Premium Writing

(I have attached a document explaining the instructions)

Privacy and the Law -Discussion Board Post
Please create two separate documents for these two Topics/Discussion Board Posts

Brief description:
Write two discussion board posts each valued at 5% for a total of 10% of the overall grade.

Purpose:
The purpose of the discussion board post is to critically engage with a reading of your choice and provide an analysis of the themes of the article. This is not a summary of the article. You are welcome to include a few lines of summary to contextualize your post, but the majority of your post should provide a critique, analysis, or in-depth engagement with the themes of the
article. Along with having a good grasp of the article, it is not just important to provide an analysis of the article however you must take extra streps to discuss limitations of the article, how does the article connect to other content or real-world events, include questions you may have and how you might answer those questions, I want more of your own thought about the article! Write a discussion post on each topic. For the first post select topic 1, for the second post select topic 2. Once these topics are selected there are two readings attached, critically engage with the readings selected.

Topics:
1. Panopticism (Topic of January 19)
a. Manokha: “Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age”
b. Guariglia: “Facial Recognition Technology Is the New Rogues’ Gallery”

2. Police, Surveillance and Privacy (Topic of February 2)
a. McMullen “Social Surveillance and the Rise of the Police Machine”
b. Loftus and Goold “Covert Surveillance and the Invisibilities of Policing”

Due date: March 23

Length:
Discussion board posts should be approximately 550+ words each , size 12 font (double-spaced).

Citation:
NO EXTERNAL SOURCES, cite the sources for each topic/discussion board post. There should only be 2 for each. Make sure you add headings, and make two separate documents and ensure they are separate from each other, as they are different topics with different readings, However it is the same task for each reading. Cite in APA: Anytime you use quotation marks you need a citation with page number

Writing style:
The discussion board post is less formal than an essay. You are welcome to write the discussion board post in essay-style format (with intro, body, conclusion) if you prefer writing more formally, but this is not required. You may also write the discussion board post in blog format, using colloquial and conversational-style language.

How should I go about writing the discussion board post?
1. Compare and contrast the readings in a given week – here, it is important to identify the key arguments of both texts, explain how the arguments differ, how they converge, how they build on each other, etc. The purpose is to identify similarities and differences in the arguments and themes, not general writing style (i.e., both authors wrote in the first person; the first author used statistical evidence while the second author used qualitative evidence). In other words, the similarities and differences must be meaningful. It is important that you also pose questions about the readings and answer your own questions, discuss the strengths and weaknesses and offer your own thoughts.

This is just an examples of how you can approach the discussion board posts but notice that this examples offers a brief overview of the article, and the majority of the assignment involves some sort of analysis. In other words, if the assignment is 550 words, the summary should not be
300-400 words.

Evaluation Criteria:
The discussion board posts are more informal, but the evaluation of the assignment still considers a degree of organization, clarity of thought, and quality of analysis.
1. Organization—is it easy to follow the sequence of ideas outlined in the discussion board posts? (1pt)
2. Clarity of thought—is the writing style clear? Are the arguments clearly articulated? Is the discussion board post free from error? (2pts)
3. Quality of analysis—does the student present an analysis (and not a summary)? Is the analysis thoughtful? (2pts)

Industrialization in the Northeast produced great benefits and also major problems. What were they? Who benefited and who suffered? Did the benefits outweigh the problems, or vice versa? What about industrialization in the South?

Assessment Description
Develop a PowerPoint presentation of 8-12 slides, addressing clinical issues in the older adults and neglect and abuse of dependent adults and older adults. Include the following in your presentation:

Part 1: Clinical Issues

Select one of the following clinical issues:

Cognitive decline
Depression
Anxiety
Substance use
Include a description of the following about the selected issue in the presentation:

Physical consequence of the clinical issue
Emotional consequences of the clinical issue
Cognitive consequence of the clinical issue.
Spiritual consequences of the clinical issue
Part 2: Abuse and Neglect

Include a description of the following in the presentation:

Common forms of vulnerable and older adult neglect.
Warning signs of vulnerable and older adult abuse.
Legal and ethical considerations for reporting abuse and/or neglect of vulnerable and the older adults.
In addition, include slides for a title, introduction, conclusion, and references (four slides minimum).

Include a minimum of four scholarly references in your presentation.

Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it.

Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50 words.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelinesAssessment Description
Develop a PowerPoint presentation of 8-12 slides, addressing clinical issues in the older adults and neglect and abuse of dependent adults and older adults. Include the following in your presentation:

Your task
You are required to complete both Part A (1200 words) and Part B (300 words)
Part A (Plan of Assignment 3)
1. Background
In this section you are to include
a) The aim or purpose of your major project.
This is to include:
•
o
 the topic (briefly) and the format for presentation (e.g. literature review) relevant to Assignment 3
 the target group of your work and the expected impact – who is to benefit from the output of Assignment 3 and what impact would you like it to have on this group?
b) The background to the issue that is to be explored in Assignment 3 – why it is important, and evidence of a gap
•
o Note that you are not to include content in Assignment 1 that is to be included in Assignment 3. For example, if you undertake a literature review on climate change policies for Assignment 3, you wouldn’t include these policies in the background of this assignment. Instead, you might include (with references) in the background, the impact of climate change and importance of mitigation strategies worldwide, the role of the healthcare system in producing global greenhouse emissions, and the need for coordinated action by the sector to reduce its impact. Then you could state that the review in Assignment 3 will explore policies in Australia and internationally that aim to reduce emissions within the healthcare sector.
o Evidence of a gap – that there is no other recent medium on this topic (e.g., there would be no recent quality literature review answering the same research question within a similar context). ‘Recent’ is approximately 3 or more years, though it is important that there is a substantial body of work that can be included and/or will add value to or provide a different perspective/angle to the existing body of work.
2. Method
In this section you are to outline and justify the key steps for developing a major piece of work.
For example,
If your major piece of work is a literature review, consider which databases (e.g., MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE) and search terms you plan to use (e.g., Boolean operators) and other planned sources of evidence (e.g., government reports), dates of inclusion, and your justification for your choices where relevant.
Part B
Separately, in a different section (~300 words)
Discuss how this topic and approach selected might be relevant to your ideal post MPH journey, your interests, and/or how it relates to your MPH studies so far

(1) an outline of the topic. This will be used to develop a presentation for 22 March.
Topic:
U.S. Treaties with Native Americans and how they are not just “quasi-constitutional” documents but also treated without regard to the canon of US law(s). The US, through court decisions, has unilaterally destroyed the sanctity of contract and treaty law, creating a hypocritical relationship with the Native Americans.

My focus point of the opinion is to show that the federal laws and policies go againest treaties with Native Americans and that this is un-Constitutional.

Purpose: Learning objectives 1, 2 and 4 are being developed and assessed here.

Due: 11.55 pm Friday 24 March 2023

Value: 15%

Word count: 800 words

Instructions: For this assessment task, students must complete an annotated bibliography, related to the topic and project brief that they will be presenting on with their group. This is an individual task but the references can help inform the group presentation. The annotated bibliography should have eight references including 6 scholarly sources.

An annotated bibliography is an alphabetical list of information sources (e.g. journal articles or book chapters), formatted like a bibliography or a reference list, accompanied by a commentary on each source (which is called an annotation). An annotated bibliography is made up of two parts: a reference and an annotation.

The reference: The reference will present the details of your source (for example, a book or journal article) in accordance with the Harvard 2020 referencing style. The references should be arranged in alphabetical order by the authors’ surnames, just like in a bibliography or reference list. In Criminology, we use Harvard referencing style. For information about Harvard referencing style, please see the library guide:

https://guides.lib.monash.edu/citing-referencing/harvard

The annotation: For the annotation, you need to:

Produce a summary of the reference. This means you need to write a brief summary of the information and arguments contained in the reference.
Justify the selection of the reference. This means you need to explain why the reference is a credible source of information on the topic under investigation. You should refer to the criteria discussed in the week 3 tutorials.

Submission requirements:

Use 12-point size Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman font
Use 1.5 line spacing
Insert page numbers
Include at least 8 reference sources. At least 6 of the sources must be scholarly sources.
Use Harvard 2020 referencing style
List all references in alphabetical order
Please note that the 800 word count does not include the reference
The annotated bibliography should be submitted as a Word document

Does America in 2022 uphold this ideal? “the ideal that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achive success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative”

Imagine you want to create a small business. Review the guidelines for small businesses discussed in the Marketing Insight,
“Positioning a Start-Up,” at the end of Chapter 7 and discuss how you would incorporate these guidelines in your business.

Required Reference:
Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Chernev, A. (2022). Marketing management (16th ed.). Pearson.
ISBN: 978-0135887158

The introduction has three specific jobs/steps. It begins by establishing ETHOS, your knowledge and credibility. This needs to be established to solidify your RIGHT to represent the authors.

In order to establish your credibility, you will need to illustrate how well you understand the central idea you are about to represent, gleaned from your experience as a worldly individual and from exposure to the ideas in the articles you have read and studied in the last module. The concept of PRIVILEGE is something we should all be aware of in our current American cultural and political climate- DO NOT DO RESEARCH; IT WILL ONLY LEAD TO PLAGIARISM.

To this end, we begin by defining and discussing. Please make sure to use the information on this page to develop your definition and discussion. Do not merely ask and answer!
INTRODUCTION
1) Define and Discuss Subject(s)-one or two paragraphs.
Define: Here are some helpful questions that will inspire definition! They may not all apply to your subjects…
What is it?
What does it do?
How does it work or function?
What is its purpose?
What are its parts/pieces/facets/elements?
Are there different types or kinds?
How is it different than others of its kind?
How has it changed over time?
Discuss: Here are some ways you can discuss your ideas! They may not all apply to your subjects…
Issues/Problems
Conflicts/Controversies
Argument/Opinions
Effects/Impacts
+/-
History/Background
2) Identify Author and Text-
Identify the authors and texts that focus on the subject-Privilege. You are focusing on two of three articles you studied. Choose what you best understand…
3)Thesis-
Author’s specific arguments to the reader about subjects.
Thesis Models: Author + Subject= ARGUMENT TO THE READER ABOUT THE SUBJECT. A good thesis is very specific and precisely reveals the argument the author is making. YOU NEED TWO OF THESE PLUS ANY TRANSITIONS TO MAKE A COMPLETE THESIS FOR THE FIRST ESSAY.

Body:
Quote#1 /2/ maybe 3
The quote has a specific format.
Introduce quote= Who said it? When/Where in the article did they said it?
The exact quote you want to use to help represent the author’s argument=1-3 lines. No HUGE or TINY quotes. The longer the quote, the more you need to analyze. The shorter the quote, the less information you have to talk about. Both of these are an issue.
The MLA citation=Author’s name, and page number if present.

ANALYSIS:
These questions can help you analyze the evidence and illustrate the author’s implied or explicit warrant. Do not use these in any particular order, although you DO want to use the questions that focus specifically on the quote you provided first. Also, do not merely ask and answer these questions directly in the analysis section. Use these questions on separate paper. Ask and answer thoroughly, even if repetitive. Then, edit and organize the results into stylish analysis with logical development and appropriate transitions. You can then incorporate into your essay.
~What specific language in the quote/evidence reveals the author’s intent? What is its purpose or function in the argument?
~How does the evidence specifically prove the author’s point?
~What does the evidence show, prove or reveal to the reader?
~What is the audience supposed to learn or know through the evidence presented?
~What is the significance of the evidence provided?
~What is the effect or result of the evidence?
~What impact does the evidence have on the reader and/or the argument?
~How does it achieve this impact-ETHOS, PATHOS, LOGOS?
~How is the evidence intended to persuade, move or manipulate the audience?
Conclusion to argument: (NOT THE CONCLUSION TO ESSAY!!!)
~What is the general significance of the argument and why is it important to the reader?
~What is the authors worldview or perspective based on the argument?
~What impact does this argument have upon us/we/society in today’s world?

Conclusion
1a) General Implications
What are the effects of the authors’ arguments in the real world?
What impact do they have on us?
What are the implications of the arguments for society itself?
1b)Compare and Contrast
How are the authors’ arguments/claims similar or possibly different?
In what ways do the authors appear to disagree?
Where are the authors points of overlap/agreement when it comes to the subject?
How do the authors ETHOS, PATHOS, AND LOGOS in their arguments? What are the similarities and differences in their use?
2) Added, Connected Ideas= Can you connect the ideas in this essay to others? What are some examples of these same subjects/arguments in:
Current Events/History/Art-Movies/Books/Songs etc.
3) Your Opinion= What are your specific opinions of the author’s arguments and/or the subjects themselves? DEVELOP THIS WELL!
What do you think of the author’s use of argumentative structure? Was it effective or ineffective?
What did you feel about the use of tone and language in the articles?
Which article persuaded you the most and how did it achieve that?
What did you learn about the subject through studying these particular articles?
What are your personal opinions about the concept of privilege?

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate that you understand how learning principles can be applied to improve conditions in everyday life.
THREE MINIMUM CREDIBLE RESOURCES ARE NEEDED (E.G., JOURNAL ARTICLES, ETC..) – DO NOT CITE WEBSITES.
PLEASE CITE WITHIN YOUR ANSWER.
MINIMUM 5 PAGES.
Select a specific behavior that you wish to change (this can be a behavior in an animal or person); describe it. Explain what the behavior is now (before intervention) and what you hope it will be after intervention. Set up an experiment to use a learning principle on someone and evaluate the outcome.
1. Decide whether this behavior is best changed using operant conditioning principles (reinforcements or extinction) or using classical conditioning (stimulus substitution). Explain your choice.
2. Describe a specific strategy for changing the behavior. That is, how will you modify the behavior using reinforcements/extinction, or using stimulus pairing? Give a step-by-step description of the intervention.
3. What specific outcomes do you expect? (This may repeat what you said in #1 above, but should be more precise.)
4. What were the actual outcomes? How do you know whether the intervention succeeded or failed? If it failed, what are some reasons that might have caused the failure?