed.). Cengage Learning).

F‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌or this discussion complete the following readings. Then, answer the three questions that follow in a separate paragraph for each question. The Norton Field Guide Chapter 47 (pp. 479-488); Chapter 48 (pp. 489-510) Little Seagull Handbook Section R-1, “Doing Research” First, review the readings carefully. In one paragraph, share a tip or fact about research and/or about sources that you learned from the readings. Then, share a tip or a skill that you have used while conducting research in the past that was successful. Be sure to cite your reading. Second, reflect on your research methodology. Briefly describe and contrast what your process has been and what it will be in ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌this course. Third, review your feedback on Milestone 1(which is the first paper you wrote for me). Then, identify which topic you will pursue and summarize your topic/argument. It may not be finalized, and that is acceptable. Describe the problem and proposed solution. List 3-5 search terms you consider using. You may include a word cloud by using EdWordle. Be sure to comment briefly on the keywords’ strength and effectiveness. Include a reference for any sources you used in the post. TIP: Respond to the questions above using a separate paragraph for each question. Please break out the search term list as bullet points or a clearly recognizable list or post as a photo word cloud‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

G‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌reat work on the last edit; however, please read what Dr. Akerman put in the Blue at the top of the research (3pg.). Edit the stuff in yellow for sure. basically, the dates are outdated for the research. The dates can’t be past‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ 5 years. Other than that, just touch up the research in chapter 2. They gave me 3 more weeks to get all of this correct. But updates must be turned in weekly (5-7) days. Let’s get this right and thank you for your experties‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

In a 500-word or more response essay (which needs a thesis such as Sexton’s “Cinderella” is an optimistic look at mother-daughter relationships, while Disney’s Cinderella shows how terrific stepmothers can be) compare and contrast the story of Cinderella as you know it and the story in Sexton’s poem. Answering these questions may help:

· What are their respective titles? Who created them? What do they describe or depict?

· What is their tone or mood? What year were they created? Is that influential?

· Why do you think they were created as they were?

· What themes do they address? Do you think one is of higher quality or greater merit than the other—and if so, why?

· Which seems more plausible to you, and why?

· What is the central focus, claim, or goal of each? What conclusions do they offer?

(Note the year written after the last line of each poem, that year is the year the poem was published. If you see two different years, the earliest year is the year the poem was written, while the latest is the year the poem was published.)

This assignment provides the opportunity to curate, revise, reflect upon 2 of the online exercises you’ve completed to date(Intelligent Failure and Don’t Know I Need Help). The online exercises were designed to help you learn the lesson content, particularly key ideas introduced in the theoretical readings. In contrast, the portfolio shifts the focus to critical evaluation and individualization:
Why are creative leadership theories and practices important to your industry?
How might you adapt and transfer course knowledge to your area of practice?
What did you learn and why is it valuable?

Instructions:

Select items that showcase key learnings, accomplishments, or failures. Portfolios are intended to showcase your best work and associated skills, and also demonstrate a commitment to lifelong learning and a growth mindset by responding to idea that just didn’t work out.
To integrate online exercises, simply copy text/pictures from relevant discussion thread and paste them into a Word document. Consider using distinct sections for each online exercise. Also, you may revise the online exercises by expanding upon ideas or editing.
Reflection
After each online exercise you curate, reflect upon a key learning gained through experience. The primary purpose of the reflections is to make your key insights/learnings explicit and to identify why they are valuable. Approach each reflection as a mini-report that shares the key idea and provides enough context for someone else to appreciate it. Use grammatically complete sentences and paragraph structure.
You are required to briefly quote or paraphrase at least 2 theoretical readings from 2 different weeks/units. Use MLA style and try to keep the quotes as short as possible; avoid quotes longer than 2 sentences unless absolutely necessary

Checklist
1. Did the submission curate 2 online exercises as outlined in the assignment instructions?
2. Did the reflections use MLA to quote and/or paraphrase at least 2 articles from 2 different week/units?
3. Did the submission include a Works Cited formatted using MLA style?

Assessment Criteria
The Reflective Portfolio will primarily be assessed via depth of reflection, completion, and professionalism. Detailed descriiptions of each level of achievement are incorporated into the rubric which is attached to this Assignment Folder (it is usually displayed in the bottom-right corner).

Depth of Reflection
This is the most important criteria and it assess the value provided by reflecting upon your learnings. It is relatively easy to identify what you learned, our goal is to explain why those learnings are important to you and your industry. It asks, how much did the author benefit from the reflections?

Completion
This criteria assesses the degree to which the submission met the assignment’s guidelines, such as integrating 2 online exercises, quoting/paraphrasing 2 articles from 2 different weeks, and including the signed Academic Integrity Checklist. It asks, did the submission follow all key criteria?

(Please do not use any consulting firm as a source) e.g. PwC, Accenture, EY, etc… This will be a publication paper, hence it shall be supported with very solid resources, e.g Graphs, etc., and no plagiarism tolerance.

This is a Research and Analytical Paper, Hence one needs to reflect the Analytical thinking when writing, with a proper conclusion.

ESG (Environmental, social, & Corporate Governance) is a new framework currently impacting financial institutions from both investment & banking. What I am interested in is how this ESG framework will impact banks in the GCC (Gulf), how banks can incorporate this new framework in their strategy and operating model? What this will entail in terms of changes to their current operating models (Changes in process, governance, data, infrastructure, KPIs, process, etc.) and how they can contribute to pushing the ESG agenda with Corporate and SME (Small-Medium Entities) clients e.g. via financing and portfolio diversification etc.

This is not an essay. I have attached the requirements. This is a notebook that will be used for future courses. It must be specific with illustrations, diagrams, and examples. I have included the course descriiption below. Citations do not need to be included.

The purpose of this course is to provide undergraduate students with basic information concerning the anatomy and physiology of the speech, swallowing and communication mechanisms. Students will acquire knowledge of the skeleton, muscles and other tissues of the trunk, neck, esophagus, larynx, pharynx, face, nasal cavity and mouth. Communication disorders related to these systems will be noted.

In addition, the students will gain an introductory understanding of the components of the human nervous system that are involved in speech, language, cognition, communication and swallowing, so that they will have a solid foundation for: a) courses that focus on neurological disorders that affect speech, language, swallowing and cognition, and b) clinical practice serving children and adults with neurogenic communication and swallowing disorders.

Write in Turabian format a Doctrine Discovery Paper Theme: Equip ) Paper must identify your Doctrinal Position and (your personal belief and understanding of Scripture ) as it pertains to the given theme: Equip ( such as the doctrine of the church and Theme: Equip) Paper must have a key passage accompanied with an explanation (exegetical study) relating to it’s importance to the theme and doctrine. Must be There pages in length. Plus a title page and bibliography page. Paper must have two sources and noted in bibliography. In the book “The Holy Spirit in the New Testament Pages 306-316 by Henry Barclay SWETE

A case analysis must be written in APA format and include the proper cover and reference list. The Case Analysis must be at least 500-700 words. Please use double spacing (as required by APA) and an APA approved font (12 point). The Case Analysis must also include at least three references. Please be sure to list your references on a separate page at the end of the case analysis. Reference support should be included in the evaluation of possible solutions as well as the recommendations and/or implementation sections. The Case Analysis MUST include the following headings and follow this prescribed format:

Title Page (APA formatted)

I. Major Facts (Heading)

(State here the major facts as you see them. Make statements clear and concise for your own understanding as well as for the understanding of the other students and the instructor.)

II. Major Problem (Heading)

(State here the major problem as you see it. Emphasize the present major problem. You may wish to phrase your statement in the form of a question. In a few cases, there may be more than one major problem. A good problem statement will be concise, usually only one sentence.)

III. Possible Solutions (Heading)

A. (List here the possible solutions to the major problem. Let your imagination come up with alternative ways to solve the problem.

B. Do not limit yourself to only one or two possible solutions. These solutions should be distinct from each other. You MUST include a minimum of three possible solutions.

C. However, you may wish to include portions of one solution in another solution, as long as each solution stands alone. Only in this manner will your subsequent choice be definitive.

D. Note the advantages and disadvantages of each possible solution as well as expected outcomes. This is an area where outside support will help.

IV. Choice and Rationale (Heading)

(State here your choice, A or B or ___ and the detailed reasons for your choice. You may also state your reasons for not choosing the other alternative solutions.) Explain the hopeful outcome of this alternative.

V. Implementation (Heading)

Prepare a plan to implement your choice (recommendation).

Reference Page (APA formatted) – every source listed should be cited within the text.