Compare and Contrast Essay

Compare and Contrast Essay
based off of the book Night. –

The following passages from Chapter 2&7 from Night, will be attached in the files. It will help you answer the prompt

Prompt-

Then in a thoughtful and well-organized compare and contrast essay, analyze the literary and stylistic devices Wiesel uses to convey the Jewish peoples evolution. Use the point by point method.

Must Include-

-Point by point method
-Must know literary and stylistic devices
– 12 font
– Times New Roman
– Doubled spaced
-MLA format
– Header
-Pagination
-Highlight the transitional words in each paragraph

*Examples of how a thematic statement is included in a correct thesis statement (at the end of the introduction)

Examples

-In the stories Bellman and Black by Diane Setterfield and The Scarlet Ibis by James Hurst a momentary rash action can result in profound regret.

-In the two works There Will Come Soft Rains, one a short story by Ray Bradbury and the other a poem by Sara Teasdale, in the struggle between man and the environment, nature is revealed to be the potentially stronger force, indifferent to mans survival, which illuminates humanitys general vanity regarding its own self-importance.

The Development of Nuclear Weapons in Iran and Its Implications in the Middle East

Write a 2-3 page reaction paper where you will discuss the following questions:
Analyze and criticize your own work. Attatched is what you will be crtiqiuing
Relate your topic to 1-2 other presentations that you listened to during the Collaborate session. The other presentation is Issues that continue to block peace between Palistianans and Isrealis
Connect your project to one of the subjects or issues that we have discussed in class.
Explanation:
What did you do well on your project and what would you do differently now that you have actually finished it. What challenges did you have to overcome? How would your project have been different if you had written a paper instead of presenting your information? You do not have to answer all of these questions, but you should use them to start your reaction paper by giving an honest assessment of your work and its quality.
How did your information and project relate to 1 or 2 other presentations that you listened to? I am giving you a choice of how many presentations to compare it to, as there may have been a couple of presentations that were closely related to your topic (perhaps a similar theme, but a different country, etc.), or there may have been nothing that was similar so you will need to really be creative as to how you connect your paper to your peer. Was the other presentation thorough enough? Did the presenter answer your questions? Were they trustworthy? Did you learn anything from how they presented that would help you in the future, either by doing what they did or by avoiding it?
We have studied the past 60 years of the entire world. Below is just a small list of possible issues that might be appropriate to your project. How did doing your project connect to one of these issues? As an example, say you are writing about AIDS in Africa, you should be able to compare it to some other aspect of this class, such as corruption in post colonial governments or the changing roles of women in Africa.
Please keep in mind, that this essay is designed to get you to be creative in your thoughts, in your connections and in your ability to analyze and synthesize information. Since most of the information is going to come from your own projects, this is much less about recall and much more about critical thinking.

As an assist to you, I am going to list here a number of potential issues that we have discussed in class, in the book and in lectures. This is by no means a complete list and you are welcome to use other options that you recall.
Key topics: (Big Issues)
Cold War competition
Economic competition
Colonialism/post colonialism
Ethnic self determination
Economic growth in emerging markets (rise of industrialism)
Climate change
Area Issues:
Berlin Crisis
Prague Spring
Invasion of Hungary
Fall of the Soviet Union
European cooperation
Cuban Missile Crisis
Bay of Pigs
Support of the Contras
Support of dictators by the U.S. (such as in Nicaragua, Chile, Guatemala, El Salvador, Philippines, Haiti, etc.)
Rise of Communism in China
Invasion of South Korea/Korean War
African independence movements
Neo-colonialism (especially in Africa)
Suez Crisis
Pan Africanism
Coup in Iran (1956)
Iranian Revolution
Hostages in the Iranian Revolution
Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood/Islam
Yom Kippur War
1973 Oil crisis
Non-Aligned movement
Post-colonial India
The separation of India and Pakistan
The invasion of Afghanistan (Soviet)
The Taliban (as freedom fighters)
Iran-Iraq War
The military coup/control in Burma
Vietnam
Geneva Accords
Tet Offensive
Conflict between China and Taiwan
Rise of the Asian Tigers

Final project proposal

The Final Project Proposal is a written submission in which students identify and discuss the issue(s) surrounding their chosen themes/topics and propose a program, initiative, or activity that will address those issues. For example, a student from a previous semester chose the theme of Climate Change and Natural Disasters for his project package. For the Final Project Product Proposal, he discussed how climate change affects agriculture in South and Central America. Within the proposal, he identified the issue and causes, prior attempts and deficiencies in addressing the issue, and proposed the solution of enhancing global awareness through art (making information pertaining to climate change more appealing and interesting for a targeted audience). Potential theme/topics/global health problems include, but will not necessarily be limited to:
COVID-19 (highly recommended)
Zika
HIV/AIDS
Obesity & Heart Disease
Food/Water Insecurity, Hunger, & Poverty
Medical Tourism
Climate Change & Natural Disasters Abortion & Family Planning
Universal Healthcare vs. Private Sector Insurance-based Payers
Health & Wellbeing for Nations at War/Unrest
Vaccinations, Genetic Testing, Autism & Developmental Disabilities
Global Health Security & Preparedness for Aggressive Communicable Diseases
LGBT Community Health
Cancer
Euthanasia / Death & Dying
White, Skinny/Thin, Heterosexual, United Statesian Privilege
***Students are also welcome and encouraged to propose topics of study they would like to pursue beyond this list.

Business Law Discussion Post Replies

To give you some context, this is the case study:
Case Study: Frederick is a student at Central Fictional State University (CFSU), and he has a great idea for a new business invention. Frederick’s invention and the business that he plans to found based on it will absolutely revolutionize the market and will make him very rich. He decides to share his idea with a few trusted professors, and he even uses the idea in a research project for one of his classes.
While Frederick is at home over summer break, he discovers, much to his dismay, that his professors have stolen his idea and have opened a business marketing his new invention. Frederick immediately seeks the advice of the local lawyer who has a reputation for being a “scorched-earth” litigator. He advises Frederick that he should sue those professors for everything they’ve got.” Frederick, however, is not sure if he should file an aggressive lawsuit, or if there is a better way to proceed.
Frederick knows that your business recently completed mediation to settle a lawsuit filed by one of your suppliers. He comes to you for advice on how to proceed. What is your answer to Frederick? In your response, consider whether the decision to file suit or to proceed through some form of alternative dispute resolution is affected by the previous relationship with the professors (can/should you sue a friend, how will the decision impact an ongoing relationship, etc.). Also, what role could Fredericks faith play in his decision?
This is the first discussion post:
I would inform Frederick to find and alternative dispute resolution, just as I did. Especially, knowing the magnitude of the lawsuit my business just previously went through and by the grace of God was able to get that case settled through mediation. Which to me, means my business was in the wrong and did not want to go through the whole litigation process. I would strongly suggest this option to my friend because he did not have a patent or copyrights and I am assuming there was not a non-disclosure agreement in place, so proving ownership for a lawsuit would be slim. Frederick luckily has documentation of this invention in writing as he made a presentation about it for another class so this would be most helpful in arbitration. As far as what impact this would have on his relationship with his Professors, should be his least concern. Professors are to be admired and respected so, the fact that they have put themselves and Frederick in this position should make him question their ethics and integrity. Not to mention if there was a friendship to begin with. His Professors should have been people in his life that he could trust and someone who will encourage and helped him in any way that they can. He can forgive them and himself and love them as God would have us to do. Frederick should always try to help the lost, but he must surround himself with good people and cast those away who has done him harm.

This is the second discussion post:
Stealing business ideas or inventions has been a trend for hundreds of years. It is difficult to prove or create a case if the idea, property, or business is not protected via trademark or copyright. Without a trademark or copyright documentation often, the person may not have a case. My answer to Frederick is to maintain and gather all documentation of this business idea, with date and time stamp. Also retrieve copies of documentation that was provided to the professors. My advice is with all the tangible evidence, initiate an Alternative Dispute Resolution. According to the textbook Legal Environment of Business, initiating an alternative dispute resolution is cost effective and does not go through the court system. I would recommend this alternative due to the fact that Fredrick lacks the copyright protection and much of the argument may come across as hearsay.
My advice would do not hesitate to initiate this resolution case as the professors crossed the line and went against the morale and right decision. The professors violated their trust and professionalism.
It is my belief that lawsuits should not be take lightly as it does create broken relationships and goes against loving and watching out for our neighbor. I also believe in doing what is right, and standing up for an unjust act is the right thing to do

Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.

First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique. If the author of your critique is not specified, focus on the publication of the critique.

Choose from among these sources:
Romantic Circle’s Critiques:
Critique 1
Critique 2
Critique 3
Critique 4
Critique 5
Critique 6
Professor Naomi Hetheringtons critique

The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now its time to write it down!

Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:
Evaluate the critic/author:
Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to find these easily)
Find the thesis of the article:
What is the thesis of the critical article youve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?
Evaluate the thesis:
Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? Weve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.
Evaluate the support:
Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?

Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critics thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essays thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.

For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelleys writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical– if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critics thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.

In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.

Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.

Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?

You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:
(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as adequately or inadequately) argue that (add critics thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).
OR
(Critic)s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as adequately or inadequately) argue that (add critics thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).

More specific thesis examples:

John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy.
OR
John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.

[Engineering] Project & Essay

the course if engineering design, concept is improving sustainability of the cat food pouch – in a nutshell, bit it’s looking at how cat food pouch recyclability can bi improved by either stripping layer of print on it, or reducing the size, or changing the seal etc – thats where i’m struggling and need to develop fast

End-of-module assessment
1 Submitting your EMA
The EMA is the examinable component for T452 and is compulsory.
You should submit your completed EMA to arrive no later than 12 noon (UK local time) on the cut-off date. Please refer to the study planner on the T452 website for the cut-off date.
The EMA is a compulsory component of the overall assessment and carries 50% of the marks for the module. You need to pass both the continuous assessment and the EMA to complete the module and gain credit for it.
To be sure of passing T452 you must achieve at least a pass grade of 40 on the EMA as well as an average of 40 on your continuous assessment.
Your EMA will consist of three sections: your project report, your project poster and your process review section. For the process review section, there will be different questions to be answered depending on which qualification you are following. Please read the guidance carefully in Section 4.
The assessment will be based on the learning outcomes and so the markers will be considering how well you have demonstrated:
competence in the use of the principles and conventions of project management and execution
that you can solve problems in developed technologies using well-proven analytical techniques
a successful application of your engineering knowledge to deliver a project using established technologies and methods.
In addition, your key skills will be assessed by considering how well you have:
executed a literature review supporting your project
produced a written technical report and a poster presentation on your specialist topic
reviewed what you have done critically, analysing your learning and skill development.
The assessors will use the following guidance to grade the achievements of the learning outcomes:
Mark range Grade (assuming the student has done equally well on the TMAs) Descriptors of the likely achievement of the learning outcomes
85100 1 Predominantly well achieved
7084 2 Mixture of achieved with some higher
5569 3 Mixture of achieved with some lower
4054 4 Predominantly just achieved
3039 borderline fail Mixture of just achieved with not quite achieved
1529 fail Mixture of not quite achieved and not achieved
014 poor fail Predominantly not achieved
Some limited feedback on your performance in each of these learning outcomes will be provided after the results have been issued.
T452 uses the online TMA/EMA service for submission of the EMA. To submit your EMA, please go to your StudentHome page and follow the link(s) provided. The file size limit for your eTMAs is 10 MB each.
Your EMA will be marked by two markers and will need to be submitted on or before the submission cut-off date.
2 Project report (80 marks)
Word limit: 6000 words maximum
This is the culmination of your engineering qualification where you will bring together your learning across the different modules that you have taken. You will have submitted reports and part reports throughout the modules of your qualification so it is expected that you will be able to show that you have developed a professional approach to communicating technical information.
Use the A4 paper size for your project report and put your name, your personal identifier, the module code and Project report at the top of every sheet.
Your report must be formal in nature, so be sure to look at the types of report given in the ebook by Bowden (2011) and adapt them to suit your purpose.
The markers of your project report will want to know the full story of your project. So ensure that you include enough narrative to explain what you set out to do by describing your proposal, what you actually did in your activities and what you found in your results and conclusions. These sections must all be supported by your reasoning and evaluation.
Why did you select your aims? What persuaded you to adopt your methods and what do your results tell us about the engineering question you set out to answer? The requirements of your report will include strict word limits so it will need to be efficiently written.
This means that you must report in a technical style, concentrating on the engineering that you did. Remember, this is about how you perform as an engineer. While your work in TMA 02 will contribute to your EMA, you need to take care in how you use it. The TMA parts are not directly transferable to the EMA. The EMA, apart from requiring additional work, also needs to comply with a formal report structure. Take care to ensure your sections actually address what they should. For example, your summary should give a brief description of what your project was about and what was concluded. It is not an introduction.
What you will need to do is imagine you are addressing a particular audience. It may be your senior management. It may be a technical committee or, if you are involved in product design, a group providing financial backing needing to understand the technical detail of the product. They will want to know answers to the questions you have set yourself and by reading your report they expect to find them. However, they will also require a formal technical or technological document.
Markers will also be judging the presentation of the report as well as the quality of the English. So make sure you pay attention to spelling, grammar and punctuation.
General guidance for writing the project report
Central to all your project work are the engineering questions that you set out to answer in your proposal. These need to be described as part of the context of your report. You will have done some of this work in TMA 02; now is your opportunity to respond to the feedback and refine their descriptions.
Similarly, you will have started describing what you did in TMA 02 and now you can report on the work you have carried out since TMA 02.
The new sections which are needed for your final report are:
your results
your discussion and evaluation of these results
your conclusions.
You will also need to arrange your references and appendices in a suitable form (see the Study guide). Finally, please ensure that your report complies with the standards expected in professional engineering. For example, have you used sufficient graphical content to explain your work?
Your report will be assessed using the marking scheme below.
What the report must cover
You must make sure that your report addresses the three questions that follow. It is your choice as to how you divide your report into sections, but you are expected to follow one of the variants of a technical report. This is an important distinction. Your report must look and read like a technical document.
For examples of types of reports, look at the ebook by Bowden (2011). It is likely that your project would be best presented by one of the technical/technological variants given in Part 3.
Plan
What was intended to be done and why? (10 marks)
You should include:
an updated version of your aims from TMA 01 these may have altered as your project evolved, and this is acceptable
a description of the context of your project, including a brief background showing why there is a need for the work you have carried out in your particular project. You will use some of the work you did for Question 2 of your TMA 02, suitably refined and updated.
a clear technical explanation of your aims
a short response to the TMA 01 feedback you received from your tutor and Internal Examiner.
Do
What was done, how was it done and why? (35 marks)
You should include:
an updated version of your literature review which you drafted for Question 3 of TMA 02 and how your evaluation of the literature shaped your methodology
a description of the particular approach you decided to use for your work
a report of the activities that you undertook as you worked through your project. This will build on the work you did for Question 3 of TMA 02.
Be careful not to write just a narrative for this last point, so avoid I did this, then I did that. Your activities need to be described in technical terms and backed up by engineering judgements. It is important, for instance, that you indicate key stages of your project. You should identify what these were and justify the decisions you made as a consequence of work done during each stage. If you changed your aims, you should say so here and include your reasons.
Explain your decisions
Ensure that you include sufficient detail for your markers to be able to follow how and why you arrived at your outcomes. For example, where you have responded to feedback from your tutor and Internal Examiner, your decisions should be indicated and explained.
Review
What were the outcomes of your work and what was your evaluation of them? (25 marks)
It is here that you are expected to show your engineering understanding. Be clear about the methods you used and how well they worked. This needs to be a critical process, reflecting on the limitations and accuracy of the techniques used.
You should include:
your technical results and conclusions
an evaluation of the results
any supporting information that is better in the report itself, rather than in an Appendix (see the information about appendices below).
Length
Your report needs to be no more than 6000 words with the number of marks as a guide, e.g. 10 marks represents around 10%, so 600 words. Marks will be deducted for going over the word limit: this can be a penalty of up to 10 marks, so ensure you stay within the word limits specified.
State the number of words at the end of your report. If you fail to do this, you will lose marks. You will also be penalised if your report deviates significantly from the stipulated word length.
Structure
As a wide range of subjects as well as contexts are covered by T452, there are several ways of presenting your technical report. You need to research the possible formats and then discuss them with your tutor.
However, as a minimum your report should have:
an appropriate title page
a one-page summary
an introduction
literature review, methodology and process
an evaluation of the results
a discussion leading to your conclusions
a list of references (and possibly a bibliography) along with any acknowledgements
appendices (see below) and, if necessary, a glossary.
As the word limits are tight, please consider using diagrams and other graphics to describe your work. They are an important and efficient means of engineering communication.
Clarity, style and use of English
Your report should be written in a clear style and be grammatically correct in its use of English. This is worth up to 10 marks of the 80 available for the project report. When thinking about the audience for your report, remember that the readers will not only be your tutor, but also someone else who may be unfamiliar with your work to date. You are advised to imagine you are writing for someone who is at a similar stage of study as yourself. It is important that your report is written in a formal style, so the use of the first person is not generally appropriate. Please be aware of the effect of poor layout by thinking about font, spacing and margins. Guidance on these details is given in the Study guide.
Use of appendices
Appendices should be used for those elements that might distract the reader from the main narrative. For example:
lengthy or detailed tables
calculations, test cases and results
user and technical documentation
derivations of standard formulae
details of standard procedures.
The total number of pages in your appendices should not be greater than the number in your actual report. You should not include appendices which have not been referred to in the main text.
Tutor feedback
You must include the feedback given by your tutor and the Internal Examiner for TMA 01 in the appendices. This is because you will need to refer to them in your main text.
Extract important information
The assessors will award marks for the main text of your report and your use of the appendices as supporting evidence. This means that they are not expected to read your appendices thoroughly, and so you should extract important results or summaries of important results from them and include these in your main text. If you do not do this, or do not reference them clearly, you cannot assume that the assessors will see them.
Plagiarism
If you take material from an Open University module or elsewhere and incorporate it into your answer word for word, you must indicate where you have taken it from. Not to do so is termed plagiarism and is regarded as an infringement of copyright. To attempt to pass off such work as your own is cheating.
You must therefore acknowledge all your sources of information. You will find further guidance at Referencing and plagiarism. On that page is a link to a guide on developing good academic practice.
Additional marking criteria
When your tutor and a second assessor mark your EMA they will consider the work you are writing up and the report itself. In no particular order of importance, they will look for:
absence of errors, particularly conceptual errors
fluency of write-up and variety of presentation of information
awareness of context of work
depth and substance of project work
independence while doing the work
integration of ideas in the report
originality of work
application of concepts from your related OU level 3 module.
Be aware that independence while doing the work does not mean that you should never contact your tutor far from it. There is, however, a difference between regularly consulting your tutor and expecting him or her to supply you with ideas or prompt you when to do particular tasks.
3 Project poster (10 marks)
Imagine you are going to a conference of experts and students in the field of your project. At this conference you have to present a poster that summarises your project. Your poster will be displayed in a public area and should be legible from a distance of about 1 metre. As a rough guide, presume a reader will spend no more than five minutes reading it. You should present your work on a poster, for display in an area of up to 1 square metre.
Posters at a conference are used to describe work in progress or completed work. It is vital to communicate the current state of the work and any significant results and milestones. Your poster might include:
a description of some completed work
the main outcome
the route to the outcome
the value of the outcome
an indication of related future work.
It should:
be visually attractive with diagrams, graphics, and so on
be viewed as an integral item
not include references.
Your project will have been lengthy and you wont be able to cover all the detail on a single poster. You will need to be selective about what material you choose to display, and how you communicate your ideas effectively. It should be possible for someone familiar with the field to read your poster and understand your work and its results without further explanation.
There are a number of ways of creating your poster but remember that it will need to be submitted electronically. Using a series of Word files with graphical images is a possibility as is a digital photo of a hard copy poster.
Marks
Of the 10 marks for this part, 5 are for the content of your poster and 5 are for layout and presentation.
4 Process review (10 marks)
Word limit: 600 words maximum
The question which you need to answer in this section depends on your qualification.
BEng (Hons) Q65
What have you learned from doing a project? (10 marks)
This final part of your report is asking you to reflect on the project by looking back over your project and asking yourself:
how your skills have changed
how your skills now match with UK-SPEC (Engineering Council, 2014).
Using the work you did in the iCMA, where you identified those Incorporated Engineer competences which are relevant to your project, critically assess your development of those competences.
BEng (Hons) top-up Q78, BSc Design and Innovation, Q61, Open degrees, QD
What did you think of your work? (10 marks)
This final question is asking you to reflect on the project by looking back over your project and asking yourself, for example, what you would do differently next time. Whereas your report and poster deal with the technical part of the project, this section is about the process.
You should include:
a discussion of how successful you were in what you set out to do
your opinion of the value of what you did for example, in relation to the field of study or to you personally
an evaluation of your project methods and approach.
Both these questions are asking you to be reflective about the work that you have undertaken. It is therefore appropriate for you to adopt a more personal tone and use the first person in your answer.
References
Bowden, J. (2011) Writing a Report: How to Prepare, Write and Present Really Effective Reports, 9th edn [Online], Constable & Robinson. Available at https://www.open.ac.uk/ libraryservices/ resource/ ebook:497748&f=28184 (Accessed 01 September 2015).
Engineering Council (2014) UK-SPEC: UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence [Online], London, Engineering Council. Available at https://www.open.ac.uk/ libraryservices/ resource/ website:104782&f=28184 (Accessed 03 December 2015).

Medicare

Use 2 scholarly sources written within the last 5 years to answer the following discussion question: Explain the history of Medicare and the prospective payment systems that are in use today. In your answer be sure to provide examples of the payments systems currently in use today.

Urban Socialagy

THE ESSAY SHOULD BE FOUR (4) PAGES MINIMUM. IT SHOULD BE TYPED, DOUBLE SPACED WITH A 12 INCH TIMES NEW ROMAN FONT, AND IT SHOULD PROVIDE A WORKS CITED PAGE. THE ESSAY SHOULD BE WRITTEN INDEPENDENTLY AND COURSE READING MATERIALS SHOULD BE DIRECTLY QUOTED AND CITED USING THE MODERN LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION METHOD (MLA). ALL MAJOR CONCEPTS SHOULD BE DEFINED USING DIRECT QUOTATIONS WITH AUTHOR AND PAGE CITATION. EVIDENCE, EXAMPLE, AND/OR STATISTICAL DATA USED BY THE AUTHOR SHOULD ALSO BE DIRECTELY REFERENCED.

1. Examine the contemporary conditions of immigrant people in American Cities. Your essay should explain the history of U.S. immigration; the reasons why people leave their countries of origin; and how the immigration policies of the United States government and reactions to newcomers have shaped the immigrant experience. Finally, your essay should explain how immigrants have adapted to urban life in the United States and the contributions they have made to the urban economy.

Human Sexuality

After reading Chapter 8, and the section on determining who might have “partner potential” (page 212 of your textbook), please discuss some of the main criteria that you establish for a potential romantic partner that is different than “friend” criteria. Then, briefly discuss which are the most important to you, and why. Be sure to relate your discussion to what you have learned in the module and
the class so far, by using appropriate concepts and terminology, and specific references to class material (with proper citations). And also be sure to write this in essay style, which includes an introductory and summary paragraph. Keep your word count to between 400-500 words. Upload as a Word document.