Best Writer

Instruction:
Artifact: https://densho.org/catalyst/minidoka-concentration-camp-looking-back-70-years-later/
Write an introductory sentence or two in which you identify the artifact and explain why you want to know more about it.
Answer the question “What is it?” (100-200 words) write a descriptive paragraph for it.
Answer the question: “What is the structure?” in about 100 words, including details.
WHAT IS IT?
• What is the genre?
• What does it look like, sound like, feel like, etc.?
WHAT IS THE STRUCTURE?
• How was it made?
• How would you describe the structure?

IMPORTANT:
1. The artifact is the PHOTOS, not the camp itself. Please identify the exact collection of photos you are using and what scholarly materials offer commentary on it.
2. Structure is not the architectural structure of the camp, please consider lengths and diction within paragraphs, sentences, as well as spaces between paragraphs or stanzas, chapters, or how a painting divides up the canvas. For the structure part, answer the following questions: How do photographs portray landscapes and people? How much of the photographs are devoted to each? How many are there in all? What are the colors in a visual piece?

The role I am applying for:
We are looking for a program manager who will manage key strategic programs under the Southeast Asia Growth team. This team has been mandated to help deliver our ambition of being the top bank in Southeast Asia for Entrepreneurs, Tech founders and Family Offices. Key aspects of the role:

Conduct market research to review and understand trends in the tech ecosystem and in the Family Office space- understand needs of potential clients and key competitor offering
Support projects to enhance the value proposition of the program based on needs of entrepreneurs/ tech firms and partners
Drive the program’s publicity and engagement channels, including website, video dialogues, mailers and internal/ external communications
Manage aggregating reporting on One Bank revenues at client segment and at individual client level
Track and maintain records of key clients and prospects who need to be covered, help ensure proper coverage across One Bank to meet client needs
Develop and execute communications programs to gain mindshare for UBS as the top bank for Entrepreneurs, tech founders and Family Offices
Manage overall program budget
Help ensure that the program’s initiatives are risk managed and in line with bank risk and compliance policies

Cover Letter demonstrate why I would be a good fit:
1) I will include my resume as a reference.
2) Currently a masters programme doing digital transformation which is key of rolling out beyond a programme-connecting value, technology& data, and people.
3) Even though i do not have any banking industry, but my experience within the start-up community, as well as corporate doing project implementation, will give them fresh insights.
4) Market research: Surveys, focus groups, personal interviews, observations and field trials have exposure during my masters program.
5) Strong communicator, stakeholder management, ability to work in agile (especially in start up environment experience)
6) Strong network in SEA especially within the start-up community, accesiblity for further market research beyond my own experience as a technopreneur.

Part A: Create a 10-minute (+/- 30seconds) PowerPoint video presentation reflecting on ONE of two (2) real world scenarios in which to focus your response.

Presentation must include audio and video.
Upload video to YouTube.
No more than 10 PPT slides + references.
Guidance will be provided on the video presentation.

Part B: Prepare and write up your script using PowerPoint NOTES.
You must use references to support your claims and discussion.
You are expected to refer to 10 sources. They can be a combination of scholarly and non-scholarly. All must be credible, reliable and current.

In your essays, be sure to use the assigned readings referenced in the syllabus corresponding to each prompt. A response should be between five to seven pages (excluding cover page and works cited page). This essay will be due Monday, February 7th by the end of the day on Canvas/eLearn.
Chicago style of citation (documenting sources accurately)
A 12 point Helvetica, Times, or Times New Roman Font
Utilize proper one inch margins and pagination
Include a separate cover page
Bolivia and Peru — Compare and contrast Bolivia and Peru with respect to ethnic parties and ethnic political mobilization. Why have ethnic parties formed in Bolivia but not Peru? What has been the status of ethnic social movements in Peru? What has been the relationship between the MAS as a political party in Bolivia and its social movement base? Analyze and explain the different trajectories in both countries while accounting for their similarities.

Grade:
Your report will be graded in a 0-100 point scale based on the following criteria:
Content (0-70 points): Do you address the topic or question for this assignment? Do you fully
comprehend and understand your reading? Do you provide textual evidence to support your
analysis?
Structure and Organization (0-20 points): Is your paper logically organized? Do you develop
your main argument? Do you provide supporting evidence?
Style (0-10 points): Are you sure your paper does not contain misspellings, grammatical
mistakes or incomplete sentences? Do you use correct punctuation? Do you cite references
correctly?

Reading Report #1
Objective: The purpose of these reports is to practice your close reading skills, and for you to
evaluate textual evidence (text, audio or film) based on interpretation. You should demonstrate
that you closely read the primary material, and that you are able to identify significant themes.
Task:
1. Choose one of the primary sources that we have been discussing in class:
a. Veronica
b. “Santi”
c. “A Truthful Letter…”
d. “The Spirits’ Mountain”
e. Cronos
f. “The Decapitated Chicken”
2. Type your report. You must:
a. Contextualize the primary source: author/director, publishing date, place.
b. Contextualize the story (where and when is set, and who are the main characters).
Briefly summarize the plot.
c. Identify one or two themes and explain how these themes work in a successful
horror/fantasy story.
d. You may support your analysis with a secondary source (scholarly paper).
i. You are strongly encouraged to use resources available through our
library.
ii. Don’t forget to cite your sources following the MLA guidelines.
3. Your report must be 2-4 pages long, typed in Times New Roman #12 and double-spaced.
a. Name your file: FNDS_Report1_yourlastname
4. Submit your report by uploading your file in Canvas > Assignments > Reports
5. Follow due dates in your class calendar or Canvas site.

Critical Reflection
Referencing: The Harvard Referencing System must be used.

A Critical Reflection (also called a reflective essay) is a process of identifying, questioning, and assessing our
deeply-held assumptions – about our knowledge, the way we perceive events and issues, our beliefs,
feelings, and actions. When you reflect critically, you use course material (lectures, readings, discussions,
etc.) to examine our biases, compare theories with current actions, search for causes and triggers, and
identify problems at their core. Critical reflection is not a reading assignment, a summary of an activity, or
an emotional outlet. Rather, the goal is to change your thinking about a subject, and thus change your
behaviour.
Writing a critical reflection happens in two phases.
Analyse: In the first phase, analyse the issue and your role by asking critical questions. Use free
writing as a way to develop good ideas. Don’t worry about organised paragraphs or good grammar
at this stage.
Articulate: In the second phase, use your analysis to develop a clear argument about what you
learned. Organize your ideas so they are clear for your reader.

Guidelines
The following is a suggested structure that can help you work through your assignment:
1. Introduction – A clear introduction with a thesis statement (answer to the question or response to the task) and
a well-defined structure.
2. Main body – Logically structured body paragraphs which include supporting evidence from academic sources.
3. Conclusion – A clear conclusion which summarise key points, restate the thesis and make a recommendation /
suggestion / prediction.

Font
You can use any font style available (as long as it is legible). Once you have chosen a style be
consistent, do not change to another.
The standard font size for written assignments is 12 pt. The size of section headings is left to your
discretion but should not be unduly large.

Appropriate description of context/critical
incident/experience/conflict
This section will set the stage for the
reader and give the required context for
the rest of the essay. The writer has
incorporated enough details for the
reader to understand the experience that
is the foundation for the reflection.

Analysis
The reflection goes beyond description of
experience to an analysis of how the
experience informs the reflectors’ selfunderstanding, others, and/or course
concepts

Clarity
The language is clear, and a reader is able
to picture the situation described.
Abstract concepts are explained
accurately. Both the situation and the
concepts are assessable to an uninformed
audience.

Evidence of criticality/Recognising
competing perspectives/Use of theoretical
literature
Reflectors should be critical of multiple
aspects in their reflections. They should be
critical about their own actions and
assumptions. You are required to
incorporate literature/theory to support
your reflections, or if your actions are
based on theory, the reflector should be
critical of that literature. A good reflective
account will accept that there are multiple
perspectives to a situation and use this
information to get the deepest learning.

Structure/Length/Presentation/Referencing
and good academic practice
The assignment is structured and in
keeping with the requirement stated in
the assignment brief. It incorporates both
in text references and a reference list in
accordance with Harvard
Referencing Guide.

We all need to rewire our brains. So the more images and examples of people that break the stereotypes that are out there, the better able we will be to rewrite those patterns we’ve spent a lifetime ingesting.
Please flip your bias and defend the opposite side of your bias with some credible sources of your research (2 pages).
(PS: My opposite side is theism. You could find two to three source, thank you)

Find a NEWS article that addresses a current political issue of concern to voters in t U.S. There are numerous possibilities, such as immigration, election interference, trade, healthcare, climate change, abortion, corruption, etc. It must, however, be an issue that is not a topic of another one of your essays. (A news article is an article from a media source like a newspaper or magazine such as the New York Times, FOX, The Washington Post, VICE, etc. that addresses a current event. It does not include sources like Wikipedia, eHow, dictionaries, academic journals, or other information websites.)

Write a minimum 300-word essay that answers the following questions:

Based on the article you chose, what is the political issue and why is it important to voters in the U.S.?
How do current political parties in the U.S. stand on the issue? Do you think their stances are reasonable and based on facts or are they designed to simply appeal to voters’ biases and emotions? (See Chapter 16 for information on political parties.)
How can social science research be used to better inform politicians and voters about the issue, i.e. where can someone go to get reliable information about the issue to make an informed decision?

HERE IS THE ARTICLE I HAVE CHOSEN: https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7n4bq/white-nationalist-anti-abortion-movement

Choose an academic paper about baroque art (JSTOR) for example and complete the worksheet bellow :

The questions below will guide you through the steps of reading a scholarly article not
just for content, but also for argument.
When you first encounter the article, book chapter, or even book, do the following:
1. Read the title, the abstract (if there is one), and the introduction, then skim the
body of the argument and read the conclusion.
2. Make note of the thesis or main argument of the article, as well as any important
aspects of the argument that jump out at you.
3. Take a look at the footnotes/endnotes. Who is the author citing and why? What
other information are they imparting in the notes?
4. What words did you not understand? Write them down and look them up.
5. Finally, go back and read more closely. This time, focus on content and evidence.
Again, take any notes necessary.
For your first paper, please answer the following questions using complete sentences and
paragraphs. For your second paper, answer the following questions in essay format.
Questions:
1. Identify the author’s argument and briefly summarize the evidence they use to
support their claims. Your entire paper should not be a summary.
2. What does the author’s evidence tell you about their point of view or what they
think is important to consider when making their argument?
3. To whom or to what is the author responding? Have they discovered something
new or are they introducing a new interpretation of a work? Do they “call out” or
cite previous scholars who have considered this object/concept/idea?
4. What is your reaction to the argument? Were you convinced/unconvinced? Why
or why not? Were you left with unanswered questions?
5. What was the most controversial/interesting/alarming/outlandish statement in the
article? Why?
6. What was the most interesting footnote or endnote you read? Why?
7. To which other scholars and/or books and articles would you turn if you wanted
to find out more information about the topic?
An “A” paper will thoroughly answer all of the questions above as well as contain:
1. A strong, directed thesis
2. Excellent spelling, grammar, and punctuation
3. A deep sense of engagement with and thorough understanding of the article

-General instructions for writing your quiz response- Answers must be in paragraph form, approximately 250-300 words long, and written in your own words. Please use 12pt and Times New Roman font. Provide your answer in text form. Do not post your answer as a link, and do not use quotes in your answer.
-Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of the textbook discuss the colonial eras of Louisiana. Both Spain and France experienced varying degrees of successes and failures while ruling over colonial Louisiana. Quiz #2 Assignment- Compare and contrast both the economic and population growth that occurred during each of the Spanish and French eras of Louisiana colonial rule (late 1600s to the Louisiana Purchase). Answers could include information on which nation was more successful in growing the population and economy of the region and why, what specific difficulties both nations encountered, and what policies each nation used to help grow the economy and/or population. Make sure to focus you answer on directly explaining the population and economic growth of the era in order to receive the highest score possible.